Best Of

dromunds wrote: »

Lighten up, Francis. You said, “it was garbage as it came from Polk originally.” That’s what I was responding to. And yeah, I’ve owned Monitor 4’s. As I’ve said many times on this forum, probably most recently when I reviewed the L200’s, I couldn’t believe what those little boxes produced, particularly the bass, and I think they may be my favorite of the monitors from that lineage other than the Monitor 7’s. I just recently gave them to a friend of mine in Colorado Springs who loves them as well. I’ve had pretty much all those Monitors and still have a pair of Monitor 5 Peerless, Monitor 7 Peerless, Monitor 7C’s, and I own or have owned a boatload of other Polk as well as other bookies, up to and including L200’s. And I’ve owned stereos since about 1970, so I dont have to rely on articles from that time period, I’ve lived it Sparky. If someone wants to disagree on the relevant merits of a speaker so be it, beauty is in eye of the beholder, but the Monitor 4’s were not garbage as they came from Polk originally.