paris is going back to jail WOO HOO

13

Comments

  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,137
    edited June 2007
    jdhdiggs wrote: »
    Lets just say this, if you saw her in real life and you still have the hots for her, your probably a closet pediphile. :o

    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAA hahaha!!! Wait a minute, wow that's not funny!!!:o
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,437
    edited June 2007
    THX 3417 wrote: »
    Oh I should just a say a few nice things about her, let me think about that one I mean I have contributed to some relays on this site. Now about rich **** Hilton, I think not.:D


    My suggestion included, "Please" as I was trying to be nice about it, but you can't seem to take a hint.

    James was a little more direct,
    jdhdiggs wrote: »
    no crap, I mean you have 155 posts in like 12 days, most of which are complaining about Paris Hilton. Could you at least try to contribute something meaningful around here?

    Study that last sentence.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,335
    edited June 2007
    There are a line of prison **** just waiting to work her little muff over right now!
    Carl

  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,335
    edited June 2007
    rskarvan wrote: »
    I'm changing my view on Paris and her jail time.

    I hope that she gets to walk away with no additional jail time.
    The reason for this is that I think the justice system needs to be publicly humiliated. The fact that they can't keep this "simple life" stupid little rich bi#$H in jail should be made to be glaringly obvious to the public. I want Paris to prove that she has more pull/power than the judge. Then, the judge will get what he deserves for being part of a system that endangers society with drunk drivers. Perhaps only then, through public outrage, can we get some real judges elected to the court that know how to administer justice fairly for all.

    She was driving drunk with a suspended license! HELLO!!!!! She has a total disrespect for the legal system in this county. She needs to be calibrated. Most people go to jail for this!

    Carl

    Carl
    Carl

  • Bill Ayotte
    Bill Ayotte Posts: 1,860
    edited June 2007
    schwarcw wrote: »
    She was driving drunk with a suspended license! HELLO!!!!! She has a total disrespect for the legal system in this county. She needs to be calibrated. Most people go to jail for this!

    Carl

    Carl
    I have no doubt that she has complete disrespect for the legal system, but said system played into the frenzy by not sticking to a decision...

    I really just wish someone would make a decision and stick to it either way...All this is just feeding the Career of a talentless rich girl..No envy here, but I think she has enough money already, this is only going to make her more.
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,335
    edited June 2007
    I have no doubt that she has complete disrespect for the legal system, but said system played into the frenzy by not sticking to a decision...

    I really just wish someone would make a decision and stick to it either way...All this is just feeding the Career of a talentless rich girl..No envy here, but I think she has enough money already, this is only going to make her more.


    The decision was changed because someone was paid off! This sheriff received more gifts than the rest of the LAPD Sheriff's department COMBINED!!! He's a crook who was paid off!

    Carl
    Carl

  • Bill Ayotte
    Bill Ayotte Posts: 1,860
    edited June 2007
    schwarcw wrote: »
    The decision was changed because someone was paid off! This sheriff received more gifts than the rest of the LAPD Sheriff's department COMBINED!!! He's a crook who was paid off!

    Carl

    This is true, but nothing is being done to resolve that problem either. The only person involved who has maintained face in this is the judge who told her to get her **** back in jail. The system there is broken, and most likely has been for a long time...Hopefully there will be overhauling of the system down there after the dust settles on this...
  • mrbigbluelight
    mrbigbluelight Posts: 9,670
    edited June 2007
    Of course she won't serve her 45 days. Neither do the others who are sentenced to 45 days.
    If they keep their noses clean, they're usually out in about 15.
    So will she, under the same conditions.

    The scene of her sobbing in the car IS sad.
    The scenes you never see of the person who is sentenced to xx days, and can't get released to house arrest because "He feels ill" and has advanced AIDS is also sad.

    My guess, and it is strictly that, is that Paris is manic/depressive (or bipolar).
    That is nothing to take lightly, to be sure, but it isn't as bad IMO as advanced
    AIDS.

    We've all seen the pictures of Paris taking Brittany Spears out on the town, with Brittany's mini-skirt and shaved cooch.
    Brittany at the time was in the midst of a divorce hassle with Kevin whats-his-puss over alimony and child custody.
    I imagine she was also in the middle of a rather large depressed episode.

    So her "friend" Paris takes her out on the town, displays her wares for public viewing, and calls it a night.
    I'm sure that Paris made sure that the Spear's children were taken care of adequately during that period.
    :rolleyes:

    Just my opinion which, if you add $1, you can get a cup of coffee at McDonalds.

