Someone explain this to me (about SVS subs)

124»

Comments

  • maxima
    maxima Posts: 143
    edited February 2008
    I think alot of people mistakenly think that a sealed sub is inherently "faster" than a ported sub. As long as group delay is kept below the threshold of audibility which SVS typically does an admireable job of, the sub (regardless) is "fast" enough to play the note. I think the key here is most sealed subs (without some sort of eq boost) miss pretty much an entire octave of information. This results in the sealed sub being perceived as "musical or faster". I have used SVS subs in music systems with great results. I just make sure I back off my HT calibration a little so that the sub blends seamlessly.
  • dbaldus
    dbaldus Posts: 730
    edited February 2008
    maxima wrote: »
    I think alot of people mistakenly think that a sealed sub is inherently "faster" than a ported sub. As long as group delay is kept below the threshold of audibility which SVS typically does an admireable job of, the sub (regardless) is "fast" enough to play the note. I think the key here is most sealed subs (without some sort of eq boost) miss pretty much an entire octave of information. This results in the sealed sub being perceived as "musical or faster". I have used SVS subs in music systems with great results. I just make sure I back off my HT calibration a little so that the sub blends seamlessly.

    You mean just knock the sub down a few dBs on the AVR while listening to music?

    Also, would you recommend this strategy for SACDs/DTS CDs as well as regular 2 ch music, or just 2 ch music?

    2-channel
    Squeezebox Touch| MSB Analog DAC | Audio Research Ref 40 Anniversary Edition| Pass Labs X350.8 | Wilson Audio Sasha 2

    Home Theater
    Arcam AVR 550 | GoldenEar Triton One | GoldenEar SuperCenter XXL | GoldenEar Aon 3 | JL Audio Fathom F113v2
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited February 2008
    maxima wrote: »
    I think alot of people mistakenly think that a sealed sub is inherently "faster" than a ported sub. As long as group delay is kept below the threshold of audibility which SVS typically does an admireable job of, the sub (regardless) is "fast" enough to play the note. I think the key here is most sealed subs (without some sort of eq boost) miss pretty much an entire octave of information. This results in the sealed sub being perceived as "musical or faster". I have used SVS subs in music systems with great results. I just make sure I back off my HT calibration a little so that the sub blends seamlessly.

    IMO, there's a distinct difference in sound between a sealed sub and a ported one or one equipped with a passive radiator (PR). I think a sealed/PR sub generally sounds better (i.e., tighter) for music. It sounds more natural. However, for HT I prefer the sound of a ported sub.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited February 2008
    Early B. wrote: »
    IMO, there's a distinct difference in sound between a sealed sub and a ported one or one equipped with a passive radiator (PR). I think a sealed/PR sub generally sounds better (i.e., tighter) for music. It sounds more natural. However, for HT I prefer the sound of a ported sub.

    icon14.gif
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • furball
    furball Posts: 234
    edited February 2008
    SVS was caught with their hand in the cookie jar, and they knew it. SVS had to come up with something to save face. And the above statement is what they came up with.

    Over the years, on many audio forums, such as avsforum, audioasylum, audioholics, etc., people have pointed out that SVS has engaged in systematic shill advertising on those forums. In recent memory, Audioholics has been the only site brave enough to stand up to this kind of unethical behavior.
  • furball
    furball Posts: 234
    edited February 2008
    And do you know how these shill advertisers work?

    For example,

    1) SVS hires a PR firm specializing in internet shill advertising
    2) The PR firm gives the job to 10 of its employees
    3) Each employee has to create at least 50 different identities (usernames) on various internet audio forums
    4) Each employee has to make at least 50 posts per hour under these different identities on different forums in order to make these aliases seem like real live people
    5) Promoting SVS all over the net is these people's full time job
    6) And whenever someone exposes their shill marketing, they swarm to SVS's defense, using whatever means necessary and at their disposal, burying the truth under piles upon piles of verbal abuse and profanity
  • furball
    furball Posts: 234
    edited February 2008
    Apparently posted the above two posts in the wrong thread.

    Should be in the other thread, titled "SVS and Their Marketing Practices."
  • Ricardo
    Ricardo Posts: 10,636
    edited February 2008
    furball wrote: »
    Apparently posted the above two posts in the wrong thread.

    Should be in the other thread, titled "SVS and Their Marketing Practices."

