IsoClean Audio Grade Fuses

14567810»

Comments

  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited December 2010
    ...it's nothing to spend $250 on a Wustoff Trident knife or better!

    :eek:

    As Rosanne Rosanna Danna says, "It's always something".
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,137
    edited December 2010
  • Outfitter03
    Outfitter03 Posts: 563
    edited December 2010
    jinjuku wrote: »
    I am consistently in fresh herbage.

    Now that explains a lot!
  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited December 2010
    Now that explains a lot!

    It's cheaper than fuses and all my audio sounds better. Even with the stereo off.
  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited January 2011
    Keiko wrote: »
    Cool! Have you considered with all that coin you're saving to perhaps invest in Colgate stocks?

    No, with you around we have to invest in:

    Preparation-H-Hemorrhoidal-Ointment-2-oz-57-g-B0000VLX0K-L.jpg&t=1
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited January 2011
    Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,137
    edited January 2011
    Keiko wrote: »
    No wonder your teeth are yellow. :rolleyes:
    TroyD wrote: »
    Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are.

    BDT

    Side splitting WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!:wink: Hehehe that PH will have your lips puckered up like the Three Stooges episode where Curly dumped a box of alum in the punch!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYCCpd2_0zw
  • bikezappa
    bikezappa Posts: 2,463
    edited January 2011
    It's interesting comparing different hobbies and the money spent.

    I raced bicycles for over 10 years and never spent more than $700 on a bike. Many racers spent over $4000 on their custom frames and other equipment.
    To each his own,

    There was not much of a relation between the money spent and number of wins you had bike racing once you reached a certain level of equipment effectiveness. Before the money for equipment started to make bike racing a little nuts everyone had just about all the same equipment. Camy record, Mavac rims, tubular tires, 5 speed Regina ora free wheel...... At a race you could switch wheels with anyone because they were all the same.

    I remember a racer winning a sprint with a leaking front tire with 40 lbs pressure. Amazing, he was a great sprinter.

    Maybe there are certain key equipment requirements to be effective in any hobby.
    At some point however the tweeks just make no sense: like paying $20 for a Ti screw to clamp your bike seat to save 4 grams. That weight change is in the noise level and is not detectable by the racer.

    Taking a good dump before the race is much more important and will reduce some weight.
  • DarqueKnight
    DarqueKnight Posts: 6,765
    edited January 2011
    bikezappa wrote: »
    It's interesting comparing different hobbies and the money spent.

    It is.
    bikezappa wrote: »
    I raced bicycles for over 10 years and never spent more than $700 on a bike. Many racers spent over $4000 on their custom frames and other equipment. To each his own,
    bikezappa wrote: »
    There was not much of a relation between the money spent and number of wins you had bike racing once you reached a certain level of equipment effectiveness.

    How do you know this? Has this been scientifically and quantitatively verified? Do you know of any peer-revewed scientific journal articles where this was investigated?

    How does rider skill affect this?
    bikezappa wrote: »
    Before the money for equipment started to make bike racing a little nuts everyone had just about all the same equipment. Camy record, Mavac rims, tubular tires, 5 speed Regina ora free wheel...... At a race you could switch wheels with anyone because they were all the same..

    Ahhhhh...the good ole' days.
    bikezappa wrote: »
    I remember a racer winning a sprint with a leaking front tire with 40 lbs pressure. Amazing, he was a great sprinter..

    Yes, and based on his skill and determination, he might have still won the race with a flat tire. Charlie Parker was notorius for using crappy saxophones, some of which would literally fall apart during performances.
    bikezappa wrote: »
    Maybe there are certain key equipment requirements to be effective in any hobby.

    There are.
    bikezappa wrote: »
    At some point however the tweeks just make no sense: like paying $20 for a Ti screw to clamp your bike seat to save 4 grams. That weight change is in the noise level and is not detectable by the racer.

    Titanium has other desirable properties rather than light weight. Perhaps a titanium screw, being much less dense than steel, transmits less vibration and provides more seat comfort. Certainly, vibration, and seat comfort, is detectable by the racer.
    bikezappa wrote: »
    Taking a good dump before the race is much more important and will reduce some weight.

    Again, how do you know this is much more important? Has this been scientifically and quantitatively verified? Do you know of any peer-revewed scientific journal articles where this was investigated?

    Happy New Year!!:smile:
    Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!
  • inspiredsports
    inspiredsports Posts: 5,501
    edited January 2011
    bikezappa wrote: »
    It's interesting comparing different hobbies and the money spent.

    I raced bicycles for over 10 years and never spent more than $700 on a bike. Many racers spent over $4000 on their custom frames and other equipment.
    To each his own,

    There was not much of a relation between the money spent and number of wins you had bike racing once you reached a certain level of equipment effectiveness. Before the money for equipment started to make bike racing a little nuts everyone had just about all the same equipment. Camy record, Mavac rims, tubular tires, 5 speed Regina ora free wheel...... At a race you could switch wheels with anyone because they were all the same.

    I remember a racer winning a sprint with a leaking front tire with 40 lbs pressure. Amazing, he was a great sprinter.

    Maybe there are certain key equipment requirements to be effective in any hobby.
    At some point however the tweeks just make no sense: like paying $20 for a Ti screw to clamp your bike seat to save 4 grams. That weight change is in the noise level and is not detectable by the racer.

    Taking a good dump before the race is much more important and will reduce some weight.


    Interesting points in that bicycle racing a hobby I pursued in my younger days.

    I DID use the Ti screw clamp (and whatever else I could to save a gram or two) in the same way I currently add a $20 Herbie's Ti-9 Ultrasonic tube damper to each pre or amp tube or an IsoClean fuse to preserve a thousandth of a decibel of sound quality in my system.

    To each his/her own :smile:.
    VTL ST50 w/mods / RCA6L6GC / TlfnknECC801S
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 w/mods
    TT Conrad Johnson Sonographe SG3 Oak / Sumiko LMT / Grado Woodbody Platinum / Sumiko PIB2 / The Clamp
    Musical Fidelity A1 CDPro/ Bada DD-22 Tube CDP / Conrad Johnson SD-22 CDP
    Tuners w/mods Kenwood KT5020 / Fisher KM60
    MF x-DAC V8, HAInfo NG27
    Herbies Ti-9 / Vibrapods / MIT Shotgun AC1 IEC's / MIT Shotgun 2 IC's / MIT Shotgun 2 Speaker Cables
    PS Audio Cryo / PowerPort Premium Outlets / Exact Power EP15A Conditioner
    Walnut SDA 2B TL /Oak SDA SRS II TL (Sonicaps/Mills/Cardas/Custom SDA ICs / Dynamat Extreme / Larry's Rings/ FSB-2 Spikes
    NAD SS rigs w/mods
    GIK panels
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,566
    edited January 2011
    It is.





    How do you know this? Has this been scientifically and quantitatively verified? Do you know of any peer-revewed scientific journal articles where this was investigated?

    How does rider skill affect this?



    Ahhhhh...the good ole' days.



    Yes, and based on his skill and determination, he might have still won the race with a flat tire. Charlie Parker was notorius for using crappy saxophones, some of which would literally fall apart during performances.



    There are.



    Titanium has other desirable properties rather than light weight. Perhaps a titanium screw, being much less dense than steel, transmits less vibration and provides more seat comfort. Certainly, vibration, and seat comfort, is detectable by the racer.



    Again, how do you know this is much more important? Has this been scientifically and quantitatively verified? Do you know of any peer-revewed scientific journal articles where this was investigated?

    Happy New Year!!:smile:

    Game. Set. Match.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • bikezappa
    bikezappa Posts: 2,463
    edited January 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    Game. Set. Match.

    It maybe a game for you but I was just giving my opinion on our hobbies.

    Many riders that couldn't stay with the pack and were pulled from the race road $4000 bikes. You could get a good car for that money back then.

    Maybe there were other issues that these riders could have addressed to improve their results.

    It's a balance of the body/mind/bike equipment.

    A good dump before a bike race was equal to over a pouind or $1000 of special equipment that weighs a few grams.

    There were racers that would drill hundreds of 1/8" holes in the crank rings to reduce weight. Some even drilled holes in the chain.

    All bikes that are raced in the TDF have a minimum weight limit.

    Just an opinion/observation no data.

    Happy New Year
  • DarqueKnight
    DarqueKnight Posts: 6,765
    edited January 2011
    bikezappa wrote: »
    Many riders that couldn't stay with the pack and were pulled from the race road $4000 bikes. You could get a good car for that money back then.

    Maybe there were other issues that these riders could have addressed to improve their results.

    I agree. It is sad that some people think that expensive equipment will make up for lack of diligent training and committment. Likewise, buying an expensive audio system will not assure a satisfying listening experience, expecially if one does not know the fundamentals of stereophonic reproduction.

    There is no substitute for natural ability honed and refined by education, practice, training and experience.

    Expensive equipment won't make you a better cyclist anymore than expensive equipment will make you a better audiophile or a better anything.
    bikezappa wrote: »
    It's a balance of the body/mind/bike equipment.

    This is generally true of all hobbies.
    bikezappa wrote: »
    A good dump before a bike race was equal to over a pouind or $1000 of special equipment that weighs a few grams.

    Well, I'll defer to your more extensive knowledge in this area.:smile:
    bikezappa wrote: »
    There were racers that would drill hundreds of 1/8" holes in the crank rings to reduce weight. Some even drilled holes in the chain.

    All bikes that are raced in the TDF have a minimum weight limit.

    Every hobby has their hardcore tweakers.
    bikezappa wrote: »
    Just an opinion/observation no data.

    OK. I was just curious. I thought it would be interesting reading.
    Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!