Are the new LSIM reference quality?

digitalvideo
digitalvideo Posts: 983
edited October 2012 in Speakers
I'm thinking of building a new HT. Are the new Polk LSIM's reference quality and able to offer quality audio in the same league as B&W, PSB, Paradigm, Definitive Technology for HT and music?
Post edited by digitalvideo on
«1

Comments

  • vc69
    vc69 Posts: 2,500
    edited October 2012
    I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say "yes".
    -Kevin
    HT: Philips 52PFL7432D 52" LCD 1080p / Onkyo TX-SR 606 / Oppo BDP-83 SE / Comcast cable. (all HDMI)B&W 801 - Front, Polk CS350 LS - Center, Polk LS90 - Rear
    2 Channel:
    Oppo BDP-83 SE
    Squeezebox Touch
    Muscial Fidelity M1 DAC
    VTL 2.5
    McIntosh 2205 (refurbed)
    B&W 801's
    Transparent IC's
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,215
    edited October 2012
    What is reference quality? Just a buzz word.

    Emotiva uses it alot in their advertising which means absolutely nothing.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • SolidSqual
    SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
    edited October 2012
    If it's the best speaker you've ever heard at its given price . . . then yes. You can see how the phrase instantly becomes subjective.
  • Moose68Bash
    Moose68Bash Posts: 3,843
    edited October 2012
    My wife and I recently went through a long, drawn-out process of auditioning contemporary high-end speakers to decide whether to move away from our Polk SDA SRS1.2s and SAD1Cs. Recently, at Polkfest I listened to the LSIM707s.

    In my view the LSIM707s hold their own with B&Ws (800D-804D), Nolas (Baby Grand Reference), Thiels, Harbeths, Lansches, and Wilson Maxx 3s that my wife and I auditioned.

    We decided to stick with our vintage Polks, and I am now doing modifications on both the SRSs and 1Cs. If I were moving to new speakers, I would have no compunction about buying the LSIM707s. The sounded great, and the price is far more attractive than the other speakers I listed above.

    I don't know what "reference" means, except that it is a marketing term.
    Family Room, Innuos Statement streamer (Roon Core) with Morrow Audio USB cable to McIntosh MC 2700 pre with DC2 Digital Audio Module; AQ Sky XLRs to CAT 600.2 dualmono amp, Morrow Elite Speaker Cables to NOLA Baby Grand Reference Gold 3 speakers. Power source for all components: Silver Circle Audio Pure Power One with dedicated 20 amp circuit to main panel.

    Exercise Room, Innuos Streamer via Cat 6 cable connection to PS Audio PerfectWave MkII DAC w/Bridge II, AQ King Cobra RCAs to Perreaux PMF3150 amp (fully restored and upgraded by Jeffrey Jackson, Precision Audio Labs), Supra Rondo 4x2.5 Speaker Cables to SDA 1Cs (Vr3 Mods Xovers and other mods.), Dreadnaught with Supra Rondo 4x2.5 interconnect cables by Vr3 Mods. Power for each component from dedicated 20 amp circuit to main panel, except Innuos Statement powered from Silver Circle Audio Pure Power One.

  • sponger
    sponger Posts: 325
    edited October 2012
    It means they come with a manual that you can "reference" if you need more information like how to connect them and so on. Other speakers you just have to "monitor" to see how things works out.
    Denon X7200WA
    LSiM 705 703 704c
    Denon DP 400
    Yamaha CDC 775
  • ravaneli
    ravaneli Posts: 530
    edited October 2012
    Reference is supposed to be the line with most realistic, true sound. The speakers that reproduce the sound with the smallest alterations. Something like Monitor. Of course everyone can use it as they please because there are no standards for that - for example call a speaker with less than 2% error in the 20 to 20k range Reference. Emotiva calls their very inexpensive speakers Reference, but Polk also calls their cheapest line Monitor, when they really are not Monitor at all
    BlueFox wrote: »
    I have found that tube based computers provide the best sound quality. ENIAC and MANIAC I offer a smooth, well defined and articulated sound unmatched by the current silicon based CPUs. :wink:
    But as in all things your perception is your reality.
  • sponger
    sponger Posts: 325
    edited October 2012
    ravaneli wrote: »
    but Polk also calls their cheapest line Monitor, when they really are not Monitor at all

