LSi15s versus LSi25s

aat
aat Posts: 45
edited March 2006 in Speakers
Hi experts,

I'm not comparing the price, I'm comparing the quality. Anyone know which one is better?

Thanks,
AAT
Post edited by aat on
«1

Comments

  • *Seby*-Polk-
    *Seby*-Polk- Posts: 375
    edited March 2006
    LSi 25 is better...but NO for MSRP 2,999. For that reason, I choose the LSi 15.
    My current new system (step by step :D)

    A/V Receiver: YAMAHA RX-V657
    DVD Player: YAMAHA DVD-S657
    Main Towers: polkaudio® Monitor 50
    Wiring: NeoTecH KS1007 OFC High Definition Speaker Cable ( 2 x 2.64 mm² )
  • McLoki
    McLoki Posts: 5,231
    edited March 2006
    LSi 25 is better...but NO for MSRP 2,999. For that reason, I choose the LSi 15.
    I disagree. I found the bass in the LSi25 to be VERY difficult to tune correctly so the speaker sounded right for both music and movies. I would take 9's and a good sub anyday over the 25's. (and 15's over the 9's) :D

    The downside is that the 15's require the most power to run correctly. (and will sound the worst of the LSi line when run from your average AVR.)

    Michael
    Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
    Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
    Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
    Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
    Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
    Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms)
  • aat
    aat Posts: 45
    edited March 2006
    Let say money is not an issue for this case :). I would like to know how much different between LSi15 versus LSi25.

    Thanks,
    AAT
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited March 2006
    Let's see if we can get beyond a simple reply....

    The 25's are an incredible sounding speaker. The imaging is just as detailed and precise as the 15's. For 2 channel only listening, this would be an excellent choice. The powered subs are excellent, but of course they are not going to perform as well as a dedicated stand alone sub. As a total package, they're hard to beat. If you are going to be using them in a Home Theater then the 15's, or even the 9's might be a better choice. Although the 9's go deep, they are not a full range speaker and will benefit from adding a sub into the mix. The 15's on the other hand do not need a sub to fill in the bottom end for 2 channel, they sound fantastic all by themselves. Yes there are those that will disagree and tell you that they feel the bass in the 15's is weak or that they don't sound good without a sub. Some of these concerns can be easily addressed by toying with placement within the room and proper amplification. I doubt seriously that there are any two people that have identical rooms, so of course we are all going to experience differences even with identical speakers. Keep in mind that the only opinion that matters is yours. Audition both the 15's and the 25's, in your own home if possible, and let your ears decide for you.
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D
  • aaharvel
    aaharvel Posts: 4,489
    edited March 2006
    the lsi15 has a passive 8".
    the lsi25 has a powered 10".

    both models will react differently depending on your room situation and power setup. Price issue or no price issue.

    take them both home and experiment.
    and oh be prepared to like the 9's over both of them.
    H/K Signature 2.1+235
    Jungson MagicBoat II
    Revel Performa M-20
    Velodyne cht-10 sub
    Rega P1 Turntable

    "People working at Polk Audio must sit around the office and just laugh their balls off reading many of these comments." -Lush
  • pmckeealaska
    pmckeealaska Posts: 808
    edited March 2006
    I auditioned both the 15's and the 25's, knowing I would be using my speakers for both music and HT. Again, just one man's opinion here, but I found the 25's to be superior to the 15's and am totally happy with them in an HT mode. If anything, somtimes the subwoofers tend to be a little much to handle. The 25's are simply the best speaker for the price I have ever heard. I wouldn't trade them for the 15's......
    Music and Movie Rig

    Samsung 40" HDTV 1080p
    LSi25 Front Speakers
    LSiC Center Channel
    LSiFX Surrounds
    Rotel RB 1080 2-Channel Amp
    NAD T763 Reciever
    Denon DVD 2900 Universal Player

    Audiosource 10 Band Digital Equalizer
    Audioquest CV-8 speaker cables
    Audioquest Sub-X subwoofer cables
    Audioquest King Cobra Interconnects

    Monster AVS 2000 Voltage Stabilizer
    Playstation 3 120GB Slim
  • aat
    aat Posts: 45
    edited March 2006
    My room size is 20x20x7.5. I had a pair of LSi15s before and it sounds great but not exactly what I wanted. I'm in the process of getting a pair of LSi25s and hopefully it does the trick.

    Thanks,
    AAT
  • maxima
    maxima Posts: 143
    edited March 2006
    If you already have a good sub, I see no reason to go the Lsi 25 route. I have two CS Ultras which in my opnion made Lsi 15 the way to go for me.
  • McLoki
    McLoki Posts: 5,231
    edited March 2006
    aat wrote:
    I had a pair of LSi15s before and it sounds great but not exactly what I wanted.

