Amps of differing power output vs speaker volumes

PrazVT
PrazVT Posts: 1,607
edited September 2011 in Electronics
Here's my question - In my setup, I'm using a few different amps right now in my HT setup.

A21 - 250wpc for the RTi A7s
NC2125 bridged - 410w for the CSi A6
NC2250 - 250wpc for the RTi A1s (surrounds)
All 3 amps are THX 2 Ultra certified
The Denon receiver is of course just running as a pre.

If the surrounds were getting say 140wpc from a receiver instead of the 250wpc from the Parasound amp, does that impact volume levels? Stated another way - when I turn the volume up or down, are all the speaker volumes going to increase/decrease the same amount? Or is there some volume disparity due to the amp max power ratings? Perhaps only at stupid high levels that I'd never listen at?

I ask b/c I bought 'something' and I'm pondering whether or not I really need the NC2250 for the surround speakers once 'it' is hooked up.

Thanks!

- Praz
Dali Optikon 1Mk2
NAD D3020 V2
Schiit Bifrost 2/64

..the rest are headphone setups.
Post edited by PrazVT on
«13

Comments

  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited September 2011
    The amount that the speakers' loudness changes as you change the volume will be dependent on the amp's gain, which is unrelated to their wattage ratings. It could be that the 140 watt receiver has more gain and will play louder as you turn it up than the A21.

    I would recommend dialing in the channel levels on your AVR or processor at the volume you'll be using the most, that way, if there are differences in gain, they won't show too much.

    I would also recommend running that NC2125 in normal, unbridged mode for your center channel. I'm not personally familiar with that amp, but most amps sound better not bridged. It is likely to have a more similar amount of gain when not bridged as well. Don't worry about the unused channel.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,304
    edited September 2011
    Ok so lets start off by reviewing your system.
    For the Main channels your sporting a Incredible Halo A21 , I love this amp , it's powerful clean and stupid dynamic. Then for some reason you picked up a NC 2125 2 channel amp and bridged it for the center channel. I'm not a fan of bridging amps as in my experience they tend to not sound as good and they don't track as well. I listened to amps Bridged and unbridged and unbridged always sounded more natural or organic to me. I'm of the mind if you want more power , get a bigger badder amp like the NC2250 you have for the rear channels. If I where you at this point I would use the NC2125 for the surrounds and the NC2250 for the center channel.

    Now I'm gonna give you real world experience and advice. I have done this kinda thing many times and left with unbalanced sounding system. Yeah it works and most probably will not notice as much as you get caught up in the movie and not pay attention to the balance of the system. But I do , I have done extremely high end theaters and when we used multi 2 channel amps or a 2 channel and 5 channel of different power same brand and even series( which you failed to do ) sounded uneven especially at reference levels.
    What I have experienced with the front 3 is when they are powered by different amps , it actually sucks ****. The one system that comes to mind as a Proceed / Martin Logan system I did which was about 600k room total. This theater was badass and I have to fix it as the owner was a 2 channel guy and wanted Prodigy's for 2 channel. He wanted the baddest 2 channel Proceed amp and could care less about the center 4 surrounds and a pair of surround backs. It had twin Decent subs living on the front stage. By the way this system when finished was breath taking and probably one of my favorite theaters I done to date.
    So What we did to fix this is get all the same amps running everything and the system came into balance and seemly surround. When something moved around the room, you didn't really notice different speakers doing the job. When we had un even power fully calibrated and dialed in , you could tell the main speakers had better dynamic range and took away from the overall experience. I was annoyed and had to sell dude more amps. After listening both ways he thanked me and felt money well spent.