    R/T/M is their cheapest line, but I understand what you mean.
    Denon X7200WA
    LSiM 705 703 704c
    Denon DP 400
    Yamaha CDC 775
  • hochpt21
    hochpt21 Posts: 5,423
    edited October 2012
    sponger wrote: »
    it means they come with a manual that you can "reference" if you need more information like how to connect them and so on. Other speakers you just have to "monitor" to see how things works out.

    lol...
    2 ChannelTurntable - VPI Classic 2/Ortofon 2M BlueAmplification - Rogue Audio Cronus Magnum II, Parks Audio Budgie PhonoSpeakers - GoldenEar Triton 17.2 Home TheaterDenon AVR-X3300W; Rotel RMB-1066; Klipsch RP-280F's, Klipsch RP-450C, Polk FXi3's, Polk RC60i; Dual SVS PB 2000's; BenQ HT2050; Elite Screens 120"Man CaveTurntable - Pro-Ject 2.9 Wood/Grado GoldAmplification - Dared SL2000a, McCormack DNA 0.5 DeluxeCD: Cambridge AudioSpeakers - Wharfedale Linton 85th Anniversary; LSiM 703; SDA 2A
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,088
    edited October 2012
    Yes, I see them as a destination speaker...

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • gdb
    gdb Posts: 6,012
    edited October 2012
    "Polk also calls their cheapest line Monitor, when they really are not Monitor at all "

    Pure Drivel ! The term "monitor" doesn't denote any inherent performance or quality characteristics.
    Read a dictionary every once in a while, would ya?:lol:

    Audio and music production
    Studio monitors, loudspeakers designed specifically for audio production and engineering
    Stage monitors or foldback (sound engineering), loudspeakers for performers on stage
    In-ear monitors, earpieces for performers on stage or in a studio
    I'd like to find a first rate Hall Monitor !:razz:
  • gdb
    gdb Posts: 6,012
    edited October 2012
    I guess it's time to whip this link out again ! :cheesygrin:


    lifted-a-veil-from voluptuous dimensionality


    http://essentialaudio.com/humor/cliche.htm
  • gce
    gce Posts: 2,158
    edited October 2012
    righteous musical eargasm
    Anaheim Hills CA,
    HT 5.1: Anthem MRX 720 / BDP-Denon DBT1713UD / Polkaudio LSiM703 / W4S mAmp's / Polkaudio LSiM706c / Polkaudio LSiM702F/X's / SVS PC12-NSD / Panasonic TC P55VT30

    2 Channel: Rogue RP-5 / WireWorld Electra power cord / Marantz TT-15S1/ Ortofon - Quintet Black MC / Marantz NA8005 DAC / W4S mAmp's / Synology DS 216+ll-4TB / Polkaudio LSiM703
  • gdb
    gdb Posts: 6,012
    edited October 2012
    gce wrote: »
    righteous musical eargasm

    I like that one !!!! :smile:
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,008
    edited October 2012
    Are they reference quality ??

    Does a bear crap in the woods ?
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • Drenis
    Drenis Posts: 2,871
    edited October 2012
    My speakers are "Signature Reference Series" so I guess I'm cool. :razz:
  • halo71
    halo71 Posts: 4,606
    edited October 2012
    Polk needs a Signature Reference Monitor series!
    --Gary--
    Onkyo Integra M504, Bottlehead Foreplay III, Denon SACD, Thiel CS2.3, NHT VT-2, VT-3 and Evolution T6, Infinity RSIIIa, SDA1C and a few dozen other speakers around the house I change in and out.
  • codyc1ark
    codyc1ark Posts: 2,532
    edited October 2012
    So my LSi's are crap now?!? Damn... I need something reference. Any suggestions?
  • Drenis
    Drenis Posts: 2,871
    edited October 2012
    codyc1ark wrote: »
    So my LSi's are crap now?!? Damn... I need something reference. Any suggestions?

