Housing market's gonna crash

1789101113»

Comments

  • Posts: 2,188
    VR3 wrote: »
    If someone asks my advice about home ownership, I tell them all the same thing.

    Can you fix things yourself?

    If not, can you afford to pay someone to fix things?

    If the answer is NO to both, then home ownership is not for you.

    Some people cant save money but they can budget to live paycheck to paycheck. It's an interesting thing.

    But there are exceptions to saying no to both questions. When I bought my fixer upper in the 80's the only tool I was proficient at using was a splitting maul. With the help of some buds in the building trade I got my learning on quickly. Anything to stop paying someone else's mortgage.
  • Posts: 17,517
    No matter how someone does things, in the end, we all leave it for someone else..
  • Posts: 11,114
    Somethings the majority of people don't have the extra cash lying around (without having to dip into a LoC) say for a new roof. Who has 15k +++ in a bank account set aside for something just like this? not many. Most either take out a loan, or use a LoC.
  • Posts: 29,003
    It's all about being proactive versus reactive

    If you budget for the roof over 15 years before you need it you will pay 60 to 80 a month to a savings or investment account or you can pay 5 times as much per month for 5 years after you replace it plus interest cost

    Or you could aim for recently renovated or new homes, live there for 5 to 10 years and constantly move trying to avoid maintenance.

    So many ways to live this life. No right answer for anyone
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • Posts: 14,877
    edited March 28
    I know a guy who only rents. Well, I know a few people who only rent, only one has a stupid reason.

    One couple is in their mid-50's. Her mother was living with them and had severe health issues. He lost his job in 2009 and was out of work until the end of 2011. So they had no savings and while they did have a house, it got foreclosed on and they lost it. They were basically paying rent on a house with mom's gubment cheese. But he ended up getting a new job and they decided that they didn't want to start all over again with only a decade to retirement. So they rent because it's cheaper and easier than buying again.

    Another guy is an IT contractor and he rents because he does very specialized work so he's essentially moving every 5-6 years or so for work. His wife doesn't mind it at all 'cause they've lived in Italy, Thailand, Malaysia, Zimbabwe, Brazil, Canada, Spain, Germany, The U.K. and several places in the U.S. including Hawaii. Owning doesn't make sense to him 'cause he needs to be able to get up and move quickly. He does get paid crazy well, though.

    Another guy "rents" a house from himself 'cause he's a tenant of an LLC he and his brother own. The LLC is a property management company. They own a couple dozen units, several are beach properties. All he does is work at maintaining them through the property management company. So while he actually owns the company that owns his house, he's a tenant and gets good rates on insurance and stuff because he bulk buys through the property management LLC. He did it because it keeps him from being liable and sued into oblivion if something goes horribly wrong. He told me he can't be sued if he doesn't actually own anything and the LLC has a limited liability and he can somehow dissolve the LLC without having to liquidate the assets if they get in to some legal trouble for some reason. It's all convoluted and feels shady to me but a real estate attorney told me it was legit. So whatever. Works for him and he's got waaaaay more money than me so what do I know?

    Another guy rents because he feels his time is more important and he can earn more in an hour than he'll pay someone else to do something for him. This is the dumbest rationalization I've ever heard. He's been in the same job, not, like, the same industry, literally the same job since 2009. No upward movement, no raises, no nothing. His rent on this house in a fancy area is about $3100 a month. So he's paying almost $40K a year in rent plus utilities, plus renters insurance, plus whatever else. He also has two leased cars. He's been living this way since I've known him and before that too. He's been in his current house for 7 years now, going on his 8th. When he started renting his rent at the current place was $2800 a month. In 7 years, he's paid at least $226,800 (probably closer to $250K with the yearly rent increases) for a town home that was valued at $269K when he started renting. If he had gotten a 15 year mortgage on the $269K house at 2017 interest rates, he'd be able to pay it off and own it outright within the next 2 years if he was throwing $3100 a month at it. Last I knew, he was bringing in about $140K a year so his take home is around $90K-$95K a year. He swears he's saving money but I don't know how. His utility bills electric, gas, water, phones, internet and TV plus his gaming subscriptions total is over 1500 a month. The two leases are over 1200 a month. His rent is 3100 a month so he's at 5800 a month, at least, for just living and renting everything. He's bringing in about $8K a month after taxes. 72.5% of his take home pay goes straight to someone else to rent things he depends on and pay the bills for maintaining them. This doesn't include his food bill or his essentials bills or anything else like that. He goes to concerts all the time, at least 2 a month, he's out to eat every weekend and he's always taking trips to other countries so he can put stuff up on his Instagram account for the social cred. I don't know what he's going to do for retirement but he's only got about 20 more years in the workforce. I just....the lack of foresight there and the indignation when challenged about it that he gets is astounding. Besides all that, his $269K townhome in 2017 is now worth $425K. 40% increase in value for just sitting there with a mook in it. But his time is SOOOO much more valuable. Doesn't have a single piece of wealth building asset to his name. I hope he doesn't outlive his savings.


