Polk L200 Speaker Demo Reviews
Options
Comments
-
Great review. Enjoyed reading it.Klipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.
-
I have received the walnut finish L200 review pair.
Let the games begin! Tower speakers on each end: LSiM 707. Bookshelf speakers L-R: Legend L200, LSi9 (modified), LSiM 703, SDA CRS+ (modified).
Only one pair of speakers will be in the room at one time.
Order of listening:
1. LSiM 707.
2. SDA CRS+.
3. LSi9.
4. LSiM 703.
5. L200.
The bookshelf speakers will be set on 30" Metal Technology TMT-30 stands in the same locations as the 707s.
In the future, when I am more dedicated to audio than I am now, I will form a posse of 10 and repeat these trials with scientifically valid quadruple blind test methods. But for now, I.will.just.listen.carefully. and take good notes.
Note: I don't know why Vanilla is causing everything to have quadruple spacing.Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country! -
Can’t wait to read your reviews.Pio Elete Pro 520
Panamax 5400-EX
Sunfire TGP 5
Micro Seiki DD-40 - Lyra-Dorian and Denon DL-160
PS Audio GCPH phono pre
Sunfire CG 200 X 5
Sunfire CG Sig 405 X 5
OPPO BDP-83 SE
SDA SRS 1.2TL Sonicaps and Mills
Ctr CS1000p
Sur - FX1000 x 4
SUB - SVS PB2-Plus
Workkout room:
Sony Bravia XBR- 32-Inch 1080p
Onkyo TX-DS898
GFA 555
Yamaha DVD-S1800BL/SACD
Ft - SDA 1C
Not being used:
RTi 38's -4
RT55i's - 2
RT25i's -2, using other 2 in shop
LSI 15's
CSi40
PSW 404 -
DarqueKnight wrote: »I have received the walnut finish L200 review pair.
That just looks like a primo PolkAudio advertisement right there......I don't care who you are, that's beautiful!!!
Source: BRP Panasonic UB9000, CDP Emotiva ERC3 - Display: LG OLED EVO 83 C3 - Pre/Pro: Marantz 8802A - Amplification: Emotiva XPA-DR3, XPA-2 x 2, XPA-6, Speakers, Mains/2ch-Focal Kanta No2's, C-LSiM706, S-702F/X, RS-RTiA9's, WS-RTiA9's, FH-RTiA3's, Subs - Epik Empire x 2
Cables: AudioQuest McKenzie XLR's/CDP/Amp, Carbon 48/BRP, Forest 48/Display
EXPERIENCE: next to nothing, but I sure enjoy audio and video MY OPINION OF THIS HOBBY: I may not be a smart man, but I know what quicksand is.
When I was young, I was Superman but now that old age has gotten the best of me I'm only Batman -
I enjoyed the L200's....will get to a quick review hopefully tomorrow.
-
Ryan, what are the floor standing speakers in your photos? Assuming you like them?
-
Ryan, what are the floor standing speakers in your photos? Assuming you like them?
Silverline Audio Sonatina MkI
And I love them.
But my room is too small for them in all honesty.
"Some people find it easier to be conceited rather than correct."
"Unwad those panties and have a good time man. We're all here to help each other, no matter how it might appear." DSkip -
@Jstas
"At this point I'm thinking maybe something is wrong with the Nova as several sources showed similar performance. So I swapped the LSiM 703's in and ran through some of the stuff I did before. There was that life to the sound again. So I swapped the Rainmakers in and again, vibrant, lively sound. Put the L200's back on and it was like a wet pillow."
both those speakers you mention (703's and Rainmakers) have a boosted top end.
-
@Jstas
"At this point I'm thinking maybe something is wrong with the Nova as several sources showed similar performance. So I swapped the LSiM 703's in and ran through some of the stuff I did before. There was that life to the sound again. So I swapped the Rainmakers in and again, vibrant, lively sound. Put the L200's back on and it was like a wet pillow."
both those speakers you mention (703's and Rainmakers) have a boosted top end.
Yet another statement you make that leads me to believe that either your hearing or you mind is faulty...
"Some people find it easier to be conceited rather than correct."