    Oh, how convenient :rolleyes:

    Who do you work for? I'm sure sales must be really bad these days to use these type of crap.
    _________________________________________________
    ***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***

    2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
    SOPA
    Thank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited February 2008
    Forum Rules
    1) Stick to the topic of the forum. This way information is easily categorized to make it easy for new members to access. Threads or posts that do not contain relevant information will be removed.

    2) The discussion of politics and religion is not allowed on this forum.

    3) Pornography and violent images or discussions are not allowed on this forum. This includes posts about weapons or explosives.

    4) No fighting. Personal attacks, trouble making, inappropriate language, or any threatening or offensive behavior will not be tolerated.

    VERY IMPORTANT...

    If you have a problem with another member's comments in a posted thread, DO NOT respond with any further comments that will aggravate the situation. Members have two options of recourse....

    1. Email the moderators, directing them to the individual and thread that the problem occurs in.
    2. Resolve the problem between both of you via PERSONAL email.

    Reacting to a hostile post with more hostility puts YOU in jeopardy, and risks your account from being deleted. To be objective and fair about situations where forum members are attacking each other, BOTH members' accounts will be removed from our forum (and no, we don't care who started it).


    5) No spam. Any member soliciting spam will be removed.

    6) Do not brand bash. We're all in this together. Discuss what you like and dislike. But don't bash someone or something because you don't like it.

    7) Be respectful of new members. If it was only you and me on this forum, we'd have no fun and the whole industry would collapse. Fact is, home theater is an exploding industry. More and more people all the time are discovering the joys of DVD and audiophile music. Welcome the newbies. For they will encourage industry growth, which will result in better prices and better equipment for all us heathens.

    8) Forum rules & guidelines are not up for debate. This is not a democracy, but rather a private forum owned by Polk Audio. Anyone openly debating the rules we have set in place will be removed.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • mrbigbluelight
    mrbigbluelight Posts: 9,724
    edited February 2008
    furball wrote: »
    Sold. Oh. Sorry.

    Well, imagine how well the sale would go if he had put down his honest opinions of the sub "... it is okay for HT, but not so good for music..."


    Yes, I can see where your friend is coming from.

    :rolleyes:
    Sal Palooza
  • kuntasensei
    kuntasensei Posts: 3,263
    edited February 2008
    If positive responses about SVS are shill advertising, then I guess I work for SVS. Sure, I have pictures of my SVS in my room... as do countless people on various forums... but they're clearly shills, as I certainly am.

    Oh, I like my Polk speakers, too. See all the times I posted about how great they sound? I'm waiting for my check, Polk. Get with it.
    Equipment list:
    Onkyo TX-NR3010 9.2 AVR
    Emotiva XPA-3 amp
    Polk RTi70 mains, CSi40 center, RTi38 surrounds, RTi28 rears and heights
    SVS 20-39CS+ subwoofer powered by Crown XLS1500
    Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray player
    DarbeeVision DVP5000 video processor
    Epson 8500UB 1080p projector
    Elite Screens Sable 120" CineWhite screen
  • furball
    furball Posts: 234
    edited February 2008
    I do not understand why you cannot tolerate my expressing my unsatisfactory experience with the sonic qualities of an SVS sub. To that end, for posting my unsatisfactory experience with an SVS sub, I have been the target of repeated personal attacks.

    This is most unprofessional.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,963
    edited February 2008
    As the title of the thread says....
    Someone has to explain this to you???????
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • dorokusai
    dorokusai Posts: 25,577
    edited February 2008
    Furball - You have been issued an infraction since you have been told to refrain from obvious brand bashing in another thread. If you continue, you will be removed from the forum until you can cool off.

    Polkies - I would ask that since he has been officially warned, that the rest of you back off with the responses, as it simply exacerbates the situation. If he continues, it will work itself out.

    Relax, go listen to some music.
    CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Speakers? Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint.
  • kuntasensei
    kuntasensei Posts: 3,263
    edited February 2008
    furball wrote: »
    I do not understand why you cannot tolerate my expressing my unsatisfactory experience with the sonic qualities of an SVS sub. To that end, for posting my unsatisfactory experience with an SVS sub, I have been the target of repeated personal attacks.

    This is most unprofessional.

    I don't take issue with you disliking the sound of a SVS sub. That's your right - it's your ears.

    I take issue with your incessant need to insist that they use shill advertising on forums. Whether it is true or not, it is wholly irrelevant to how they sound, and makes you seem like you're trolling.