    Yeah,

    The modified "M" version of your LSi's :razz:
  • gdb
    gdb Posts: 6,012
    edited October 2012
    codyc1ark wrote: »
    So my LSi's are crap now?!? Damn... I need something reference. Any suggestions?

    How about a dictionary or encyclopedia, they're both considered "reference".:cheesygrin:
  • Obsession18
    Obsession18 Posts: 191
    edited October 2012
    I have heard the new Polks and I will say this - they will compete with anything that B&W, PSB, Paradigm, and Definitive Technology has to offer in the same or even higher price range.

    I have listened to the Paradigm Studio 100's (yes I know they are cheaper) and thought the Polks were in a whole different league, the Paradigms were headache inducing bright, while the Polks were smooth and musical.
    2-Channel System
    Analog: VPI Traveler TT, Audio Technica 150MLX, Pro-Ject Tube Box DS
    CD Player: Jolida JD-100 Preamp: Cambridge 840E Amp: Odyssey Kismet Stereo
    Spkrs: Tyler Acoustics Linbrook Signature Systems
  • Dawgfish
    Dawgfish Posts: 2,554
    edited October 2012
    Without a doubt they easily compete with the speakers you mentioned.
  • ravaneli
    ravaneli Posts: 530
    edited October 2012
    gdb wrote: »
    "Polk also calls their cheapest line Monitor, when they really are not Monitor at all "

    Pure Drivel ! The term "monitor" doesn't denote any inherent performance or quality characteristics.
    Read a dictionary every once in a while, would ya?:lol:

    Audio and music production
    Studio monitors, loudspeakers designed specifically for audio production and engineering
    Stage monitors or foldback (sound engineering), loudspeakers for performers on stage
    In-ear monitors, earpieces for performers on stage or in a studio
    I'd like to find a first rate Hall Monitor !:razz:

    This is the same dictionary that you quote "Studio monitors, also called reference monitors, are loudspeakers specifically designed for audio production applications such as recording studios, filmmaking, television studios and radio studios where accurate audio reproduction is crucial.
    Among audio engineers, the term monitor usually implies that the speaker is designed to produce relatively flat (linear) phase and frequency responses. In other words, it exhibits minimal emphasis or de-emphasis of particular frequencies and the loudspeaker gives an accurate reproduction of the tonal qualities of the source audio ("uncolored" or "transparent" are synonyms), and there will be no relative phase shift of particular frequencies meaning no distortion in sound stage perspective for stereo recordings."
    BlueFox wrote: »
    I have found that tube based computers provide the best sound quality. ENIAC and MANIAC I offer a smooth, well defined and articulated sound unmatched by the current silicon based CPUs. :wink:
    But as in all things your perception is your reality.
  • gdb
    gdb Posts: 6,012
    edited October 2012
    I don't deal in "implied" anything, monitor is a broad, nebulous term at best. To state that some things "are not monitor" is best done in a grade school setting, IMO. (where a lot of other meaningless crap is uttered)
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited October 2012
    You want to argue semantics, get a medium and channel Dr. Morris Raphael Cohen and his cohort! You'll have all kinds of fun. Then have Paul Tillich spend a week with you and show you that you're not as stable as you think you are! Oh, he's dead too!

    B&W, never thought much of them! PSB and Paradigm make competent Monitors (care to use the "R's" definition above? Be my guest!). Def Tech headed by Polk dudes, so what does that tell you?

    In short, LSiMs can compete with "anything" in their price range, and a lot of speakers at twice their price point. These are great speakers. You want to call them reference or have a positivistic discourse on that term, that's your problem! Any term, and I mean "any" can be debated. It receives its meaning historically through its usages and contexts and changes with time!

    My advice is STOP worrying about what is "reference" and get your "ears" on a set of LSiMs and don't even bother with B&Ws at the same price point unless you like ice pick highs!

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • gdb
    gdb Posts: 6,012
    edited October 2012
    Also.....do you see the prefix "studio" anywhere in relation to Polk's desciption of their Monitor series speakers,in either the new or vintage iterations?

    OOPS ! I missed cnh's pontification while I stepped away to check the clothes dryer!
  • Devlon
    Devlon Posts: 355
    edited October 2012
    I'm thinking of building a new HT. Are the new Polk LSIM's reference quality and able to offer quality audio in the same league as B&W, PSB, Paradigm, Definitive Technology for HT and music?

