Best Of
Re: My 2024 Polk SDA 2b Modification Progress Thread (Drop1)
What if you moved the upper dowel rods to the midpoint between the mid-woofer and the passive?
pitdogg2
1 ·
Re: My 2024 Polk SDA 2b Modification Progress Thread (Drop1)
2 likes and an agree. I'll prob go ahead.
drop1
1 ·
David Chesky on "ringing"
Here is a quote I found on the 'GoN that I found to be very interesting.
Every once in a while, the 'GoN will have something that actually interests me and this particular post that was presented by someone else, included this quote from Chesky. I found it intriguing. It is kind of hard to put your finger on why vinyl has a different, pleasing sound to it over other sources (besides maybe RTR). It's kind of hard to describe why I like that "bell", as you all call it, sitting right in front of my rig.
What he says here, might just touch on why. This is an open ended discussion and going off topic, while staying somewhat on topic is welcome. He hits on many different points here.
Joshua, at JMW Acoustics kinda has the same philosophy. While Magico goes to one end of the spectrum to reduce or eliminate all ringing in their speakers, Josh is the exact opposite. He wants to hear the ringing. He wants to tune his speakers to the drivers, to include the ringing....and that's how he designs and voices his speakers. Maybe this is why those who listen to his speakers like them so much. They are not fatiguing at all, even at loud volumes, after hours and hours of listening.
What are your thoughts?
Tom
The World is a Bell, and it wants to RING!
Walk up to a piano, strike a single key, and listen closely. What you hear is not just a note — it’s a sympathetic vibration, a resonance that arises because the string naturally wants to vibrate at its fundamental frequency. The same happens with a guitar, a drum, a wine glass, or even a sheet of metal. Everything in our physical world has a resonant frequency, a natural mode of vibration, a note it wants to sing. The universe is, quite literally, a concert of ringing.
Audio reproduction is no different.
Your loudspeaker box is the most obvious example — a large resonant cavity with panels that flex and radiate sound in unintended ways. But it's not just the box. Your amplifier chassis, your cables, your digital-to-analog converter (DAC), even the circuit boards and power transformers — everything vibrates, and thus everything rings.
This became viscerally apparent to me recently in the studio while comparing linear-phase equalizers to minimum-phase EQs. Set to identical filter shapes, the sonic difference was striking. Linear-phase filters preserve phase relationships across the spectrum but introduce pre-ringing artifacts — a kind of temporal smear that occurs before the transient. Minimum-phase filters, by contrast, do all their damage after the transient, creating post-ringing that, while technically less "accurate," can feel more musically natural to the ear.
The ear can hear this ringing — not as an overt tone, but as a kind of blur, a clouding of the leading edge of a note, an inability to localize or feel immediacy. And this is just from a software filter. Now imagine the cumulative effect of every physical object in the playback chain doing its own version of ringing, from capacitors to cables, from enclosures to air gaps.
This may also explain why people still love vinyl. LP playback is, from a technical standpoint, riddled with flaws — mechanical noise, surface wear, channel crosstalk, limited dynamic range. And yet, it's emotionally engaging. Why?
Because analog never stops ringing. The cartridge, the stylus, the cantilever, the headshell, and the tonearm are all mechanical resonators that don't just start and stop. They sing along with the music. They fill in the gaps — not with data, but with sympathetic overtones and a kind of musical sugar that pleases the brain. There's a reason maple syrup and salt taste good together in the morning: we crave harmonic density. LPs, in a sense, continue the sound beyond the note — a sonic metaphor for warmth, continuity, and presence.
So what is accurate?
That’s the philosophical core of this discussion. You can measure a flat frequency response, perfect impulse behavior, or total harmonic distortion below 0.0001%. But no measurement can capture the cumulative psychoacoustic impact of all the materials, mechanics, and algorithms in your playback chain. The ringing, the resonance, the interactions — they are systemic and emergent, not linear or isolated.
The signal is not the music. The music is what happens after the signal passes through your chain of resonating objects and arrives in your emotionally perceptive brain.
So the question is not merely what is accurate, but rather:
What is beautiful? What is meaningful? What moves you?
Because in the end, the world is a bell — and it wants to ring.
- David Chesky
Every once in a while, the 'GoN will have something that actually interests me and this particular post that was presented by someone else, included this quote from Chesky. I found it intriguing. It is kind of hard to put your finger on why vinyl has a different, pleasing sound to it over other sources (besides maybe RTR). It's kind of hard to describe why I like that "bell", as you all call it, sitting right in front of my rig.