    Sorry you had a negative experience with the SVS, as there are plenty of us who have nothing but good things to say about them. Fortunately, there are plenty of other companies making gear that might satisfy you. ;)
    Equipment list:
    Onkyo TX-NR3010 9.2 AVR
    Emotiva XPA-3 amp
    Polk RTi70 mains, CSi40 center, RTi38 surrounds, RTi28 rears and heights
    SVS 20-39CS+ subwoofer powered by Crown XLS1500
    Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray player
    DarbeeVision DVP5000 video processor
    Epson 8500UB 1080p projector
    Elite Screens Sable 120" CineWhite screen
  • DarqueKnight
    DarqueKnight Posts: 6,765
    edited February 2008
    furball wrote: »
    I do not understand why you cannot tolerate my expressing my unsatisfactory experience with the sonic qualities of an SVS sub. To that end, for posting my unsatisfactory experience with an SVS sub, I have been the target of repeated personal attacks.

    This is most unprofessional.

    I do not understand why you arrogantly assume that we must tolerate your repetitious tirades against SVS. How many times do you need to tell us that you don't like SVS products and alleged business practices? You have made your point that you think SVS is the scum of the earth. Why go on an irrational crusade against a company that most people on this forum respect and have had nothing but good experiences with? It should be obvious now that you are not going to win any "converts" to your "cause". Your energies would more appropriately be applied to finding a product you like and then sharing your evaluative knowledge with the membership. If that is impossible for you, go find an "SVS Hater" cult and live happily ever after. Many of us here think Bose makes overpriced, mediocre products. There is the occasional joke about Bose, but you do not see thread after thread talking about Bose's inferior audio performance and misleading billion dollar marketing machine. Most of us here prefer to discuss what we like rather than the things we do not like. If we find some product or manufacturer that didn't serve us well, we inform the membership and then move on.

    My observation has been that when an individual is irrationally crusading against something or someone that is no real threat to them, they actually really, really, like the thing they are crusading against or they are simply jealous or envious of the individual they are crusading against.

    Some examples that come to mind are religious leaders who crusade against sexual immorality and then are exposed as adulterers, **** mongers, and pedophiles. Then there are politicians who have gotten elected on a "clean up the corruption" crusade who later turned out to be on the mob's payroll.

    In your case, I speculate that you purchased an SVS sub, abused the hell out of it, blew the driver and/or amp, and then sent it back to SVS for free repair or replacement. When your claim was denied based on obvious abuse, you then initiated this anti-SVS crusade or became a disciple in an pre-existing crusade.

    Good luck with driving SVS out of business.
    dorokusai wrote: »
    Furball - You have been issued an infraction since you have been told to refrain from obvious brand bashing in another thread. If you continue, you will be removed from the forum until you can cool off.

    Polkies - I would ask that since he has been officially warned, that the rest of you back off with the responses, as it simply exacerbates the situation. If he continues, it will work itself out.

    Relax, go listen to some music.

    Not trying to exacerbate. Just offering some perspective. I'm done here.
    Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!
  • furball
    furball Posts: 234
    edited February 2008
    For merely expressing my opinion of the poor sonic qualities of an SVS sub, I personally heard, I have been the target of repeated personal insults and slanders.

    And I cannot speak out in defense of what I said? Look through all my postings, never for once have I hurled any personal insults against any other member on this forum.

    If you want to invoke any infractions, you should invoke infractions against those forum members who have repeatedly engaged in personal attacks.


    dorokusai wrote: »
    Furball - You have been issued an infraction since you have been told to refrain from obvious brand bashing in another thread. If you continue, you will be removed from the forum until you can cool off.

    Polkies - I would ask that since he has been officially warned, that the rest of you back off with the responses, as it simply exacerbates the situation. If he continues, it will work itself out.