"Unwad those panties and have a good time man. We're all here to help each other, no matter how it might appear." DSkip -
Round 1. L200
Associated equipment: , PS audio direct stream jr High Fidelity Reveal RCA into T+A intigrated 1530r, Audioquest cv8 72v ( yes i need to change speaker cable soon lol ). Source music is a combination of my own uncompressed wav rips and Qobuz \ Tidal.
First impression while playing with the placement, very clean and more open then previous Polk bookies. Some rooms i think they might be on the brighter side in but in my livingroom where the acoustics are dead, they sounded right. Fast mids, great tone, clean punchy low end.
More to come later on when i have a more time with them but just wanted to say off the bat, impressive sounding so far.Post edited by erniejade onKlipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's. -
both those speakers you mention (703's and Rainmakers) have a boosted top end.
What the hell are you talking about?
Expert Moron Extraordinaire
You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you! -
Can’t talk from a rainmaker perspective but the 703s are pretty lazy up top (not in a bad way). They have a boosted midrange to make up for a lack of organic lower frequency reproduction but certainly not boosted on the top end2 Channel in my home attic/bar/man cave
2 Channel Focal Kanta 3 I Modwright SWL9.0 Anniversary Pre I Modwright PH9.0X I Modwright KWA-150SE I VPI Prime Signature w/ Soundsmith Zephyr MIMC I Lumin U2 Mini I North Star Designs Intenso DAC I Audience OHNO ICs/Audience Furutech FP-S55N and FP-S032N Power Cables/Acoustic Zen Satori I Isotek Sirius -
More to come later on when i have a more time with them but just wanted to say off the bat, impressive sounding so far.
I echo Erniejade's first impressions.
Home theater trials and comparison of the L200 against three other Polk bookshelf speakers (2 channel music only) have been completed.
Setting up the L200 in my 2 channel system. The red light on each speaker is a laser level which assisted with toe in alignment. Feeding the L200s a higher quality signal resulted in much higher quality sound.
The tonal balance and bass performance are excellent.
More later.
Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country! -
DarqueKnight wrote: »More to come later on when i have a more time with them but just wanted to say off the bat, impressive sounding so far.
I echo Erniejade's first impressions.Home theater trials and comparison of the L200 against three other Polk bookshelf speakers (2 channel music only) have been completed.Setting up the L200 in my 2 channel system. The red light on each speaker is a laser level which assisted with toe in alignment. Feeding the L200s a higher quality signal resulted in much higher quality sound.
The tonal balance and bass performance are excellent.
More later.
Dang! What a tease
I'm just kidding of course. We're looking forward to your review. 
2ch rig:Speakers: LSi9s with VR3's Fortress modsPreamplifier: Parasound P5Amplifier: Parasound A23CDP: Pioneer DV-563ACables: Wireworld Equinox 7 XLR ICs, Wireworld Ultraviolet 7 USB, AudioQuest Q2s, AudioQuest NRG X(preamp) -
both those speakers you mention (703's and Rainmakers) have a boosted top end.
I'd really like it if you could elaborate on this because without some kind of active external signal processing like a gain varistor on the speaker inputs (would have to be powered too) or some kind of complex capacitance circuit, there's no way for a speaker to have a "boosted top end" without some kind of amplification circuit that changes the cutoff frequency to push it past the components +6 dB capabilities.
Even then, if you did do that, there is a physical limit to the components. You may be able to boost the signal past the +6 dB cutoff but just because you can boost the signal doesn't mean your drivers can actually reproduce it or your ears can actually hear it. A +/- 3 dB cutoff is typically the most boost you can get out of a signal processor before you get signal clipping and a +/- 6 dB cutoff is where the physical limits of the components are reached.
The only time I have ever been able to push a response curve past a +6 dB limit is with subwoofers in SPL competitions where you are building the enclosure and taking advantage of the enclosure loading caused by the massive amounts of pressurization a sub will provide. Even then, you're barely hitting a +9 dB cutoff and it's not even the driver that's doing it. It's the enclosure resonances and it's hitting it at a very tight frequency stretch, right around driver resonance, that is maybe 10 Hz wide with a super powerful peak right in the center of that range. But even then, you're driving that driver at or just past it's physical distortion point and using the pressure in the sub box to brace the driver against it trying to tear itself apart. Your sub is a one note wonder, though and good for only one thing...competing with the Space Shuttle launches on SPL levels for a "burp" which is, at most, 3 seconds long before you send your amps into thermal failure.
