What influences sound the most

CCNJ
CCNJ Posts: 384
edited October 2012 in 2 Channel Audio
I want to limit the discussion to electronics and remove speakers, source, room treatments and cables from the discussion. Which of the following three components do you feel has the greatest ability to influence sound quality in a two channel setup. I welcome any supporting comments or anecdotes.

Preamp
DAC
Power Amp
Rig1 - Totem Hawks, Benchmark HDR, Parasound A21, Sonus, Samsung 52 LCD, Audioquest Type4
Rig2 - LFD LE IV Integrated, Harbeth P3ESR, Rega Dac, MF V-Link, IMAC, Audioquest Type4
Post edited by CCNJ on
«13

Comments

  • pearsall001
    pearsall001 Posts: 5,068
    edited August 2012
    My AVR!
    "2 Channel & 11.2 HT "Two Channel:Magnepan LRSSchiit Audio Freya S - SS preConsonance Ref 50 - Tube preParasound HALO A21+ 2 channel ampBluesound NODE 2i streameriFi NEO iDSD DAC Oppo BDP-93KEF KC62 sub Home Theater:Full blown 11.2 set up.
  • Oldfatdogs
    Oldfatdogs Posts: 1,874
    edited August 2012
    For my setup it was the preamp.
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,590
    edited August 2012
    I would think it would be whatever piece of gear is the one converting the signal to analog. Any changes upstream from that component cant add or enhance sound that has been removed.

    So if your going digital to your pre-amp and then analog to your amp, I would say your pre. If your going digital to your DAC and then analog to a pre, I would say your pre, ect.
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited August 2012
    Power amp from that line up.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • CCNJ
    CCNJ Posts: 384
    edited August 2012
    Some differing opinions so far. I haven't done enough experimenting to offer any more than a gut feel right now. I am curious however if am allocating dollars smartly on the electronics front.
    Rig1 - Totem Hawks, Benchmark HDR, Parasound A21, Sonus, Samsung 52 LCD, Audioquest Type4
    Rig2 - LFD LE IV Integrated, Harbeth P3ESR, Rega Dac, MF V-Link, IMAC, Audioquest Type4
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,418
    edited August 2012
    Tubes...
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
  • CCNJ
    CCNJ Posts: 384
    edited August 2012
    Tubes...

    Tube pre, tube dac, tube power amp?
    Rig1 - Totem Hawks, Benchmark HDR, Parasound A21, Sonus, Samsung 52 LCD, Audioquest Type4
    Rig2 - LFD LE IV Integrated, Harbeth P3ESR, Rega Dac, MF V-Link, IMAC, Audioquest Type4
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,418
    edited August 2012
    I can only speak to amps and pre's, but the two most dramatic improvements in my rig came about with a Rogue Audio pre and my tube amps. Detail is off the charts, as is imaging, soundstage, and transparency. Speakers are not part of your discussion, so I will limit my comments to say this. Little Maggies are like being in the tenth row of a performance, and the big ones put me on the stage.

    Tubes give life to sound in the same way that a great performer gives life to his or her instrument. Tubes are essential if you want to hear everything the artist intended, and a few things they didn't. I swear I could hear a **** on one recording.:lol:
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
  • CCNJ
    CCNJ Posts: 384
    edited August 2012
    I can only speak to amps and pre's, but the two most dramatic improvements in my rig came about with a Rogue Audio pre and my tube amps. Detail is off the charts, as is imaging, soundstage, and transparency. Speakers are not part of your discussion, so I will limit my comments to say this. Little Maggies are like being in the tenth row of a performance, and the big ones put me on the stage.

