Pontiac is no more

Danny Tse
Danny Tse Posts: 5,206
edited April 2009 in The Clubhouse
GM dumps Pontiac brand
The struggling automaker General Motors is expected to eliminate its iconic Pontiac brand, NPR has learned.

An official announcement could come as early as Monday, according to NPR's Frank Langfitt.

"This is the end of a famous car name," Langfitt said on Friday's All Things Considered. "But for anyone who has been following Pontiac, it's not a surprise at all."

GM is living on more than $15 billion in government loans and faces a June 1 deadline to cut its debt, reduce labor costs and take other restructuring steps. If it doesn't meet the deadline, the company's CEO has said it will enter Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

The move follows GM's decision to shed other brands, including Saturn and the Hummer line of sport-utility vehicles.

GM knows it has "too many brands and too many models," Langfitt says.

GM said Thursday it will temporarily close 13 assembly plants in the U.S. and Mexico — some for more than two months — laying off nearly 24,000 workers to pare back a bloated inventory.

"In the days and weeks ahead we may hear about some permanent closings," Langfitt says.

The announced closures, which will start in May, vary by factory from as short as three weeks to a long as 11, including the normal two-week July shutdown to change from one model year to the next.

GM said the shutdowns will help control high dealer inventories and bring manufacturing in line with sales. The company plans to cut production by 190,000 vehicles and reduce inventory from the current 767,000 to 525,000 by the end of July.

As for Pontiac, about 40 dealers who sell the brand exclusively will be hit hard by the news, Langfitt says. More than 1,000 dealers sell Pontiac along with other brands.

In eliminating Pontiac, GM is closing out a famous muscle-car brand memorialized in at least one rock song and in films such as Smokey and the Bandit.

Langfitt says dealers were told as recently as two weeks ago that Buick and the GMC truck line will survive.

Meanwhile, the summer plant closings will affect about 24,000 hourly and salaried employees at the affected assembly plants, but there will be thousands more layoffs and temporary factory closures when GM works out its schedules for engine, transmission and parts stamping factories.

The troubled automaker has 22 assembly plants in North America as well as dozens of other parts and powertrain factories.

Laid-off hourly workers will get unemployment benefits and supplemental pay from the company that amounts to most of their base wages. Salaried workers also will get some income, GM North America President Troy Clarke said Thursday in a conference call with reporters.

The end of an era, indeed....I guess there will not be a new Firebird

gallery_transam_05.jpg
Post edited by Danny Tse on
«1

Comments

  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,186
    edited April 2009
    This is such sad news. I have been a Firebird fan all my life. My 3rd car was a Firebird. One of my very favorite cars is the 1989 20th Turbo Trans am pace car. Wow the world is coming down around me.

    This is truly the saddest 2 years of my life.

    Dn
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • zingo
    zingo Posts: 11,258
    edited April 2009
    I will miss the GTO.
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited April 2009
    Sad indeed, and something I don't think GM wanted to do.

    Have a 1966 428HO engine in my garage. Love Pontiac engines, but they killed those 30 years ago so what 1979 was the last engine year of Pontiac.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited April 2009
    That was the car many of us lusted after in our youth, once we got old enough we bought Toyotas. Actually my wife has the Toyota, I'm driving a GM family sedan (Impala).

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • danz1906
    danz1906 Posts: 5,144
    edited April 2009
    That Stinks big-time!
    Linn AV5140 fronts
    Linn AV5120 Center
    Linn AV5140 Rears
    M&K MX-70 Sub for Music
    Odyssey Mono-Blocs
    SVS Ultra-13 Gloss Black:D
  • zarrdoss
    zarrdoss Posts: 2,562
    edited April 2009
    Well I guess the important thing will be if GM can get through this at all. If they can do that they can bring back the other lines latter on.
    I hear Chrysler is not expected to make it at all.
  • NotaSuv
    NotaSuv Posts: 3,849
    edited April 2009
    mantis wrote: »
    This is such sad news. I have been a Firebird fan all my life. My 3rd car was a Firebird. One of my very favorite cars is the 1989 20th Turbo Trans am pace car. Wow the world is coming down around me.

    This is truly the saddest 2 years of my life.