    Relax, go listen to some music.
  • dorokusai
    dorokusai Posts: 25,577
    edited February 2008
    I have a great idea...how about you participate in the rest of the forum? I'm sure that you have more than SVS hatred to discuss and expound upon right?
    CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Speakers? Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint.
  • doggie750
    doggie750 Posts: 1,160
    edited February 2008
    Furball, we explained and we are done........Dude, respect the fact that this forum has valid facts that you might need to reconsider. You haven't been in this forum quite long enough to appreciate, so please do yourself a favor explore within and find out that Polkies WILL DO YOU NO HARM if you just listen, unlike my 2 year old son.:)
    Godspeed,
    D0661E

    AVR:Pioneer Elite SC-07
    Surrounds: RTis
    2channel:Rti100 (carver driven
    Sub:SVS PB12-Plus/2
    Dedicated AMPs:Adcom GFA535, 2xCarver 1.5t, Carver m1.0t
    Wsrn:Hitachi ultra vision LCD60, 32XBR400
    PowerConditioner: MonsterC HTS5100
    PS3, Toshiba HD A2, etc: SonySACD/ Panasonic gears DIVX.


    MR3LIGION: Polkaudio; GSXR; E46; Reeftank;
    Odyclub; Xsimulator; Sony; Zune; Canon
  • maxima
    maxima Posts: 143
    edited February 2008
    dbaldus wrote: »
    You mean just knock the sub down a few dBs on the AVR while listening to music?

    Also, would you recommend this strategy for SACDs/DTS CDs as well as regular 2 ch music, or just 2 ch music?

    Sorry, I don't have the opportunity to visit this forum as often as I would like. Getting back on track to dbaldus' question. Yes, you would want to back off your calibration when listening to music. This is because most people tend to calibrate their subs a bit hot for HT use.

    I just finished building a sub for a friend based on an Ascendant Audio Atlas 15. He uses it for HT and music. He has found that if he backs off his HT sub calibration about 6db, the sub blends beautifully for music. As always, YMMV.:D
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited February 2008
    maxima wrote: »
    I just finished building a sub for a friend based on an Ascendant Audio Atlas 15. He uses it for HT and music. He has found that if he backs off his HT sub calibration about 6db, the sub blends beautifully for music. As always, YMMV.:D

    Yeah, that's a great driver. The folks at Epik designed and sold it a couple of years ago.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • maxima
    maxima Posts: 143
    edited February 2008
    Hi Early,

    I agree with you 100%. I wish Chad still sold drivers for DIY. There is definitely a void in this price range. What do you say we go into business!;)
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited February 2008
    I would like to know what SVS did with all of the older model drivers they recieved for upgrades. Didnt the customers return them to SVS? I know a couple have sold outside the manufacture.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • Ron Temple
    Ron Temple Posts: 3,212
    edited February 2008
    jakelm wrote: »
    I would like to know what SVS did with all of the older model drivers they recieved for upgrades. Didnt the customers return them to SVS? I know a couple have sold outside the manufacture.

    Everybody kept their drivers and either sold them or used them.

    Combo rig:

    Onkyo NR1007 pre-pro, Carver TFM 45(fronts), Carver TFM 35 (surrounds)
    SDA 1C, CS400i, SDA 2B
    PB13Ultra RO
    BW Silvers
    Oppo BDP-83SE
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited February 2008
    Ron Temple wrote: »
    Everybody kept their drivers and either sold them or used them.


    Did not know that, I thought SVS bought them back or discounted the new ones if returned the old ones.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • polkseller
    polkseller Posts: 184
    edited March 2008
    wallstreet wrote: »
    All speakers have "stellar" online reviews. Keep looking and you'll find the "unstellar" review too. That's the beauty of the internet.

    I like this quote, try to find one negative review on the internet on speakers and subwoofer.... Everybody that own a product will not review it bad for sure.

    Anyway I trust Furball for its opinion, I almost ordered b&w speaker only based on the reviews and user comments. When I went to listen to them, I was shocked that they were not like people were describing them.

    Polk subwoofer are very musical and delicate at the same time, but some people here like Big and powerful sub sound.

    I dont know any sub that can be at the same time fast, accurate, airy, go down low and clean and clear

    there is always compromise.
  • furball
    furball Posts: 234
    edited March 2008
    Speaking of subwoofer reviews...

    Every subwoofer ever made is supposed to have BOTH stellar and unstellar reviews on the net. It's when you ONLY find stellar reviews on the, then you start to suspect that there is something unwholesome about that particular sub.
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,644
    edited March 2008
    My subs (and not just because I am selling them) are the only subs i know that can do 115db at 20hz... and at the same time be faster than lightning with tone.

    They are great subs... alot of their abilities do that come from their design. They are sealed, push pull, with low compliance drivers.

    They also tune the PR down to like 15hz and load it in a slot port, so its a really cool design.

    VMPS makes fantastic subs.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.