    The scene of Paris sobbing in the back of the cop car is sad, but it might be one of the best things that has ever happened to her.
    Sal Palooza
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,335
    edited June 2007
    The scene of Paris sobbing in the back of the cop car is sad, but it might be one of the best things that has ever happened to her.

    Sad????? Long overdue my friend. She's never been accountable for her actions.
    Carl

  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,335
    edited June 2007
    This is true, but nothing is being done to resolve that problem either.


    I think this guy is an elected official??? People need to hold their elected officials accountable for their blatant misuse of public office. How about bringing this guy to an ethics hearing? Time to sweat these celebrity kiss **** pukes. Maybe a little jail time for these public crooks would help!
    Carl

  • Bill Ayotte
    Bill Ayotte Posts: 1,860
    edited June 2007
    The best thing that could happen is that the fine people of California don't put this piece of **** back in office....
  • DarqueKnight
    DarqueKnight Posts: 6,765
    edited June 2007
    I know its "fun" to see the snobby, arrogant, rich girl get thrown in the slammer, but I really don't see any social value in jailing non-violent offenders.

    In this case, a stiff fine scaled to her economic status, house arrest or some type of half-way house, and proper psychological and drug counseling, (all at her expense). If she proved to be unresponsive to treatment for stopping the practice of driving while chemically impaired, then she should be placed in some type of controlled, stuctured environment where she won't be a danger to others, but not in jail with hardened, violent criminals.
    Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!
  • Bill Ayotte
    Bill Ayotte Posts: 1,860
    edited June 2007
    I know its "fun" to see the snobby, arrogant, rich girl get thrown in the slammer, but I really don't see any social value in jailing non-violent offenders.

    In this case, a stiff fine scaled to her economic status, house arrest or some type of half-way house, and proper psychological and drug counseling, (all at her expense). If she proved to be unresponsive to treatment for stopping the practice of driving while chemically impaired, then she should be placed in some type of controlled, stuctured environment where she won't be a danger to others, but not in jail with hardened, violent criminals.

    I think that this would be a much better sentence, but sometimes common sense doesn't prevail. Like I said above, I could care less what happens as long as there is a definitive decision, and it is followed. It looks like one hand is not talking to the other in this case, and one of the hands needs to be washed.
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited June 2007
    schwarcw wrote: »
    The decision was changed because someone was paid off! This sheriff received more gifts than the rest of the LAPD Sheriff's department COMBINED!!! He's a crook who was paid off!

    Carl

    Bull ****! The Sheriff want her out of his jail ASAP. What administrator running a jail the size of LA County's wants to put up with the crap this "prisoner" causes? The hype...the press...daily Paris updates, etc...etc... It is a huge PIA to deal with this sort of situation.

    Secondly, even before she served a single day there was talk of how most offenders of this type of crime only serve a couple of days until the jail fills up and the non-violent, misdemeanor prisoners are sent home with monitors (or released outright) to free up space.

    The real jerk (IMO) in this case is the "whiney" judge who got his panties in a wad because HIS sentence was affected. You must remember...this isn't a highly respected, high profile jurist here. He is a low level judge who has been handling arraignments and TRAFFIC court for 25 years. That is the bottom of the judge pool. The drama was overblown. A Balck and White with lights flashing, 9 armed officers in the court room. Was this Paris or the Unibomber? He isn't out to right the terrribly unfair justice system. This judge is using Paris to extend his "15 minutes of fame". He just needs to go on to the next "broken taillight" case and get over it and let the system take care of itself.
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • THX 3417
    THX 3417 Posts: 219
    edited June 2007
    Well I’m going to give the little rich spoiled lass, a break for now I mean lets all let her do her time only 44 days to go and then we can pick on her again but for now I’ve had enough of her. I feel sorry for the inmates that would hath to stuff there ears up listening to her moaning reverberating around the hollow walls, and the banging on the doors HILTON STFU!:D
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited June 2007
    I can imagine it now...Off the gate Hilton! On the noise Hilton!
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited June 2007

    In this case, a stiff fine scaled to her economic status, house arrest or some type of half-way house, and proper psychological and drug counseling, (all at her expense). If she proved to be unresponsive to treatment for stopping the practice of driving while chemically impaired, then she should be placed in some type of controlled, stuctured environment where she won't be a danger to others, but not in jail with hardened, violent criminals.

    I see your point, but dont really agree. I posted statistics in this thread or the other one, cant remember which one, of their being more people killed by drunk drivers than outright murder. So people like Paris kill more people than the person in the next cell who shot someone. She needs a wake up call, and so does everyone else who drives drunk. Besides, she has such a high profile she will never see someone in that jail that is violent, at all, unless is through a plexi window or on the other side of the bars.

