LSi15s versus LSi25s

2»

Comments

  • aaharvel
    aaharvel Posts: 4,489
    edited March 2006
    EricT43 wrote:
    Remember 200w is only going to be +6dB louder than 100w (correct me if I'm wrong guys).

    +3db Eric. ;)
    H/K Signature 2.1+235
    Jungson MagicBoat II
    Revel Performa M-20
    Velodyne cht-10 sub
    Rega P1 Turntable

    "People working at Polk Audio must sit around the office and just laugh their balls off reading many of these comments." -Lush
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited March 2006
    McLoki wrote:
    That is +3db louder (3 db every time the power doubles).

    The main reason that we recommend 200 wpc amps is not really for the watts. It is just that few amp companies start with 200wpc amps so you are moving up the amp food chain a little nomatter what you purchase. By not buying the cheapest amp in the line, many times, you get better current, slew rate, damping factor, etc.

    Michael
    It's also about "headroom".
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • cfrizz
    cfrizz Posts: 13,415
    edited March 2006
    Please explain what headroom is. Thank you!:)
    shack wrote:
    It's also about "headroom".
    Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited March 2006
  • Dennis Gardner
    Dennis Gardner Posts: 4,861
    edited March 2006
    headroom = reserve power.

    Depending on how they rate amps (since no real standard exists), a 100wpc amp might have 3db headroom if it could produce a burst of energy = to 200 wpc for that dynamic passage that requires that amount of output. This isn't built into power supply and transistors ability to drive that much power, but more in huge capacitors that store the power an discharge when called upon to do so.
    HT Optoma HD25 LV on 80" DIY Screen, Anthem MRX 300 Receiver, Pioneer Elite BDP 51FD Polk CS350LS, Polk SDA1C, Polk FX300, Polk RT55, Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz, ICs-DIY Twisted Prs, Speaker-Raymond Cable

    2 Channel Thorens TD 318 Grado ZF1, SACD/CD Marantz 8260, Soundstream/Krell DAC1, Audio Mirror PP1, Odyssey Stratos, ADS L-1290, ICs-DIY Twisted , Speaker-Raymond Cable
  • McLoki
    McLoki Posts: 5,231
    edited March 2006
    Here is a quick rundown of amplifier terminology (also a great amp article that I came accross while researching)

    Slew Rate: This is a term used to describe how quickly the output of an amplifier can track its input. Slew Rate is usually measured in V / usec. The higher the value (up to a point), the better the amp is at potentially reproducing the subtle nuances and dynamics associated with music reproduction.

    Damping Factor: This is a quantity which defines how quickly the amplifier can stop a reproduced frequency such as a bass note. The higher the damping factor, the better the amp will control the woofer and help reduce overhang distortion (again to a point). The damping factor of an amplifier is mostly dependent on the output impedance of the power amplifier and the ability of the power supply which feeds the power amp.

    Dynamic Headroom: The ability of a receiver or amplifier to output power at a significantly higher level than normal for short periods to accommodate musical peaks or extreme sound effects in films. This specification is important in home theater, where extreme changes in volume occur during the course of a film. Dynamic Headroom is measured in Decibels. If a receiver/amplifier has the ability to double is power output for a brief period to accommodate the conditions described above, it would have a Dynamic Headroom of 3db.

    Watts and Current: This is a great article that it would be worth cutting and pasting, but you can read it yourself here....

    Michael
    Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
    Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
    Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
    Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
    Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
    Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms)
  • 2+2
    2+2 Posts: 546
    edited March 2006
    Michael, that was a very informative post....thanks...funny that the article used the HP/Torque analogy...which is how I ended up thinking about the watts/current.
    System 1: Martin Logan Vantage, Rotel RC 1070, B&K Reference 200.2, Music Hall DAC 15.2, Yamaha 2300

    System 2: LSi15 w/db840, Marantz SR8400, Rotel 1080, RM6800 (C&S), Sony X2020ES

    System 3: LSi7, Yamaha SW215, Music Hall Maven, Music Hall MMF CD25 w/627opamps

    System 4: RTi100, Harman Kardon AVR 230, Panasonic DVD
  • AndyGwis
    AndyGwis Posts: 3,655
    edited March 2006
    I agree with the quality over quantity regarding watts.

    My 75wpc Harman Kardon sounds just as powerful (if not moreso) than the Pioneer vsx-1015 I returned which boasts 120wpc, and my 65 wpc Carver amp seems even more capable than either of them.

    Still need to hook them up bridged to my fronts for 200wpc.

    Just to make sure, if the amp only can handle 8-ohms bridged and my monitors claim to be 8-ohms nominal impedence, I should be okay, right? I know nominal is an average so it might peak and valley higher and lower than 8-ohms.

    Thanks!
    Stereo Rig: Hales Revelation 3, Musical Fidelity CD-Pre 24, Forte Model 3 amp, Lexicon RT-10 SACD, MMF-5 w/speedbox, Forte Model 2 Phono Pre, Cardas Crosslink, APC H15, URC MX-950, Lovan Stand
    Bedroom: Samsung HPR-4252, Toshiba HD-A2, HK 3480, Signal Cable, AQ speaker cable, Totem Dreamcatchers, SVS PB10-NSD, URC MX-850
  • Midnite Mick
    Midnite Mick Posts: 1,591
    edited March 2006
    I had that Pioneer before. It got some very good reviews and I thought that it sounded horrible. It produced the grainiest sound I have ever heard.

    Mike
    Modwright SWL 9.0 SE (6Sons Audio Thunderbird PC with Oyaide 004 terminations)
    Consonance cd120T
    Consonance Cyber 800 tube monoblocks (6Sons Audio Thunderbird PC's with Oyaide 004 terminations)
    Usher CP 6311

    Phillips Pronto TS1000 Universal Remote
  • Dennis Gardner
    Dennis Gardner Posts: 4,861
    edited March 2006
    You've got it right Andy, it is an average. Normally, speakers have lower impedance at the lower end of their frequency spectrum and higher at the high end. Some 4 ohm models from Polk dip under 2 ohms at their lowest point.
    HT Optoma HD25 LV on 80" DIY Screen, Anthem MRX 300 Receiver, Pioneer Elite BDP 51FD Polk CS350LS, Polk SDA1C, Polk FX300, Polk RT55, Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz, ICs-DIY Twisted Prs, Speaker-Raymond Cable

    2 Channel Thorens TD 318 Grado ZF1, SACD/CD Marantz 8260, Soundstream/Krell DAC1, Audio Mirror PP1, Odyssey Stratos, ADS L-1290, ICs-DIY Twisted , Speaker-Raymond Cable