The Sound Of Hard Drive Enclosures

1246

Comments

  • heiney9heiney9 Posts: 24,124
    Imaginary substance and imaginary bickering.

    I am waiting for her to tell me why we have to have such nice stereo gear if it's all contrived in our minds from imaginary points in space. Why not a single speaker and then let our imagination run wild?

    Better yet, why does she own so many components and speakers if it's all just made up in our minds from imaginary points in space?

    H9

    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Plus DAC | MIT Shotgun S3 | MIT Z P/C's | updated SDA 1C| SQ Box Touch/Welbourne Labs P/S- Tubes add soul!
  • K_MK_M Posts: 1,507
    edited March 2017
    K_M wrote: »

    Oh wow, I was expecting you to at least use DK's favorite argument.
    Find scientific proof I am wrong, and at least 5 links proving your point.

    I get it, you took the easy way out and just name called.
    Clever!

    Please quote a single example of where I asked you to find scientific proof that I was in error. I asked you to provide scientific proof that you were right. The two are not the same thing.

    My favorite method of argument is to state a position, and then state my experiential and scientific basis for the position. In science, no one proves their position by asking others to prove them wrong. If someone has a contravening position, they should provide scientifically justification...not to prove someone else wrong...but to support their own position.

    I get it, you took the easy way out and just deflected from your inability to scientifically justify your position. Deceitful and dishonest!

    The fact that you have to make gross deflections, gross misrepresentations, and outright lie to make a point indicates that you don't have confidence in your positions.

    It appears to me that you have nothing of substance to contribute to this thread other than bickering.

    You are obviously missing the humor I intended. Completely.

    No one (including me) cares if I am right or wrong, I never said I was. I asked Multiple times where you got this training you keep referring to, and simply wondered "aloud" as to why not use Blind testing.
    It was a simple question.
    I never heard of Training Bias away, was all I meant.

    I never said I cared or like it better or worse, or care about blind testing.
    Simply blind tends to remove bias, and your training, I can find zero information about, inluding from you personally.
    Was it me questioning where you got your "Training" that started all of this?

    Still waiting patiently for the answer!
    (Not out to get you, simply curious what training removes bias, back to the ACTUAL question...lol)
    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-Sold
    Electro Voice EV-SIX
    Infinity-Sold
    Advent-Now gone
    Yamaha A-S801
    Yamaha RX-V377
    Yamaha RX-A860
    Yamaha RX-A3060
    Harman Kardon Hk-350i
    Harman Kardon Hk-........
    Harman Kardon PM-665
    Harman Kardon HK-775
    Pioneer.......Stereo Receiver

  • DarqueKnightDarqueKnight Posts: 6,602
    edited March 2017
    K_M wrote: »
    You are obviously missing the humor I intended. Completely.

    Oh, I see, now you are using the old, "I was just playing" dodge with a side order of "gaslighting".

    For those unfamiliar with the term:

    "Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or members of a group, hoping to make targets question their own memory, perception, and sanity."


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
    K_M wrote: »
    Again, where did you get this training?

    Have you passed tests or are certified?
    Is this a seminar, something online, something you created yourself?

    Like are you simply "willing" it away in your mind?

    All of these questions have been addressed thoroughly in this, and other, threads.

    I understand that you are frustrated by your inability to scientifically impugn my positions and that, to a much greater degree, you are embarrassed by your inability to scientifically articulate and justify your positions. As is typical, all that is left for you now is personal attacks to deflect from your inadequacies.

    I further understand that insults are the last refuge of the outwitted. Since this thread has gotten too "hot" for you, perhaps you should move on.
    "So hot it burns Mice!"~DK
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK
    "Those who irrationally rail against something or someone that is no threat to them, actually desire (or desire to be like) the thing or person they are railing against."~DK
  • I wonder how a researcher would evaluate what method of bias reduction is most effective.