    House arrest? For Paris Hilton? House arrest is good for people that arent rich and have big houses. Maybe a rehab center, but house arrest for her isnt a bad thing...she just cant go out and party, but is there something preventing her from having parties at her house? I'm not sure if theres a stipulation that prevents that, but if theres not, then she can still party every night(again assuming theres not a stipulation that would prevent that)
    -Cody
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,335
    edited June 2007
    shack wrote: »
    Bull ****! The Sheriff want her out of his jail ASAP. What administrator running a jail the size of LA County's wants to put up with the crap this "prisoner" causes? The hype...the press...daily Paris updates, etc...etc... It is a huge PIA to deal with this sort of situation.

    Secondly, even before she served a single day there was talk of how most offenders of this type of crime only serve a couple of days until the jail fills up and the non-violent, misdemeanor prisoners are sent home with monitors (or released outright) to free up space.

    The real jerk (IMO) in this case is the "whiney" judge who got his panties in a wad because HIS sentence was affected. You must remember...this isn't a highly respected, high profile jurist here. He is a low level judge who has been handling arraignments and TRAFFIC court for 25 years. That is the bottom of the judge pool. The drama was overblown. A Balck and White with lights flashing, 9 armed officers in the court room. Was this Paris or the Unibomber? He isn't out to right the terrribly unfair justice system. This judge is using Paris to extend his "15 minutes of fame". He just needs to go on to the next "broken taillight" case and get over it and let the system take care of itself.

    From the Associated Press:

    The newspaper also said he had accepted more than $42,000 in gifts since taking office, including some from those who do business with his department.

    In 2004, he took more gifts than California's other 57 sheriffs combined


    I think this guy can be bought.


    Carl
    Carl

  • THX 3417
    THX 3417 Posts: 219
    edited June 2007
    The whole point of prison system is to liberate you of all your personal privileges. Your there to do time and to think about what you did wrong!

    I don’t think she’s mentally competent to hold a drivers licence same apples to anyone who blags there way though a driving lesson and there final test. And she is one of those who as blaged her way though life. Honesty is the best policy!
  • Deadof_knight
    Deadof_knight Posts: 980
    edited June 2007
    You do the dcrime you do the time and all the little high profile princesses need to get their asses spanked hard !!!! Im glad she went serves her right and proves money cant always buy your way out.

    Can you imagine what they spent trying to keep outa jail though probably more than most of us make in a year hahahaha...better make nice while your in there honey ....and look out Lindsay your next honey !!
    :cool: " He who dies with the most equipment wins Right ? "

    Denon 3300 Adcom 535 BBe w/sub out 1 pr 4.6s 2 pr of 4 jrs Recent additions Samsung Lns-4095D LCD, Samsung hd-960 DVD, Monster HT-5000 Power center
    ,HPSA-1000 18" sealed DiY home sub.:D
    Black Laquer 1.2tl's w/ upgraded x-overs and Tweets BI-Amped with 2 Carver tfm-35's Knukonceptz 10ga cables
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited June 2007
    schwarcw wrote: »
    From the Associated Press:

    The newspaper also said he had accepted more than $42,000 in gifts since taking office, including some from those who do business with his department.

    In 2004, he took more gifts than California's other 57 sheriffs combined


    I think this guy can be bought.


    Carl

    Carl, You're a professional...right? Ever taken a gift from someone your company does business with? Someone bought you lunch or dinner? Offered you tickets to a ball game? It happens to me very often. I also spend a lot of money on enterainment....thousands of dollars. There are rules and regulations and reporting protocols to follow. I can go to jail if it is determined that any gift I accept is not properly reported or was accepted to influence my decisions. I would assume that the LA County Sheriff is under the same sort of guidelines. Or else...they wouldn't have been reported and open to public scrutinty. I think you are jumping to conclusions.
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited June 2007
    Usually gifts are there to influence decisions. Businesses donate millions of dollars to campaigns for elections. You think they dont expect anything in return? Yea...right...
    -Cody
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it
  • bobman1235
    bobman1235 Posts: 10,822
    edited June 2007
    THX 3417 wrote: »
    The whole point of prison system is to liberate you of all your personal privileges. Your there to do time and to think about what you did wrong!

    I don’t think she’s mentally competent to hold a drivers licence same apples to anyone who blags there way though a driving lesson and there final test. And she is one of those who as blaged her way though life. Honesty is the best policy!

