Spearker cables..fact or fiction?

[QUOTE=Norm I'm glad you brought this up because I was wondering what the opinion was on this matter from those who question differences among speaker/IC/power cable.[/QUOTE]

Let's all have hearing tests, especally the audio critics

DarqueKnight wrote: »

:rolleyes:
Typically, when someone shows up on this forum with an opposing viewpoint on cables, rarely do they do so from the position of:

[b]"I tried these cables with this gear and didn't hear an improvement."[/b]
Wow....equalizers and experimenting with Cat5 speaker cable. What a great leap forward in audio performance enhancement.:rolleyes:

Please check the below quote which is from POST #1 THE OP and try post a different statement!

bobt wrote: »

I don't under stand the price for speaker cables....some cost more then the equipment there hookup to....The price is insane. The Stereophile mags review these....of course there not going to say anything bad about them..they get paid to do this...then sit there and try to tell you....oh yes we hear this one gives you more highs, or this one is more clear.....BULL...

Sorry..it's a piece of wire...when you get to a certain point...thats about it.

I have a 12 gauge speaker cable, I will not say which kind. I went and spent $250 (on sale)...some supposed great cable......NO DAM DIFFERENCE.No way you could tell the difference between the 2. Now OK...."MAYBE" if your playing some violin thing........MAYBE you could hear something different, but my guess would be NOT. If I changed cables on these "reviewers"...they would not have a clue............

OK, I play mostly rock and blues, but do throw in some classic music.

If Stravinsky, or Tchaikovsky..sound the same to me, over different cables..well I get the fact.....basically you have just been riiped off, because it's called "audiophile"....and no I'm not tone deaf...I've mixed CD's for people , run PA mixers...I know what good sound is.

It's like Boats...if it's marine..you pay a ton....same crap you can buy for cheap...Audiophile.....the price goes up.....

Most of this "sound" is precived..just because you spent..300 plus on a cable.

The OP DID try some different and WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED in the end result and COMPANY PROMISES! There was many IFs in his first post to sort of point out that who knows in some specific circumstances it may have made a difference!!! This kind of lead me to wonder where you actually started your reading of this discussion or if you are somewhat selective in the answers you post and your quotes?????? You never quoted anything related to the piss poor answers he was getting from his legitimate OP!!!!!!! To make it short, HE WAS THE PROBLEM!!! NOT the CABLES!!!!! Except for providing a manufacturer MAKETTING PITCH and the USUAL "HEARING IS BELEIVING" and the tons of childish and un-educated name calling, NOTHING intelligent was actually brought to the table to prove that MON$$TEROUSLY priced cables were actually making any difference!!!!!

Thank YOU!!

Flash21 wrote: »

Actually I wasn't referring to the technical discussions, I am referring to the flurry of childish name calling that erupts from both sides after each attempt to discuss...FWIW DK you have been quite civil in your attempts to maintain an actual debate here.

I agree with what you are saying and am on the same page as you are: "the backyard childish debate" are totally useless and negative to this discussion and has pointed out started with the OP which was quite civil and actually did some testing and created this discussion because of his disapointment!

a_mattison wrote: »

Wow... This is getting old.

That's exactly what I'm thinking. I'm not even enjoying arguing with these trolls anymore.

This thread has gotten really stupid.

Sorry Megasat... One more post...

Thoughts to improve the efficiency of this and future cable debates:
1. This is a place to learn and share experiences
2. OP bought expensive cables and didn’t hear a difference, so 3. Those who haven’t experienced a difference in cables because they haven’t tried different cables should consider keeping their traps shut because they can’t speak from personal experience, which is what this hobby is all about
4. Those who have taken similar path as 2.a. have a right to express their agreement
5. Those who have taken similar path as 2.b. have a right to explain what they have discovered. 6. Those who have taken path 3 have no right to give any further opinion

TECHNOKID wrote: »

Please check the below quote which is from POST #1 THE OP and try post a different statement!

The OP DID try some different and WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED in the end result and COMPANY PROMISES!
Thank YOU!!

Thanks, but no thanks. This is what the OP said:

bobt wrote: »

I have a 12 gauge speaker cable, I will not say which kind. I went and spent $250 (on sale)...some supposed great cable......NO DAM DIFFERENCE.

No way you could tell the difference between the 2.

You'd have to be very desperate, pitiful and have some hidden agenda if you find the OP's statement INFORMATIVE and USEFUL.

The OP said he tried a 12 gauge cable but he REFUSED to say which, nor did he elaborate on the associated equipment used with the cable or discuss the kind of music listened to.

Let me get this straight: Someone walks in, says he tried a cable and it didn't work, then we are supposed to take that and make a useful and intelligent inference from it? You naysayers are always accusing performance audiophiles of "living by faith", yet you put up an example of someone who refuses to divulge the full information regarding his cable trial and expect us to "have faith" that it was a valid trial. If that's all it takes for you to be "convinced" good for you.

If I had the kind of deductive ability necessary to make sense of this kind of "brand X" trial, I would rather use it to predict winning power ball numbers.:rolleyes:

TECHNOKID wrote: »

+1! Some data would be quite positive and welcomed in this discussion

Please refer to section 2.a. or 3, whichever fits you best. It will improve the nature and quality of this thread.

ben62670 wrote: »

Again if you think you can measure what everyone hears you are on a different planet. It is a good start, but as for the listening experience it holds no weight till you can prove how others ears, nerves, and minds process such data...
Rock on young child.
Ben

This comment supported by section 5 of the cable discussion guide.

a_mattison wrote: »

Sorry Megasat... One more post...