    So back to your system. I would sell all those awesome amps you got and get a 5 channel amps from Halo A series or just a NC series. I like both a lot and honestly with RTiA series speakers your Denon can do the job by itself. I personally don't like Denon receivers and especially as a pre as they tend to not have any dynamic range , even as a pre. They sound like a typical receiver being outclassed. A pioneer Elite SC-57 would solve all your problems , power your system correctly sound way better then what you are doing now , save you on plugs and your electric bill and give you the best experience you ever had in your home.
    You can take all the extra money saved with all those amps IC's electric bill and buy mad Blu ray movies.You wouldn't need the DAC magic either unless your using it for the SB and then yeah keep it. You could go Digital out to the Pioneer Elite and get very close results and much better then what you are doing with that Denon.

    If you like having external amps and you like your Denon for whatever reason then I strongly suggest this amp.
    http://www.parasound.com/nc/5250v2.php
    I fully believe this is all you need ever and you can upgrade to any speakers you want and keep this amp on board. You could keep your NC2250 if you ever decide to go 7 channels.

    Good luck with what ever you decide to do.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    @falconcry - thanks for clearing that up for me. I've powered the center 2 ways before. With the HCA-1000A (previous amp), I was using each channel to power each set of binding posts (bi-amp i guess?). Ultimately, I wasn't sure how wattage correlated with the speaker volumes.

    @mantis -

    Man, that's a lot of food for thought. When all this started, I was just trying to improve the performance of the A7s - and the addition of amps was just me learning and kinda trying one step up. I wasn't happy w/ the Denon powering the A7s themselves - it's not even close when compared to the 2250 an A21. I guess I'm kind of like the guy you mentioned - though it's my HT system, I do listen to music with just the A7s.
    I personally don't like Denon receivers and especially as a pre as they tend to not have any dynamic range , even as a pre. They sound like a typical receiver being outclassed. A pioneer Elite SC-57 would solve all your problems , power your system correctly sound way better then what you are doing now , save you on plugs and your electric bill and give you the best experience you ever had in your home.

    Well, I think I may have inadvertently taken a step in the right direction here then. I ordered an SC-57 yesterday prior to starting this thread. I've had no problems with the Denon - it's been reliable, has all the bells and whistles, and even as a pre, at least sounded better than the Yamaha I had before. Of course, with all the talk about the Pio Elite receivers, I thought I'd give one a shot. So I'll find out how those D3 amps perform and how the receiver performs as a pre.
    I would sell all those awesome amps you got and get a 5 channel amps from Halo A series or just a NC series.

    That's an idea...hmm. I could sell the 3 amps and save a little for a 5ch amp. I will say that I prefer the A21 to the NC2250 so most likely I'd save up and spring for the A51.

    And yeah - the Dacmagic is for the SB. But even that, if I like the SC57's DAC better, I could part with it. Nothing wrong with simplifying the setup.

    Thank you for laying it all out there - this is the kind of advice / feedback that I needed!

    - Praz
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,304
    edited September 2011
    I'm willing to bet the SC-57 sounds as good or better then your current setup even with the amps in line. Your going to be impressed with it's dynamic range and clarity compared to the Denon and amp setup.

    You now can clean up all those power cords and not have such a mess behind the rack. Clean simple effective.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    I'm looking forward to hearing the SC-57. I'm house sitting during the week for my parents the next few weeks, so I'll only get to hook it up this weekend. But meanwhile, I'll start putting the amps and receiver up for sale and check out what my 5/7 ch amp options are.
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • SRTer
    SRTer Posts: 372
    edited September 2011
    mantis wrote: »
    I'm willing to bet the SC-57 sounds as good or better then your current setup even with the amps in line. Your going to be impressed with it's dynamic range and clarity compared to the Denon and amp setup.

    You now can clean up all those power cords and not have such a mess behind the rack. Clean simple effective.

    Is there something wrong with the quality of Denon. I have heard 2 knocks on it in this thread.
    Fronts: Polk RTi A9
    Center: Polk CSI A6
    Rears: Polk RTi A7
    Receiver: Pioneer Elite SC-35 (140 watts x 7)
    Amplifier: Adcom GFA-555 Mk.II (200 watt @ 8 ohms)
    Sub: Polk DSW PRO 500 (10 inch, 200 Watt)
    TV: Samsung 59 inch 3D Plasma 600 Hz PN59D7000
    Sources: Samsung BD-D6700 3D Blu-ray Player, DirecTV, PS3, iPhone 4 and IPod Classic with Apple Lossless Tracks
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited September 2011
    The amount that the speakers' loudness changes as you change the volume will be dependent on the amp's gain, which is unrelated to their wattage ratings. It could be that the 140 watt receiver has more gain and will play louder as you turn it up than the A21.

    Okay. How is "gain" measured?
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    Quality-wise, I would say there is nothing wrong with the Denon. Considering all the tech features it has, and Denon's frequent updates, it's been ridiculously reliable - not a hiccup in 9 months. Hell, prior to yesterday, I wasn't even thinking about replacing this 3311ci. Feature-wise it has everything, and as far as I know, it sounds great as a pre. In fact, my reason for changing it out was more out of curiosity about the Pio than anything being wrong w/ the Denon.

    mantis' comments on the Denon are the first I've heard like that. I'll be able to do an a-b once the 57 comes in ..
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,304
    edited September 2011
    SRTer wrote: »
    Is there something wrong with the quality of Denon. I have heard 2 knocks on it in this thread.

    I can give you a history lesson on Denon if you wish , you can search for my comments on Denon over the last 6 years.
    I'll sum it up. Denon has declined in performance and quality since 2005. Everything before that time Denon was King of the Receiver market and for many good reasons. They have made many poor decisions.

    Sound quality they are one of the worse Dynamic range receivers on the market. Onkyo , Yamaha , Integra , Sony ES , Marantz , Harmon Kardon , Pioneer Elite all make better sounding more dynamic receivers compared to what Denon has been doing.
    Highest Failure rate out of all receivers. I have Been Installing all of the above receivers since 1999 and never have I seen so many Denon receiver failures. I'm still to this day cleaning up the mess the left behind. I refuse to sell Denon anymore and at one time I was loving what they where doing and the legacy they earned.
    I'm going to leave it at that. When dude gets his Pioneer Elite SC-57 , you will see the Denon for sale. It's a fine unit and I'm sure many will love it when it works.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • Theheadsn
    Theheadsn Posts: 413
    edited September 2011
    To anyone here who HAS the sc-57, or the sc-37, how much tweaking did you do to the system before you got it sounding the way you liked it? I know everyones ears different, so thats something to consider. I just hooked up my 37, and so far I can already tell the difference from my old vsx-1020k.

    Do you guys use the thx settings? or just the auto surround most of the time? I mainly use it for movies, so Ive been **** around with the settings.

    This might be a stupid question, but are the iceamps always on? or is there something specific you have to do?
    Home Theater Setup
    • Receiver - Onkyo TX-RZ1100
    • Mains - Polk RTi A9's
    • External Amps - Outlaw 2200 Monoblocks for L/R/C
    • Center - Polk CSiA6
    • Side Surrounds - Polk FXiA6's
    • Atmos - 4 Polk 80F/X RT's
    • Sub - SVS PC-4000
    • T.V. - LG OLED65C7P

  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    When dude gets his Pioneer Elite SC-57 , you will see the Denon for sale. It's a fine unit and I'm sure many will love it when it works.

    Despite your generalizations - which I would agree with through the xx10 series - my 3311ci is a rock solid receiver. Everything works perfectly without hiccups - networking, hdmi, airplay, etc. I've had ZERO issues with it.

    Whether you meant to or not, though, you've kinda screwed me over on the selling front. eh.
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • larry777
    larry777 Posts: 480
    edited September 2011
    It sounds like you have a very reliable Denon 3311ci. You shouldn't have any problem selling it.
    Home Theatre.............