Speakers are passive devices. They don't boost anything. You can use crossovers to move your -3 dB cutoffs around so that you have a decent amount of driver response curve overlap to make a less than desirable -3 dB cutoff point a non-issue. The thing is, though, without some sort of external amplification either on the actual power end or through some kind of processing on the signal path end (bass button, tone controls, gain knobs, equalizers, etc) you're not going to boost a -3 dB cutoff frequency at all let alone anything above the 0 dB base.
So, unless you're misusing terminology here to describe something else, you're full of baloney.
Expert Moron Extraordinaire
You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you! -
I imagine we are using boosted as a way to represent more prominent. IE I used it to describe the way a 703 has a bloated/more prominent midrange than a lot of more accurate speakers.2 Channel in my home attic/bar/man cave
2 Channel Focal Kanta 3 I Modwright SWL9.0 Anniversary Pre I Modwright PH9.0X I Modwright KWA-150SE I VPI Prime Signature w/ Soundsmith Zephyr MIMC I Lumin U2 Mini I North Star Designs Intenso DAC I Audience OHNO ICs/Audience Furutech FP-S55N and FP-S032N Power Cables/Acoustic Zen Satori I Isotek Sirius -
I don’t think the LSiMs are bright at all; in fact the lower mid-bass bump (reflected in stereophile measurements) makes them a bit warm sounding. However, we all know that Polk does make bright speakers. From John atkinsons measurements of the RTiA1:
“While the woofer is quite flat within its passband, the tweeter shelves up by 5dB in its top octave.”
Read more at https://www.stereophile.com/content/polk-rtiii-a1-loudspeaker-measurements#QtxA7cG1hQLGCsZZ.99
How would you explain that @Jstas?Living Room 2.2: Usher BE-718 "tiny dancers"; Dual DIY Dayton audio RSS210HF-4 Subs with Dayton SPA-250 amps; Arcam SA30; Musical Fidelity A308; Sony UBP-x1000es; Squeezebox Touch with Bolder Power Supply
Game Room 5.1.4: Denon AVR-X4200w; Sony UBP-x700; Definitive Technology Power Monitor 900 mains, CLR-3000 center, StudioMonitor 350 surrounds, ProMonitor 800 atmos x4; Sub - Monoprice Monolith 15in THX Ultra
Bedroom 2.1Cambridge Azur 551r; Polk RT25i; ACI Titan Subwoofer -
I don’t think the LSiMs are bright at all; in fact the lower mid-bass bump (reflected in stereophile measurements) makes them a bit warm sounding. However, we all know that Polk does make bright speakers. From John atkinsons measurements of the RTiA1:
“While the woofer is quite flat within its passband, the tweeter shelves up by 5dB in its top octave.”
Read more at https://www.stereophile.com/content/polk-rtiii-a1-loudspeaker-measurements#QtxA7cG1hQLGCsZZ.99
How would you explain that @Jstas?
Measuring frequency response is not the same as boosting frequency response in crossover curves.
https://soundcertified.com/what-does-crossover-do-what-is-crossover-frequency-how-crossovers-work/
What you see in that Stereophile article you posted is physical measurements with either sensors attached directly to the loudspeaker assembly or response graphs from microphones placed in proximity to the loudspeaker in an anechoic chamber. Any power measurements are not going to be a baseline standard. They are going to be measured at the output level of the amplifier being used. You can monitor that output level with measuring equipment but you are not going to be able to energize the crossover circuit with that amplifier and measure the electronic components at the same time without disassembling the speaker and putting the components on a bench.
The Stereophile article comes to it's conclusions via measuring it's amplifier output and graphing the SPL produced by the loudspeaker/individual drivers at each measured frequency point and graphing it against the amplifier power level at each point. They can also measure impedance and cabinet flex/resonance with sensors that will show cycles of movement of electricity or physical vibrations which travel in sine waves.
How would I explain it? You don't understand as much as you think you do. You're trying to goad a gun fight with your pocket knife. That's how I would explain it.
