Security with A.I.
Options
Comments
-
Thanks for taking the time to type all of that out, John. Honestly, I am more worried about someone stealing my identity and taking out 5 mortgages on my house, then finding out near foreclosure that it happened.
Most of my audio purchases these days are made by speaking directly to the designer or manufacturer, and I just buy direct through them, sometimes at a reduced rate. So I don't see how AI could infiltrate an already agreed upon price. Most all of my groceries are through Sam's Club (fixed pricing for business members), so while they may get me on some items, the most expensive ones (audio purchases), I don't see how they could affect pricing, although I may be nieve to think that. I just don't know how they could alter the prices.
I have no smart appliances. But the guest coming over aspect was enlightening. That is definitely a vulnerability!
Question - would it matter if they were only allowed on my guest network? Or are we just as vulnerable?
Tom
OK, so, this dynamic pricing is not everywhere...yet. The vast majority of stores are not doing it...yet.
For it to work, you need to go through a retail front. A direct buy from a manufacturer or something is not likely to be affected. Mainly because they don't have the resources to implement it.
Dynamic pricing already happens, though. It's also referred to as "surge pricing" and you see it happening the most obviously with air fares and Uber pricing. High demand surge pricing has been around a long time.
But the newest iteration is called algorithmic pricing and it is a form of dynamic pricing that follows "algorithms" that "follow" you. With facial recognition and digital device promiscuity, they can dynamically identify your personal profile, establish your base algorithm and change pricing based on that. So if they think you're rich, they'll bilk you out of a few more dollars.
The biggest concern isn't so much the pricing shenanigans but rather, how the hell did the Kroger get your personal data to know how much to shaft you on that 3 pound block of Velveeta you got your eye on?
There's been legislation put in place about it already:In November, 2025, New York state's "Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act" came into effect. The law requires companies to disclose when prices are set using a consumer's personal data. The bill enables civil penalties of up to $1,000 per violation.
So basically, NY requires stores that use this type of pricing to disclose that it is in effect.In April 2026, Maryland Governor Wes Moore signed HB0895 into law, which bans grocery stores and third-party grocery delivery services from using consumer personal data to raise prices for consumers. The law authorizes $10,000 penalties for first-time violations and $25,000 for repeat offenses. The law is scheduled to take effect in October 2026
Maryland basically outlawed it completely. Several other states are following this tact.
The personal algorithm pricing is still a ways away from being really prime time. It's mostly been in a test and see phase with targeted markets with a diverse population like NYC.Retailers, and online retailers, in particular, adjust the price of their products according to competitors, time, traffic, conversion rates, and sales goals.
You already see it happen at Amazon which isn't so flagrant but if you shop TEMU or Alibaba it is flagrant. A good example is the Best Buy website "anomaly" where the price is higher in-store and when you tell the store personnel it was cheaper online, they look it up in-store and they go to specific web server that shows the in-store price, not the non-Best Buy store site which shows it cheaper. We used to call this the bait and switch.
It can be beneficial, though, as places with perishable products can adjust prices to move them faster so they don't have waste. A spoiled product that didn't sell is a 100% loss. A product that isn't spoiled but sells for a 20% discount is only a fraction of that loss.Supermarkets often use dynamic pricing strategies to manage perishable inventory, such as fresh produce and meat products, that have a limited shelf life. By adjusting prices based on factors like expiration dates and current inventory levels, retailers can minimize waste and maximize revenue. Additionally, the widespread adoption of electronic shelf labels in grocery stores has made it easier to implement dynamic pricing strategies in real-time, enabling retailers to respond quickly to changing market conditions and consumer preferences.[35] These labels also make it easier for grocery stores to mark up high demand items (e.g. making it more expensive to purchase ice in warmer weather)
So there's nuances to it and it's been around a while. The new AI and massive processing data centers are making it easier to get things into real-time but, it's not there yet. But it has the potential to be very damaging even if it isn't abused so it's good to see legislation establishing boundaries for it already.
As far as the network stuff, a guest network is typically separated from the main network and there's no way to jump between them. So the entire idea of a guest network is to secure your home network from visitors who might bring threats into your environment.
Expert Moron Extraordinaire
You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you! -
Thanks for taking the time to type all of that out, John. Honestly, I am more worried about someone stealing my identity and taking out 5 mortgages on my house, then finding out near foreclosure that it happened.
Freeze all your credit. After the Equifax breach in 2014 (IIR), we froze all of our credit. even with lesser known bureaus.
Equifax, Transunion, Experian, Chex systems, and Innovis. There may be more I forgot.
I can't even get my own credit report without unlocking one of them.
That's enough to stop anyone trying to get a mortgages or car loan in our names. Not much else you can do.
That's a bit excessive.