    Dn

    ooooohhhh yes the 89 turbo one kick **** 6 along with the GNX are in my top 3
  • Hillbilly61
    Hillbilly61 Posts: 702
    edited April 2009
    That's a thing I can't understand. Ford is doing OK. You take much of their Ford/Mercury and related Mazda lines and the vehicles are largely interchangeable. I honestly do not buy the story that "while superficially similar" better parts (higher price) are used as you move among brands within the same lines.

    While GM is guilty of the same practice and I have never been a fan of GM in particular, at least the Pontiac line had some distinctive models to call their own.
  • Polkersince85
    Polkersince85 Posts: 2,883
    edited April 2009
    When I was five, my Dad bought a brand new 1960 Pontiac Catalina. I can still hear that 389 moan. Hate to see them go away.
    >
    >
    >This message has been scanned by the NSA and found to be free of harmful intent.<
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited April 2009
    MOPAR is most likely done. All that may be left are the Jeeps, Minivans, and Ram trucks. Instead of being a white knight and bailing Chrysler out, Fiat will probably just cherry pick the names they want after the bankruptcy.

    Sad to see Pontiac gone. GTOs, Trans Ams, Bonnevilles...a true legacy gone for good. (probably). Much like what happened to Plymouth a few years ago.

    Lately Ford has done ok with the Edge, F-series, Focus, Fusion and Mustang in the US and the Focus and Fiesta in the rest of the world. They saw the light early and started making smaller vehicles. I just wish they would get the Euro Focus over here instead of crappy one sold in the US.

    A world without Dodge, Oldsmobile, Chrysler, Plymouth, Pontiac...Very sad for an old muscle car junkie like me.
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • Michael_Js
    Michael_Js Posts: 34
    edited April 2009
    Wow! No more support and parts too? That sucks! I'm looking forward to the new '10 Camaro!
  • WilliamM2
    WilliamM2 Posts: 4,771
    edited April 2009
    Bummer. At least GMC is staying around. My family owns a dealership started by my Grandfather, they sell GMC, Buick, Pontiac, and Jeep. They were a little worried about losing Pontiac, GMC and possibly Jeep. Oddly, the Pontiac's are their best sellers right now.
  • Hillbilly61
    Hillbilly61 Posts: 702
    edited April 2009
    The after market for parts will hang on for a long time. What will be first to go is replacement body panels, then castings. Those are hard to make parts that require presses or hard to create molds. Body panels are still usually done by the manufacturer. The rest is usually contracted out, creating a knowlege base for independent businesses to continuing manufacturing as long as there is a viable market.
  • dougy
    dougy Posts: 182
    edited April 2009
    I'm surprised they're killing Pontiac but keeping Buick. In my part of the country (southwest Missouri), Pontiacs are good sellers. I guess not so much in most of the world, though. Too bad.

    Another thing: we own a Pontiac Vibe and have, for the last few years been getting an extra $1000 patronage rebate whenever we buy a new Pontiac. I guess we can kiss that little perk goodbye.:(
    THE MAN-CAVE 5.1 CHANNEL A/V RIG
    Sony KDS-60A3000
    a/d/s/ HT-400LCR (3)
    a/d/s/ HT-300 (2)
    Velodyne DLS-4000R (2)
    Pioneer Elite VSX-55TXi
    Pioneer Elite DV-47Ai
    Sony BDP-S300
    Sony SLV-779HF
    DirecTV HD sat. receiver

    MAN-CAVE 2-CHANNEL RIG (shares sources with a/v system)
    Adcom GFA-5500
    Bose 901 Series VI
    NAD C-165BEE
    Slim Devices Squeezebox Classic
    TEAC CD-RW890
    Technics SL-BD20D w/ Audio-Technica P34
    Akai HX-A3X
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,335
    edited April 2009
    That's a thing I can't understand. Ford is doing OK. You take much of their Ford/Mercury and related Mazda lines and the vehicles are largely interchangeable.

    This is true only in the US. Worldwide Ford has many vehicles that are not marketed in the US because they are small, lack creature comforts, have manual transmissions and are made in factories that don't have the UAW to deal with. These businesses are thriving in Europe, Asia, Africa, China and elsewhere.