    Tubes give life to sound in the same way that a great performer gives life to his or her instrument. Tubes are essential if you want to hear everything the artist intended, and a few things they didn't. I swear I could hear a **** on one recording.:lol:

    Thanks for elaborating. What rogue pre did you have that made such a dramatic improvement and why isn't it in your current sig today.
    Rig1 - Totem Hawks, Benchmark HDR, Parasound A21, Sonus, Samsung 52 LCD, Audioquest Type4
    Rig2 - LFD LE IV Integrated, Harbeth P3ESR, Rega Dac, MF V-Link, IMAC, Audioquest Type4
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited August 2012
    CCNJ wrote: »
    I want to limit the discussion to electronics and remove speakers, source, room treatments and cables from the discussion. Which of the following three components do you feel has the greatest ability to influence sound quality in a two channel setup. I welcome any supporting comments or anecdotes.

    Preamp
    DAC
    Power Amp

    This is not a flippant answer, but all 3. You can't cut corners on either piece and make up that cut corner with the other 2 pieces of gear. I know it's not what you wanted to hear, but it's true. If you already have a capable amp and preamp, I have found the most difference in DAC's, even DAC's that use the same digital chipset.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,418
    edited August 2012
    The Rogue Audio Perseus with Magnum upgrades and phono stage. It was replaced by the Sunfire Classic Tube pre, also with a phono stage.
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
  • CCNJ
    CCNJ Posts: 384
    edited August 2012
    heiney9 wrote: »
    This is not a flippant answer, but all 3. You can't cut corners on either piece and make up that cut corner with the other 2 pieces of gear. I know it's not what you wanted to hear, but it's true. If you already have a capable amp and preamp, I have found the most difference in DAC's, even DAC's that use the same digital chipset.

    H9

    I do realize that everything in the chain makes a difference but I wanted to get opinions on which of the three made the most dramatic improvement in people's rigs based on their own experimentation.
    Rig1 - Totem Hawks, Benchmark HDR, Parasound A21, Sonus, Samsung 52 LCD, Audioquest Type4
    Rig2 - LFD LE IV Integrated, Harbeth P3ESR, Rega Dac, MF V-Link, IMAC, Audioquest Type4
  • soundfreak1
    soundfreak1 Posts: 3,414
    edited August 2012
    +1 h-9. Went through 1/2 doz. amps till i found the sound i wanted....went through a bakers doz. of pre's till i found one my amp liked. And the DAC was the icing on the cake that they both liked. Its expieramentation to find the "senergy". Of the diff units that produces tje results your ears like. And i cant even count how mamy speakers i went thrpugh till i found the sound i have now.so therw ia no one single answer to pur question. Sorry but you asked.
    Main Rig:
    Krell KAV 250a biamped to mid/highs
    Parasound HCA1500A biamped to lows
    Nakamichi EC100 Active xover
    MIT exp 1 ic's
    Perreaux SA33 class A preamp
    AQ kingcobra ic's
    OPPO 83 CDP
    Lehmann audio black cube SE phono pre, Audioquest phono wire (ITA1/1)
    Denon DP-1200 TT. AToc9ML MC cart.
    Monster HTS 3600 power conditioner
    ADS L1590/2 Biamped
    MIT exps2 speaker cable
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited August 2012
    Good question, but if you ask me.......YOU do.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited August 2012
    Like it or not, the room and speakers do.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • CCNJ
    CCNJ Posts: 384
    edited August 2012
    Face wrote: »
    Like it or not, the room and speakers do.

    For me, speakers would top the list but i wanted to focus this discussion on electronics.
    Rig1 - Totem Hawks, Benchmark HDR, Parasound A21, Sonus, Samsung 52 LCD, Audioquest Type4
    Rig2 - LFD LE IV Integrated, Harbeth P3ESR, Rega Dac, MF V-Link, IMAC, Audioquest Type4
  • CCNJ
    CCNJ Posts: 384
    edited August 2012
    tonyb wrote: »
    Good question, but if you ask me.......YOU do.

