Need helping finding a receiver for Lsi7s

dylin88

Hi all,

I need some help finding a suitable receiver for a pair of Lsi7s I purchased for $300. I went to an electronics store nearby and the guy helping me out insisted that the Onkyo TX-8555 Stereo Receiver would provide enough juice for my pair of Lsi7s. Can anyone help confirm or deny that / give me a suggestion for an alternate receiver that won't be too expensive and will do the job?

Thanks in advance.

Kex

Welcome to Club Polk!

My favorite: NAD and h/k. NAD products deliver hugely dynamic sound IMO, which belies their very modest ratings usually, and their products are rated at 4 and even 2 ohms. Harman/kardon is another favorite if you get their stereo receivers (their 5.1 and 7.1 products are not rated for 4 ohms). For h/k, you can usually find excellent pricing on amazon.com.

http://nadelectronics.com/products/hifi-amplifiers
http://www.spearitsound.com/nad/nadspec.htm

http://www.harmankardon.com/product_detail.aspx?cat=REC&sType=C&prod=HK+3490

dylin88

Thanks for the advice. Would you say those are definitely better than the onkyo?

dylin88

Which one of the below do you guys think is the best for a pair of Lsi7s?

Onkyo 8555, Harmon Kardon 3490, NAD 720BEE


NAD: http://nadelectronics.com/products/hifi-receivers/C720BEE-Stereo-Receiver
Onkyo: http://www.onkyousa.com/model.cfm?m=TX-8555&class=Receiver&p=i
HK: http://www.harmankardon.com/specifications.aspx?Region=USA&Country=US&Language=ENG&cat=REC&ser=&prod=HK%203490&sType=PCS

Thanks

Sami

The HK's can be had for insanely low prices, and will be a good match with LSi's.

nikolas812

I'm going to recommend the HK3490.

I just sold one here on the FM.

I was using it power a pair of LSi9's. And it did a damn good job.... I would imagine it would be more than enough for 7's.


Plus Amazon is a authorized dealer and you can get them for $299.99 with free shipping. Performance to price ration is amazing IMO.






Nick

Kex

dylin88 wrote: »

Which one of the below do you guys think is the best for a pair of Lsi7s?

Onkyo 8555, Harmon Kardon 3490, NAD 720BEE


NAD: http://nadelectronics.com/products/hifi-receivers/C720BEE-Stereo-Receiver
Onkyo: http://www.onkyousa.com/model.cfm?m=TX-8555&class=Receiver&p=i
HK: http://www.harmankardon.com/specifications.aspx?Region=USA&Country=US&Language=ENG&cat=REC&ser=&prod=HK%203490&sType=PCS

Thanks

The Oink is not rated for 4 ohms AFIK, so I would forget it. Either of the other two will do a great job, but at $100 extra for the NAD, I would be very tempted to go that way.

dkg999

AudioAdvisor did have the NAD C720BEE receiver for $399. I have that receiver, and I have run my LSi7's and 9's with it. As far as SQ, I would rate it as significantly better than any H/K receiver I have ever listened to.

cfrizz

Welcome Xcapri. The only thing the Onkyo does is limit the amount of power the will be put out with its little switch. Thereby further starving the LSI's of the power they truly need to sound their best.

I swear the LSI's should come with a label saying that unless you are willing to spend the money for ample amplification....buy the RTIa series!:rolleyes:

The increase of newbies coming on KNOWING that they need more power and hoping to get told on here that "no you don't need to cough up more money" has been mind numbing.

If you're not willing to spend what's needed to make the LSI's sound their best why buy them?

xcapri79 wrote: »

With Onkyo you need to look at either the TX-SR706, 806, 876, or 906 for 4 ohm rating. Amazon has the TX-SR706 7.1 channel AVR on for $549.95.
The specs show its 4 ohm rating.
http://www.onkyousa.com/model.cfm?m=TX-SR706&class=Receiver&p=s

Amazon also has the Harman Kardon HK 3490 2 x 120W Stereo Receiver on for $299.00.

