are bridged amps common ground?

1235

Comments

  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,083
    edited October 2007
    ka7niq wrote: »
    I DO own several Pro Amps Troy, along with several high end amps too.
    And I DO hear differences in amps, WHEN listening to them flat.
    However, try this.
    Get a pre amp with decent tone controls, and forget your "audiophile conceptions".
    Adjust a CD using the tone controls until it sounds it's best.
    Then listen.
    Then, substitute another amp, adjust tone controls again, then listen ?
    You might find that "differences" in amps suddenly disappear ?

    That's probably the most ridiculous statement that I've heard in a VERY long time.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • DarqueKnight
    DarqueKnight Posts: 6,765
    edited October 2007
    I'm mad at Jesse. PM him and ask why (if you don't know already).
    Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,195
    edited October 2007
    TroyD wrote:
    That's probably the most ridiculous statement that I've heard in a VERY long time.
    Agreed. This thread was a comic book. There are many more "quotes" that could be pointed out, but I have to admit, that's a good one.

    Hope all is well bro'.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,734
    edited October 2007
    I'm mad at Jesse. PM him and ask why (if you don't know already).

    Hehe.......
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • Systems
    Systems Posts: 14,873
    edited October 2007
    Huummm no more responses so my guess is the pleasant gentleman :D from Tampa must have lost his CP privelages.
    Testing
    Testing
    Testing
  • DarqueKnight
    DarqueKnight Posts: 6,765
    edited October 2007
    Alas, our "daddy", El Padre Loco, has been ex-communicated.
    Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!
  • analog97
    analog97 Posts: 328
    edited October 2007
    I started this thread asking advice on a simple question. Excellent advice quickly came in and confirmed my own experimentation. There is NO benefit to bridging the 125 watt Parasound amp and using it to drive a single 1.2 TL. It is much better to do the classic bi-amp configuration. So, thanks for your advice (again). :D Then, for some strange reason, this thread went South (pun intended to the Tampa guy). Nice to know there is an involved moderator. Thanks, whoever you are.
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited October 2007
    I think everyone made a point, but why don't you try it and see if you like it.

    BTW bridge amps are not common ground, so you will need what ever in that department.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,195
    edited October 2007
    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=27914&d=1191632749

    Is this Londonbarn? Chris Barnhardt? AKA ka7niq? If so, I feel bad for George having to endure such an asshat's presence.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,083
    edited October 2007
    No, that's Mark, aka dorokusai.

    I also think that they (barn and specK) are two seperate jerkoffs.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited October 2007
    No, neither are jerkoffs.

    George is a crackpot, and Mark is a dunderhead.
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • bikezappa
    bikezappa Posts: 2,463
    edited October 2007
    GV#27 wrote: »
    Yes more precisely it is capacitive,and inductive reactance that make up the complex impedance of a speaker.Because of this complex impedance that is made up of reactance and resistance you cannot using ohm's law accurately calculate the current requirements as though it were a pure 4 or 8 ohm resistor.

    Just to add a little more.

    E=IR is for DC voltages only not AC voltages

    E=I(impedance) is for any electrical circuit

    With a constant voltage the reactive inductance=resistance and the reactive capacitance=infinite resistance or open circuit.

    Impedance and Resistance use the same unit, Ohms.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,734
    edited October 2007
    Peter, you're a little late to the party ;)
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • bikezappa
    bikezappa Posts: 2,463
    edited October 2007
    F1nut wrote: »
    Peter, you're a little late to the party ;)

    It's the story of my life.
  • ka7niq
    ka7niq Posts: 577
    edited October 2007
    Shall we continue the amplifier current discussion ?
  • read-alot
    read-alot Posts: 812
    edited October 2007
    ka7niq wrote: »
    Shall we continue the amplifier current discussion ?


    And your little dog, too?

