LSi Help

24

Comments

  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,077
    edited December 2010
    If you could avoid running any 4 ohm speaker off the receiver,do it. The reason most here don't care for emotiva amps is, they are good for HT,but somewhat lack in the music department. Choice is yours.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited December 2010
    Adcom 7500 hands down. Adcom new retail $1500. EMO half that.
    Emo specs from their website.
    Power output (all channels driven):
    300 watts RMS @ 4 ohm (0.1% THD)
    200 watts RMS @ 8 ohm (0.1% THD)
    THD for the Adcom is less than .01 all channels driven from 20-20khz
    I like the way some companies like to rate their power at near clipping:rolleyes:
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • butter21
    butter21 Posts: 19
    edited December 2010
    The majority of the time it will be for movies. with occational video games and music. would the emotiva still work.
  • butter21
    butter21 Posts: 19
    edited December 2010
    Can you explain the .1%THD to me
  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited December 2010
    Heh. There's irony in there.

    The last Indiana Gathering i went to, we all realized at the same time (though we didn't tell john, because we didn't want to make him cry :tongue:) that the Sunfire Grand Signature that he brought sounded EXACTLY LIKE THE XPA-2.

    I would bet good money that the two amps are more than just kissing cousins.
    Matt34 wrote: »
    It's possibile, the MPS-1 was released in early 05 while the Carver unit was first announced in 04 but was never shown until 06, so which came first?....does it really matter? If you have been around long enough you will see many similarities between different company amps as a majority made overseas come from the same small group of manufactures.

    The MPS-1 weighed in at 115lbs.
    http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/amplifiers/emotiva-mps-1/mps-1-overview-and-setup

    Carver back panel:
    GarageSale_1266782867_9139.jpg

    EMO MPS-1
    image
    I'd like to put $20 down that it's the same amp. Those modules are visually IDENTICAL, down to the mounting screws, and that's just a bit too much coincidence for me.
    dorokusai wrote: »
    It's still embarassing.

    Just some information for the OP to digest.
  • Hilbert
    Hilbert Posts: 316
    edited December 2010
    THD is Total Harmonic Distortion. The less you have of it the better.
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited December 2010
    The EMO has ten times the distortion at rated power. The EMO would be ok for HT. But why take a real nice set of speakers and drive them with an entry level amp? It would be like putting a four cylinder in a Corvette.
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited December 2010
    ben62670 wrote: »
    The EMO has ten times the distortion at rated power. The EMO would be ok for HT. But why take a real nice set of speakers and drive them with an entry level amp? It would be like putting a four cylinder in a Corvette.

    I don't know why (as a design choice) the Emotiva amps simply don't have a lower THD.

    The Parasound HCA 1500 is 0.03% at full power; < 0.01 % typical levels. That is an order of 10 better.

    Like dampening factor, some believe that after you hit a certain performance thresh hold your ears can't really discern the difference.
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited December 2010
    I am sure the EMO has a lower distortion level at a more realistic level instead of near clipping. Better amps can handle transiants better than others. It is like when you buy a head unit for a car. They rate the silly things at 50x4wpc when in all actuality it is usually 14wpc rms clean. It is a numbers game to get people to jump on higher wattage amps.
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited December 2010
    Here is a good read on the Adcom. It has separate power supplies like the pic you posted above. It also has twice the Capacitance: 120,000uf verses the EMO's 60,000uF
    http://www.adcom-usa.com/data/manuals/gfa_7500manual.pdf
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,916
    edited December 2010
    butter21,

    With audio gear, as with most material possessions, you have multiple choices based on cost and performance. Generally speaking, the better the performance, the greater the cost. It's up to each of us to decide the ratio that we are comfortable with. However, when building an audio system, it is best to build it with gear that is at least on the same performance level. As you have chosen some fairly decent speakers, you would want to find an amp that is on the same level. My advice, save up some more money to buy that amp. Rome wasn't built in a day.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited December 2010
    ben62670 wrote: »
    Here is a good read on the Adcom. It has separate power supplies like the pic you posted above. It also has twice the Capacitance: 120,000uf verses the EMO's 60,000uF
    http://www.adcom-usa.com/data/manuals/gfa_7500manual.pdf

    Are they the same topology? Look at the capacitance of most class D amps. Very little but they still are able to perform. Apples to apples and all that.
  • Jetmaker737
    Jetmaker737 Posts: 1,123
    edited December 2010
    To the OP... also look at Parasound amps while you're at it.
    SystemLuxman L-590AXII Integrated Amplifier|KEF Reference 1 Loudspeakers|PS Audio Directream Jr|Sansui TU-9900 Tuner|TEAC A-6100 RtR|REL T/9X SE Sub
  • mdaudioguy
    mdaudioguy Posts: 5,164
    edited December 2010
    butter21 wrote: »
    That i adcom is off the audiogon website.