Hawkeye

Kathy I have to agree with you completely. I read these posts and just shake my head.

I think what Polk should do is double the price of the LSI line, thereby eliminating a lot of unhappy and disappointed customers. The LSI will gain stature since the people willing buy them have the funds to operate them correctly.

Gordon

Sami

Would you guys and gals just give it a rest. He came in here to ask if he is ok with the Onkyo or if he should consider something else. He was given two choices that are reasonably priced and will do a great job with LSi7's.

dkg999

The LSi series does need good amplification to sound there best. What you get with higher power amplifiers is the ability to produce dynamic power reserves when the source material demands it, and even if you have a lessor quality 200 wpc or greater power amplifier, the 200 wpc's kind of guarantees it can provide the dynamic power reserves the LSi's need. Do you need 200 wpc or greater to make the LSi series sound good ........ absolutely not! What you do need is a good quality amplifer with good SQ and lots of reserve power.

I own the LSi7 and LSi9 and have played around with various amps and receivers. The LSi7's are far easier to drive than the LSi9's and the other speakers in the LSi series. If you look at the spec's on the NAD C720BEE receiver you will see that it has great dynamic power reserves in spite of its 50 wpc rating. Unless you are trying to get to very high SPL, it will drive the LSi7's very nicely and with great SQ. It will do an adequate job with the LSi9's at moderate SPL, but I would make a different recommendation for the LSi9's.

We had a gathering of the RAS with most of our members in attendance, and we were powering a set of LSi15's with various amplifiers. A couple were high wpc Carver and Sunfire, and my measly 125 wpc Marsh amp kicked the living snot out of them. Why, again it's not the wpc that is the determining factor on how well an amplifier is going to drive the LSi series, or what the resulting SQ will be.

You'll get a lot of good information on this forum, and some solid recommendations from members that have experience with the speakers and gear you are considering. Ultimately you need to go get your listen on at CP get togethers or audio stores. And it doesn't hurt to buy what you can afford and is available and go from, and learn from, there. Just drive your speakers and gear at sensible levels and no harm, no foul. Good luck!

mantis

cfrizz wrote: »

Welcome Xcapri. The only thing the Onkyo does is limit the amount of power the will be put out with its little switch. Thereby further starving the LSI's of the power they truly need to sound their best.

I swear the LSI's should come with a label saying that unless you are willing to spend the money for ample amplification....buy the RTIa series!:rolleyes:

The increase of newbies coming on KNOWING that they need more power and hoping to get told on here that "no you don't need to cough up more money" has been mind numbing.

If you're not willing to spend what's needed to make the LSI's sound their best why buy them?

I'm so agree with you. Polk made a mistake when they made the Lsi's and didn't market them correctly or make sure they where powered correctly. I hated when we (tweeter) sold them with yamaha and Denon receivers. We had a few clip and had to add amps. Sucks. But it is how it is.

Shame.

On target get the NAD from above. NAD has plenty of high current and sounds really good. Not to mention you will be able to hear what you paid for. If not sell them, get Rtia series and buy whatever you want.

Dan

inspiredsports

xcapri79 wrote: »

. . . Is there something flawed in the manufacturer's specs or in the THX certification process that is either misleading to or misinterpreted by us lesser mortals?

Yes, dynamic headroom. If output transistors are near saturation at their rated output, it's still "legal" to rate them at that output. It does not speak to sound quality at that rated output. Most of the amps Polkies use to drive their systems have power output ratings that are understated by their manufacturers.

Face

The LSi7 isn't that hard to drive, it doesn't dip below 4 ohms.


Due to it dipping below 4 ohms, the LSi9 is a more difficult load.


There may be graphs of the 15 out there, but I couldn't find any with a quick search.

dkg999

xcapri - go ahead and put together that system and report back on your findings. It may sound absolutely fantabulous! Let us know, we love first hand reviews.