    Still haven't seen where taking away the knowledge of what devices are under testing is problematic.
  • K_MK_M Posts: 1,507
    K_M wrote: »
    You are obviously missing the humor I intended. Completely.

    Oh, I see, now you are using the old, "I was just playing" dodge with a side order of "gaslighting".

    For those unfamiliar with the term:

    "Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or members of a group, hoping to make targets question their own memory, perception, and sanity."


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
    K_M wrote: »
    Again, where did you get this training?

    Have you passed tests or are certified?
    Is this a seminar, something online, something you created yourself?

    Like are you simply "willing" it away in your mind?

    All of these questions have been addressed thoroughly in this, and other, threads.

    I understand that you are frustrated by your inability to scientifically impugn my positions and that, to a much greater degree, you are embarrassed by your inability to scientifically articulate and justify your positions. As is typical, all that is left for you now is personal attacks to deflect from your inadequacies.

    I further understand that insults are the last refuge of the outwitted. Since this thread has gotten too "hot" for you, perhaps you should move on.

    I made no insults at all.

    I have no position for nor against you. I asked a question multiple times, do not see an answer.

    Again, How and where did you do this training. You elaborate on everything but this one simple question.

    Are you not able to answer it for some reason?
    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-Sold
    Electro Voice EV-SIX
    Infinity-Sold
    Advent-Now gone
    Yamaha A-S801
    Yamaha RX-V377
    Yamaha RX-A860
    Yamaha RX-A3060
    Harman Kardon Hk-350i
    Harman Kardon Hk-........
    Harman Kardon PM-665
    Harman Kardon HK-775
    Pioneer.......Stereo Receiver

  • DarqueKnightDarqueKnight Posts: 6,602

    Still haven't seen where taking away the knowledge of what devices are under testing is problematic.

    It is not that it's problematic, it is that it is unnecessary. I have already provided the scientific basis for this. Good luck.


    "So hot it burns Mice!"~DK
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK
    "Those who irrationally rail against something or someone that is no threat to them, actually desire (or desire to be like) the thing or person they are railing against."~DK

  • Still haven't seen where taking away the knowledge of what devices are under testing is problematic.

    It is not that it's problematic, it is that it is unnecessary. I have already provided the scientific basis for this. Good luck.


    You really haven't supported your position. I've asked two times now how a 30% bias reduction (your quote) is equivalent to removing knowledge of the DUT from the participant.

    Mark Waldrep released tracks @ various encoding formats and participants didn't need to know what encoding rates the various tracks were to properly evaluate. This blinding was actually key to this.

  • DarqueKnightDarqueKnight Posts: 6,602
    K_M wrote: »
    I asked a question multiple times, do not see an answer.

    Again, How and where did you do this training. You elaborate on everything but this one simple question.

    Are you not able to answer it for some reason?

    Didn't I say that I had already answered this question IN THIS THREAD? :s

    Are you not able to read and comprehend for some reason? :s

    So sad.
    "So hot it burns Mice!"~DK
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK
    "Those who irrationally rail against something or someone that is no threat to them, actually desire (or desire to be like) the thing or person they are railing against."~DK
  • DarqueKnightDarqueKnight Posts: 6,602
    edited March 2017
    You really haven't supported your position. I've asked two times now how a 30% bias reduction (your quote) is equivalent to removing knowledge of the DUT from the participant.

    Now you have given me cause to wonder if your forum screen name is in reference to your IQ.

    As with any concept, some people will "get it" and others won't, no matter how many times and ways the concept is explained.

    Again, good luck with your studies.
    "So hot it burns Mice!"~DK
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK
    "Those who irrationally rail against something or someone that is no threat to them, actually desire (or desire to be like) the thing or person they are railing against."~DK
  • ZLTFULZLTFUL Posts: 5,103
    Fun fact, look at the way a symphony orchestra is laid out.
    The reason it is laid out in such a manner is because certain instruments produce certain sounds in the frequency range and thus arrive at the listener at different times. Arranging the symphony in this way reduces the differences so that these sounds arrive at the listener as closely to the same time as possible.