    It's surely not the only one out there - keep looking! :tongue:
  • mdaudioguy
    mdaudioguy Posts: 5,164
    edited December 2010
    F1nut wrote: »
    As you have chosen some fairly decent speakers, you would want to find an amp that is on the same level. My advice, save up some more money to buy that amp. Rome wasn't built in a day.

    Well said, Jesse!

    butter21 - To reiterate that point, basically, you're attracted to the E...... amps, based on their attractive price point for new gear, but clearly, you didn't use that same logic when buying your speakers, or else you wouldn't own Polk LSis. :tongue:
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,077
    edited December 2010
    mdaudioguy wrote: »
    Well said, Jesse!

    butter21 - To reiterate that point, basically, you're attracted to the E...... amps, based on their attractive price point for new gear, but clearly, you didn't use that same logic when buying your speakers, or else you wouldn't own Polk LSis. :tongue:

    ....and he doesn't mean that in a bad way either. What he's trying to say is you decided on some quality speakers, do the same in your decision for an amp. Yeah, I know cost is a factor but quality costs more, should not be news to anyone.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • butter21
    butter21 Posts: 19
    edited December 2010
    mdaudioguy- At first i was goin to go with the RTi but a deal came around that i couldnt pass up. I like i said before im faily new at this. what should i be looking for in an amp. I dont have a huge budget for this because it went to the speakers. I guess i should done a little more research first. but like i said before it was something i had to jump on. Thanks for all your guys help.
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited December 2010
    Amps stay in your system a long time. Not the place to save a few bucks. Your speakers should stay with you a while. Sources and processors every few years.

    butter21 wrote: »
    ...what should i be looking for in an amp...

    Reread our posts. Use the search function. I am not repeating myself anymore. There have been plenty of suggestions offered up here.
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • mdaudioguy
    mdaudioguy Posts: 5,164
    edited December 2010
    The LSi series speakers are nice. Power them with something nice, too. Like Ben said, everything you need to make a good decision precedes this post. Lots of good ideas have been offered. Good luck! :smile:
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,916
    edited December 2010
    xcapri79 wrote:
    It is a matter of opinion. I'd take Emo. That XPA-2/XPA-3 combo is definitely better, but everyone has their preference.

    Hmmmmm....
    xcapri79 wrote:
    Your statement is based on personal preferance and not logic at all.

    So, you can express your personal preference, but when someone else does the same it doesn't count because it is not based on logic!?!


    I know, I know....you look like a fool, but then again, you should be use to it by now.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited December 2010
    F1nut wrote: »
    Hmmmmm....



    So, you can express your personal preference, but when someone else does the same it doesn't count because it is not based on logic!?!


    I know, I know....you look like a fool, but then again, you should be use to it by now.

    Hmmmmm....

    With people comparing a line up of amps to fischer price toys...

    Then finding out the Carver and Emotiva are either sharing the same exact chasis or voiced exactly the same....

    One shouldn't be so quick to say what's foolish or not.

    To the OP: let me google that for you

    Enjoy the reading.
  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited December 2010
    ben62670 wrote: »
    X fisher price is still a toy.
    I have heard both amps in house:wink:
    Do you work for EMO?
    2 to 1 guys that have both had both amps in house.
    Enjoy
    Ben

    And the best advise that butter can get is to get BOTH amps in house. Use your own ears, form your own opinions. Most he would be out is the shipping. Simply the cost of curiosity and experimentation.