    Pioneer SC-35
    Polk RTi10's Fronts
    Polk CSiA6 Center
    RTi4 Surrounds
    SVS PB-12 Sub


    2 Channel.............................

    Yaqin MC-100B
    Energy RC-70 Speakers
    Arcam CD-192 Disc Player
    Van Den Hul Interconnects
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited September 2011
    larry777 wrote: »
    It sounds like you have a very reliable Denon 3311ci. You shouldn't have any problem selling it.

    +1, everybody has their preferences but it doesn't discredit your Denon just because you wanted to try something better. With the Elite being double the price it should be :biggrin:
  • dave shepard
    dave shepard Posts: 1,334
    edited September 2011
    I wouldn't worry about if you can sell the Denon or not you should (if you deside) have no problems.
    What Dan is also saying is you will have a better balanced sound system by not mixing power amps, each amp will have a differant sound signature to it not to mention the power differance. The Halo will walk over most amps even some with more power. This is where the power rating becomes less important because of the Halo's ability to play so clean and dynamic even under a demand. Some amps sound differant played at higher volumes then at lower volumes the better amps just get louder without changing the overall sound. I'm sure you have heard it said that "it sounds better if I turn it up", I have, and I experianced it. I look forward to hearing what you deside and your thoughts when you get it done.

    Dave
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,304
    edited September 2011
    Not my intentions just stating my history with Denon. Many people love Denon and everything they do. I'll just wait for your review when you get the SC-57. it will speak for itself.
    Good luck building your system. Sounds like it's going to come along nicely.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    Hey mantis - no worries - just a reflexive reaction on my part. As I said, you're right about everything you've mentioned thus far. And I appreciate the input - will be acting on your advice in the coming weeks.

    @ b run - yeah I guess I just wanted it to be clear that I'm trying a Pioneer not because of any defiency on the Denon's part.

    @Dave - yeah mantis made some great points and I'm taking them in the spirit I should. More learning :)

    On the amp side, I may give the NAD M25 a shot once these amps are sold. Any thoughts on that one? I've seen good reviews so far and I love the 375 I have.
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • dave shepard
    dave shepard Posts: 1,334
    edited September 2011
    NAD makes really nice stuff, clean and dynamic. They are very close to Rotel in their sound and dynamics, nice Mid-level audio equipment. NAD also has some higher-end gear "Master Series" really nice stuff again, just FYI. Don't let the level's of gear get the best of you while looking, everything has it's place and you can get to a point of diminishing returns.

    I think you will enjoy the Elite if you choose that route.

    Dave
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited September 2011
    PrazVT wrote: »
    ...I prefer the A21 to the NC2250 so most likely I'd save up and spring for the A51...

    Dude, not to knock your RTi's at all, because they are great HT speakers, but an A51 seems like overkill big time. I think you'd gain a much larger improvement in sound for the money by buying new speakers instead of buying an A51.

    Good luck with the elite, that thing looks effing sweet!:smile:
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    Well if you ever hear RTi A7s with the a21 or nc2250, you'll hear the difference. An AVR will never compare to me. Rti A7s handle 300wpc - no overkill here!
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited September 2011
    PrazVT wrote: »
    Well if you ever hear RTi A7s with the a21 or nc2250, you'll hear the difference. An AVR will never compare to me. Rti A7s handle 300wpc - no overkill here!


    Oh I know there is a difference; I'm a firm believer in quality electronics, but I'm also a believer that their quality should be commensurate with the speaker's quality and that the speakers make a bigger difference in overall sound. I wouldn't run a 600w/channel Bryston 28BSST^2 on a pair of Monitor 70's... not because the Monitors couldn't handle it, and not because that Bryston wouldn't make the Monitors sing better than they ever have, it's that I know I'd gain a much larger improvement in sound by buying a less expensive amp and using the left over money to buy a pair of LSiM's to replace the Monitors. Hands down.

    It has nothing to do with the quantity of watts; it has to do with the quality of watts.

    The rti's could handle an amp that was rated at 3000 watts per channel, but that makes no difference.