    To think that there is no such thing as imaging or soundstage in a live performance (and in the stereophonic methods of *reproducing* said stereophonic performances) is naive at best and flat out ignorant at worst.

    "Some people find it easier to be conceited rather than correct."

    "Unwad those panties and have a good time man. We're all here to help each other, no matter how it might appear." DSkip
  • K_MK_M Posts: 1,507
    edited March 2017
    K_M wrote: »
    I asked a question multiple times, do not see an answer.

    Again, How and where did you do this training. You elaborate on everything but this one simple question.

    Are you not able to answer it for some reason?

    Didn't I say that I had already answered this question IN THIS THREAD? :s

    Are you not able to read and comprehend for some reason? :s

    So sad.

    Sorry, only found a Google link to "Debiasing", you provided, and some stuff you copied and pasted from the google article itself.

    No actual mention of what training you took, where, when, or what it involved.

    Is there another reference you made that answers that specifically, I am not seeing?
    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-Sold
    Electro Voice EV-SIX
    Infinity-Sold
    Advent-Now gone
    Yamaha A-S801
    Yamaha RX-V377
    Yamaha RX-A860
    Yamaha RX-A3060
    Harman Kardon Hk-350i
    Harman Kardon Hk-........
    Harman Kardon PM-665
    Harman Kardon HK-775
    Pioneer.......Stereo Receiver

  • You really haven't supported your position. I've asked two times now how a 30% bias reduction (your quote) is equivalent to removing knowledge of the DUT from the participant.

    Now you have given me cause to wonder if your forum screen name is in reference to your IQ.

    As with any concept, some people will "get it" and others won't, no matter how many times and ways the concept is explained.

    Again, good luck with your studies.

    Say you have a person/s that think blue jacketed cables sound terrible

    Do you train them to de-bias that thinking?

    Do you simply remove from them the knowledge of the color of the cable?
  • K_MK_M Posts: 1,507
    You really haven't supported your position. I've asked two times now how a 30% bias reduction (your quote) is equivalent to removing knowledge of the DUT from the participant.

    Now you have given me cause to wonder if your forum screen name is in reference to your IQ.

    As with any concept, some people will "get it" and others won't, no matter how many times and ways the concept is explained.

    Again, good luck with your studies.

    Is it really necessary to insult people that are merely discussing something with you?

    Seriously, you lost me totally with this comment. Uncalled for.
    Get some sensitivity training.

    Gonna find it very hard to take you seriously, after rude comments to me and that guy.
    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-Sold
    Electro Voice EV-SIX
    Infinity-Sold
    Advent-Now gone
    Yamaha A-S801
    Yamaha RX-V377
    Yamaha RX-A860
    Yamaha RX-A3060
    Harman Kardon Hk-350i
    Harman Kardon Hk-........
    Harman Kardon PM-665
    Harman Kardon HK-775
    Pioneer.......Stereo Receiver

  • ZLTFULZLTFUL Posts: 5,103
    Says the biggest passive-aggressive insulter of them all. @K_M you really need some time for self inspection before you can start throwing around hypocritical accusations.
    "Some people find it easier to be conceited rather than correct."

    "Unwad those panties and have a good time man. We're all here to help each other, no matter how it might appear." DSkip
  • DarqueKnightDarqueKnight Posts: 6,602
    Getting back to the subject of hard drive enclosures:

    I made the following inquiry to Sabrent about a upgrade power supply for my enclosure and their response is shown:

    Question from me:

    "I am using my EC-UEIS7 to house a 2TB hard drive that contains digital music files. The enclosure is connected by eSATA cable to a music server. I would like to upgrade the power supply to a higher quality, low noise power supply. Do you offer such a power supply or can you suggest options that will work with the EC-UEIS7?"

    Answer from Sabrent:

    "Thank you for contacting us at Sabrent.
    Sorry but we only recommend using it with the included power.
    The power adapter shouldn’t be making any sounds.
    The enclosure does have a fan so it will make a little noise."


