When was the last time you have used your CD player?

124

Comments

  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,650
    edited May 2011
    newrival wrote: »
    no its a PCM capture of the the 24-bit DSD signal.
    Since DSD is a 1bit process I assume you mean converted to 24bit LPCM.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    Sorry, it's still not SACD.

    Obviously not literally. It's a copy of my SACD.
    There are other methods currently being developed using a linux ps3
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    FTGV wrote: »
    Since DSD is a 1bit process I assume you mean converted to 24bit LPCM.

    You are correct, LPCM
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    Sorry, it's still not SACD.

    Another thing you got wrong.....DSD is not 24 bit, it's 1 bit.

    Yes you're correct, The PCM is 24-bit, which nearly any SACD player offers as a playback option of SACD which is derived fro the 1-bit DSD.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    newrival wrote: »
    Obviously not literally. It's a copy of my SACD.

    Right, it's Redbook.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,650
    edited May 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    Right, it's Redbook.
    Not if it's 24bit.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    newrival wrote: »
    The PCM is 24-bit, which nearly any SACD player offers as a playback option of SACD which is derived fro the 1-bit DSD.

    I'm not aware of any SACD player that has that option. I mean, why would it?
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    FTGV wrote: »
    Not if it's 24bit.

    Well, you're right. It would be closer to DVD-A. Still not SACD tho.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,650
    edited May 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    Well, you're right. It would be closer to DVD-A. Still not SACD tho.
    Yes.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    Right, it's Redbook.

    F1, It's not redbook.

    You're like a brick wall tonight
    design is where science and art break even.
  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,650
    edited May 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    I'm not aware of any SACD player that has that option. I mean, why would it?
    Some universal players convert DSD to PCM when the players on board bass management is used.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    I'm not aware of any SACD player that has that option. I mean, why would it?
    The PCM/DSD debate has been going on since the introduction of SACD and as such, most players include an option of PCM conversion for playback. Fewer players output in PCM but some do.

    Some believe 24-bit PCM is superior, others contend 1-bit DSD is.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,650
    edited May 2011
    newrival wrote: »

    The PCM/DSD debate has been going on since the introduction of SACD and as such....Some believe 24-bit PCM is superior, others contend 1-bit DSD is.
    True.Certainly excellent results can be had by both formats if the they are used to their fullest potential.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    FTGV wrote: »
    True.Certainly excellent results can be had by both formats if the they are used to their fullest potential.

    Agreed. I've experimented with listening to both and while I felt I heard some kind of difference, it was tough to put my finger on what it was, or which one I preferred. Now I just leave it on DSD because that is what is default.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited May 2011
    As a side note to the DSD/PCM discussion, I played a SACD via my Sony 9100ES, and the same SACD through the Oppo BD83 output as PCM. Both formats were digital to the Sony DA7100ES (DSD via ilink, and PCM via HDMI). For whatever reason, there was no contest between the two. The Sony DSD beat the Oppo PCM in sound quality hands down. Of course, this was only a 1 SACD test so it really does not mean anything other than a personal experience.

    Now that I have upgraded to the Oppo BDP93 I should retry the test.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,065
    edited May 2011
    BlueFox wrote: »
    As a side note to the DSD/PCM discussion, I played a SACD via my Sony 9100ES, and the same SACD through the Oppo BD83 output as PCM. Both formats were digital to the Sony DA7100ES (DSD via ilink, and PCM via HDMI). For whatever reason, there was no contest between the two. The Sony DSD beat the Oppo PCM in sound quality hands down. Of course, this was only a 1 SACD test so it really does not mean anything other than a personal experience.

    Now that I have upgraded to the Oppo BDP93 I should retry the test.

    I could be mistaken, but doesn't that Sony convert all incomming signals to 1 bit dsd ? Maybe it's just the added conversion in the sony that relates to the lesser sound quality you experienced running the Oppo thru it. I don't think the differences you are hearing are due to the specific format itself but rather the quality of the conversion in the sony.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited May 2011
    tonyb wrote: »
    I could be mistaken, but doesn't that Sony convert all incomming signals to 1 bit dsd ? Maybe it's just the added conversion in the sony that relates to the lesser sound quality you experienced running the Oppo thru it. I don't think the differences you are hearing are due to the specific format itself but rather the quality of the conversion in the sony.

    I really do not know how it works. I assumed it was playing DSD from the SACD.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    FTGV wrote: »
    Some universal players convert DSD to PCM when the players on board bass management is used.