    Ownership is rough. You gotta put on your big boy pants and get to being a responsible adult. But there's having a lot of money in a savings account and then there's wealth building. Savings accounts are nice but even Dave Ramsey tells you not to hold all your money in a savings account. Investing in markets (stocks, funds, money, etc), buying real estate and even owning a business whether it's a primary or a side business makes your money that you've made work for you and return far more on an investment than sitting there in a bank account making millions for the bank while you get a pittance in return while being charged a fee to be able to access your money.

    I mean, think about it. Say you bought NVidia stock 'cause you're a gamer and you want to support one of your favorite hardware manufacturers. Say you bought it for $6.50 or so a share back in early 2020. 300 or so shares for $6.50, that's about $2K worth of stock in NVidia. A year later that stock split in a 4:1 ratio. It was valued at $14.40 a share before the split. But you now have 1200 shares of NVidia stock. After the split it was now worth $16 or so a share. Your $2K investment is now worth about $19,200. Cool. Then AI hits and NVidia stocks starts rising. So you keep riding that wave and by June of 2024, it's worth 131.88 a share. Your 1200 shares are now worth $158,256.00. Then it splits in a 10:1 ratio. You now own 12,000 shares of NVidia stock. Immediately after the split, you share value drops to 125.31 a share. Big whoop. Those 12K shares are still worth $1,503,720.00. Congrats, bro, you're a millionaire. But wait! There's more! NVidia is still skyrocketing to a valuation of $153.13 a share.

    $153.13 x 12,000 = $1,837,560

    A $2,000 investment at the end of 2019 instead of buying that new HUGE TV on the Black Friday Sale turned in to almost $2M in 5 years. That's only a blip in the hundreds of billions in valuation that NVidia has right now. So you could cash in all of that $1.87M and it'd barely register on the stock valuation. There's a lot of gaming nerds out there who have had similar success and are now actually wealthy because of NVidia right now. You gotta play the long game. You don't build wealth with just a paycheck but you can become very wealthy if you're smart with what the guy you work for says you are worth instead of what you are actually worth.

    They say a man never got rich working for someone else. That's baloney. I see it all the time. But those people who are getting rich working for someone else? They did it through investment vehicles like investment funds, stock/share ownership, property ownership, all of which they got by leveraging the income they made. You just have to have some insight looking forward and play the long game. The idea that your time is valuable is true but to put a number on it that someone else said it's worth is stupid.
    Post edited by Jstas on
    Expert Moron Extraordinaire

    You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you!
  • Posts: 14,877
    billbillw wrote: »
    There are problems in the market, but there are far fewer sub-prime loans that are out there now. I don't think it will be as bad as before, but who knows. There will be losses for sure, but everything will get snatched up by investors on the other side of bankruptcy. There will be even more homes converted to rentals. Rent prices will continue to climb. Ultra rich get richer. Poor and middle class struggle. Younger middle class will shrink and eventually cease to exist. The dream of home ownership is growing distant for the kids graduating from college today and in the near future unless they want to put in the work to buy a fixer upper and do a lot of hard work.

    It's not the sub-prime loans that are the problem this go around.

    Real estate is a wealth transfer vehicle. It lets poors borrow money from richs to be able to get a wealth building asset to make them notsopoors.

    The fact that foreclosures are up means there are poors who will stay poor because they will not be able to borrow money from richs again.

    Even at that, though, the interest rates are still high and the credit market is all but frozen up again so the access to the money for poors to become notsopoors is drying up.

    So instead of richs lending money to poors who had none and had no way to pay it back, richs have the money and aren't giving it to the poors.

    The real estate growth market completely depends on that creation of money. If a rich can't turn $350K into $400K through interest payments then there's no growth. But you must have that $350K first, on both sides.

    Lenders have it in their pocket now. But it's not growing in their pocket. So they lend it and get extra back for the effort of lending it. That's how it grows.

    Borrowers don't have it right now but they will eventually and then the rich will get the monetary growth while the poor ends up with an appreciating asset that can be liquidated for double digit gains percentages if they played it right.

    In the sub-prime game, it was the poor who didn't have the money nor did they have the potential to get it all. Can't grow the pile of money if there isn't money being injected to it from loan payment. That crashes the game.