    Anyway, just my two cents. :smile:

    and BTW I'm not saying to not use an external amp; I'm saying that buying a less expensive external amp, and using the extra money to upgrade your speakers, will make a ginormously bigger difference in sound than just splurging on the amp will.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited September 2011
    In all seriousness, for the price of that A51, you could get 2 pairs of the new LSiM-703's and the LSiM-706c center channel. Now that would be an upgrade!:biggrin:
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    Okay - perhaps you guys are right. I may have gotten too caught up in the amps and forgotten I'm only running RTi series speakers in the living room. I'll go easy on the amp I guess and save some $$.

    @falconcry72 - LOL don't get me started on speakers :) I'd want towers anyway - so that's an altogether more expensive proposition.
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • JimAckley
    JimAckley Posts: 1,138
    edited September 2011
    PrazVT wrote: »
    I'd want towers anyway

    Based on that statement, I'm gonna go ahead and say you haven't heard the 703s yet :biggrin: You'd be shocked at what they're capable of
    - Computer Rig -
    YAΘIN MS-20L, polkaudio RT5

    - Main Rig -
    Pioneer SC-37, Overnight Sensations, Samsung 52" LCD

    - Currently In Progress -
    Curt Campbell's Uluwatu LCR, LMS Ultra Gjallarhorn, JBL W15GTi stereo subs, 2.1 entertainment system for the gf
  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    No unfortunately I haven't had the opportunity to hear the 703s - though from what you told me on the phone, they absolutely kick ****. My issue with the 703s is that they need subs and I haven't had much success getting subs to integrate properly w/ bookshelves. Either Audyssey sets the sub vol too low for music or the subs sound really obnoxious.

    Hence, my preference for full-range towers - the bass is there, but there's nothing for me to have to screw around with, and the bass sounds natural.

    If there's a way to get that experience with bookshelves / subs, I'd be open to 703s in the HT.

    But I guess even towers like LSi25s or Def Tech BP-8080STs are just bookshelves with subs attached right?
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • PrazVT
    PrazVT Posts: 1,607
    edited September 2011
    Anyway - let me see how things go with the Pioneer first. One thing at a time :)
    Dali Optikon 1Mk2
    NAD D3020 V2
    Schiit Bifrost 2/64

    ..the rest are headphone setups.
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited September 2011
    In all seriousness, for the price of that A51, you could get 2 pairs of the new LSiM-703's and the LSiM-706c center channel. Now that would be an upgrade!:biggrin:

    I forgot that there was a surround speaker in the LSiM lineup: the 702f/x, so you'd probably want that instead of a second pair of 703's.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited September 2011
    jimackley wrote: »
    based on that statement, i'm gonna go ahead and say you haven't heard the 703s yet :biggrin: You'd be shocked at what they're capable of

    +1000
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited September 2011
    PrazVT wrote: »
    I haven't had much success getting subs to integrate properly w/ bookshelves. Either Audyssey sets the sub vol too low for music or the subs sound really obnoxious.

    Hence, my preference for full-range towers - the bass is there, but there's nothing for me to have to screw around with, and the bass sounds natural.

    If there's a way to get that experience with bookshelves / subs, I'd be open to 703s in the HT.

    Oh there's a way. You just have to set it yourself. Forget Audyssey.

    I see a 5.1 LsiM setup in your future...
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,304
    edited September 2011
    It's all about balance. RT series speakers are very nice for the price. They sound wonderful but Halo amps are as noted overkill and is why I think the SC-57 is going to be a perfect match for them. Spend that extra money on Blu ray's , CD's or digital downloads , maybe a better TV or a nice power conditioner / surge protector.

    If you like your speakers , no need to upgrade them to something else.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,304
    edited September 2011
    JimAckley wrote: »
    Based on that statement, I'm gonna go ahead and say you haven't heard the 703s yet :biggrin: You'd be shocked at what they're capable of

    Not many of us have heard them yet. I'm waiting on them to make their way to the east coast.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.