Face - agreed on the LSi7. I think any good quality amp/integrated from about 35 wpc on up will do a good job depending on the room and listening characteristics. I have a restored Marantz 2270 that has been modified to be good with 4 ohm speakers, and the LSi7's sounded very nice with it.

cfrizz

Take another look at those specs. specifically the 1 channel driven. I don't know about you, but in MY real world, my SPEAKERS run in 2,3,5 channels! I NEVER run just one speaker.

It has been proven time & time again that the All Channels Driven number that Onkyo and others have published are out and out lies! So yes the info published is useless!

So needless to say if all you are running is 1 channel, the result might be impressive. But when you start running the 2-7 channels of info that is there to be played, the results are alot different.

My brother has the LSI 7's. He originally ran them with a 50wpc Rotel amplifier. Did it sound great? ABSOLUTELY! However, you could also fry an egg on top of amp after extended use a normal listening levels.

I doubt all that extra heat was doing anything good to the insides of that amp. So while others on here say go for a lower wpc amp for the 7's, I would say proceed at your own risk.

xcapri79 wrote: »

I note the Dynamic Power ratings for the Onkyos with THX certification from their specs.

Onkyo 706
Dynamic Power: 240 W (3 ohms, 1 ch), 210 W (4 ohms, 1 ch), 120 W (8 ohms, 1 ch)

Onkyo 806
Dynamic Power: 300 W (3 ohms, 1 ch), 250 W (4 ohms, 1 ch), 150 W (8 ohms, 1 ch)

Onkyo 876
Dynamic Power: 320 W (3 ohms, 1 ch), 270 W (4 ohms, 1 ch), 160 W (8 ohms, 1 ch)

Onkyo 906
Dynamic Power: 400 W (3 ohms, 1 ch), 300 W (4 ohms, 1 ch), 180 W (8 ohms, 1 ch)

I didn't see the 20-20kHz or even 1 kHz continuous power ratings published at 4 ohms. (8 ohm and some 6 ohm ratings were published.) So by inference are these specs more or less meaningless with respect to being adequate for a pair of LSi7's?

It would be interesting to find a good review that actually performed some measurements to confirm whether or not these Onkyos would actually be inadequate for 4 ohm speakers.

reeltrouble1

xcapri79 wrote: »

I note the Dynamic Power ratings for the Onkyos with THX certification from their specs.

Onkyo 706
Dynamic Power: 240 W (3 ohms, 1 ch), 210 W (4 ohms, 1 ch), 120 W (8 ohms, 1 ch)

Onkyo 806
Dynamic Power: 300 W (3 ohms, 1 ch), 250 W (4 ohms, 1 ch), 150 W (8 ohms, 1 ch)

Onkyo 876
Dynamic Power: 320 W (3 ohms, 1 ch), 270 W (4 ohms, 1 ch), 160 W (8 ohms, 1 ch)

Onkyo 906
Dynamic Power: 400 W (3 ohms, 1 ch), 300 W (4 ohms, 1 ch), 180 W (8 ohms, 1 ch)

I didn't see the 20-20kHz or even 1 kHz continuous power ratings published at 4 ohms. (8 ohm and some 6 ohm ratings were published.) So by inference are these specs more or less meaningless with respect to being adequate for a pair of LSi7's?

It would be interesting to find a good review that actually performed some measurements to confirm whether or not these Onkyos would actually be inadequate for 4 ohm speakers.

The Onkyo products will in fact drive the Lsi, I have done so many many times, however, what the expertdohahagurunoitallsuperduperaudiofolks of club Polk which I am happy to be associated with are saying is they will sound better with better amplification but then what speaker does not???

Carry on my wayward son.

RT1

reeltrouble1

cfrizz wrote: »

I don't know about you, but in MY real world, my SPEAKERS run in 2,3,5 channels! I NEVER run just one speaker.

That is because your a young hot chickie baby and never owned a transistor radio.

Twist and Shout.

RT1

shack

dkg999 wrote:

AudioAdvisor did have the NAD C720BEE receiver for $399. I have that receiver, and I have run my LSi7's and 9's with it. As far as SQ, I would rate it as significantly better than any H/K receiver I have ever listened to.

I played around with a NAD C320BEE integrated amp rated at 50wpc and some LSi9s for a while and the NAD would drive them as loud as I wanted with no degredation of the SQ. Granted it was not in a huge room but the NAD at 50wpc was more that up to the task.

I would not hesitate to run the C720BEE with LSi7 and bet that it would be a sweet sounding rig!

dkg999

shack wrote: »

I would not hesitate to run the C720BEE with LSi7 and bet that it would be a sweet sounding rig!

And you get an LFE out, plus a Zone 2 output, and a great tuna on the C720BEE. The C720BEE has pre-outs so you can add an external amp later, and still use the pre/tuner section. Great receiver, I've been really impressed with it. The remote lets you switch between A/B speaker outputs, so it's really good for comparing two sets of speakers.

Eric W

Well the LSi7's are an easier load than the 9s, 15s, 25s, C and FXs. They're closer to 6 ohm nominal, so the Onkyo (and all the other ones mentioned) will drive them fine.

cfrizz

ROTFLMAO!!!! Teddy, you are a riot! And I'm here to tell you that YES, in my early childhood, I DID own a transistor radio or 2!

I was quite shocked at how good stereo sounded!:eek::D

reeltrouble1 wrote: »

That is because your a young hot chickie baby and never owned a transistor radio.

Twist and Shout.

RT1

inspiredsports

shack wrote: »

. . . I would not hesitate to run the C720BEE with LSi7 and bet that it would be a sweet sounding rig!

NAD is the perfect case in point. NAD watts are understated as there is a huge high current power supply backing them up.

dylin88

First of all, thanks everyone for your comments. I appreciate the help a lot.

I got the Lsi7s used cheaply and given that I'm a college student, I don't really have the funds to get a really extravagant receiver/amp combo. Also, I don't play TV/Music very loudly.

I do have a related question though. Is there anything bad about getting used receivers? Do these things just give out after a few years of use or anything? Reason I'm asking is because I'm looking at a used NAD T760 from 2001 for 200 dollars. Would you guys suggest that over some of the cheaper alternatives I'm looking at right now? I know it's a 5.1 receiver, but I feel like it still might be better than say....the Onkyo 8555? It's also rated at a higher wpc than the NAD C720BEE at half the price.

Thanks again

dkg999

Nothing wrong with buying used. Quality audio gear doesn't just give out. There are things that will go bad or deteriorate with age, but a NAD receiver from 2001 should be fine if it was taken care of. Many people on this forum run vintage audio equipment.

Kex

dylin88 wrote: »

... Reason I'm asking is because I'm looking at a used NAD T760 from 2001 for 200 dollars. Would you guys suggest that over some of the cheaper alternatives I'm looking at right now? I know it's a 5.1 receiver, but I feel like it still might be better than say....the Onkyo 8555? It's also rated at a higher wpc than the NAD C720BEE at half the price.

Thanks again

The T7xx series are fabulous receivers IMO, but they did have quite a few issues when first released, it seems. The current range is T7_5, and I own a T7_4, but anything prior to T7_3 were prone to problems, by reputation (bad solder or something). That said, if the unit is from 2001, it may be safe to assume any problems it was going to have are long gone. I'm not sure. Perhaps if it's not a recurring problem.

Never underestimate the C720BEE IMO, the BEE part refers to a particular design, and a closer look at the specifications, such as 3.4dB of dynamic headroom for instance, might reveal that it may even perform better than the T760 (or the Onkyo you mentioned), if I am not mistaken.

A working T760 would be very tempting, and should surprise you with its outstanding performance IMO, but you should be aware of the issues when making your choice. In case you don't already know it, a good source for NAD, including refurbished units:

http://www.spearitsound.com/nad/nadspec.htm