Expert Moron Extraordinaire
You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you! -
How would I explain it? You don't understand as much as you think you do. You're trying to goad a gun fight with your pocket knife. That's how I would explain it.
-
Please, let's stay on topic: L200 Speaker Demo Reviews.Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!
-
L200 Speaker Review
My L200 review was done with three systems:
1. Home theater system, where it was compared to three previous model Polk Audio bookshelf speakers: The SDA CRS+ (highly modified), the LSi9, and the LSiM 703.
2. Two channel system (no comparisons to other speakers).
3. Work office system (compared to the highly modified SDA CRS+s I listen to every day at work).
General Observations
I was impressed with the balanced sound, clarity, detail, and sound stage characteristics. The L200 sounds "bigger" than it's physical size, but it didn't generate a large sound stage in the three systems I reviewed it with. However, the images within the sound stage were well defined and stable. The cabinet construction, real wood veneer, driver and tweeter, and binding posts are very high quality. The aesthetics are somewhat "bland" for my tastes. I much prefer the curved lines and satin finishes of the previous LSiM line.
Program material was DSD music files of instrumental jazz, jazz vocal, and rock recordings.
My evaluation methodology is based on mapping and describing the locations and sound quality characteristics of sound images in the sound stage.
L200 Home Theater Trials
Figure 1. Tower speakers on each end: LSiM 707. Bookshelf speakers L-R: Legend L200, LSi9 (modified), LSiM 703, SDA CRS+ (modified).
Listening environment: 22' x 16' room with 12' ceiling. Speakers were placed on the long wall. I sat 12' from the speaker front plane. Only one pair of speakers was in the room at one time. The bookshelf speakers were set on 30" Metal Technology TMT-30 stands in the same locations as the 707s. The CRS+s were 9'- 3" apart center to center and 15-3/8" from the rear wall. The other three speakers were 8'- 6" apart center to center and 12.5" (LSi9), 12.75" (LSiM 703), and 14" (L200) from the rear wall. The SVS subwoofer was not used for two channel music evaluation.
Order of listening:
1. LSiM 707. (For reference purposes.)
2. SDA CRS+.
3. LSi9.
4. LSiM 703.
5. L200.
Going from the LSiM 707s to the CRS+s was an upgrade in every respect except for bass tactile sensation.
Figure. 2. These modified 1989 model SDA CRS+s outperformed the LSi9, LSiM 703, and L200 in every respect: clarity, detail, sound stage, image weight, etc. In my excitement, I forgot that the Dreadnought isolation transformer (black box on the floor) sounds better oriented vertically.
Bear in mind that the CRS+s are substantially larger than the other bookshelf speakers in this review. At 1.5 cubic feet, they are 50% larger than the L200s, 27% larger than the LSi9s, and 21% larger than the LSiM 703s. In addition, the CRS+s have over $1900 in cabinet and electronic component modifications, including custom crossover boards, Sonicap capacitors, Mills MRA-12 resistors, teak cabinet veneer, driver and tweeter retaining rings and brackets, the "TL" tweeter/crossover modification, low DCR SDA inductor, and the Dreadnought 1000VA isolation transformer.
Figure 3. A pair of Bosch model 3LL30 laser levels were used to assist with setting toe in angles.
Figure 4. The laser levels centered on top of each speaker projected horizontal and vertical cross lines. My head was in the same location as the tiger's. The speaker's toe in was adjusted until the two vertical lines were just outside of the tiger's head. This meant the speakers' center axis lines converged a few feet behind my head.
Figure 5. Setting up the LSi9 speakers and adjusting toe in with the laser levels.
The LSi9's have the following modifications: 1. Original crossover capacitors and resistors replaced with Solen and Sonicap film capacitors and Mills MRA-12 resistors. 2. Original wiring replaced with Cardas 15.5 gauge litz wire. Total modification cost was $535. They are some fine looking and fine sounding speakers, but they were a huge step back from the modified CRS+s.
Figure 6. The LSiM 703s were the most visually appealing of the group and came in 3rd place in overall sound quality.
In addition to curvy good looks, the 703s were a leap up in clarity, detail, and sound stage.