    Hell if Hafler was still in operation I would be running with them, not Adcom. Just a personal preference from comparing DH series to the GFA series in earlier years.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,916
    edited December 2010
    On the other hand, what's the point of trying out an amp that is, at best, entry level when you have already have speakers that are at a much higher performance level.......pure logic, ya know!?!
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,650
    edited December 2010
    jinjuku wrote: »
    Hell if Hafler was still in operation I would be running with them...comparing the DH series to the GFA series in earlier years.
    Those early DH's were great amps for that era,simple and reliable(if built correctly) with good SQ.E Borbely championed the use of MOSFET's long before Mr Pass.
  • mdaudioguy
    mdaudioguy Posts: 5,164
    edited December 2010
    xcapri79 wrote: »
    Your statement is based on personal preferance and not logic at all.
    The OP can try the XPA-3 for 30 days and if it is not to his liking, he can return it for the shipping charge.

    Many LSi users use Emotiva and are quite happy with the combination. Many LSi users use Adcom and are quite happy with that combination as well.
    I own both Adcom and Emotiva and like both products. It is unfair to bash either product.

    Hyundai makes good cars, too. Really, they do. They'll even reach the speed limit on the highway, and then some! They have heat, A/C, and a nice radio, too! And for some, they make perfect sense. However, you don't see so many in the garages of $500K+ homes, do you? But, they'll definitely get you from A to B.
  • mdaudioguy
    mdaudioguy Posts: 5,164
    edited December 2010
    jinjuku wrote: »
    And the best advise that butter can get is to get BOTH amps in house. Use your own ears, form your own opinions. Most he would be out is the shipping. Simply the cost of curiosity and experimentation.

    Hell if Hafler was still in operation I would be running with them, not Adcom. Just a personal preference from comparing DH series to the GFA series in earlier years.

    Btw, I'm not pro-Adcom, simply because I have one now. It's one of many options the OP has... E-brand included. A better idea yet, would be to get 25 different amps in house, no?

    Basically, people here are trying to open the OP's eyes to the reality that there really are options out there. I was once wowed by the Blue "e", too. The choice is his. Live and learn. Or, learn and live.

    Over and out. I've said all I need to say here.

    Once again, good luck butter21. Do let us know how it turns out for you!
  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited December 2010
    F1nut wrote: »
    On the other hand, what's the point of trying out an amp that is, at best, entry level when you have already have speakers that are at a much higher performance level.......pure logic, ya know!?!

    Because that XPA-2 at $800 may be a Sunfire Grand Cinema at multiple times the price. You would have to ask Concealer and the guys at that GTG since they a/b'd them and couldn't tell the audible difference.
  • mdaudioguy
    mdaudioguy Posts: 5,164
    edited December 2010
    jinjuku wrote: »
    Because that XPA-2 at $800 may be a Sunfire Grand Cinema at multiple times the price. You would have to ask Concealer and the guys at that GTG since they a/b'd them and couldn't tell the audible difference.
    And if you keep reading through the thread...
    thuffman03 wrote: »
    They might be voiced to sound similar but they are two completely different amps.
    Wasn't it you that found that Carver amp that was identical to the XPA? :tongue:
    That was a prototype Carver that was abandoned when Carver Corp failed. It was then picked up by the guy that started Emo....
    Who cares? Some think the OP should buy an Emotiva amp, while others think he should look at used amps that once sold for more money. It's his choice - all the opinions are out there.
  • jinjuku
    jinjuku Posts: 1,523
    edited December 2010
    mdaudioguy wrote: »
    Btw, I'm not pro-Adcom, simply because I have one now. It's one of many options the OP has... E-brand included. A better idea yet, would be to get 25 different amps in house, no?

    I own Adcom, I own Parasound I am happy to say I am pro-both. What I am not is anti-Emotiva.

    I couldn't hear enough of a difference between the XPA-3 and the NAD C272 to make me, SQ wise, pick one over the other. The NAD was a little warmer in the mids (desinged this way on purpose) and the XPA was nice and neutral the entire spectrum. One wasn't any worse than the other. Just slight shades of gray.
  • ibewbrother
    ibewbrother Posts: 186
    edited December 2010
    My opinion to the OP.....there are some nice old Carvers on e-bay right now...I've had good luck with mine...and I could simply detonate my monitors if I wanted to...
    "Making life enjoyable through expensive electronics." BillD

    Pioneer Elite SC-57
    M70 series 2 mains
    CS2 center
    M40 surround
    M30 front height
    SVS PB 12 NSD

    Carver TFM-45 (mains)
    Carver A753x (center, surround)

    320GB PS3, 42" Panasonic G10,

    M60's as a Zone 2 off of the Pioneer in the living room

    R.I.P. Onkyo TX-NR807