Which would yield the better performance gain-high end interconnects or spk.wire?
Answers
-
-
Gosh, I'm so sorry that you feel I was only callously rude in my assessment. So, will Kelly_zbag_Montini be joining you in your safe space? Hey I know, you two can 3rd, 4th and 5th yourselves until Mr. Rogers comes on and after your nap time you can play pattycake.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
Ken Brydson got a question for ya- Just out of curiosity why is that when I click your profile I see F1's picture as listed as a profile picture change Normally I wouldn't ask but I thought it may bear relevance to your picture post featuring Monty Python .good movie like the cow toss,although they should've used a bull as its a good way to fling the s__t
None of your business....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8yjNbcKkNY -
-
Good Intellectual comeback truthfully I expected more from a man of your stature I guess its limited to the audio genre only. PS- I didn't start the fire its been burning since this post was churning
-
The pattycake queen has spoken.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
Ken Brydson got a question for ya- Just out of curiosity why is that when I click your profile I see F1's picture as listed as a profile picture change Normally I wouldn't ask but I thought it may bear relevance to your picture post featuring Monty Python .good movie like the cow toss,although they should've used a bull as its a good way to fling the s__t
No relevance at all....just a co inky dink. -
I bear all due respect and bow before the almighty Polk king
Me? Noooooooo! I'm just a court jester! -
-
Home Theater
Parasound Halo A 31 OnkyoTX-NR838 Sony XBR55X850B 55" 4K RtiA9 Fronts CsiA6 Center RtiA3 Rears FxiA6 Side Surrounds Dual Psw 111's Oppo 105D Signal Ultra Speaker Cables & IC's Signal Magic Power Cable Technics SL Q300 Panamax MR4300 Audioquest Chocolate HDMI Cables Audioquest Forest USB Cable
2 Channel
Adcom 555II Vincent SA-T1 Marantz SA 15S2 Denon DR-M11 Clearaudio Bluemotion SDA 2.3tl's (Z) edition MIT Terminator II Speaker Cables & IC's Adcom 545II Adcom Gtp-450 Marantz CD5004 Technics M245X SDA 2B's, SDA CRS+
Stuff for the Head
JD LABS C5 Headphone Amplifier, Sennheiser HD 598, Polk Audio Buckle, Polk Audio Hinge, Velodyne vPulse, Bose IE2, Sennheiser CX 200 Street II, Sennheiser MX 365
Shower & Off the beaten path Rigs
Polk Audio Boom Swimmer, Polk Audio Urchin -
Home Theater
Parasound Halo A 31 OnkyoTX-NR838 Sony XBR55X850B 55" 4K RtiA9 Fronts CsiA6 Center RtiA3 Rears FxiA6 Side Surrounds Dual Psw 111's Oppo 105D Signal Ultra Speaker Cables & IC's Signal Magic Power Cable Technics SL Q300 Panamax MR4300 Audioquest Chocolate HDMI Cables Audioquest Forest USB Cable
2 Channel
Adcom 555II Vincent SA-T1 Marantz SA 15S2 Denon DR-M11 Clearaudio Bluemotion SDA 2.3tl's (Z) edition MIT Terminator II Speaker Cables & IC's Adcom 545II Adcom Gtp-450 Marantz CD5004 Technics M245X SDA 2B's, SDA CRS+
Stuff for the Head
JD LABS C5 Headphone Amplifier, Sennheiser HD 598, Polk Audio Buckle, Polk Audio Hinge, Velodyne vPulse, Bose IE2, Sennheiser CX 200 Street II, Sennheiser MX 365
Shower & Off the beaten path Rigs
Polk Audio Boom Swimmer, Polk Audio Urchin -
The most important thing is to make sure you have the interconnects and speakers cables connected with the arrows going in the right direction on all your components and speakers. That is regardless off how much your cables and components cost. I've heard systems at the extreme high end turn to crap simply because they plugged one cable in opposite the other and the electronics flowing through the cable were going in the wrong direction.
-
afterburnt wrote: »I don't really give a carp what he thinks about cables. I will debate him all day on the merits of one hot dog over another.
That is the perfect response in a forum thread. People won't know if that is intentional or a typo.
How about a trout or a flounder?
-
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPolitical Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
Here's something on the net concerning cable that some members might find of interest;-[Quantifying the performance ]- A key element missing when discussing the performance of audio cable was the ability to quantify the performance through test results,Then through our Rand D we came to develop the efficiency scale.A test and measurement program that correlates the sonic qualities of the cable with bench test performance,Using proprietary software designed by us and assisted by HP we are now able to measure the networks complex impedance,and phase and calculate its in phase power and losses.These factors show the efficiency a given audio network or cable will pass the signal from input to output. We were now able to combine these results into a single graph to characterize and correlate a networks sonic performance to what the Ear Hears!
UM, they've been measuring that for some time, it's nothing new and many cable builders take that all into consideration and much further still.
I don't see what test can compare anything to human hearing as like we say, the human hearing part is a moving target. I know of no test, measuring instrument that can graph soundstage width/height/depth, place instruments on a stage, measure the tone of the notes or air around them.