    I defer to my previous statement.....
    McLoki wrote:
    The downside is that the 15's require the most power to run correctly. (and will sound the worst of the LSi line when run from your average AVR.)

    Michael
    Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
    Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
    Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
    Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
    Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
    Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms)
  • aat
    aat Posts: 45
    edited March 2006
    I had Denon AVR-3805. I'm going to get Denon AVR-4306 with LSi25s and hope that would sound better.
  • Airplay355
    Airplay355 Posts: 4,298
    edited March 2006
    spend the extra cashyou are spending on the lsi25's on a freakin amp
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited March 2006
    Airplay355 wrote:
    spend the extra cashyou are spending on the lsi25's on a freakin amp
    I keep reading about these but I'll be damned if I can find a source for 'em. Where do you guys get your Freakin Amps from?
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D
  • McLoki
    McLoki Posts: 5,231
    edited March 2006
    Frank Z wrote:
    I keep reading about these but I'll be damned if I can find a source for 'em. Where do you guys get your Freakin Amps from?
    I got mine off of audiogon. A Freakin great deal on my Freakin monster of an amp.... :D

    Michael
    Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
    Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
    Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
    Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
    Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
    Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms)
  • eugene65
    eugene65 Posts: 29
    edited March 2006
    I like the lis15's over the 25's and ended up buying the 15's. The drivers on the 15's seemed smoother over the freq range. and worked better with eachother. i.e.more of an musical type sound.. The 25's just sounded like a subwoofer was turned on.... and If I want that... I will..ummm turn my subwoofer on.. I didnt even try the 9's... I like the tower look, and they do not req stands.
  • organ
    organ Posts: 4,969
    edited March 2006
    Another thing that didn't come up is where the subs are crossed. The 15's cross over at 150Hz which I think is strange but I'm sure Polk knows what they're doing. The 25's cross at 80Hz. I'd rather take the 25's if I had to pick but damn they're expensive.
  • cfrizz
    cfrizz Posts: 13,415
    edited March 2006
    Welcome AAT. Before you spend all of that additional money on the 25's, & another receiver, you really should get a separate amplifier to run the 15's. The Denon is the weak link here. However, since it has preouts you can get separate amplification for it. It will make all the difference in the world.

    Do not get one that is less than 200 wpc @ 8ohms. Do a search on LSI's & receivers. You will learn a lot.
    Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2
  • organ
    organ Posts: 4,969
    edited March 2006
    Agreed. The receiver is the weak link. What you can do is first find a used 2ch amp around $150 to $200 and use it for the LSi. Yes even a 100w/ch will work better than the amp sections in your receiver. Then, when you're ready to have a full blown LSi system, use that amp for the rears and get the best amp you can for the mains.
  • scottyf
    scottyf Posts: 129
    edited March 2006
    If you aren't getting enough bass out of the LSi15's then get a better amp/preamp combo. Something in your system is deficient. In my room the bass was over-ripe until I pulled those babies a bit more than 3ft into the room and moved my listening position 3ft off the back wall.

    HOME: VPI Classic/Grado Reference Master, EVS-modified Oppo BP83, Bryston DAC, Counterpoint 3000/SA-100 modified by Alta Vista, Polk LSi15


    TRUCK: Pioneer 8600MP, Soundstream 300SX, pr of Xtant 1001i, Autotek SS490.2, Polk SR6500, Polk MMC6500, pr of Polk MM2084DVC
  • fireshoes
    fireshoes Posts: 3,167
    edited March 2006
    I prefer the sound of the LSi25's when cost is not factored in, and I also agree that adding an amp to the system would make a bigger difference than the speaker upgrade.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,201
    edited March 2006
    I perfer the Lsi25's but I'm not a fan of powered towers. I don't like the 25's due to the fact you have to plug them into the wall and have speaker cables/Lfe cables all running them. I hate all the extra wire. but if none of thats a factor to you(I had powered towers before and hated all that) then the 25's are the better sounding choice.
    The Lsi15's are almost as good. But they lsi25's are a bit smoother and dig deeper. the bass is way better.

    Good luck with your sppeaker choice. As mentioned above, don't cheap out on what you run them with. They require alot of clean high current power in order to sound there best. Forget about trying to run them with a tipical receiver.

    Dan
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • reeltrouble1
    reeltrouble1 Posts: 9,312
    edited March 2006
    Buy both, see simple.

    Nobody here can tell what your going to like, just what they like. Which is fine. Its what we do. I would buy the 25's but I am very strange, you would have these very cool high powered subs in your speaks. Besides sounding good, audio must be cool, especially speakers, see the round holes have drivers in them which you have to pump to make sound come out of them that is pleasing to the ear. So powered drivers, more power, power is a good thing. Sound familiar??? Stand alone Subs are for HT or bookshelfs.

    I would buy the 15's beacuse you would have these great sounding speakers for very little relative dough which look great, sound great and do the same thing except no powered driver for the woof. So you need an amp with more flow, juice, current, to make them sing. Either way you win.

