XSchop's modded 5jr

Options
13

Comments

  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    Well, I got an email that the sonic barrier was on back order. I got on the line to the local foam supplier and asked if they had a piece of "Open-cell Poly-ether" and they had some in 1.5" so I installed some 4x4 pieces above and below crossover as WMG suggested..... Seams like the mids have opened up and I cannot hear any diminished bass.....Happy camper here. No Crown involved in this mod, sorry guys...

    58s8496d9yv7.jpg
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    edited February 2016
    Options
    Round 2......

    This time I have a later set of 5Jr X-overs with the boards and 1.0 ohm resistor that I will install to see what difference I will hear when I'm done with this second set... I took precise dimensions of these because I was going to machine adapters to recess them out of the cabinets and make a solid strip of sound barrier, but it would be overkill on the foam. Thanks Westmassguy for your advice.
    lm2c8jaqup22.png

    zoqcc4t6clzv.jpg

    Although I didn't use the internal billet braces to remove the cabinet flex because the faceplates solved that issue, I am sharing dimensions here....

    Rear interface is 1.50" diameter tapped 1/2-20. A button-head 1/2-20 x1.75" length is perfect, just drill the box with 1/2" drill bit by hand.

    Total length is 6.8125
    Baffle end is 1/2" dia. Tapped 1/4-20.
    A 1/4-20 countersunk head would also work great if the area was carefully drilled. But I would take it a step further and make some internal mounts for the top 2 midwoofer fasteners to mount....lwfbknj6b3l3.jpg
    ekz7i3g9cln6.jpg


    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    I found a thread where the Poly switch was replaced with a 0.5 ohm resistor in SDA's. Does this make much difference in sound? I'm only going to be running 80 wpc to these....
    op9k7iymkywr.jpg
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • westmassguy
    westmassguy Posts: 6,850
    Options
    There's more than one thread addressing Polyswitches. Replace it with a .5 ohm, 10 or 12 watt Mills/Mundorf Resistor
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/143984/my-2as-finally-finished-almost/p1
    Center: Custom Built forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/150760/my-center-channel-project/p1
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom Built forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/151647/my-surround-project/p1
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, Hurricane Nuts, Blackhole5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-600, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer

    dhsspeakerservice.com/
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    edited February 2016
    Options
    x3g0ru96nto2.png
    Thank you again WMG. I placed the order for them with the 1.0 ohm Mills and same 12uF Dayton caps. These will be much easier to mod/solder with the boards....

    Post edited by xschop on
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    Sonically.....night and day....

    9unn024a4oja.jpg
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,092
    Options
    Dayton caps aren't all that great. For a little bit more, Clarity caps are preferred. Certainly better than 30+ year old electrolytics, but Dayton, Bennic and Solen aren't the best choice they aren't as smooth and artifact free as a Clarity or Sonicap.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    Thank you H9.... Where do you get them from?
    Ill try them in my next setup.
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • deucekazoo
    Options
    Polk S10, S8, S4
    Polk RT8
    Polk Monitor 7s
    Working on getting SDAs
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    Question for Polksda....
    What would a "Time Aligned Jr" do/sound?
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • westmassguy
    westmassguy Posts: 6,850
    Options
    The original Polk stands had a 6 degree backward incline. This "Time Aligns" the tweeter and woofer.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/143984/my-2as-finally-finished-almost/p1
    Center: Custom Built forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/150760/my-center-channel-project/p1
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom Built forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/151647/my-surround-project/p1
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, Hurricane Nuts, Blackhole5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-600, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer

    dhsspeakerservice.com/
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    So technically that puts the center of the woofer cone in plane with the tweeter dome?
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • Polkaguy58
    Options
    Theoreticaly low frequencies travell slower than their treble counterparts.
    If the woofer is slightly closer to the listener than the tweeter is, the sound waves are supposed to arrive at your ears at the same time.
    I'm no scientist, but I just finished "time aligning" my newest NHT (Victorian) sub to my KEF C-15 mini speakers and it seems to make a difference....at least to my ears.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    Ah Ok. So Polk just cheated by placing -6° on the vertical plane instead of making a baffle where the woofer sets out further.
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • Polkaguy58
    Options
    Tilted back stands have been around for years, so my guess is that the "Time Alignment Theory" has legs.....................as does my latest audio abomination, The Victorian Subwoofer:

    i7ypueavgx3y.jpg
  • pkquat
    pkquat Posts: 748
    Options
    The crossovers also come into play. Wiki has some good info on time aligning, and there is a good diyaudio post July 25, 2003. Another reason for the tilt is keep the speakers low, but aim the tweeters and sound upwards so the highs are less muffled by carpet or reflected by hardwood. This helps keep the speakers smaller and on more stable stands vs. tall stands and towers.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    Nice Polksda. I understand subs are electronically timed. Now I see what PKQ is saying.
    So if the monitors are at ear level like my workbench without tilted stands, it would benefit from the woofer being stepped out an inch or so like Polksda commented originally?
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • pkquat
    pkquat Posts: 748
    Options
    Possibly. It still depends on the crossover. I don't remember the specifics of hand, but I think the polks use a 12db, 6db combo that is supposed to flatten the response out.. It also depends where the "acoustic center is". Some times if the speaker is raised higher only a small tilt helps with the sound, or other times none is needed. Try some things and see how it sounds. On and off axis response of the tweeter also comes into play. My M4A's have a much narrower axis range than my 5A's regardless of the angle. The 4A's are also a little better off axis above the speaker than below. This has a greater effect than the time alignment.

    A side question have you compared the SL5000's to the RDO-198's?
  • Polkaguy58
    Polkaguy58 Posts: 352
    edited February 2016
    Options
    This sub is devoid of any electronics/crossover, just a nice heavy, laquered box, with a very springy 10" woofer and a pair of banana jacks in the rear.
    It pairs up well with the Velodyne plate amp that I removed from an old blown sub and mounted into it's own heat vented box.
    I borrowed the legs from a foot stool I spotted in the dumpster.
    Being a double amputee, I hate seeing a good set of legs being tossed aside.
  • Polkaguy58
    Polkaguy58 Posts: 352
    edited February 2016
    Options
    Don't know why this double posted..........please ignore
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    edited February 2016
    Options
    I have not heard 198's I don't believe. Just these old twangy sl-1000 and 2000's. These SL5000's are so much smoother, not as overbearing.

    I love the sound of my new 5jr's, I'm only asking about the stepped design for future mod.

    And to Polksda, I have seen 180° subwoofer dials, is what I was referring to.
    Your sub is trick.
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • Polkaguy58
    Options
    Google Technics Linear Phase speakers and you'll see some time aligned designs.
    When you think of it, any speaker with horn tweeters have the tweeter's driver deep inside the cabinet (about three inches or so) , so thus could be considered time aligned.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    edited February 2016
    Options
    Yes, but a horn inserted won't fix the baffle flex or the midwoofer air leaks.

    I'm thinking of a 4 birds with 1 stone mod.
    Post edited by xschop on
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    So at -6° tilt, the 5Jr's midwoofer is moved forward 14mm in relation to tweeter.
    Those pics of the Technics speakers have them much further back obviously.
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    edited February 2016
    Options
    Got some time to play. Opened up the cabinets to start work and original X-overs are both also different, and still no board. I'll take a peek and see what value that SINGLE ceramic resistor is.....
    Looks like Polk subcontracted with Groovfold on the cabinets. The bridge is also a flexy affair on these....o9hhcwy8k7s5.jpg


    rfjbhxd3bwis.jpg
    bgzgl86makz7.jpg
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    Options
    These 6502's state 33 & 35 Res.
    Power Grab and sound deadener done....
    iw5wwrpvmbay.jpg

    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • msg
    msg Posts: 9,480
    Options
    which brand sound damping material is that?
    I disabled signatures.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    edited February 2016
    Options
    Tite Seal....60 mil
    I've done complete custom vehicle interiors..... my own that is.
    Better sound deadening at WAY less cost than Dynamat.
    Here's my Porvette wheel well sub and exhaust sound isolation. Adding 4 more cyl. to the mix made the interior rumble.
    bbycmj2bujzq.jpg
    mymsmhyybajv.jpg
    m11gtexm4lzs.jpg
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 4,720
    edited February 2016
    Options
    I didn't mention it on last set because they were not off by much, but these baffles are off kilter the way they're installed from factory. .030 inset on one end and .070 on the other. I removed vinyl and will belt-sand face edges on these and square them up before gluing. Sound deadening foam is MUCH easier to install when cabs are empty hehe....
    The bottom edge where the cabs are folded had separation, so I sealed it last night with glue and this morning went to work on spot-glazing. Auto body works great and dries quick and hard....
    49tq8sbaaxxg.jpg

    nj2gri8dxgix.jpg
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • Polkaguy58
    Options
    If you're going to attach a metal faceplate like the last job, maybe put a self stick foam gasket tape around the old speaker shelf to seal it off between the plate ?