    ***Big Sigh*** :/
    "So hot it burns Mice!"~DK
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK
    "Those who irrationally rail against something or someone that is no threat to them, actually desire (or desire to be like) the thing or person they are railing against."~DK
  • Why don't you do away with physical connection and go with network attached storage and wireless?

    If you are that concerned about electrical noised and mixed signal systems wireless seems like a really good approach.

  • txcoastal1txcoastal1 Posts: 10,612
    Possibly dependent on the DSD rips
    2-channel: Modwright KWI-200 Integrated, Dynaudio C1-II Signatures
    Desktop rig: LSi7, Polk 110sub, Dayens Ampino amp, W4S DAC/pre, Sonos, JRiver
    Gear on standby: Melody 101 tube pre, Unison Research Simply Italy Integrated
    Gone to new homes: (Matt Polk's)Threshold Stasis SA12e monoblocks, Pass XA30.5 amp, Usher MD2 speakers, Dynaudio C4 platinum speakers, Modwright LS100 (voltz), Simaudio 780D DAC
  • txcoastal1 wrote: »
    Possibly dependent on the DSD rips

    You can get very high throughput, and certainly low latency wireless.

    I'm hitting on average 38MB/s with a $14 adapter with ping rates sub 1ms.
  • txcoastal1txcoastal1 Posts: 10,612
    Many DAC's will only see DSD-64 via NAS
    Many DACs only see DSD via USB
    2-channel: Modwright KWI-200 Integrated, Dynaudio C1-II Signatures
    Desktop rig: LSi7, Polk 110sub, Dayens Ampino amp, W4S DAC/pre, Sonos, JRiver
    Gear on standby: Melody 101 tube pre, Unison Research Simply Italy Integrated
    Gone to new homes: (Matt Polk's)Threshold Stasis SA12e monoblocks, Pass XA30.5 amp, Usher MD2 speakers, Dynaudio C4 platinum speakers, Modwright LS100 (voltz), Simaudio 780D DAC
  • DarqueKnightDarqueKnight Posts: 6,602
    edited March 2017
    Why don't you do away with physical connection and go with network attached storage and wireless?

    If you are that concerned about electrical noised and mixed signal systems wireless seems like a really good approach.

    A wireless NAS is something on my list of future investigations.

    Wireless transmission has its own set of noise issues, although I am not sure they are of the type that would affect sound quality.

    The noise I was concerned about in the previous post was electrical noise from the power supply.
    DarqueKnight:

    I've been reading through some of your claims that "through training" our bias can be removed. This statement is too strong. Through training, we may reduce, but certainly not eliminate our bias. Nor can we eliminate our past history and our best guess judgments from coloring how we approach today and the future.

    When I was in accounting and auditing, we followed GAAP and strict auditing procedures. Everything I did was reviewed by at least one other professional. The entire audit was planned, supervised, and carefully reviewed. We documented everything. Despite our best efforts, we could not eliminate the risk of audit error. We could only reduce it.

    It appears that you might be confusing bias with error. Bias is the tendency of a procedure or process to over-estimate or under-estimate a measurement. Error is the amount of deviation from a true value. An accounting error would not be an example of bias unless the accounting process had a tendency to consistently over-estimate or under-estimate true values.

    Again, for the 1,000,000th time, I never said that eliminating bias was necessary. It is the EFFECT of bias that must be removed. It is the same principle as being inside an air conditioned office and working comfortably during a 100 degree, 100% humidity day. Did you remove the sun's heat? No. You removed the effect of the sun's heat on your body.

    With regard to audio, the basic measurements I use are:

    1. Height, width, and depth of sound stage.
    2. Clarity and detail of sound images.
    3. Palpability (realistic sonic weight) of sound images.
    4. Tactile sensation.
    5. Bass quality: weight, articulation, and detail.