This really is a subject that one has to experience for themselves. Once you start with "Here's something on the net", your already behind the 8 ball. Go get your ears on a variety, you don't even have to buy anything. Hi-fi shops, Polk members who host little get togethers. Ask on the forum who's close to you, put aside a couple hours to chew the fat and listen. Get signed up when we do demo rounds of cables or other gear. Only cost ya shipping as a way to get your ears on stuff.
HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
Good Morning Sunshine
Sunshine ? My outstanding personality doesn't wake up until the 2nd pot of coffee.
HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
Tonyb is the resident curmudgeon and get off my lawn guy.
-
Tonyb is the resident curmudgeon and get off my lawn guy.Tonyb is the resident curmudgeon and get off my lawn guy.
Don't let my relaxed disposition fool you Russ, I've already killed you like 3 times in my head. lolHT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
thanks I enjoyed that, its been awhile!2 ch- Polk CRS+ * Vincent SA-31MK Preamp * Vincent Sp-331 Amp * Marantz SA8005 SACD * Project Xperience Classic TT * Sumiko Blue Point #2 MC cartridge
HT - Polk 703's * NAD T-758 * Adcom 5503 * Oppo 103 * Samsung 60" series 8 LCD -
My 2cents which is probably overpriced by a cent a half. I'm in the cables sure do make a difference camp because I've "seen" them work. This is in addition to hearing them make a difference. Case in point I was using what I thought were decent interconnects but there was a problem somewhere with the sound that I could not pinpoint. I swapped out interconnects and the problem quickly became apparent. There was one driver that was wired out of phase on one of my 2.3s. The not so good cables weren't up to task of making this bo-bo noticeable for a couple months. But within the first 5 minutes of the new ones being installed I could see that one driver not operating in unison with the rest of the array. That was all the proof I needed to see.
Now what about those hot dogs? I'm also partial to Nathans -
For 2 channel listening, whomever on this site came up with 'everything matters' has hit the nail on the head. If and that is a big if, you are wanting to search for synergy in your system to your ears, everything matters, from components to interconnects to speaker wires. Pretty simple.McCormack DNA-1 Amp, Parasound Halo P5 Pre Amp, Denon DVD 2900 CD player, Adcom GDA 700 DAC, VPI Traveler TT with Denon 103R cartridge, Lounge Audio MKiii phono pre and Copla SUT, Polk SDA SRS 3.1 TL speakers, Tributaries series 8 IC's and speaker cable.
-
Tony b- Since you took the time to respond to my posting on the other relevant thread I'll respond in kind and re-post my reply to your post here to: I'm curious to see how many other members agree with all your viewpoints on this subject. I'll admit I don't know Much on this subject and I may prove naive but I posted it because I believe what I read!!--[read]past tense implied [red] Hope to hear some feedback but please be aware I was referring to the issue of cable only in relation to my reference to what i copied from the net in my previous post
No, you believe what you want to believe and read what supports the conclusions you've already subscribed to. If you simply believe everything you read, go read cable manufacturers marketing and reviews. How do you decipher the different opinions you'll read ?....if you truly believe everything you read.
Stevieb,
Great post. A little here and a little there all adds up to something bigger. Hence the everything matters we keep throwing around.HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
@steveB, how well does the A23 drive those 3.1tl's?The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
It is imperative that we recognize that an opinion is not a fact. -
Tony maybe you could help me to interpret what was implied in the phrase "Audio Networks" in the net page I sited.
I assume they mean audio systems, with network being the various ways you connect a system such as USB, Digital, analog, etc.
It also states at the beginning, "- A key element missing when discussing the performance of audio cable was the ability to quantify the performance through test results"
There is no way to quantify anything that is subjective.....and that discussion is not missing from cable debates. I can no longer suggest to you that Spam is the next best thing since sliced bread. You may like Spam, your family may like spam. You can all get together in a room and taste test against something else and come away with Spam is great. I hate spam....so what. The only test that matters is the one YOU do, in YOUR home, on Your gear with YOUR ears.
Your reading too deep into these internet articles. You can find anything on the internet for or against anything. It's your ears that have to be pleased, not someone elses.
HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!
Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
[sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash] -
here is a chance for the all cables are the same crowd to prove it.
http://www.ap.com/
get back to me w/ your results. Hopefully, you will use the scientific
method in your testing. -
motorhead43026 wrote: »@steveB, how well does the A23 drive those 3.1tl's?
McCormack DNA-1 Amp, Parasound Halo P5 Pre Amp, Denon DVD 2900 CD player, Adcom GDA 700 DAC, VPI Traveler TT with Denon 103R cartridge, Lounge Audio MKiii phono pre and Copla SUT, Polk SDA SRS 3.1 TL speakers, Tributaries series 8 IC's and speaker cable. -
In some cases its the nuances in the presentation of the sound that is of a subjective factor to the listener. And in some other cases its in the way that varying components contribute to the presentation of the sound that is of a subjective quality to the listener
....and in some cases, both. The degree of those nuances though vary, and many things contribute.
HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's
This discussion has been closed.