Figure 7. The L200 was the best sounding and best imaging of the conventional stereo bookshelf speakers. Overall, it came in a distant second place behind the modified CRS+s.
Serving as front speakers in a 5.1 home theater speaker arrangement, the L200s were a "decent" match for the LSiM 706c center channel and LSiM 702 surround speakers when watching movies and when listening to multichannel music.
Associated Equipment For Home Theater Trials
Yamaha CX-A5100 Preamp Processor
Oppo UDP-205 Blu-ray Player/DAC
LG OLED65E8PUA 65" OLED TV
Synology DS918+ NAS
Bryston BDP-1 Digital Player
Revelation Audio Labs Dual Conduit USB Cable1.25m
PS Audio PerfectWave P5 AC Regenerator For Source Components And TV
PS Audio PerfectWave P10 AC Regenerator For Prepro And Power Amps
PS Audio PerfectWave AC-5 Power Cords For AC Regenerators
Two 20 Amp Dedicated AC Circuits
PS Audio Soloist SE In-Wall Power Conditioner For AC Circuit #1
PS Audio Soloist SE In-Wall Power Conditioner For AC Circuit #2
PS Audio Statement SC Power Cords, 2m - 7 Total (PrePro, Front Amp, Center Amp, BDP-1, Surround Amp, Blu-ray, TV)
Adcom GFA-565 SE Power Amp (250 wpc) Surround Speakers
Adcom GFA-565 SE Power Amp (250 wpc) Front Speakers
Adcom GFA-565 SE Power Amp (250 wpc) Center Speakers
Polk Audio LSiM 706C Center Channel Speaker (Biwired)
Polk Audio LSiM 707 Front Speakers
Polk Audio LSiM 702 F/X Surround Speakers
SVS PB12 Ultra/2 Subwoofer
PS Audio xStream Plasma Power Cord For Subwoofer
Signal Cable Silver Resolution Reference XLR Interconnects for Power Amplifiers
DSR Silverline (9 Gauge) 36 Foot Pair For Surround Speakers
Salamander Quad 30 Audio/Video Cabinet
50 Feet/Side Monster UL/CL3 In-Wall 12 Gauge Speaker Cable For Surround Speakers
36 Foot Blue Jeans LC-1 CM Rated In-Wall Subwoofer Cable
AudioQuest Cinnamon HDMI 2.0 Cable 2m Prepro To TV
AudioQuest Cinnamon HDMI 2.0 Cable 2m Prepro To Blu-Ray
Straightwire Select HDMI Cable 1m Tivo To Prepro
Douglas Connection DCF-92 Speaker Cables, 10 Feet/Side Center Channel Speaker
Douglas Connection DCF-92 Speaker Cables10 Feet/Side Front SpeakersPost edited by DarqueKnight onProud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country! -
L200 Two Channel Trials
Figure 8. Setting up the L200s in my two channel system. I gained a deeper respect for the L200s after putting better electronics behind them.
Listening environment: 22' x 17' room with 10' ceiling. Speakers were placed on the long wall. I sat 10' from the speaker front plane. The L200s were set on 30" Metal Technology TMT-30 stands. The inside rear corners of the L200s were 5" away from the front of the SDA SRS 1.2TL loudspeakers and spaced 7' - 7" center to center.
In my two channel system, the L200s produced more weighty and solid images with improved definition and speed. The sound stage was still shallow and confined to the area between the speakers.
Figure 9. The L200s responded favorably, with small increases in clarity and detail, as increasingly better quality jumpers were installed. Bottom to top: 1. Stock jumpers, 2. Jumpers made from DSR Silverline 9 gauge hybrid silver/copper speaker wire ($15). 3. Jumpers made from AudioQuest GO-4 speaker wire ($75). 4. AudioQuest Perfect Surface Copper+ jumpers ($200). 5. AudioQuest Perfect Surface Silver jumpers ($500).
The L200 jumpers appeared to be identical to the LSiM 703 jumpers.