    In the current situation, the poors potential to get the money eventually is there but the richs are freaked out and holding on to every dollar with both hands out of fear of losing all the dollars. So there's no money on the richs end to borrow and the poors won't get the chance to be notsopoor. That's even in spite of the glut of low-cost homes that are in foreclosure now.

    What we're going to see in 2025 is all of the housing prices that are artificially high, they're gonna drop...a lot. That's because even though there are buyers available for houses to be sold, there's no money to borrow. A buyer with no money is just a watcher. So house prices will continue to drop, but not until a poor can afford to buy it. No, poors can afford it now. They will drop to a point where the rich feels the house is more valuable than the sale price thereby mitigating the risk of lending to a poor because even if the poor defaults and gets foreclosed on, the rich can still write off the loss on the lent money and then turn around sell the house at auction and recoup all of the money they lost on the defaulted loan and then some. They'll still get to take the capital gains loss deduction for the next 3 years too.

    They'll call it "market correction" but it's really just the guy with the money is trying to wait it out long enough to rig it in his favor. There's nothing anyone can do about it either 'cause you can't compel someone to spend or lend money through legislation. Well, I mean, you can. The Democrats did it during Clinton's administration which directly led to collapse in 2008 but those laws were being challenged in court for 10-15 years until the collapse. They just didn't get it done before the disaster hit.

    With the way the insurance companies are jettisoning people's policies and not underwriting new ones makes that scenario seem absolutely planned because the only ones who can afford to snap up the foreclosures are big corporations. They can afford to wait too. Makes you wonder why, though, 'cause being a landlord is not especially lucrative. It can be hard to manage costs and the liability risk is very high. The more properties you have the more opportunities for that to get out of control there are. Kinda makes you think about all these conspiracy theories around the 15 minute cities and "you'll own nothing and you'll like it" stuff. They use to call those "company towns".
    Expert Moron Extraordinaire

    You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you!
  • Posts: 7,099
    edited March 28
    That's pretty much what I said, but you added almost 1000 words. :p
  • Posts: 745
    billbillw wrote: »
    That's pretty much what I said, but you added almost 1000 words. :p

    :D
  • Posts: 4,792
    edited March 28
    billbillw wrote: »
    That's pretty much what I said, but you added almost 1000 words. :p

    Over 2000 words. And you never mentioned predicting the future for investments.

    Meanwhile, I'm in an area where house prices continue to go up, just like they did in the last housing "crash".
  • Posts: 3,946
    Inflation up and gold over 3k.

    The best way to predict the future is to invent it.

    It is imperative that we recognize that an opinion is not a fact.
  • Posts: 29,003
    25% of home transactions are institutions versus 12% back in the early 2000s
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • Posts: 4,792
    Inflation up and gold over 3k.

    And inflation will only get worse, and soon. Someone wants to accelerate it. Nobody's ever seen anything like it. I hear people say...
  • Posts: 34,204

    But there are exceptions to saying no to both questions. When I bought my fixer upper in the 80's the only tool I was proficient at using was a splitting maul. With the help of some buds in the building trade I got my learning on quickly. Anything to stop paying someone else's mortgage.

    Proper and efficient use of a splitting maul, (especially) without concomitant property damage or loss of life, is no mean feat. B)

  • Posts: 34,204
    The big problem, it seems to me, is pretty much always that people have a disheartening tendency to buy high and sell low, be it stocks, gold, real estate, trading cards, or Beanie Babies.
    Don't do that.
    B)
  • Posts: 5,605
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    The big problem, it seems to me, is pretty much always that people have a disheartening tendency to buy high and sell low, be it stocks, gold, real estate, trading cards, or Beanie Babies.
    Don't do that.
    B)

    As my mother said once, there's no guarantee that house prices are
    going to go up. That was the hard lesson of the 1930's. The commercial
    real estate is giving a lot a people a hard lesson in this. Most home prices
    shot up across the country about 2015 until 2024. Prices in my subdivision
    doubled since 2017. Imagine the devastation even a 20% drop could cause.
    Look at what's happening in China. And they're a big lender to the U.S. debt.
    "The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --Thomas Jefferson
  • Posts: 3,946
    My home is the smallest investment I have. But you have to live somewhere.

    And it’s paid for.
    The best way to predict the future is to invent it.

    It is imperative that we recognize that an opinion is not a fact.
  • Posts: 14,877
    billbillw wrote: »
    That's pretty much what I said, but you added almost 1000 words. :p

    As usual, though, it wasn't clear to me that you grasped what I was talking about so I tried a deeper explanation in the hopes that you would comprehend it the second time around.
    WilliamM2 wrote: »

    Over 2000 words. And you never mentioned predicting the future for investments.

