Where does brightness come from in a receiver?
Options
gocard
Posts: 19
People have talked about the brightness of Yamaha receivers and that paired with the RTi towers, might not be such a great fit. I'm wondering if that's the amp in the yamahas, or if it's the preprocessing.
The reason I ask is because I'm debating between getting a Marantz SR7002 (for 1k) or waiting for the new yamahas and pioneers (possibly denons) to come out (for around 500) and getting some outlaw 200W monoblocks for my towers (my setup is: RTi8, CSi3, RTi4, PSW10) and using the receiver for the center and rears. Getting the Marantz wouldn't prevent me from adding amplifiers later on, but I want to know if I'd be putting my money where I'll get the most bang for the buck.
The reason I ask is because I'm debating between getting a Marantz SR7002 (for 1k) or waiting for the new yamahas and pioneers (possibly denons) to come out (for around 500) and getting some outlaw 200W monoblocks for my towers (my setup is: RTi8, CSi3, RTi4, PSW10) and using the receiver for the center and rears. Getting the Marantz wouldn't prevent me from adding amplifiers later on, but I want to know if I'd be putting my money where I'll get the most bang for the buck.
Post edited by gocard on
Comments
-
It may be the processing, but I'd also think the amp has something to do with it too. Different output transistors in amps sound different, but the sound might just be caused by the way the preamp/processing section of the receiver handles highs.
I may be wrong though...polkaudio RT35 Bookshelves
polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
polkaudio DSWPro550WI
polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
polkaudio RM6750 5.1
Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good! -
I too would think it would be the pre amp section of a receiver. To me that's where everything happens. I would think a Marantz or Denon would handle the highs with more finesse.PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin: -
It's all video's fault.
Richard? Who's your favorite Little Rascal? Alfalfa? Or is it........................Spanky?.................................Sinner. -
I use my Yamaha RX-V2500 as a pre for HT and when I added the B&K amp it took away some of the brightness, but not all of it. Just going by my personal experience i'd say it's a combination of the two, with more of it being caused by the pre section.Speakers: Polk LSi15
Pre: Adcom GFP-750 with HT Bypass
Amp: Pass Labs X-150
CD/DVD Player: Classe CDP-10
Interconnects: MIT Shortgun S3 Pro XLR
Speaker cables: MIT MH-750 bi-wire
TT:Micro Seiki DD-35
Cartridge:Denon DL-160
Phono Pre:PS Audio GCPH -
I previously had a Yammie RX-V2700 and now have the Marantz SR-8001. It is like chalk and cheese. Both mains (RTi10) were / are running through my Rotel RB-991 and the Marantz sounds THAT much better on 2 channel.
I have recently read a review on the Yammie RX-V3800, which apparently addresses all those issues with 2 channel anyway and sounds not so tinny anymore - maybe worth a listen? Anyway, I don't think you can go wrong with the SR-7002, which has all the latest decoders and HDMI 1.3 to boot.
Good luck anyway.Regards - Gaz from the land of Oz
Main System
Denon - AVC-4700H
Emotiva - XPA-9
Cambridge Audio - Azur 851C - CXUHD
Polk Audio - Legend L800 - Legend L400 - Legend L900 - LSiM fx - OWM3
SVS - PB1000 x 2
Foxtel - iQ4
Belkin - Pure AV PF40
Sony K77A9G
Front Room System
PS Audio - Sprout 100
Cambridge Audio - CXC S2 - CA752BD
Sony - UBX800 4K BluRay
Polk Audio - Legend L200 -
It's the preamp section. The amp doesn't change the sound as much.
Pioneer Elite already has wonderful receivers out right now that you can do everything that goes on today and into the near future. I suggest a nice Pioneer Elite vsx92txh and go. Marantz makes nice sounding receivers as well. I perfer Pioneer Elite.Dan
My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