    Domestically, they are doing poorly like everyone. Their legacy costs are frightening. Ford Motor Company is the 8th largest healthcare company in the US. They are not seeking stimulus money (bailouts), but don't be surprised if GM and Chrysler negotiate a pre bankrupcy deal with the Justice Dept, Ford is right behind them looking to get out of their UAW contracts. I'm not talking about the autoworker wages, so all you UAW workers don't get all huffy. But the legacy costs (retiree healthcare, pensions, etc.) are frightening. They need domestic change or all of their autos will be built 3rd world countries overseas and sold in the US. They are already doing it in Africa, Asia and elsewhere. The product quality is not bad, it just is not an American style car. But that may change.

    Wait until the Chinese start building American style autos. At first, the quality will be lacking. But after 10 years, their product will be better than most American products. China graduates more than 10 times the amount of engineers that the US graduates. The future belongs to the Chinese and Indian ecoonmies. Well, at least for the a large part of the 21st century.

    Do yourself a favor and read some non fiction books while you have the Polks signing in the background. The future is scary for the US economy and it's not a Democrat/Republican thing. Although I thing the liberal socialist agenda will accelerate the US economies decline because of the eventual higher taxes to pay for unbridled spending for everything liberally imaginable. The Beltway bandit firms the Administration is forming for National Healthcare, a green economy, free market regulation, limits on executive compensation, windmills, you name it. Businesses are being formed to be factories to burn tax money.:(:mad:
    Carl

  • Danny Tse
    Danny Tse Posts: 5,206
    edited April 2009
    dougy wrote: »
    I'm surprised they're killing Pontiac but keeping Buick.

    GM is not going to dump the brand that just dethroned Lexus in initial quality. Buick and Jaguar are tied at the top for quality right now, with Lexus and Toyota following closely. On top of that, Buick is a hot selling brand in China right now, therefore GM wouldn't want to mess around with success.
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,711
    edited April 2009
    The mental image of a billion Chinese driving Buicks is just too much to fathom :-)
  • dorokusai
    dorokusai Posts: 25,577
    edited April 2009
    Buick should have been taken into the woods and shot a long time ago.
    CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Speakers? Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint.
  • stuwee
    stuwee Posts: 1,508
    edited April 2009
    :mad::mad::mad::mad:

    Through most of the 60's my tiny butt was shuffled around in uber fine Poncho's (my Pa ws a huge fan) Tempest/GTO/Catalina/Bonnie's :)

    I understand the why? but how could they??
    Thorens TD125MKII, SME3009,Shure V15/ Teac V-8000S, Denon DN-790R cass, Teac 3340 RtR decks, Onix CD2...Sumo Electra Plus pre>SAE A1001 amp>Martin Logan Summit's
  • ND13
    ND13 Posts: 7,601
    edited April 2009
    I'm sporting a 400 hp 6.0 GTO/Holden right now. Definitely not a freakin Cavalier. Sux it's an auto, though.
    "SOME PEOPLE CALL ME MAURICE,
    CAUSE I SPEAK OF THE POMPITIOUS OF LOVE"
  • xj4094dg
    xj4094dg Posts: 1,158
    edited April 2009
    GM has too many products. GMC is not safe. The word is Cadillac, Chevy and Buick will remain. I think that is too many as Buick is not necessary.
    The commercial GMC trucks are mostly Chevy trucks with a GMC badge, sharing almost all parts/design.

    They should just focus on making great Cadillacs and Chevys. If they focus on just two, they might survive. Too many distractions got them into this mess.

    disclaimer: I am a Certified GM Service Manager (GMC, Pontiac, Buick, Chevy and Cadillac).
    "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." Neil deGrasse Tyson.
  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited April 2009
    I kinda wondered that instead of randomly giving billions to GM, why not just buy out their remaining pensions (if the government has to bail something out) then let them go bankrupt so they can get out of their UAW contracts? That way they could restructure, be free of the pensions and all the UAW crap that is dragging them down and they could start over again. Im not sure if that would work or not but it seems logical to me. UAW wages and UAW productivity along with staggering funds going to pension plans is whats killing the Big 3 - this way theyd be out from under those anchor weights.
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited April 2009
    MacLeod wrote:
    I kinda wondered that instead of randomly giving billions to GM, why not just buy out their remaining pensions (if the government has to bail something out) then let them go bankrupt so they can get out of their UAW contracts? That way they could restructure, be free of the pensions and all the UAW crap that is dragging them down and they could start over again. Im not sure if that would work or not but it seems logical to me. UAW wages and UAW productivity along with staggering funds going to pension plans is whats killing the Big 3 - this way theyd be out from under those anchor weights.