    Meanwhile, I'm in an area where house prices continue to go up, just like they did in the last housing "crash".

    And pot shots from the cheap seats from a guy who clearly didn't read any of it. Otherwise, you would have seen that I was using the Nvidia story as an example of riding out the long game. It was not a future prediction at all. In all honesty, it was dumb luck. The story is actually true only the timeline is different. The guy bought Nvidia stock in 2001. He bought it because his dad's graduation gift to him was $25K and he had to invest it. At the time, Nvidia was about $2 a share. He bought 5,000 shares because it was on track to double that in 5 years. The only reason he wanted to buy it was because he liked Nvidia better than ATi. So he wanted the nerd cred to be able to say he owned Nvidia. Seriously. That was why. That's like your wife winning a football pool because she liked the colors of the team she chose and they just happened to go all the way. He never sold it, he just let it ride. 5K shares turned to 20K then to 200K. They are worth over $22M now. He has enough shares in Nvidia to be a voting shareholder and he has a portfolio worth 9 figures over all from all the stocks he bought with that $25K in 2001. He doesn't "day trade" or short anything either. He makes investments in stocks showing steady growth and then sits on them for years.

    And your house's value doesn't matter a hill of beans unless you sell. Housing market prices affect those who own more than one property or those who are making a move. The housing market taking a dive, nationwide, hurts everyone even those whose "house prices continue to go up, just like they did in the last housing "crash"." and those who don't even own a house.

    Which is the point of this thread. Not to gloat about anyone's wealth or house values. It's a discussion on the volatility of the housing market since about 2015 and where the pandemic bubble is heading.

    If your house went up in value, good for you. Mine didn't and it hurt for a couple years there.
    Expert Moron Extraordinaire

    You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you!
  • Posts: 5,605
    Got an insult offer in today's mail. About 100k lower than some I got
    Last year. There isn't a house in the area selling for that low a price.
    Clearly these guys are just bargain hunting now.
    "The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --Thomas Jefferson
  • Posts: 2,118
    I get those about once a week on the property I bought to build on in TN. But, once, not too long ago, the offer came in almost 50% more than I paid for it five years ago! Got me thinkin’ about letting it go … for a few minute, anyway!

    Brian

    One-owner Polk Audio RTA 15TL speakers refreshed w/ Sonicap, Vishay/Mills and Cardas components by "pitdogg2," "xschop" billet tweeter plates and BH5 | Stereo REL Acoustics T/5x subwoofers w/ Bassline Blue cables | Rogue Audio Cronus Magnum III integrated tube amp | Technics SL-1210G turntable w/ Ortofon 2M Black LVB 250 MM cart | Sony CDP-508ESD CD player (as a transport) | LampizatOr Baltic 4 tube DAC | Nordost & DH Labs cables/interconnects | APC H15 Power Conditioner | GIK Acoustics room treatments | Degritter RCM
  • Posts: 4,792
    edited March 29
    Jstas wrote: »
    If your house went up in value, good for you. Mine didn't and it hurt for a couple years there.

    Why, were you selling?
    It wasn't a pot shot either, or wealth bragging, just a point of reference. My house is actually reasonable for this area, but I couldn't afford it today...or 10 years ago.

    I did own nvidia stock in the early 2000's because I was a fan. $2.00? It was $0.54 a share in 2002 when I bought it, when I sold in 2006 it was about $0.38 a share. It did not double in 5 years, it didn't hit $1.00 until 2016. I remember it dropping to $0.10 while I owned it.
    No one could predict crypto mining would become profitable, or the AI boom that would come 20 years later. Neat story though, I wish I had kept mine.

  • Posts: 7,099
    Jstas wrote: »

    As usual, though, it wasn't clear to me that you grasped what I was talking about so I tried a deeper explanation in the hopes that you would comprehend it the second time around.
    Seriously John? You think I need a deeper explaination? This place isn't a classroom for remedial economics. Most of us are pretty educated in these matters. I also prefer to do my own research from multiple independent sources. Oh yeah, I've also seen The Big Short multiple times 😅.
  • Posts: 5,605
    I'm not moving anytime soon. My taxes are pretty darn low here.
    And unlike Dallas, water is cheap. And a lot less traffic. People
    move to Tennessee after selling those expensive houses in $$$
    areas with high property taxes and state income tax. Other than
    places like Nashville, things are pretty good. Climate isn't bad here
    either. Not 100 degrees all the time like Texas.
    "The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --Thomas Jefferson

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.