    Andyourlittledogtoo.jpg
    polkaudio SRS (rdo194 x 8)
    Dodd ELP (separate power supply)
    JC 1 blocks ( strapped )
    Rega Apollo
    MIT (speaker cables) Outlaw (ICs)

    polkaudio SDA2(rdo194x4) (front) polkaudio CRS (rdo194x4)(rear) polkaudio 400i (center)
    B&K 505
    Samsung LCD
    VIP 622
    HSU STF-2
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,204
    edited October 2007
    ka7niq wrote: »
    Shall we continue the amplifier current discussion ?

    Knock yourself out.......kind of a glutton for punishment. Let it go, would probably be best, but hey you have a new lease on life here thanks to Polk management.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • ka7niq
    ka7niq Posts: 577
    edited October 2007
    analog97 wrote: »
    I started this thread asking advice on a simple question. Excellent advice quickly came in and confirmed my own experimentation. There is NO benefit to bridging the 125 watt Parasound amp and using it to drive a single 1.2 TL. It is much better to do the classic bi-amp configuration. So, thanks for your advice (again). :D Then, for some strange reason, this thread went South (pun intended to the Tampa guy). Nice to know there is an involved moderator. Thanks, whoever you are.
    I have been unable to defend myself, but allow me to set the record straight.
    Yes, you did START this thread.
    There have been well over 100 posts in it, yet you haven't posted since post 18 in "your thread".
    No one "owns a thread" here BUT Polk Audio, and sometime they take on a life of their own.
    This thread "went south" starting with an insult by another poster, who slammed a guys amp because it had fans in it, and was of "pro sound heritage".
    It then turned into a heated amplifier current discussion.
  • strider
    strider Posts: 2,568
    edited October 2007
    [QUOTE=ka7niq;713244This thread "went south" starting with an insult by another poster, who slammed a guys amp because it had fans in it, and was of "pro sound heritage".
    [/QUOTE]

    Nice edit. :rolleyes:
    Wristwatch--->Crisco
  • ka7niq
    ka7niq Posts: 577
    edited October 2007
    strider wrote: »
    Nice edit. :rolleyes:
    The reason I edited is because it was someone else who actually started the thread going south with a personal shot at another poster.
  • Systems
    Systems Posts: 14,873
    edited October 2007
    ka7niq wrote: »
    Shall we continue the amplifier current discussion ?
    ok but play nice;)
    Testing
    Testing
    Testing
  • analog97
    analog97 Posts: 328
    edited October 2007
    I don't post a lot. Nor do I offer false pretense. My main interest is learning from the experience of senior Polksters, H9, DK, F1 and others come to mind. To them (and others) I am thankful. I certainly find the notion of my "owning a thread" to be quite disgusting. Have you heard the term "projection"? Not referring to A/V, of course.
  • ka7niq
    ka7niq Posts: 577
    edited October 2007
    analog97 wrote: »
    I don't post a lot. Nor do I offer false pretense. My main interest is learning from the experience of senior Polksters, H9, DK, F1 and others come to mind. To them (and others) I am thankful. I certainly find the notion of my "owning a thread" to be quite disgusting.
    Yes, so did I.
  • Systems
    Systems Posts: 14,873
    edited October 2007
    ka7niq wrote: »
    Shall we continue the amplifier current discussion ?
    OK so we left off with you claiming that by just using ohm's law you can predict the current requirements of a speaker. As I mentioned in a couple of posts that there was more to it than that.

    Here is a good read about said subject and it may well convince that your formula based approximations will not be accurate.See specifically the right column in the introduction.http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/cableInteractions.pdf



    Now lets keep any discussion civil THERE IS no need for flaming.Technical discussions can be fun and educational for all without the BS.
    Testing
    Testing
    Testing
  • ka7niq
    ka7niq Posts: 577
    edited October 2007
    GV#27 wrote: »
    OK so we left off with you claiming that by just using ohm's law you can predict the current requirements of a speaker. As I mentioned in a couple of posts that there was more to it than that.

    Here is a good read about said subject and it may well convince that your formula based approximations will not be accurate.See specifically the right column in the introduction.http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/cableInteractions.pdf



    Now lets keep any discussion civil THERE IS no need for flaming.Technical discussions can be fun and educational for all without the BS.
    It is the load that determines the current demands of an amplifier, and IF the load is known, current requirements can be predicted.
    Of course a speaker is not a perfect resistor.
    The PDF file you provided clearly shows the reference to Dr Matti Otala work.
    I take exception to the part that says an 8 ohm load drops to 1.2 ohms because of dynamic resistance.
    Maybe in a poorly designed crossover, or speaker with significant reactance.
    And WHAT amp will drive 1 ohm anyway, not many ?
    There will always be speakers ONLY certain amps will drive.
    But the majority of speakers are 4 or 8 ohms, and do not always require some welding machine to drive them.
    I think it safe to say that some speakers sound better with monster, high current amps, and some do not.

    Some feel that all things being equal, a smaller amp can often sound better then a big one, as long as it can properly drive the speaker in question.
    High Current amps have their place, and some speakers really do need them, but most do not.
    The LOAD is the boss, and it determines the current demands of any amp.
    If 6 amps is all that is called for by the load, and one amp can deliver 25 amps, and one deliver 100, all that is going to be passed is 6 amps of current.
    That is all that is being asked for.
    Any more, on this speaker, is a waste of money.
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited October 2007
    ...................
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • ka7niq
    ka7niq Posts: 577
    edited October 2007
  • Systems
    Systems Posts: 14,873
    edited October 2007
    Good reply.;)
    ka7niq wrote: »
    It is the load that determines the current demands of an amplifier, and IF the load is known, current requirements can be predicted.
    Of course a speaker is not a perfect resistor.
    Yes the problem is determining the actualload of some speakers.A standard impedance measurement may not tell the whole story.
    But the majority of speakers are 4 or 8 ohms, and do not always require some welding machine to drive them.
    Agreed and many designers at least with their budget models try to make their speakers easy loads for amps as they will likely be mated with low powered AVR's etc.
    Some feel that all things being equal, a smaller amp can often sound better then a big one, as long as it can properly drive the speaker in question.
    Certainly.
    High Current amps have their place, and some speakers really do need them,
    Yes ,this is the point that was trying to be delivered but you seemed to be saying previously that hi current amps where overkill and not necessary.
    The LOAD is the boss, and it determines the current demands of any amp.
    If 6 amps is all that is called for by the load, and one amp can deliver 25 amps, and one deliver 100, all that is going to be passed is 6 amps of current.
    That is all that is being asked for.
    Any more, on this speaker, is a waste of money.
    Keep in mind that in general amplifiers that have high current capability have been designed with a lot care in other performance aspects that may also improve its sound quality.For instance the power supplies are usually overdesigned with large transformers and big filter caps.Having large amounts of storage in the filter caps means the amp can better deal with heavy bass transients etc. even if the speaker is a nominal 8 ohms.
    Testing
    Testing
    Testing
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,734
    edited October 2007
    I'm your huckleberry.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • ka7niq
    ka7niq Posts: 577
    edited October 2007
    I think we are pretty much in agreement that high current amps DO have their place on some speakers.
    And, I MAY have said or implied they didn't too, which is in error.
    That is wrong, and I have been wrong before.

    I once had a Bedini 200/200, a monster of an amp.
    Weighed about 90 lbs.

    I had some speakers from Canada called Perkins, a 2 way with the tweeter mounted on a spring.

    They had zero bass, and i could not re sell em, so in the closet they went.

    When I got the Bedini 200/200 I had B&W 802 F's.

    I fried a tweeter one night on the 802's.

    The next day, in desperation, I pulled the Perkins out of the closet.

    Suprise Suprise, the big Bedini gave em bass.

    I was TOLD the Perkins were a 4 ohm load, but they were revealed to dip down below 2 ohms!

    My Hafler didn't like to go there, but the big Bedini got 'turned loose' by the Perkins 2 ohm load.

    Many consider some big Krells bright.
    I think the Krells have real power supplies that do not sag.

    A sagging power supply can cause an amp to roll off, or sound loose in the bass.