What he says here, might just touch on why. This is an open ended discussion and going off topic, while staying somewhat on topic is welcome. He hits on many different points here.
Joshua, at JMW Acoustics kinda has the same philosophy. While Magico goes to one end of the spectrum to reduce or eliminate all ringing in their speakers, Josh is the exact opposite. He wants to hear the ringing. He wants to tune his speakers to the drivers, to include the ringing....and that's how he designs and voices his speakers. Maybe this is why those who listen to his speakers like them so much. They are not fatiguing at all, even at loud volumes, after hours and hours of listening.
What are your thoughts?
Tom
treitz3
3 ·
Re: ES20 or ES55?
Went with the ES55 and Im legit blown away. Never had towers before and these hit amazing in movies and sound amazing with music also
5 ·
Re: ES20 or ES55?
Welcome to Club Polk. Congratulations on your new gear. New toys are always fun in this hobby!
Tom
Tom
treitz3
1 ·
Re: ES20 or ES55?
That’s great, glad you got what you were looking for
Welcome to Club Polk
Welcome to Club Polk
txcoastal1
1 ·
Re: Everything Matters, Even with RTA 15TLs
Dude was as cool as dry ice!
I want a state police F150 interceptor!
I want a state police F150 interceptor!
pitdogg2
1 ·
Monitor series 7, new acquisition, new member
I have been trying to do a modest set up in my basement, which is unfinished, and serves as the smoking area of the house. So far, my system is a Pioneer RT-1020L reel tape deck, and the two Polk speakers I just got Saturday (09/13/25). I have the power source coming in the mail 09/15/25, a JVC JA-S44 integrated amp w/equalizer (45wpc). The Polks are pretty nice, with edge/corner damage in the back of speakers only, with the fronts of both like new. The grills are also fantastic.
Now, as to what model 7 series I have, other than the serial number sticker on the back saying just '7', I learned that pulling the tweeter and looking for the tweeter model #, and I find it's says SL2000, 1985.
Other than pulling out one tweeter for series model ID, I have not done anything else. The surrounds are nice (rubber materiel).
Inspections and tests on the to do list, check ohms on the tweeter and driver. Then inspect the crossover. Other than the seller demo-ing on a Sony (black) receiver to hear them (which as they are now, they sound good to this ole man with bad hearing), I will see about changing any caps or diodes? Oh, I got some nice speaker stands along with the sale. I really like the wood trim on the bottom of them. I really like the front cabs how they curve out, (ie. like advent bullnose??) sort of.
On the one tweeter I pulled, I see what looks like (stamp) M7 ??? (for Monitor 7)??
Well, in closing, I got these Polks picked out from a short list from FB marketplace I was shopping. (BA HD10, Advent 5002, BA 40, Polk Monitor 5). I am real glad I got the Monitor Seven.





Now, as to what model 7 series I have, other than the serial number sticker on the back saying just '7', I learned that pulling the tweeter and looking for the tweeter model #, and I find it's says SL2000, 1985.
Other than pulling out one tweeter for series model ID, I have not done anything else. The surrounds are nice (rubber materiel).
Inspections and tests on the to do list, check ohms on the tweeter and driver. Then inspect the crossover. Other than the seller demo-ing on a Sony (black) receiver to hear them (which as they are now, they sound good to this ole man with bad hearing), I will see about changing any caps or diodes? Oh, I got some nice speaker stands along with the sale. I really like the wood trim on the bottom of them. I really like the front cabs how they curve out, (ie. like advent bullnose??) sort of.
On the one tweeter I pulled, I see what looks like (stamp) M7 ??? (for Monitor 7)??
Well, in closing, I got these Polks picked out from a short list from FB marketplace I was shopping. (BA HD10, Advent 5002, BA 40, Polk Monitor 5). I am real glad I got the Monitor Seven.





3 ·
Re: Monitor series 7, new acquisition, new member
Hello @gkwolfman. Please allow me to offer you a very warm welcome to Club Polk!
Love the R2R as a source. Congrat's on what you have been able to assemble so far.
Tom
Love the R2R as a source. Congrat's on what you have been able to assemble so far.
Tom
treitz3
1 ·
