speaker set up
steelervic
Posts: 142
hi, looking for opinions on which speakers to use and where (mainly between fx500 or rt800 rears) in a 5.1 system here is what i have,
pair rt800
pair rt2000i
pair fx500
cs350ls
psw250
thanks
pair rt800
pair rt2000i
pair fx500
cs350ls
psw250
thanks
Post edited by steelervic on
Comments
-
I would think either the 800's or 2000's up front, I;f i understood the question correctly?? and i would use the fx500's for rears, and of course center and sub accordingly. Not real familiar with the 2000's but are those powered mains? If so maybe use them for mains, and the rest mentioned above. Good luckMY HT RIG:
Sherwood p-965
Sherwood sd871 dvd
Rotel 1075 amp x5
LSI15 mains
LsiC center
LSIfx surround backs
Lsi7 side surrounds
SVS pb12/plus2
2 Channel Rig:
nad 1020 Pre-amp
Rotel 1080 stereo amp
Polk sda 2B
kenwood grunt Tuner
realistic lab 450 TT
Signal cable IC -
rt800's as suround back and the fx/500 as surround.......Dan
My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time. -
Sorry but I disagree with you there mantis. I would use the 800i's as mains. To me they sound better for HT than the single woofer speakers in the RT line.
Steelevic, you should test them out and use the ones you like the most.
Maurice -
organ,
the rt200's have 3 woofers.1 midbass and 2 8 inch.I assume you know that.The rt800's, well I wouldn't put them up front over the rt2000's.The rt2000's sound much better to me at least.
The amount of drivers don't yield better sound quality,most of the time less is more.Dan
My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time. -
Oops I meant 2 mid-woofers. I ignored the 2000i because he's got a sub already. I have compared the 800i to the 600i and 35i and preferred the 800i because of the increased dynamics in the mids but that's just my ears. I just hope our posts are not making Steelevic's decisions more difficult.
Maurice