Associated Equipment For Two Channel Trials
Bryston BDP-3 Digital Music Player
dCS Puccini U-Clock word clock
dCS Debussy DAC
Polk Audio SDA SRS 1.2TL loudspeakers (heavily modified)
Synology DS718+ NAS For Music File Server
Pass Labs XP-30 line level preamplifier
Pass Labs X600.5 monoblock power amplifiers
AudioQuest Sky XLR interconnects
AudioQuest Everest speaker cables
Revelation Audio Labs Prophecy CryoSilver digital coaxial cable - RCA connectors
Revelation Audio Labs Prophecy CryoSilver digital coaxial cable - BNC connectors
Revelation Audio Labs Prophecy CryoSilver USB 2.0 dual leg cable
PS Audio PowerBase isolation platforms for DAC, BDP-3, and U-Clock
22 pound granite slabs to couple source components to isolation platforms
Black Diamond Racing Isolation Mini Pits and Mk IV Cones
TeraDak DC-150VA Linear Power Supply For Synology DS718+ NAS
Cisco SG110D-08 Ethernet Switch For NAS, BDP-3
TeraDak DC-30 Linear Power Supply For Cisco SG110D-08 Switch
PS Audio PerfectWave AC-12 power cords
PS Audio PerfectWave P-10 AC regenerator
Salamander Synergy Triple 30 audio credenza
Dell Venue Pro 11 7140 Docked Tablet Computer For System Control
Logitech Harmony One Remote
L200 Office System Trials
Figure 10. I enjoyed the L200s' brief stay in my office system.
Listening environment: 11' x 12' room with 9' ceiling. Speakers were placed in metal bookcases along the 11' wall. I sat 8' from the speaker front plane. The L200s were spaced 6' - 3" center to center.
Figure 11. The L200s produced a much smaller sound stage than that of the modified CRS+s, but they provided an overall enjoyable presentation. The L200s are the first conventional stereo speakers I have tried in those bookcases that didn't sound boomy.
Going from the modified CRS+s to the L200s, I gave up some low level detail, and the finely detailed bass rumble, growl, and tactile sensation I was used to. However, if I found myself in a situation where the CRS+s were too big and heavy, I would be happy with the L200s.
Associated Equipment For Office System Trials
Bryston BDA-3 digital to analog converter
Bryston BDP-2 digital player with IAD sound card upgrade
Rosewill Armer RX304-APU3-35B External HDD Enclosure with 5TB Seagate HDD
iFi Audio Mercury3.0 USB 3 Cable For HDD Enclosure
TeraDak DC-30 Linear Power Supply For Rosewill HDD Enclosure
Bryston BP-26 preamp with MPS-2 power supply
Bryston 4B3 power amp (300 wpc 8 ohms/500 wpc 4 ohms)
PS Audio xStream Transcendent XLR interconnects for DAC and preamp
Revelation Audio Labs Prophecy Cryo-Silver CCIC USB cable
Revelation Audio Labs 6pin XLR Power Umbilical cable for MPS-2/BP-26
PS Audio Premier SC power cords for DAC, digital player, power amp and preamp
PS Audio P10 AC Regenerator
PS Audio AC-12 power cord for P10 AC Regenerator
Polk Audio SDA CRS+ (1989 version) loudspeakers (heavily modified)
1000VA Dreadnought Non Common Ground Interface for SDA CRS+ loudspeakers
Douglas Connection CDF92 speaker cables (9 AWG)
HiFi Tuning Classic Gold fuses for amp, preamp, AC regenerator
HiFi Tuning Silver Star fuse for DAC.
Dell Venue Pro 11 7140 tablet computer, with dock, for digital player and DAC control
Logitech Harmony One universal remote for preamp and DAC
Acknowledgement
Thanks to Polk Audio for facilitating this trial experience and to F1nut for his trial management services, and for the excellent additional packing to protect the speakers during numerous trips.Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country! -
Dang, I feel sorry for the dude that has to follow one of Ray's reviews.
HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
question re: @DarqueKnight's review above:
When you say:
What is the comparator? Does this refer to the L200s in the first setup vs. the two-channel setup, or a comparison of the L200s to some other loudspeakers you previously auditioned in the two-channel setup?In my two channel system, the L200s produced more weighty and solid images with improved definition and speed.
Thanks.
PS and strictly FWIW:
I had the same impression.The sound stage was still shallow and confined to the area between the speakers.