Thoughts to improve the efficiency of this and future cable debates:
1. This is a place to learn and share experiences
2. OP bought expensive cables and didn’t hear a difference, so

a. He didn’t hear a difference, so can go back to using his less expensive cables

b. He could listen to some advice from those who do feel that cables make a difference as to why he might not have heard a difference

3. Those who haven’t experienced a difference in cables because they haven’t tried different cables should consider keeping their traps shut because they can’t speak from personal experience, which is what this hobby is all about
4. Those who have taken similar path as 2.a. have a right to express their agreement
5. Those who have taken similar path as 2.b. have a right to explain what they have discovered.

a. Cables might not make a difference in a lower end system or.. the synergy of the components in the system also contributes to the effectiveness of the cable swap

b. Cables might sound different to one person and not another

c. Not everybody likes the same type of sound

d. Etc.

6. Those who have taken path 3 have no right to give any further opinion

Sorry, Ben. I forgot to title this the Cable Discussion Guide

bikezappa wrote: »

I think what you are saying is that the differnces in audio you are pursuing are revealed with very expense and sensitive equipment. If so we agree.

No. What I clearly said was that there are TOO MANY perception variables at work to make DBT'ing of audio phenomenon valid.

It is not just the variances in equipment resolution. There are also the differences in human hearing response, hearing tastes and preferences, ear training, etc. One of the things I "key in" on is sound stage rendering. I am specifically looking for how weighty, focused, three dimensional and stable images are within a sound stage. Another person might couldn't care less about imaging. That person might just key in on clarity and definition. Two cables may be equal in the way they facilitate image clarity and definition, but one might exceed the other in sound stage rendering. For the person only interested in clarity and definition, the two cables would sound alike. For me, because of my listening preferences, the cables would sound very different.

bikezappa wrote: »

And I also agree that DBT may not be the best test.

Thank you.

bikezappa wrote: »

But maybe consider that DBTs is a method to determine if the audio differences are large or small.

It might and it might not. Here again, perception plays a role...like for instance, how sweet is "too" sweet? For one person, two lumps of sugar in their coffee is just right. For another person who prefers black coffee, two lumps is too sweet. Yet another person, accustomed to four lumps of sugar in their coffee, two lumps is not sweet enough. Same brand of coffee, same brand and amount of sugar, yet three different quantitative perceptions and interpretations.

Your right how good can they be. and can your hear even tell the diff

bobt wrote: »

OK..interconnet cables is NOT what i was talking about....speaker cables are.
I have SDA 1C's.....and don't have crap equipment.

Most of these insane dollor cables are made from type 5 or 6 cables....do you even know what they are??????

Do you even know what they were built for...my guess is NOT. Do you even know how thick they are?

bobt wrote: »

OK..good lord..you people really don't get the fact of what these cables are made from.

Is my system calibrated?.....your jokeing right.

I have a set of SDA 1C's
Adcom 400 (not the best)
Sony XA3ES
Onkyo Intergra M-504
Plus other stuff..yes there set the right way off the wall.
Do i have aset seat from the speakers...NO..I move around the room.....I don't say that at 10 feet (or whatever)...this is the best...I tend to move as to what seems best for the recording..but the SDA handles that. But thats me. It depends on how loud i what to play it.
But dose the cable I'm using make a big difference......once you get to a certen level....NO

DarqueKnight wrote: »

Thanks, but no thanks. This is what the OP said:



You'd have to be very desperate, pitiful and have some hidden agenda if you find the OP's statement INFORMATIVE and USEFUL.

The OP said he tried a 12 gauge cable but he REFUSED to say which, nor did he elaborate on the associated equipment used with the cable or discuss the kind of music listened to.

Let me get this straight: Someone walks in, says he tried a cable and it didn't work, then we are supposed to take that and make a useful and intelligent inference from it? You naysayers are always accusing performance audiophiles of "living by faith", yet you put up an example of someone who refuses to divulge the full information regarding his cable trial and expect us to "have faith" that it was a valid trial. If that's all it takes for you to be "convinced" good for you.

If I had the kind of deductive ability necessary to make sense of this kind of "brand X" trial, I would rather use it to predict winning power ball numbers.:rolleyes:

Sorry DarqueKnight, you get a green light for the cable brand but you get a red light for gear and music. I tought you were right about the gear but a quick check back in time proves otherwise.

Cheers

bikezappa wrote: »

What is unreasonable about talking about double blind testing?

Talking about double blind testing is fine...demanding that I do it in my home is unreasonable. Seriously, how would I set that up? It would be VERY difficult to do a proper DB test in my house...or yours for that matter.

Again, single blind is fine for my purposes. I am confident that bias is not present in any significant form in the tests I have done. Believe me, I am not motivated to enjoy spending money on cables.

ben62670 wrote: »

More entertaining than this thread
http://joecartoon.atom.com/cartoons/147-monkey_looker
Edit:Sorry I forgot the oh look at me big colors and text.
Thanks
Ben

Pay attention to me! I went out of my way to post something irrelevant to this discussion, and I want to be acknowledged:mad: Also it is very funny and reminds me of some of our newer members.
Thanks
Ben

TECHNOKID wrote: »

No debate there, there are different quality of cables but the question is to which extent? Now, I don't know anything about battery operated cables, can you expand on this and provide the benefit of such cables as I don't have a clue about this type of cable. The AVR or AMP are actually applying power and modulates that power with the audio sent for the speakers, how is applying a different power source through the cable it self will improve the quality of the sound at the speaker? What is the relation of that new power with the already existing power provided by AVR/AMP? How is that new power interfaced/isolated from the AVR/AMP circuitry?

Cheers

http://www.audioquest.com/pdfs/aq_cable_theory.pdf