Best Of

nooshinjohn wrote: »

ken brydson wrote: »

Dude, switch to decaf...

He could also lay off the crack pipe, but that would be no fun.

Ahh and here's the welcome wagon.

Anybody who is enthusiastic about Polk audio and audio equipment is ok in my book.

seagiant wrote: »

Hi,
A question...
Does Polk Audio, know you Guys are running your own "Dog and Pony Show" over here, and...
Running people off, and giving Polk Audio, a bad name???
Just wondering how this works?

Polk Audio is... well... between gigs at the moment.
We'll see what happens under Harman/Samsung.
One concern will be legacy product support, so, there's that.

It is safe to say that there's a substantial concentration of experts on the legacy (Matt Polk-era) hardware still on this forum, so, there's that, too.
We're actually pretty friendly, care deeply about a broad range of Polk-branded products (right up to the present, if there is a present for the brand), and rarely bite or scratch, but we do have our limits.

You have to understand that component technology wasn't as advanced back then. Also, any of the higher quality components that were available were not available in the quantity required for large scale production. Lastly, the bean counters always win.

So, while the bone stock speakers sounded good, properly modded ones sound great.