    In view of the above measurements, the cost, appearance, and brand name of an audio component are irrelevant. If a less expensive, less attractive, less prestigious brand of amplifier generates a larger, more life size, more lifelike, more holographic, more three dimensional sound stage than an uber-expensive, diamond encrusted, boutique brand amplifier, I am not going to lie to myself and say the lateral width of the expensive amp's sound stage is 20 feet when I know I don't hear anything outside of 15 feet.

    It also appears that you did not really read my prior comments. Maybe you just glanced over them. I plainly stated what my biases were and what my selection criteria were. With regard to the subject of this thread, I ended up choosing equipment alternatives, based on the selection criteria, that were in opposition to my personal biases. This is not the only thread where I have documented such an occurrence.

    The issue that all you have, that are gagging and choking on these concepts, is that you do not understand how stereophonic audio systems work. Without that understanding, you don't know what performance parameters to test. If you don't know what performance parameters to test, you can't possibly know what kind of test to use.

    That's all there is to it.
    "So hot it burns Mice!"~DK
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK
    "Those who irrationally rail against something or someone that is no threat to them, actually desire (or desire to be like) the thing or person they are railing against."~DK
  • littlewoodboatslittlewoodboats Posts: 808
    edited March 2017
    Its not an attack Ray they just don't get your thought process. The most briliant person I have met in my life was an EE. I can do analytical calculus in my head and am certain in your presence I am a moron.

    In Ray's own system he is able to hear differences and posts his thoughts.

    Ray simply offers his thoughts. Take them for what they are worth or don't but to argue testing methods with the man when he is testing within his own system is just silly.

    Thought and Bias are two different things. I "think" my OPPO is nice. If you brought your player to my house for a listen using the same media do you think we would both hear the same differences? In a perfect world we should. If I brought my player to your system could we sit and listen then hear the same differences? We should.

    I "think" my OPPO is nice but would a "bias" preclude me from hearing differences in the players?

    I love Ray for all he brings to the forum and at the same time thank the gods I do not have his critical listening thought process.

    Post edited by littlewoodboats on
  • DarqueKnightDarqueKnight Posts: 6,602

    Ray simply offers his thoughts. Take them for what they are worth or don't but to argue testing methods with the man when he is testing within his own system is just silly.

    There is nothing wrong with arguing about testing methods, as long as you can articulate a rational basis for what you are doing or what you believe. The silliness comes from saying things like "I tried ________ once and it didn't work, so I don't believe it worked for you" or "I believe ___________ because I read it on a popular website", or "I believe _________ because a lot of people accept it as truth".

    I always appreciate it when people take the time to write a thoughtful review. I never take it as they are saying that their results are what I, or everyone else, can achieve in their systems. If it sounds interesting, and plausible, I take their experiences as something that I might achieve.

    The enjoyment of stereo is not about proving to other people that you can hear certain things. It is about creating a reasonably accurate and satisfying reproduction of a musical performance in the home. That is why I disregard "reviews" and "technical articles" and "tests" that mention nothing at all about stereophonic performance.

    "So hot it burns Mice!"~DK
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK
    "Those who irrationally rail against something or someone that is no threat to them, actually desire (or desire to be like) the thing or person they are railing against."~DK
  • Absolute_ZeroAbsolute_Zero Posts: 73
    edited March 2017

    Ray simply offers his thoughts. Take them for what they are worth or don't but to argue testing methods with the man when he is testing within his own system is just silly.

    There is nothing wrong with arguing about testing methods, as long as you can articulate a rational basis for what you are doing or what you believe. The silliness comes from saying things like "I tried ________ once and it didn't work, so I don't believe it worked for you" or "I believe ___________ because I read it on a popular website", or "I believe _________ because a lot of people accept it as truth".

    I always appreciate it when people take the time to write a thoughtful review. I never take it as they are saying that their results are what I, or everyone else, can achieve in their systems. If it sounds interesting, and plausible, I take their experiences as something that I might achieve.

    The enjoyment of stereo is not about proving to other people that you can hear certain things. It is about creating a reasonably accurate and satisfying reproduction of a musical performance in the home. That is why I disregard "reviews" and "technical articles" and "tests" that mention nothing at all about stereophonic performance.

    Dr. Sean Olive (Harman Listening Lab) talks about The Dishonesty of Sighted Evaluation:

    A Blind Versus Sighted Loudspeaker Experiment

    This question was tested in 1994, shortly after I joined Harman International as Manager of Subjective Evaluation [1]. My mission was to introduce formalized, double-blind product testing at Harman. To my surprise, this mandate met rather strong opposition from some of the more entrenched marketing, sales and engineering staff who felt that, as trained audio professionals, they were immune from the influence of sighted biases. Unfortunately, at that time there were no published scientific studies in the audio literature to either support or refute their claims, so a listening experiment was designed to directly test this hypothesis. The details of this test are described in references 1 and 2.

    Just wanted to post another point of view.




  • K_MK_M Posts: 1,507
    Its not an attack Ray they just don't get your thought process. The most briliant person I have met in my life was an EE. I can do analytical calculus in my head and am certain in your presence I am a moron.

    No, even far simpler. People do not ever all agree. Just how it is.
    Go to other audio forums, views are all over the place.

    Has nothing to do with "Getting" someone's thought process, has to do with the fact that everyone will never agree on many things.

    Has virtually nothing to do with brilliance or intelligence either.
    Discussing and debating ideas and theories and methods can be fun and educational.
    There is no totally right and wrong answer or method.





    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-Sold
    Electro Voice EV-SIX
    Infinity-Sold
    Advent-Now gone
    Yamaha A-S801
    Yamaha RX-V377
    Yamaha RX-A860
    Yamaha RX-A3060
    Harman Kardon Hk-350i
    Harman Kardon Hk-........
    Harman Kardon PM-665
    Harman Kardon HK-775
    Pioneer.......Stereo Receiver

  • lightman1lightman1 Posts: 10,496
    hot dogs with ketchup
  • txcoastal1txcoastal1 Posts: 10,612
    edited March 2017
    lightman1 wrote: »
    hot dogs with ketchup

    WRONG....NEVER...MUSTARD YOU S-CH-MUCK...ONLY MUSTARD :p
    2-channel: Modwright KWI-200 Integrated, Dynaudio C1-II Signatures
    Desktop rig: LSi7, Polk 110sub, Dayens Ampino amp, W4S DAC/pre, Sonos, JRiver
    Gear on standby: Melody 101 tube pre, Unison Research Simply Italy Integrated
    Gone to new homes: (Matt Polk's)Threshold Stasis SA12e monoblocks, Pass XA30.5 amp, Usher MD2 speakers, Dynaudio C4 platinum speakers, Modwright LS100 (voltz), Simaudio 780D DAC
  • machonemachone Posts: 1,134
    DK,
    Why can't you purchase a better power supply with the same voltage/amps and build a cable?
    My experience has been very positive with cleaner/faster power supplies.
    Mojo Audio Illuminati v3>>Quantum Byte w/LMS>>Rpi/PiCoreplayer>> Starlight 7 USB >> Mojo Audio Mystique v2 SE>>ModWright SWL 9.0 SE Signature>>Hafler DH-500 Amp+ (Musical Concepts Fully Modded)>>
    SRS 2.3TL (Fully Modded)...SDA-1A (Fully Modded with Dimensional Tweeter Delete)
    1KVA Dreadnought
    Marantz SA 8005
    Pioneer PLX-1000 Turntable - Shure SC35C/N35X - V15III/VN35HE
    Yamaha TX-540 Tuner...Sony BDP-S570
    Sony PS4

    Separate subpanel with four dedicated 20 amp circuits.
    1. Amplification 2. Analog 3. Digital 4. Video

    "All THAT IS LOST FROM THE SOURCE IS LOST FOREVER"
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!