    Interesting. I wouldn't own one of those.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    Never mind, I didn't read that properly.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    BlueFox wrote: »
    I really do not know how it works. I assumed it was playing DSD from the SACD.

    The way you had them hooked up meant that the Sony DA7100ES was using its DAC(s). You'd have to use analog connections for the players to use their DAC(s).

    It would be interesting to see what the results would be using RCA's.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    BlueFox, The PCM/DSD test you described doesn't offer any proof other than you prefered the Sony DSD performance over the PCM performance of the Oppo. They're two diferent circuitries and doesn't speak to the direct comparison of th PCM vs DSD.

    Also, I believe F1 is correct here in saying that by using the HDMI you are likely having your receiver do the decoding. But not knowing your player all that well I can't be certain.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited May 2011
    F1nut wrote: »
    The way you had them hooked up meant that the Sony DA7100ES was using its DAC(s). You'd have to use analog connections for the players to use their DAC(s).

    That is the whole point. The only difference between the same SACD decoded through two sources was one is DSD, and the other is LPCM. The same DAC was used, the same analog pre-amp was used, and the same amp was used. Only the digital input was different. In this case the DSD digital sounded better than the PCM version.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    F1, I think you'd be surprised to know which SACD players actually downsample and then upsample to 24bit. The Denon 2910 & 3910 being prime examples that jump to mind. Personally, I've heard excellent examples of both.

    There was a similar controversy with CDP's whether or not to upsample. Obviously there are soe excellent upsampling CDP's, But I enjoy the sound of my Consonance CD-120 which is non-upsampling. It's preference and many times the difference is the component's circuitry and not the method in which it's processed. Just how I see it.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited May 2011
    BlueFox wrote: »
    That is the whole point. The only difference between the same SACD decoded through two sources was one is DSD, and the other is LPCM. The same DAC was used, the same analog pre-amp was used, and the same amp was used. Only the digital input was different. In this case the DSD digital sounded better than the PCM version.

    But the sources were two different players (one a sony, one an Oppo), yeah?
    design is where science and art break even.
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited May 2011
    newrival wrote: »
    But the sources were two different players (one a sony, one an Oppo), yeah?

    Yes, but as I said;
    Of course, this was only a 1 SACD test so it really does not mean anything other than a personal experience.

    Then again, there is the argument that digital is digital, so PCM from one player should be the same as PCM from another player, and DSD from one player should be DSD from another player.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    newrival wrote: »
    F1, I think you'd be surprised to know which SACD players actually downsample and then upsample to 24bit. The Denon 2910 & 3910 being prime examples that jump to mind. Personally, I've heard excellent examples of both.

    I do not believe I have heard either of those. I have heard SACD on the 2900. I don't know if that one converts to PCM or not, but I was not impressed at all.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited May 2011
    One other point, or question, is that I do not know how a SACD is converted to PCM. Is there also a high-res PCM version on the SACD, or is there a DSD to PCM conversion done by another device? If there is another device (player, processor, etc.) doing the DSD to PCM conversion then that implies the conversion algorithm and/or implementation could have a bug, or at least be improved. Then again, I am just guessing here, and trying to understand why the Sony DSD and Oppo PCM sounded so different.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    BlueFox wrote: »
    That is the whole point. The only difference between the same SACD decoded through two sources was one is DSD, and the other is LPCM. The same DAC was used, the same analog pre-amp was used, and the same amp was used. Only the digital input was different. In this case the DSD digital sounded better than the PCM version.

    But the decoding was taking place in the Sony DA7100ES.....at least I think that's right.....getting confused at this late hour. So, if I am thinking correctly, the difference would be down to the transport and power supply.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,678
    edited May 2011
    Is there also a high-res PCM version on the SACD

    Definitely not.
    doing the DSD to PCM conversion then that implies the conversion algorithm and/or implementation could have a bug, or at least be improved.

    Less likely to have a bug....more likely it could be improved upon.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • thuffman03
    thuffman03 Posts: 1,325
    edited June 2011
    I use mine about once a week. I really like the sound I get from the tube output stage.
    Sunfire TGP, Sunfire Cinema Grand, Sunfire 300~2 (2), Sunfire True Sub (2),Carver ALS Platinum, Carver AL III, TFM-55, C-19, C-9, TX-8, SDA-490t, SDA-390t