Samsung to quit making new Blu-ray players??

Toolfan66Toolfan66 Posts: 14,201
https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/17/18228584/samsung-stops-producing-blu-ray-players

Changes seem to be happening fast with physical media...

Comments

  • BlueFoxBlueFox Posts: 11,504
    Yes. Those that want the best are a niche market.
    Bud - Silicon Valley

    Lumin X1
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD
    Pass XP-22 pre, X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers, SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on preamp, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • EmlynEmlyn Posts: 2,375
    The article is confusing. Seems from other articles that Samsung is saying they will not develop any new 4K models because they have realized they can't compete for market share with Sony and Panasonic. I would not recommend a Samsung over a Sony or Panasonic player now anyway, but I did buy a Samsung 4K player when they first came out. It was poorly built but worked ok.

    One thing I have really noticed in the last couple of years is that even the big box stores like Target and Walmart in my area are carrying hardly any physical media. A Target store I go to once a year remodeled last year to be in the store's latest format and I went in looking for their media section and found basically one row with new and recent video releases at full MSRP. Before the remodel, the store had probably six times the floor space for Blu Ray/DVD/4K discs. Their CD selection was even smaller. Best Buy has beefed up their selections from what they used to be though.

    I think the model of selling physical media online rather than in stores is way better, especially through Amazon Prime.
    1. Polk LSiM707, 704C, 703; Dual SVS SB2000 subwoofers; Marantz SR7011 receiver; Parasound A23 amp; Oppo 205; Sony 65" 4K TV; FIOS; PS Audio Power Plant Premier; MIT S2 cables
    2. JM Labs Electra 920.1; Sonic Frontiers Line 3 Preamp; Classe Model 25 amp; Sony HAP-Z1ES; Oppo 105D; Music Hall MMF7 and Acoustech phono pre; PS Audio Power Director; MIT S1 Cables
    3. Polk LSiM703; Parasound JC2BP and A21; Sony 48" 4K TV; Wyred4Sound DAC 2; Oppo 203; Squeezebox Touch; MIT S3 cables
  • mantismantis Posts: 15,364
    Samsung makes crappy products in my opinion especially their Blu ray players. We still have Panasonic, Sony and Pioneer Elite for good quality models. I think it's safe to say we are all in good hands.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • treitz3treitz3 Posts: 13,034
    edited February 18
    Never mind. Posting without coffee has it's challenges...

    Please disregard.

    To.
    In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence.

    The best way to enjoy digital music reproduction is to never listen to good analogue reproduction.
  • dagodago Posts: 38
    treitz3 wrote: »
    Never mind. Posting without coffee has it's challenges...

    Please disregard.

    To.

    Ahem....cough cough, dressing before coffee is also a challenge for you. :) :) :)
  • mrlorenmrloren Posts: 2,006
    Anything before coffee is a challenge for me....

    I don't like the Samsung players. I've had two of them and they suck One was a low end and the other mid range ($150) both had the same problems and needed to be unplugged every month for a reboot.

    I've been happy with my Sony and Panasonic players. The Oppo is just fantastic for picture and sound.
    When I was a kid my parents told me to turn it down. Now I'm an adult and my kids tell me to turn it down.

    Family Room:
    Samsung UN75RU710DFXZA,
    Denon AVR-X4400H, Emotiva XPA3 GEN3
    Oppo BDP-93,Sony UBP-X800BM, WD Live HUB.
    Main: Polk LsiM 705
    Center: Polk LSiM 704C
    Front High/Rear High In-Ceiling Polk 80F/X RT
    Surrounds: Polk S15
    Sub: HSU VTF3-MK5

    Bed Room;
    Marantz SR5010, BDP-S270
    Main: Polk Signature S20
    Center: Polk Signature S35
    Rear: Polk R15
    Sub: HSU STF-2

    Working Warehouse;
    Sony 2100ES AVR, Sony DVP-NS3100ES for disc
    Cerwin Vega AT-12 (blasters) Advent Prodigy (listening)
    Old sony 12" Sub
    Mini tower PC with 400GB of music
  • erniejadeerniejade Posts: 4,902
    Streaming is taking over much of this market. I haven't bought or rented a Bluray in a few years.
    Den: Lumin D1,Wireworld Silver Eclipse, KEF LS50 Wireless, Velodyne SPL1200, Technics 1200, Denon DL160, Jolida D9,

    Living Room:,T+A PA 1530R, Tyler Highland H2, Aries Mini, High Fidelity Reveal RCA, Grant Fidelity Tube Dac 11, W4S recovery, Wireworld Platinum Starlight, PS Audio Direct Stream JR.

    Have but haven't used in a while: LH Labs VI Dac, Cayin SCD50T

  • GlennDogGlennDog Posts: 1,979
    I just canceled my Netflix DVD account.
    Thought I'd use it, but I've had the same 3 DVDs site's here for 2 months!
    Power Rogue M180 monos & Adcom GFA 5802
    PS Audio PerfectWave Power Plant 10
    Rears Salk SuperCharged Surrounds
    Source PSA PWT into NSD Supremo
    Pre/Pro Integra DHC 40.1
    LCD Samsung LN46B750
    Mains Salk HT2-TL
    Center Salk HT2C
    Pre Cary SLP-05
    Wires WW & MIT
  • pkquatpkquat Posts: 657
    I have an older midgrade Samsung BD from ~2013. The picture and speed have been above par IMO. How are the Sony and Panasonic at playing media off a multi TB hard drive?

    IMO the Samsung does a really good job of playing movies, clips, FLAC files, MP3's right off a multi TB HD. It supports a LOT of formats and so far odd resolutions from phones and such have not been an issue. The menu structure is ok for movies and clips, but a little cumbersome for MP3 and FLAC.
  • a multi layer issue that combines the low cost of internet speeds and streaming services. With about every TV sold within the last 3 years have the built in ability to stream full HD to UHD you can only look at the cost factor of producing an additional piece of gear that is not truly needed as it once was. In todays world you can cut out several pieces of audio and video gear that we all chased at one time for the best quality. You now have AVR's that have the ability to stream music from a variety of sources including your own collection, combine that with a smart TV that comes with Roku or chromecast that gives you the video streaming you can cut out 2 or more pieces of gear from any setup. We look back and complain about how Napster and other early digital music sources killed off quality sounding music, but now the technology has appeared to have caught up to please both sides of the argument.
    Family Room HT 7.2/i]:
    Vizio P55-E1UHD Pioneer Elite SC-LX502 Pioneer Elite BDP 85FD Pioneer Elite N-50 Panamax M5300-EX
    Living room 2ch:
    Integra ADM 2.1 Teac EQ MKII Squeezebox Touch Fluance SX Speakers Panamax M5100-EX
    Upstairs media room:
    Vizio D1 32" Pioneer Elite VSX 32 Sony PS4 Squeezebox Touch Polkaudio Rti 6's fronts Polk CSR Center Polkaudio PSW 10 sub Panamax M5300-EX
    Master bedroom:
    Vizio VF550M Pioneer Elite VSX 33 Pioneer Elite BDP 80FD Squeezebox Touch Polk audio Monitor 40 II fronts, Rears Optimus LX5s Jensen CCS center Polkaudio PSW 10 sub Panamax 5100
  • tophatjohnnytophatjohnny Posts: 2,489
    When we got our Sammy 65 4k we picked up their little curve blue ray player and it's like a toy to me. Works but nothing magical. Love the curved screen though.
    "if it's not fun, it's not worth it & remember folks, "It's All About The Music"!!
    *****************************
  • rpf65rpf65 Posts: 2,028
    I’ll start with I’m not a fan of Samsung products.

    Samsung, in general, usually targets the mid-range price in many of their products. With their decision to exit the BD market, it’s another bad sign for those who enjoy spinning those silver disks.

    I can understand people gravitating toward streaming. A new release in 4K, costs about $30. Of all the movies released last year, I’m pretty sure that there was less than 10 that I would even consider buying at that price point. Just seems the industry is putting out content that just doesn’t interest me. Sure special effects have gotten better, but most everything else has gotten worse.

    When it comes to quality between physical players versus streaming the same content, it seems to be getting closer. For the most part, there isn’t much, if any, difference between low end players and streaming. To see/hear differences, you have to get a player in the $500 and up. There may be an exception out there, but probably not three of them.

    If the majority of people are happy with MP3 type quality, or less, with music, they will probably be happy with the same quality when it comes to movies. Although I understand manufacturers getting out of this market, I hope a few will continue to remain in it.
  • tophatjohnnytophatjohnny Posts: 2,489
    rpf65 wrote: »
    I’ll start with I’m not a fan of Samsung products.

    Samsung, in general, usually targets the mid-range price in many of their products. With their decision to exit the BD market, it’s another bad sign for those who enjoy spinning those silver disks.

    I can understand people gravitating toward streaming. A new release in 4K, costs about $30. Of all the movies released last year, I’m pretty sure that there was less than 10 that I would even consider buying at that price point. Just seems the industry is putting out content that just doesn’t interest me. Sure special effects have gotten better, but most everything else has gotten worse.

    When it comes to quality between physical players versus streaming the same content, it seems to be getting closer. For the most part, there isn’t much, if any, difference between low end players and streaming. To see/hear differences, you have to get a player in the $500 and up. There may be an exception out there, but probably not three of them.

    If the majority of people are happy with MP3 type quality, or less, with music, they will probably be happy with the same quality when it comes to movies. Although I understand manufacturers getting out of this market, I hope a few will continue to remain in it.

    Oh they will and are.
    "if it's not fun, it's not worth it & remember folks, "It's All About The Music"!!
    *****************************
  • rooftop59rooftop59 Posts: 5,682
    rpf65 wrote: »
    When it comes to quality between physical players versus streaming the same content, it seems to be getting closer. For the most part, there isn’t much, if any, difference between low end players and streaming. To see/hear differences, you have to get a player in the $500 and up. There may be an exception out there, but probably not three of them.

    Really? The cheap LG is my sig is clearly superior on audio and video when playing a standard blu ray vs streaming the same movie HD on vudu or netflix. Now I will admit that on my very mid level tv the picture quality difference is more subtle, but the audio quality is FAR superior
    rpf65 wrote: »
    If the majority of people are happy with MP3 type quality, or less, with music, they will probably be happy with the same quality when it comes to movies. Although I understand manufacturers getting out of this market, I hope a few will continue to remain in it.

    I agree with you 100% there. The clear audio difference I hear doesn't matter to most people.

    HT Rig:
    Denon AVR-X4200w; Peachtree Audio NovaPre; B&K TX4430; Bryson BPD-1; Mains: Dynaudio Excite x18; Center - Polk cs400i; Heights, Center Surround - Klipsch KHC - 6 In-Ceiling; Surrounds - Monoprice in-ceiling; Sub - HSU VTF-2 MK5; LG UP870 4K BDP; NVidia ShieldTV
    ;
    Master Bedroom
    Cambridge Azur 551r; Definitive Technology SM45, NHT Super One CI surrounds, Martin Logan Dynamo (original), Squeezebox Touch
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!