    Took me a minute to get it...good answer
    Rig1 - Totem Hawks, Benchmark HDR, Parasound A21, Sonus, Samsung 52 LCD, Audioquest Type4
    Rig2 - LFD LE IV Integrated, Harbeth P3ESR, Rega Dac, MF V-Link, IMAC, Audioquest Type4
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited August 2012
    CCNJ wrote: »
    For me, speakers would top the list but i wanted to focus this discussion on electronics.
    In that case, it varies. Some manufactures design their products flat with the lowest amount of distortion, some tilt FR in either direction, some add a little extra distortion for "lushness". It depends more on the exact component in question than the category.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • audiocr381ve
    audiocr381ve Posts: 2,588
    edited August 2012
    My first "WHOA" moment came when I plugged in the Adcom GFP-750 preamp.
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited August 2012
    Once you get reasonably good versions of those three items then you will be amazed at how much sound can be improved with vibration isolation, and all forms of cables (power, speaker, ICs).
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,194
    edited August 2012
    The preamp does.
    I have noticed by adding amps to certain systems that their was little or no change at all in the overall sound quality. More dynamic range and more control which to some may think it's a change in sound quality and I can agree to a point.
    I'm not saying all amps sound the same , some sound very different from the other depending on the radical differences in power , design , etc. Technically all amps should sound the same but they don't. In many rigs , changing out an amp is less noticeable then the preamp.

    DAC's change the sound depending on what you are comparing them to. If you have 2 good DAC's , it's hard to tell them apart. A cheap internal DAC compared to a good quality external DAC will yield easier to hear results.

    All things in ones system matter as you are building a system , not focusing on each part but how they all work together. This is the key to a successfull sounding system.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited August 2012
    A Tube Pre.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited August 2012
    mantis wrote: »
    The preamp does.
    I have noticed by adding amps to certain systems that their was little or no change at all in the overall sound quality. More dynamic range and more control which to some may think it's a change in sound quality and I can agree to a point.
    I'm not saying all amps sound the same , some sound very different from the other depending on the radical differences in power , design , etc. Technically all amps should sound the same but they don't. In many rigs , changing out an amp is less noticeable then the preamp.

    DAC's change the sound depending on what you are comparing them to. If you have 2 good DAC's , it's hard to tell them apart. A cheap internal DAC compared to a good quality external DAC will yield easier to hear results.

    Couldn't disagree more with your comments about amps and dac's. I've heard it with my own ears, and they don't lie. The bolded part is ridiculous to say and I have found power ratings have very little to do with sound quality unless you have speakers at the extreme end that need gobs of power to operate properly or you have an extremely large room to pressurize. Then it's not so much about differences in quality with wattage, but having the proper power to overcome the inefficiency or room size.
    mantis wrote: »
    All things in ones system matter as you are building a system , not focusing on each part but how they all work together. This is the key to a successfull sounding system.