(and not that I'm feeling defensive or anythingmhardy6647 wrote: »... I did note, with some surprise, that the image was ‘small’ – centered between the speakers but not extending beyond them. It was also ‘shallow’; considerably less depth than I am used to from my FrankenAltecs. Both of these observations might stem from the L200s’ placement, so I am loath to fault them too much for this... )
Perhaps this limited depth/spaciousness arises from the extremely conventional cabinet design?
Just musing, you know?
-
mhardy6647 wrote: »question re: @DarqueKnight's review above:
When you say:
What is the comparator? Does this refer to the L200s in the first setup vs. the two-channel setup, or a comparison of the L200s to some other loudspeakers you previously auditioned in the two-channel setup?In my two channel system, the L200s produced more weighty and solid images with improved definition and speed.
Thanks.
Compared to the way they sounded in the previous home theater setup.mhardy6647 wrote: »
Perhaps this limited depth/spaciousness arises from the extremely conventional cabinet design?
Just musing, you know?
I had thoughts along the same lines. I wondered if the small sound stage size was a result of the speakers being built more for sonic accuracy rather than imaging.
Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country! -
They are coming to me next. I don't have nearly the same volume of things to experiment with in my home, but hopefully with some help from a few friends I can provide enough detail to add value for others here.Dang, I feel sorry for the dude that has to follow one of Ray's reviews. Analog: MoFi MasterTracker > MoFi UltraDeck > Sutherland 20/20
Digital: Cambridge CXC / Streaming > Cambridge CXN v2
MastersounD Dueventi > Rosso Fiorentino Certaldo or Arcam rHead > Hifiman HE4XX
Discogs -
displayname wrote: »
I think A/B comparisons with other, familiar loudspeakers (ideally of similar configuration) are invaluable (not that you were looking for any advice
).
-
What are any of your thoughts on the new style binding posts? $3 parts? I’m not a fan, I thought the previous gen LSiM has better binding posts.
Has anyone opened up the box to look inside at the crossover? Prolly a cheap $3 parts?
How about the driver basket? Are they stamped steel? The LSiM where cast aluminum but prone to damage from the heavy motor structure.
Not to be negative here as I own Legend speakers but built to a price point is starting to nag at me for premium speakers built overseas.- Living Room Music-2.0 Polk Legend L800 | McIntosh C70 | McIntosh MA5200 (Treble) | McIntosh MC452 (Bass) | Sublimeacoustic K231 Active xover | Denon DP-2500A | Denafrips Ares II | Belkin Soundform Connect | iPad Air USB to DAC
- Media Room Ht-7.2.6/13.1 (Atmos/Auro-3D) Polk LSiM707, LSiM706c, LSiM702 F/X [x4], height LSiM703 [x6], HSU VTF-15H MK2 Dual | Marantz AV8805A | Rotel RB-1590 (L/R) | Appollon NC500 11ch | Sony UBP-X800 | AppleTV 4K | JVC RS2100 | 150” Elite Screen Acoustic Pro UHD
- Game Room-5.1 Polk LSi25, LSiC, LSiF/X | Marantz SR7009 | AppleTV 4K | Xbox One S | Sony PS2, PS3 | Nintendo Wii | Gaming PC | Sony 75" LCD
- Master Bedroom Music-2.0 Totem Hawk | Marantz PM-10 | Marantz SA-10 | SONY PS-HX500
- Office-2.0 Ascend Acoustics Sierra LX, DSW microPRO3000 | Rotel RA-1570 | Marantz HD-CD1
- Daughter's Bedroom 1-2.0 TBD Martin Logan Forte
- Guest Room 2-2.0 Klipsch RP-600M | Martin Logan Forte
- Guest Room 3-3.0 Martin Logan Motion 40, 50XT | Onkyo TX-SR705 | Apple TV | Samsung 55" TV
- Guest Room 4-2.0 QAcoustics 3030i | Sansui AU-6900 | Topping DX7s | Sansui FR-1080 | TV
- Maintenance: Pro-Ject VC-S Record Cleaning Machine
-
Buyers remorse setting in?The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD
“When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson -
I thought the binding posts were quality metal binding posts. That's also mentioned in non-forum reviews out there. I had no problems with the binding posts on the LSiM's but I thought the binding posts on the L200's were superior. For what its worth.