    See buy them both!!!!

    RT1
  • Mrtaz
    Mrtaz Posts: 2
    edited March 2006
    I have two LSi25s that I use for the front and six LSi15s that I use for Surround A,B and Surround Back plus one LSiC for the center and a PSW1000 for my Sub. At first I had 15s for the main speakers. I like the difference the 25s made. A Denon AVR5805 reciever powers them. My system is setup as a 9.1. Any suggestions or comments on getting the most from this system is welcomed.
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited March 2006
    Placement, calibration with an SPL meter, and better amplification than you're getting from your receiver.
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D
  • Mrtaz
    Mrtaz Posts: 2
    edited March 2006
    The reciever puts out 170 watts in each of the 10 channels @8 ohms into a 4 ohm rated speaker. I don't think the speakers can handle the full available power now with the exception of the 25s.
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited March 2006
    Mrtaz -- what everyone is telling you is that watts on a receiver are essentially meaningless. If you want better performance from your speakers, get a freakin' amp.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • Dennis Gardner
    Dennis Gardner Posts: 4,861
    edited March 2006
    Mrtaz wrote:
    Any suggestions or comments on getting the most from this system is welcomed.

    Unless your 15s are hung from the ceiling, you aren't getting them above the ear level as sides and surrounds are meant to be. I see it as Frank does that your over speakered and underpowered when using the LSi 15 in the numbers you have with any receiver.

    With that said, I'm sure your room is small enough to not reach the limits of either your electronics or your speakers or you wouldn't have posted with the statements you have so far. Too many around here have driven their receivers into shutdown with far fewer LSis than you have.
    HT Optoma HD25 LV on 80" DIY Screen, Anthem MRX 300 Receiver, Pioneer Elite BDP 51FD Polk CS350LS, Polk SDA1C, Polk FX300, Polk RT55, Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz, ICs-DIY Twisted Prs, Speaker-Raymond Cable

    2 Channel Thorens TD 318 Grado ZF1, SACD/CD Marantz 8260, Soundstream/Krell DAC1, Audio Mirror PP1, Odyssey Stratos, ADS L-1290, ICs-DIY Twisted , Speaker-Raymond Cable
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited March 2006
    Your 15's are rated at 20-250WPC. They'll suck the life right out of your receiver if you give them the chance. Don't get me wrong, I'm not knockin' your gear, but the LSi line can and will demand better and cleaner power than your receiver will ever be capable of delivering.

    FWIW, I've pushed mine well beyond the 250watt mark and they handled the additional power without breaking a sweat.
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D
  • McLoki
    McLoki Posts: 5,231
    edited March 2006
    Mrtaz wrote:
    The reciever puts out 170 watts in each of the 10 channels @8 ohms into a 4 ohm rated speaker. I don't think the speakers can handle the full available power now with the exception of the 25s.
    Page 20 of your manual on the AVR. (under Speaker Impedance)
    The first bullet point: Speakers with an impedance of 6 to 16 ohms can be connected.

    Second Bullet Point: The protector circuit may be activated if the set is played for long periods of time at high volumes when speakers with an impedance lower than the specified impedance are connected.

    Translation - get an amp. (in your case, a few of them)

    I cannot help but think you speaker setup is overkill, but I sure wish I had the opportunity to listen to it at least once.... :D:D

    remember, we are not knocking your setup - you asked what you could do to improve the sound. Get a decent 2 channel amp (at least 200 watts/channel (although high current capability is even more important)), hook it up - and report back if we were wrong or not....

    Wow - all you need is a decent sub (if movies are your bag) and amp and you would have the killer setup.

    Michael
    Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
    Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
    Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
    Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
    Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
    Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms)
  • EricT43
    EricT43 Posts: 130
    edited March 2006
    I can vouch for the amp. I added a 2-ch amp with less rated power than my receiver and it made a noticable improvement. It's about way more than just the peak or RMS power output, it's about current, slew rate, damping factor, etc. Remember 200w is only going to be +6dB louder than 100w (correct me if I'm wrong guys). And if the 100w amp is more detailed and responsive than the 200w receiver, guess which one is going to sound better.
  • McLoki
    McLoki Posts: 5,231
    edited March 2006
    EricT43 wrote:
    Remember 200w is only going to be +6dB louder than 100w (correct me if I'm wrong guys). And if the 100w amp is more detailed and responsive than the 200w receiver, guess which one is going to sound better.
    That is +3db louder (3 db every time the power doubles).

    The main reason that we recommend 200 wpc amps is not really for the watts. It is just that few amp companies start with 200wpc amps so you are moving up the amp food chain a little nomatter what you purchase. By not buying the cheapest amp in the line, many times, you get better current, slew rate, damping factor, etc.

    Michael
    Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
    Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
    Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
    Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
    Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
    Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms)