Post a picture... any picture
Comments
-
The view while back country 4-wheeling near Durango, Colorado last October.McIntosh MA252 Integrated Amp, LUMIN D2 Network Music Player, Yamaha Aventage RX-A840 receiver, Emotiva XPA Gen3 2 channel amp, Polk LSiM 703 speakers. Oppo UDP-203 Blu-Ray player, Polk LSiM 705 speakers. Polk Signature S20 speakers.
-
Another view while 4-wheeling near Durango.McIntosh MA252 Integrated Amp, LUMIN D2 Network Music Player, Yamaha Aventage RX-A840 receiver, Emotiva XPA Gen3 2 channel amp, Polk LSiM 703 speakers. Oppo UDP-203 Blu-Ray player, Polk LSiM 705 speakers. Polk Signature S20 speakers.
-
Took this picture yesterday in the backyard. Can you guess what kind of bird?My system:
http://www.blu-ray.com/community/gallery.php?member=ahmedreda
RTI A9/CSI A6/RTI A5
Subs: 3xRythmik Audio FV15HP
Denon 4311CI/Emotiva XPA-2/Emotiva XPA-5
BenQ W6000/W7000 projectors/130" 16:9 screen
Playstation 3/WDTV Live/Roku 2 XS /Apple TV/Tivo HD[/SIZE] -
EagleAC Regenerator PS Audio PerfectWave Power Plant 10
Source Lumin U1 Mini into Lampizator Baltic 4 DAC
Pre Cary SLP-05
Power Rogue M180 Dark monos
Mains Salk HT2-TL
Rythmik F12 -
Cool cloud formation with the early sun shining through this weekend... -
~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~ -
/\ now that's a back yard /\
-
My system:
http://www.blu-ray.com/community/gallery.php?member=ahmedreda
RTI A9/CSI A6/RTI A5
Subs: 3xRythmik Audio FV15HP
Denon 4311CI/Emotiva XPA-2/Emotiva XPA-5
BenQ W6000/W7000 projectors/130" 16:9 screen
Playstation 3/WDTV Live/Roku 2 XS /Apple TV/Tivo HD[/SIZE] -
-
mark090852 wrote: »The view while back country 4-wheeling near Durango, Colorado last October.
Beautiful picture Mark! -
Beautiful properties fellas!Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Source: Rotel CD14MkII CD Player - Speakers: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
-
Never saw one of these before so I just had to take a pic.Yep, my name really is Bob.
Parasound HCA1500A(indoor sound) and HCA1000(outdoor sound), Dynaco PAS4, Denon DP1200 w/Shure V15 Type V and Jico SAS stylus, Marantz UD7007, Polk L600, Rythmik L12 sub. -
Rosy Maple Moth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dryocampa_rubicunda
-
mhardy6647 wrote: »Rosy Maple Moth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dryocampa_rubicunda
Makes sense, we have several very large silver maples near the house. That moth stayed on the screen from mid afternoon until sometime into the night. I was even pushing on it but it would not budge.Yep, my name really is Bob.
Parasound HCA1500A(indoor sound) and HCA1000(outdoor sound), Dynaco PAS4, Denon DP1200 w/Shure V15 Type V and Jico SAS stylus, Marantz UD7007, Polk L600, Rythmik L12 sub. -
We had one do essentially the same thing one day at the ol' (MA) house some years back -- At the time, I went to the good ol' Golden Field Guide to Butterflies and Moths :-) to ID it. Today I just Googled "large yellow and pink moth", since of course I didn't remember the name!
-
Here in Kansas we been having a like of kite flying going on, everytime I look up I swear their up there soaring around, and I'm sure their Mississippi Kites! to far away to really tell but I'm almost positive.2 ch- Polk CRS+ * Vincent SA-31MK Preamp * Vincent Sp-331 Amp * Marantz SA8005 SACD * Project Xperience Classic TT * Sumiko Blue Point #2 MC cartridge
HT - Polk 703's * NAD T-758 * Adcom 5503 * Oppo 103 * Samsung 60" series 8 LCD -
-
Well, if we're doing bugs now...
...how about an orange grasshopper?
My son thought it was cool enough to photograph. -
-
Someone say bugs? I had a dragonfly hit my window and fall to the sidewalk, so I took the liberty of posing it while it was in a stunned state. Did the same thing with a bird.
-
-
-
-
This is a beaver that was causing mass destruction that I had to eliminate.
-
-
These 2 little guys just running around living it up, with no parental supervision. Oddly enough, right next to the neighborhood playground, with kids and a few dogs around and they didn't even seem to mind at all.
Attachment not found.Home Theater: LG 60PB450; Pioneer Elite SC55; RT2000P; RT55P; CS400p; FX500; SVS PB12-Plus/2; PS3 360GB
Office: Onkyo TX-NR616; RT2000i; RT800i; CS400i; DSW Micropro 4000; XBOX 360 250GB; LG BR370; Panasonic Plasma
Bedroom: Sony STR-DH820; CS400p; RT55p; Sony Grand Wega 55"
Retired: Sony STR-DN840; Yamaha HTR-6130; Sony STR-DN520; Paradigm Phantom V.3; Paradigm CS-270V.3, Cinema ADP V.3, PS1000 V.4; Polk S6; Onkyo TX-NR809; Monitor 50, CS1; FXi3; PSW350 -
Dragonflies -- my son went through a "dragonfly" phase early in his photography hobby arc. The conservation land behind our house was chock-full of 'em in the midsummer.
Here're a few :-) of his photos that I really like (indeed, we have prints hanging in our home of a couple of his dragonfly photos).
These guys weren't stunned, they were just in repose ;-)
http://icouldbeahero.blogspot.com
http://icouldbeahero.blogspot.com/search/label/dragonflies -
Those are really nice. My pictures always pale in comparison to the ones you post! Those shots had to be difficult to take because dragonflies don't seem to sit still for more than a couple seconds. In a different thread I was talking about Blu-ray picture quality and how the movie Aliens was so grainy. Digital vs. Film was discussed. Which do you prefer in photography? I think there is a place for both. But for me personally, I was getting sick of paying the have a roll developed only to find one or two good pictures in the bunch. If you are having actual prints made, do you prefer one over the other? As much as I dislike watching a grainy movie, I've seen some really awesome grainy photographs. Especially black and white ones.
-
Those are really nice. My pictures always pale in comparison to the ones you post! Those shots had to be difficult to take because dragonflies don't seem to sit still for more than a couple seconds. In a different thread I was talking about Blu-ray picture quality and how the movie Aliens was so grainy. Digital vs. Film was discussed. Which do you prefer in photography? I think there is a place for both. But for me personally, I was getting sick of paying the have a roll developed only to find one or two good pictures in the bunch. If you are having actual prints made, do you prefer one over the other? As much as I dislike watching a grainy movie, I've seen some really awesome grainy photographs. Especially black and white ones.
My son's photos those are! I am not nearly that skillful, nor that patient, nor that good with composition.
I think it's safe to say that he and I both prefer film. I am too lazy to use film any more, though.
Heck, he went to Germany for a meeting last month and he only took his very vintage Leica IIIg and film! :-)
He's posting his German photos now...
http://icouldbeahero.blogspot.com/2014/08/9.html
ach, those Germans have a wacky sense of humor! ;-)
Both digital and film can make good prints; actually in terms of resolution (in terms of image quality or color palette), you (still) can't beat slow-speed, medium or large format film.Cause tube amps look, awesome!
Like I'm gonna disagree? ;-)
oneRSampaglow by mhardy6647, on Flickr
Actually I did take this photo -- not bad, but my son's tube photos are still better! -
dang it happens so quickly on this forum ;-(
gimme a minute...
