How Important is Imaging to You?
Comments
-
Thanks Mark for the recommendation. I appreciate it sir.
Tom~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~ -
Glad you are giving that amp a work out. Enjoy.
-
$65 for the records? Jeeze Louise, thanks but no thanks. Just checked Tidal and that album is on it along with 166 other Grateful Dead albums. Holy Mackerel. No wonder Dead fans live in tented communities with their hippie brethren, all they can afford are albums.
Anyway I starred Reckoning, I'll give it a listen after I get something like the Bluesound Node 2.afterburnt wrote: »They didn't speak a word of English, they were from South Carolina.
Village Idiot of Club Polk -
I am really impressed with tidal sound quality too. Damn what a bargain.
-
Glad you are giving that amp a work out. Enjoy.
Within its limitations (5 wpc) it is very good. Very good.
I am trying to work up some sort of integrated synopsis.
Buoyed by unexpected 'success' with the KLH 5s -- time to try more loudspeakers with it, now.
It is a cool piece.
So much so that it makes me start to think seriously (cheapskate that I am) about the big-bucks Pass amplifiers
-
$65 for the records? Jeeze Louise, thanks but no thanks. Just checked Tidal and that album is on it along with 166 other Grateful Dead albums. Holy Mackerel. No wonder Dead fans live in tented communities with their hippie brethren, all they can afford are albums.
Anyway I starred Reckoning, I'll give it a listen after I get something like the Bluesound Node 2.
Heh -- I have a warped copy of one of the two LP disks that I found at the Harvard, MA dump years back.
It is a good sounding rekkid, tho'. No, I am not recommending spending 65 smackers for a copy, though!
I also have a cassette dub of the album I made back when it was new -- I may have to dig it out & try it sometime -
mhardy6647 wrote: »
It is a cool piece.
So much so that it makes me start to think seriously (cheapskate that I am) about the big-bucks Pass amplifiers
They are SUPERB! Worthy every penny
"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul! -
mhardy6647 wrote: »
It is a cool piece.
So much so that it makes me start to think seriously (cheapskate that I am) about the big-bucks Pass amplifiers
They are SUPERB! Worthy every penny
That is what I am afraid of. I'll have to donate a kidney -- and that'll probably just get me a monoblock. -
You wouldn't need anything over the XA30.5, if even that much.
For the stuff he runs, a First Watt might even suffice.
"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul! -
Yes indeed.
But that's another story for another day.
-
have to donate two kidneys to get two mono blocks.
[/quote]
That is what I am afraid of. I'll have to donate a kidney -- and that'll probably just get me a monoblock.[/quote]
-
yeah, I left the math for y'all to do -- QED and all that.
I'm not too good at math.
I mean, I could live with one kidney and a mono system, too, you know?
-
mhardy6647 wrote: »I mean, I could live with one kidney and a mono system, too, you know?
So you don't really care about imaging then? If a mono audio system was my only option I'd just get a decent iPod dock and be done with the hobby.Post edited by Nightfall onafterburnt wrote: »They didn't speak a word of English, they were from South Carolina.
Village Idiot of Club Polk -
Ohh Nooo! Josh just stepped on a landmine!
-
Fixed?afterburnt wrote: »They didn't speak a word of English, they were from South Carolina.
Village Idiot of Club Polk -
actually I was going to opine earlier in this thread that true mono reproduced through a true point source radiator may be the best possible evocation of a real live musical performance -- now that I'm bartering body parts, heck, I'll just go ahead and post it!
-
mhardy6647 wrote: »actually I was going to opine earlier in this thread that true mono reproduced through a true point source radiator may be the best possible evocation of a real live musical performance -- now that I'm bartering body parts, heck, I'll just go ahead and post it!
Stick to your convictions, Doc....
-
mhardy6647 wrote: »I mean, I could live with one kidney and a mono system, too, you know?
So you don't really care about imaging then? If a mono audio system was my only option I'd just get a decent iPod dock and be done with the hobby.
The problem is MrH's iPod dock would look like this within 24hrs as h tried to figure out how to put tubes in it or adding an Altec horn
2-channel: Modwright KWI-200 Integrated, Dynaudio C1-II Signatures
Desktop rig: LSi7, Polk 110sub, Dayens Ampino amp, W4S DAC/pre, Sonos, JRiver
Gear on standby: Melody 101 tube pre, Unison Research Simply Italy Integrated
Gone to new homes: (Matt Polk's)Threshold Stasis SA12e monoblocks, Pass XA30.5 amp, Usher MD2 speakers, Dynaudio C4 platinum speakers, Modwright LS100 (voltz), Simaudio 780D DAC
erat interfectorem cesar et **** dictatorem dicere a -
There're reasons I never show y'all what it looks like behind my hifi junk.
-
mhardy6647 wrote: »There're reasons I never show y'all what it looks like behind my junk.
Origin of Tony's "sack back" saying? -
ken brydson wrote: »mhardy6647 wrote: »There're reasons I never show y'all what it looks like behind my junk.
Origin of Tony's "sack back" saying?
And another way to show your age....things that make you go
2-channel: Modwright KWI-200 Integrated, Dynaudio C1-II Signatures
Desktop rig: LSi7, Polk 110sub, Dayens Ampino amp, W4S DAC/pre, Sonos, JRiver
Gear on standby: Melody 101 tube pre, Unison Research Simply Italy Integrated
Gone to new homes: (Matt Polk's)Threshold Stasis SA12e monoblocks, Pass XA30.5 amp, Usher MD2 speakers, Dynaudio C4 platinum speakers, Modwright LS100 (voltz), Simaudio 780D DAC
erat interfectorem cesar et **** dictatorem dicere a -
speaking of stereo -- I just read that Alan Blumlein is slated to receive a posthumous Grammy for inventing it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4209900/A-Grammy-British-genius-changed-music-ever.html
-
Do you think he ever envisioned it being the sole focus for multi-million dollar investments in one system?
I guessing "no" -- but he may have been more interested in ensuring that all of Europe didn't end up speaking -- well -- another language besides English, French, etc.
oh, and speaking of mono, this is kind of interesting (offered strictly as-is and FWIW):
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/vintage/messages/23/238970.html
-
mhardy6647 wrote: »speaking of stereo -- I just read that Alan Blumlein is slated to receive a posthumous Grammy for inventing it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4209900/A-Grammy-British-genius-changed-music-ever.html
Here is a quote from the above article..."It was three years later that he had the 'Eureka moment' that led to the development of stereo recording and playback. While watching a film with his wife Doreen, he became frustrated that the sound did not match what was happening on screen.
He decided it would be more realistic if he used two microphones to record separately. The development – 'binaural recordings' – is what is now known as stereo."
Sounds to me like that is very similar to imaging.