Spearker cables..fact or fiction?

1…676869707173»

Comments

  • inspiredsports
    inspiredsports Posts: 5,501
    edited March 2010
    xcapri79 wrote: »
    This should last until April Fools' Day. I note the recent increase in the audio myths threads in this forum.

    Heres some truth by Thomas D. Kite, Ph.D.
    http://signal.ece.utexas.edu/seminars/dsp_seminars/01fall/AudioMyths.pdf

    I do agree with Kite that I listen to "Expensive turntables that look fabulous" and my "Huge installed base of analog gear . . ." and my "pricey cables look cool."
    VTL ST50 w/mods / RCA6L6GC / TlfnknECC801S
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 w/mods
    TT Conrad Johnson Sonographe SG3 Oak / Sumiko LMT / Grado Woodbody Platinum / Sumiko PIB2 / The Clamp
    Musical Fidelity A1 CDPro/ Bada DD-22 Tube CDP / Conrad Johnson SD-22 CDP
    Tuners w/mods Kenwood KT5020 / Fisher KM60
    MF x-DAC V8, HAInfo NG27
    Herbies Ti-9 / Vibrapods / MIT Shotgun AC1 IEC's / MIT Shotgun 2 IC's / MIT Shotgun 2 Speaker Cables
    PS Audio Cryo / PowerPort Premium Outlets / Exact Power EP15A Conditioner
    Walnut SDA 2B TL /Oak SDA SRS II TL (Sonicaps/Mills/Cardas/Custom SDA ICs / Dynamat Extreme / Larry's Rings/ FSB-2 Spikes
    NAD SS rigs w/mods
    GIK panels
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,137
    edited March 2010
    xcapri79 wrote: »
    This should last until April Fools' Day. I note the recent increase in the audio myths threads in this forum.

    Heres some truth by Thomas D. Kite, Ph.D.
    http://signal.ece.utexas.edu/seminars/dsp_seminars/01fall/AudioMyths.pdf

    Seems to me the only truth in debunking these "audio myth" studies have no basis in fact when it comes to perceptual/sensory testing as proven in this study thread;

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=98139
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
This discussion has been closed.