    Now the above, I agree with that.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • newbie308
    newbie308 Posts: 767
    edited August 2012
    If you are not a fan of digital, then I think the most important component in an analog system would be the phono cartridge. If the detail is not tracked then it cannot be reproduced. I was amazed at how different the music sounds with various cartridge and stylus types. I will admit that a tube pre made a large impact on the sound quality of my system, but the cartridge (or dac for digital) is key.
    Sources: Technics SL1200MKII | SME3009 Tonearm | Monster Alpha 1 MC cartridge | Oppo UDP203 disk player | Nikko NT-790 analog tuner | Musical Fidelity Trivista 21 DAC | Preamp: Threshold SL-10 | Amplifier: Threshold Stasis 2 | Speakers: Snell Acoustics C/V | Kimber 12-TC bi wire speakers | Analysis plus Oval 1 preamp to amp | Wireworld Eclipse 7 DAC to Preamp | Wireworld eclipse digital IC Oppo to DAC | Audioquest Quartz tuner to preamp |
  • vcwatkins
    vcwatkins Posts: 1,993
    edited August 2012
    Tube pre here.
    b]Beach Audio[/b]: Rega RP6 (mods) - AT33PTG/II - Parks Budgie SUT - PSAudio NPC * Eversolo DMP-A6 * Topping D90iii * Joule-Electra LA-100 mkIII * Pass Aleph 30 * MIT S3 * Polk SRS 2.3tl (mods) * PSAudio PPP3
    Beach Study: Pro-Ject Stream Box S2 Ultra & Pre Box S2 * Pass ACA * DH Labs SS Q10 * Brines Folded ML-TQWT RS 40-1354 * PSA Dectet
    Beach Master: WiiM Pro * Dayens Menuetto * Zu Libtec * Dynaudio Audience 50
    Beach Den: Bluesound Powernode 2i * DH Labs SS Q10 * Zu Omen DWII * Richard Gray RGPC
    Town Study: WiiM Pro * Chord Qute (Pardo) * Elekit TU-8600 * MIT S3 * Revel M22 * Beyer DT-990 * Shunyata Hydra 2
    Town Den: Music Hall mm5.1se - Denon DL-103r - Jolida JD9ii (mods) * WiiM Pro * Cary xCiter * Rogue 99 Magnum * Schiit Aegir * MIT S3 * Polk SRS 1.2tl (mods) * Dectet * Bottlehead Crack - Senn 600
    Town Porch: WiiM Pro Plus * Sunfire Sig II * Canare 4S11 * Magnepan 1.6 * Dectet
  • pearsall001
    pearsall001 Posts: 5,068
    edited August 2012
    Out of the three choices listed I'll go with the DAC as having the most impact. Of course the room trumps them all...but of course you already know that.
    "2 Channel & 11.2 HT "Two Channel:Magnepan LRSSchiit Audio Freya S - SS preConsonance Ref 50 - Tube preParasound HALO A21+ 2 channel ampBluesound NODE 2i streameriFi NEO iDSD DAC Oppo BDP-93KEF KC62 sub Home Theater:Full blown 11.2 set up.
  • Conradicles
    Conradicles Posts: 6,081
    edited August 2012
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited August 2012
    Whatever the weakest link is, that is the piece that is influencing the sound the most at any given time.

    Not exactly what you were looking for, but it's the truth.


    Now, if I had to put them in order, I'd say:

    - Dac
    - Pre
    - Amp

    Why? Because if your DAC and pre are good, an amp can't make it sound really crappy unless it's defective. If your amp and DAC are good, a pre could possibly make it sound really crappy, even if it wasn't defective. But if your pre and amp are good, a DAC can definitely make it sound crappy, even just operating as it was intended.

    One reason for this may be that there just aren't a lot of super crappy dedicated 2-channel home audio preamps and poweramps out there, whereas there are a ton a crappy DAC's, mainly internal, but external as well.


    edit: so given my theory, why is it that I've spent the most money on my amp, followed by me pre, followed by my DAC??? I don't know.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • halo71
    halo71 Posts: 4,603
    edited August 2012
    For me, when I went from using a AVR as a pre to using an actual dedicated preamp. It was a night and day moment.
    --Gary--
    Onkyo Integra M504, Bottlehead Foreplay III, Denon SACD, Thiel CS2.3, NHT VT-2, VT-3 and Evolution T6, Infinity RSIIIa, SDA1C and a few dozen other speakers around the house I change in and out.
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited August 2012
    I would have to agree that everything makes a difference. But with Face, I'd have to go with speakers. In my experience there are some speakers that sound "good" with almost anything? The two in particular that come to mind are classic Polk Monitors and ADS. It's is HARD to make those sound bad, period.

    Along with John I'd also go with "tubes" next. I've found that almost anything with good tubes put into the chain has an "effect", usually a good one! The easiest to see instantly, is to get a hold of a good tube CDP and run it.

    DACs yeah, I'm on record on those. I think they're important but they're really, really expensive if you're going to get a "good" one!

    And a decent tube integrated. Stick a fork in it you're done for now!

    Enough for now!


    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]