    Dude, do they teach homophones in England? I try not to say anything but every single one of your posts has one of the following errors :

    you're = YOU ARE.
    your = belonging to you.

    there = a place, not here.
    their = belonging to them
    they're = they are

    It's ridiculously distracting. Your post in the Casino Royale thread looked like some kind of cruel joke.


    Beyond the grammar lesson, your whole argument is ludicrous. You know nothing about her. The people of this forum could pass better judgment on YOUR ability to hold a driver's license than you could on Paris; at least we've had contact with you.
    exalted512 wrote:
    posted statistics in this thread or the other one, cant remember which one, of their being more people killed by drunk drivers than outright murder. So people like Paris kill more people than the person in the next cell who shot someone. She needs a wake up call, and so does everyone else who drives drunk. Besides, she has such a high profile she will never see someone in that jail that is violent, at all, unless is through a plexi window or on the other side of the bars.

    There's some really twisted logic in there. I agree that drunk drivers need to be punished too, but comparing someone who drives intoxicated and doesn't actually hurt anyone to a murderer is borderline obscene. Heart disease kills more people than murder AND drunk driving, and that stat's just about as meaningless in this context. Driving while talking on a cell phone has been shown in some studies to be as dangerous as driving intoxicated, yet is perfectly legal in almost all states, yet I'll bet a bunch of you who are preaching from the mount do that all the time.

    Yes, driving drunk is irresponsible and anyone caught doing it should be punished. Probably more than they currently are. But current laws do not send most people with DUI and suspended license violations to jail for 45 days. It's borderline unprecedented. And aside from looney toones like THX who have a scarily violent hatred towards someone they know solely from pictures on the internet, I can't understand why people think someone privileged like Paris should be punished more than the average Joe who commits the same crime.
    If you will it, dude, it is no dream.
  • JimBRICK
    JimBRICK Posts: 1,543
    edited June 2007
    Bobman loves paris..........bobman love paris!!!!!!!!!!:D:D
    2 CHANNEL
    Speaker - Klipsch Heresy II
    Under construction
  • mrbigbluelight
    mrbigbluelight Posts: 9,670
    edited June 2007
    Uhm ..... a little sidenote here:

    I'm willing to be entertained to the tune of $42,000.

    I may be easy, but I'm not cheap.
    Sal Palooza
  • THX 3417
    THX 3417 Posts: 219
    edited June 2007
    bobman1235 wrote: »
    Dude, do they teach homophones in England? I try not to say anything but every single one of your posts has one of the following errors :

    you're = YOU ARE.
    your = belonging to you.

    there = a place, not here.
    their = belonging to them
    they're = they are

    It's ridiculously distracting. Your post in the Casino Royale thread looked like some kind of cruel joke.


    Beyond the grammar lesson, your whole argument is ludicrous. You know nothing about her. The people of this forum could pass better judgment on YOUR ability to hold a driver's license than you could on Paris; at least we've had contact with you.



    There's some really twisted logic in there. I agree that drunk drivers need to be punished too, but comparing someone who drives intoxicated and doesn't actually hurt anyone to a murderer is borderline obscene. Heart disease kills more people than murder AND drunk driving, and that stat's just about as meaningless in this context. Driving while talking on a cell phone has been shown in some studies to be as dangerous as driving intoxicated, yet is perfectly legal in almost all states, yet I'll bet a bunch of you who are preaching from the mount do that all the time.

    Yes, driving drunk is irresponsible and anyone caught doing it should be punished. Probably more than they currently are. But current laws do not send most people with DUI and suspended license violations to jail for 45 days. It's borderline unprecedented. And aside from looney toones like THX who have a scarily violent hatred towards someone they know solely from pictures on the internet, I can't understand why people think someone privileged like Paris should be punished more than the average Joe who commits the same crime.

    Well it’s obvious you can decode it. But please don’t criticize me. I don’t do it to you, so shall we keep this civil or do you what to criticize, the balls in you’re court.
  • BaggedLancer
    BaggedLancer Posts: 6,371
    edited June 2007
    THX 3417 wrote: »
    Well it’s obvious you can decode it. But please don’t criticize me. I don’t do it to you, so shall we keep this civil or do you what to criticize, the balls in you’re court.

    I want to criticize....in accordance to Bobmans post, I vote no to your ability to hold a drivers license.
  • BaggedLancer
    BaggedLancer Posts: 6,371
    edited June 2007
    JimBRICK wrote: »
    Bobman loves paris..........bobman love paris!!!!!!!!!!:D:D

    Who doesn't love Paris????? :confused::confused:
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited June 2007
    I will be the fourth or fifth person to ask you this. Would you please shut the **** up THX, and secure some type of other diversion for awhile?
This discussion has been closed.