    We would spend more on taking over the pensions than we are giving them in bailout loans. It really doesn't matter. If they go bankrupt the Pension Guaranty Benefit Corporation will honor the pension benefits. PBGC is a federal corporation created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. It currently protects the pensions of American workers and retirees in more than 29,000 private single-employer and multi-employer defined benefit pension plans. PBGC receives no funds from general tax revenues. Operations are financed by insurance premiums set by Congress and paid by sponsors of defined benefit plans, investment income, assets from pension plans trusteed by PBGC, and recoveries from the companies formerly responsible for the plans. Problem is that a GM or Chrysler bankruptcy would probably use up all the reserves and more forcing the govt. to fund them anyway.
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited April 2009
    I hear ya. The one thing tho is that buying up these pension plans would cost hundreds of billions (pure guess on my part) but as time went on, the cost would decrease as the retirees died off. Within maybe 20 years they would all have assumed room temperature and the government's responsibility is done and GM, Ford and Chrysler would still be thriving businesses. At least thats my theory.
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
  • ND13
    ND13 Posts: 7,601
    edited April 2009
    Never been a GM fan, not since the early '70s(pre'72), but GM should have taken a little more advice from their Ausie brand, Holden.. Maybe not worthy, to some, of the GTO nameplate, but it'll kick any "stock" GTO's **** from the past.

    Definitely not a Cavalier:rolleyes:, most definitely a sleeper, especially if the boy-racer scoops were removed.
    "SOME PEOPLE CALL ME MAURICE,
    CAUSE I SPEAK OF THE POMPITIOUS OF LOVE"
  • CaligulaPolk
    CaligulaPolk Posts: 1,650
    edited April 2009
    it sucks, no more firebird :( My first car was 1982 firebird that i got for graduation, it was excellent car. It had like 2,600 miles on it and i got it in 98.

    Miss that brown firebird :( Never got speeding ticket til last day i moved out of college 4 years later, it sucked!
    I am 100% BORN DEAF and No I am not kidding! :D Why am I here? My wife's hearing! :p

    My Home Theater Rig || Television: 58" Panasonic TH-58PZ800U Viera Plasma || Power Conditioner: Power Monster HTS 3600 MKII || Receiver: Onkyo TX-SR805 || Blu-Ray/Gaming: 60 Gigabytes Playstation 3 || Amplifier: Emotiva XPA-5 || Fronts: Polk Audio RT800i || Center: Polk Audio CS245i || Surrounds: TBA|| Subwoofer: TBA
  • Barefoot
    Barefoot Posts: 149
    edited April 2009
    1968-1972 GTO's. The rest you can keep.

    +1 xj4094dg.
  • ND13
    ND13 Posts: 7,601
    edited April 2009
    You forgot the 64-67s, before they were bloated parodies of themselves. I still like the tacky boy-racer Pontiac stick-ons, though. Just not as much as stuffing a 389 tri-power under the hood of a lightweight(for the timeframe) Tempest.
    "SOME PEOPLE CALL ME MAURICE,
    CAUSE I SPEAK OF THE POMPITIOUS OF LOVE"
  • Mazeroth
    Mazeroth Posts: 1,585
    edited April 2009
    I own a 2007 Pontiac G6 and it's the best car I've ever owned, hands down. I see tons of them around here on the roads. Shame they're going bye-bye.
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited April 2009
    Sad, I owned a 68 Grand Prix 400 cu in engine, owned a 69 Grand Prix with 400 cu in engine. My 68 GP got do more speed then I was scared **** about 150 mph + I did it was, and never did it again. The 69 GP was faster off the line, but never was a fast of my 68 GP on highway. I blow my 69 GP 400 engine, and I brought an old 67 428 engine. I stated that the 428 engine was a 1966, but that's wrong 1966 would be a 421 engine. In 1967 to 1969 it was .030 in over so it was 428, my engine was built in Dec 1966 for 1967 model.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR