Spearker cables..fact or fiction?

1414244464771

Comments

  • comfortablycurt
    comfortablycurt Posts: 6,745
    edited April 2009
    seafire wrote: »
    First of all please don't lie.I said that we laugh at all the childish name calling and how everyone was over reacting.Not once did I say polk members were ignorant!.You told me your sloppy story of how you came on here and got involved with some big argument.That you later realized you are making yourself unpopular so you retracted from the argument,I call that SUCKING UP :rolleyes:

    Ok...I didn't lie about anything.:confused: I briefly skimmed over the message after I received it and immediately deleted it...I didn't take the time to memorize the entire thing. My apologies. What I don't get, is if you're so annoyed by all of the over reacting and the childish name calling...why are you still here? You're more than welcome to leave.

    Yes, I got involved in a stupid argument when I first joined here. I realized how out of hand it was getting, so I stepped out of it. I don't call that "sucking up". I apologized to everyone, because I shouldn't have been arguing about it all in the first place. I'd look at it more as admitting a stupid mistake, than "sucking up". I don't suck up to anybody...aside from my girlfriend from time to time.;)

    Admitting that you were out of hand, and backing out of a pointless argument seems to be something that you have a complete inability to do though.

    I've made numerous friends on here since then...even with some of the people I was arguing with initially. I'm glad I backed out of the argument because it wasn't going anywhere at all. I tried recommending that you do the same. You might have actually had a chance of repairing your reputation here at that point, but I'd say it's completely beyond hope now.

    How is this thread not locked yet? It really should be.

    This argument is getting to old, and way to repetitious, so I'm done with it. Enjoy, Seafire. Troll the forum to your hearts content.
    The nirvana inducer-
    APC H10 Power Conditioner
    Marantz UD5005 universal player
    Parasound Halo P5 preamp
    Parasound HCA-1200II power amp
    PolkAudio LSi9's/PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
    Audioquest Speaker Cables and IC's
  • seafire
    seafire Posts: 459
    edited April 2009
    Ok...I didn't lie about anything.:confused: I briefly skimmed over the message after I received it...I didn't take the time to memorize the entire thing. My apologies. What I don't get, is if you're so annoyed by all of the over reacting and the childish name calling...why are you still here? You're more than welcome to leave.

    Yes, I got involved in a stupid argument right when I joined here. I realized how out of hand it was getting, so I stepped out of it. I don't call that "sucking up". I apologized to everyone, because I shouldn't have been arguing about it all in the first place. I'd look at it more as admitting a mistake, than "sucking up". This is something that you seem to have a complete inability to do.

    I've made numerous friends on here since then...even with some of the people I was arguing with initially. I'm glad I backed out of the argument because it wasn't going anywhere at all. I tried recommending that you do the same. You might have actually had a chance of repairing your reputation here at that point, but I'd say it's completely beyond hope now.

    This argument is getting to old, and way to repetitious, so I'm done with it. Enjoy, Seafire. Troll the forum to your hearts content.
    If you scroll back to some posts ago I asked you to leave me alone.I also asked you "then why are you still here" and that question still applies.I'm not a girl and so really don't care for my reputation with certain people that can only call me names .However I do care for those with valid opinions and have already made some good friends here.
  • seafire
    seafire Posts: 459
    edited April 2009
    This thread sucks. Period.

    How in the hell it is even still unlocked is beyond me.

    Seriously... what are you guys 2? Get over it.

    If you take notice I stayed away here for numerous posts but certain people come here and start name calling me again..seafart ,seascum etc etc.He keeps on asking me to leave and then askes''I wonder where seafart/seabiscuit is?''.So I gave him a little piece of my mind ;)
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 29,385
    edited April 2009
    Irregardless -

    We are all adults. Just because someone is bored does not mean you have to respond. Be the bigger man (both of you) and shut up.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • bikezappa
    bikezappa Posts: 2,463
    edited April 2009
    Irregardless -.

    There no such word, regardless works just fine by itself. Grin.

    Peace
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited April 2009
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 29,385
    edited April 2009
    ;)

    Thanks
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited April 2009
    BZ is a tard...
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • williamgauci
    williamgauci Posts: 88
    edited April 2009
    Sorry people, I'm not picking sides or anything, but that words a pet peeve of mine.
    Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.

    Now, back to our regularly scheduled program. ;)
    _____________________________________________
    Yamaha 6080 Emotiva XPA-5 CSi A6 RTiA-7's RTi A1's Velodyne DLS-4000R
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 29,385
    edited April 2009
    Im glad I could change the topic with my bad word usage! :)

    It is a much better and informative conversation than the previous one. THAT is for sure.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • bikezappa
    bikezappa Posts: 2,463
    edited April 2009
    Im glad I could change the topic with my bad word usage! :)

    It is a much better and informative conversation than the previous one. THAT is for sure.

    You just can't take a joke. I added grin at the end. Go pound sand.
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 29,385
    edited April 2009
    I took the joke. I also didnt know that wasnt considered a word.

    So I learned something new in the process as well.

    Hmmmmmm
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • Norm Apter
    Norm Apter Posts: 1,036
    edited April 2009
    I took the joke. I also didnt know that wasnt considered a word.

    So I learned something new in the process as well.

    Hmmmmmm

    If I'm not mistaken its a combination of irrespective and regardless which mean pretty much the same thing. While irregardless is not standard English usage, I have heard (can't recall my source) that it has been used mistakenly so often that it is actually considered acceptable in some quarters...not sure which quarters those are. So its kind of a half-word...I guess.
    2 Ch.
    Parasound Halo A23 Amp
    Parasound Halo P3 Preamp
    Parasound Halo T3 Tuner
    Bada HD22SE tube CD Player
    Magnum Dynalab Signal Sleuth
    Magnum Dynalab ST-2 antenna
    polkaudio Lsi9s (upgraded cross-overs)
    MIT Shotgun S-3 Bi-wire Interface Speaker Cables
    MIT Shotgun S-3 Interconnects (3)
    IegO L70530 Power cords (3)

    HT
    Denon 2808ci AVR
    polkaudio RTi A5s (fronts)
    polkaudio RTi A1s (rears)
    polkaudio Csi A6 (center)
    Signal Cable Ultra Speaker Cables
    Signal Cable Analog II Interconnects
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,796
    edited April 2009
    Im glad I could change the topic with my bad word usage! :)

    It is a much better and informative conversation than the previous one. THAT is for sure.
    I use bad words and get slap on the wrist. No fair!
  • MillerLiteScott
    MillerLiteScott Posts: 2,564
    edited April 2009
    My system sounds pretty F'n good. That's all.

    Nuff said.
    I like speakers that are bigger than a small refrigerator but smaller than a big refrigerator:D
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited April 2009
    Norm Apter wrote: »
    If I'm not mistaken its a combination of irrespective and regardless which mean pretty much the same thing. While irregardless is not standard English usage, I have heard (can't recall my source) that it has been used mistakenly so often that it is actually considered acceptable in some quarters...not sure which quarters those are. So its kind of a half-word...I guess.

    It ain’t a word us intelligent folk use.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • bikezappa
    bikezappa Posts: 2,463
    edited April 2009
    I took the joke. I also didnt know that wasnt considered a word.

    So I learned something new in the process as well.

    Hmmmmmm

    Your ok forget the sand comment.

    I learned the same way.
  • mdaudioguy
    mdaudioguy Posts: 5,165
    edited April 2009
    BlueFox wrote: »
    It ain’t a word us intelligent folk use.
    Neither is spearker, but, what the heck... and FWIW, whenever you use the term spearker, keep in mind that you should pronounce "wire" such that it rhymes with "tar." :)
  • Hillbilly61
    Hillbilly61 Posts: 702
    edited April 2009
    This thread. 1433 responses, make that 1434 after I hit enter, in 39 days (started 3/20/2009). Besides still being alive, I wonder if that is some sort of record for the topic it started out as?
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited April 2009
    This thread. 1433 responses, make that 1434 after I hit enter, in 39 days (started 3/20/2009). Besides still being alive, I wonder if that is some sort of record for the topic it started out as?

    These threads are usually locked down in the first 5 pages, or people just have their little arguments then stop. I am disappointed nobody has earned some red letters.
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • reeltrouble1
    reeltrouble1 Posts: 9,312
    edited April 2009
    there are few things in life more belittling than burying the bone in somebody else's backyard.

    RT1
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited April 2009
    Sorry people, I'm not picking sides or anything, but that words a pet peeve of mine.
    Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.


    Actually...irregardless IS a word....

    Merriam-Webster should be a definitive source on this one.
    Main Entry: ir·re·gard·less
    Pronunciation: \ˌir-i-ˈgärd-ləs\
    Function: adverb
    Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless
    Date: circa 1912
    nonstandard : regardless

    usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance.

    Whether one considers it non-standard or not proper usage of the english language...that does not change the fact that it exists and is fequently used. We certainly do not speak the Kings English and "American English" continues to evolve as it has since people of various English speaking ancestry as well as many other cultures moved to these shores. ALL languages evolve over time...
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited April 2009
    Irregardless...I still don't think spearker is currently a word...nor has it ever been.
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • Flash21
    Flash21 Posts: 316
    edited April 2009
    Just because it is in the dictionary doesn't mean it is proper English. Many words included in there are not. As a general rule the dictionary makers are not arbiters of proper English, but simply document what words in common usage mean.

    For example, the really big dictionaries you find at the library have all sorts of curse words in them. Which BTW gave us all sorts of giggles as children, looking up "those" evil words... :)

    What were we talking about again?:rolleyes:
    Steve Carlson
    Von Schweikert VR-33 speakers
    Bel Canto eVo2i integrated amp
    Bel Canto PL-2 universal disc player
    Analysis Plus Oval Nine speaker cables and Copper Oval-In Micro interconnects
    VH Audio Flavor 4 power cables
    Polk Monitor 10B speakers, retired but not forgotten
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited April 2009
    Flash21 wrote:
    Just because it is in the dictionary doesn't mean it is proper English.


    As I said....our language is constantly evolving...REGARDLESS (irregardless...whatever :rolleyes:) of whether those that think it is "proper" English or not. Hell...our entire American language is a bastardization of many different languages and dialects. Based on that, here in the USA we have never spoken "proper" English...and that is just fine with me.
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • mrbigbluelight
    mrbigbluelight Posts: 9,878
    edited April 2009
    Well ...... a lot has been said ...... not much has been done ...... time has passed, and the world has turned ....... and the Lizard King decrees:

    THIS IS THE END



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDN9y2vTdUs










    So, Patrick, Jim Morrison has spoken ..... listen to ...... and heed his words ......
    Sal Palooza
  • Hillbilly61
    Hillbilly61 Posts: 702
    edited May 2009
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,796
    edited May 2009
  • moe
    moe Posts: 48
    edited May 2009
    Amazingly(is that a word)? the things one learns about the world/country/people in this thread could be studied for 100 years,with no conclusion other than"there's nothin' funnier than people".:confused:
  • Lord Vader
    Lord Vader Posts: 167
    edited May 2009
    How fortunate that the Emporer does not yet know about this thread. He is far less forgiving than I am. I want this SEAFART found and brought to ME. He is not to be damaged in any way. The Emporer has been needing a new subject for his Force Lightning experiments and this piece of bantha poodoo will do nicely. See to it personally Commander. There will be no-one to stop us this time!
This discussion has been closed.