    About six months ago I read an article where a guy took is LSIM's over to his friends house who had modded his Lsi9's. After comparing them they both came to the conclusion that the modded Lsi9's sounded better. No mention was made of what the upgraded components were. I think it would interesting to compare what Vr3 usually uses to mod the Lsi9's say to the components of the LSIM's. Anybody here ever heard the LSIM's compared to modded Lsi9's?
    Living Room: HK AVR 354 as pre/pro, 2 x Polk Audio Micropro 4000, Adcom GFA-7500, 2 x Mirage OMD-15
    2 x Mirage OMD-5, 1 x Mirage OMD-C1, APC H15, Sony S790, Philips 52" LCD, Beogram 3000, FAT (Firestone Audio Tobby DAC), Harmony One

    Den: Sherwood R-972,as pre/pro, 2 x Velodyne SPL-1000R, 3 x Crown Drivecore XLS1500, 2 x Polk Audio Lsi9
    1 x Polk Audio Lsic, 2 x Polk Audio Lsifx, Sony S790, APC H15, Dspeaker Dual Core 2.0, W4S DAC 2, Keces DA-151
  • nhhiep
    nhhiep Posts: 877
    edited October 2012
    i'd be very surprised if someone can make the lsi9 better than lsim for just a few hundred bucks. Given the tech of the drivers is like 10 yrs old. if this is true, then what is wrong with engineers at Polk?
  • Devlon
    Devlon Posts: 355
    edited October 2012
    You're probably right. I did think it was interesting that the LSIM guy would say that though. I am going to try to find that article again and post a link to it. I've owned my Lsi9's for years and never understood why some implied that the Lsi9's had a "veiled" sound. Darqueknight's mod thread is when I first heard this term applied to them. He and others were very impressed by what the mod did to their sound. Most, that had it done, agreed that the the bass got tighter, and it opened up the midrange and treble. Clarity greatly improved. It was like a "veil" had been lifted off the sound several said. Look at Darqueknights thread on this and see the pics of what caps were originally used on the stock Lsi9's. Then look at what replaced them. Polk could have done that, but probably choose not to because of the extra cost involved. A manufacturer has to draw the line somewhere on the cost for sure. This is an interesting video on youtube where a guy is comparing a modded Lsi15, to a stock Lsi15. Listen to it with your eyes closed to see if you can tell the difference in the clarity. Even with a Sony camcorder mic I think the difference is impressive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFNPrqSxAgw
    Living Room: HK AVR 354 as pre/pro, 2 x Polk Audio Micropro 4000, Adcom GFA-7500, 2 x Mirage OMD-15
    2 x Mirage OMD-5, 1 x Mirage OMD-C1, APC H15, Sony S790, Philips 52" LCD, Beogram 3000, FAT (Firestone Audio Tobby DAC), Harmony One

    Den: Sherwood R-972,as pre/pro, 2 x Velodyne SPL-1000R, 3 x Crown Drivecore XLS1500, 2 x Polk Audio Lsi9
    1 x Polk Audio Lsic, 2 x Polk Audio Lsifx, Sony S790, APC H15, Dspeaker Dual Core 2.0, W4S DAC 2, Keces DA-151
  • Dawgfish
    Dawgfish Posts: 2,554
    edited October 2012
    The article you are refering to was actually a thread that was posted here on CP last summer I believe. One of the members compared the LSiM-703 to their modded LSi-9s and posted their findings. I think the title of the thread was LSiM-703 review or something like that. At any rate I've never heard any modded LSi-9s, but they have to sound damn impressive to sound better then the LSiM-703s. I'm blown away by their performance everytime I listen to them.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,201
    edited October 2012
    I've only heard the LSIM703's and from that experience I can honestly say they are an amazing speaker. Compared to others you listed IMO they do very well. They hold their own and are worth the asking retail price as they don't get embarrassed by others in the price range.

    Reference ? As far as Polk audio is concerned , they are the Flagship or Reference series speaker line. So they should be compared to others in the same league.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.