Sure, there's lots of people out there like Dave Ramsay who swear up and down that credit cards and the credit market serve no good purpose for the average joe and they should exit post haste live by the cash is king mantra. But, unless you are independently wealthy and can pay cash for everything, you need credit.
Freezing your credit does more damage that one thinks too. Nobody can open a new account under you but nobody can report on your old/existing accounts either. No big deal until you need to unlock your credit. Sure, it means you have your credit available to you again but it can take as much as 6 months for any recorded credit history with your current creditors to be available to new creditors on your credit report. That ends up being a big delay or even outright denial if you need to get a line of credit from something as simple as a store credit card to a mortgage, it can really kill the deal on you. For example, storm damage destroys your roof, insurance company denies the claim says you didn't have a "wind damage rider" so you need $20K like yesterday. Hey, bank of cool guy, can I get a loan for $20K. Sure, dude, lets take a look at your cre....welp, it's frozen, that's a no go. Sorry, man, unfreeze your credit and we can help you. UGH! That's going to take MONTHS and my roof is like swiss cheese NOW! Oh well, too bad, so sad, sucks to be you, exit is on the left, honcho, have a good day.
Credit freezes weren't meant to be a permanent way to handle credit. They often come with flags on your credit report so that if any attempt, even you, happens where a line of credit is attempting to be established, it'll start a legal process and potential fraud investigation. Credit freezes are intended to be used when you believe that there is a real and present threat to your credit. Something like a lost wallet internationally, a potential stolen identity or some level of fraud like a spouse or business partner trying to establish credit in your name.
Freezes, though, don't stop fraudulent mortgages from being issued on your property. That's deed theft and it's not as prevalent as certain commercials would have you believe. What deed theft is concerns the named owner of the house, not their credit. They forge some documents or get you to sign fraudulent documents under duress and then go file a deed transfer, often times a "quit deed" which requires no financial information at all, it's pretty much claiming a property in abandonment and exists so banks can get out from under a foreclosed property. Anyway, they get your deed registered in their name and then take out mortgages on it, take the money and leave you hanging. Your credit doesn't get touched, at all. Most people don't know it happens because the nefarious evil doer has the mortgage docs sent to a different address and you don't even see it on your credit report. You know when the eviction notices and foreclosure notices start coming to the house because they are required by law to send that stuff to the property location address as well as the business address. So a credit watch would never show a deed theft. Since it's near impossible to do on a mortgaged house underwritten by a bank, you wouldn't even get a default notice on a mortgage because the mortgage was never in your name just against your property as collateral. Is it on the rise? Yes. But, in 2023 there was a little over 9500 cases nationwide. You hear the 600% increase number but that's from 2015 to 2026. It's only been on the rise because consumer level computing, optics and imaging tools have gotten significantly better. Between 2019 and 2023 there was less than 60K cases nationwide. That's not even 12K a year. There's 147 million houses in the United States. So yes, the number has increased but it still substantially rare in the grand scheme of things. Of those title fraud cases, less than 10% were done against an occupied house and they involved some level of phishing and deception on someone like an elderly owner. The vast majority were on vacant properties, properties in probate due to will disputes or other inheritor negligence on dealing with the property, foreclosures and rental properties that are seasonal and vacant for a significant portion of the year.
Additionally, States have procedures in place that make deed theft difficult. Some States, like New York and Michigan, have more lax requirements for things like "quit deeds" that make it easier to forge and transfer the title than others but many states require, also, a tax transfer form that requires direct, in-person, notary witnessing for both parties of the deed transfer. Additionally, the feds and every state has services for tax notices that you can sign up for for free. Does this mean we're all safe? Nope. You should take every precaution you feel is necessary but if you have a mortgage, you don't have the deed to your house so you don't need deed/title insurance. In fact, it's probably part of your PMI, read your fine print. The bank does have your deed and they are on top of it. If you own your house outright, no mortgages or liens, get title insurance.
As far as what you can do without a freeze, it's simple really. Every credit reporting agency has notification capabilities now. Sign up for it. You will get immediate notification of any credit report request. Check out your bank, see if they have credit monitoring services for you. 'Cause it's way cheaper for them to pay for the monitoring service for you than to eat the fraud that was foisted upon you.Expert Moron Extraordinaire
You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you! -
This guy actually proves the pricing variance. He calls it surveillance pricing.
https://youtu.be/tCSwx9LZtD8?is=3xQLK_3Sbo5Fq0Pb
Finally had a chance to watch this video and it was actually a really good video. Guy demonstrates how the surveillance pricing works and I have seen this first hand myself.
We got the Navelgazer in 2023 because of this baloney too.
So the last time we flew to see the fam in Midland, TX, it cost about $4500 round trip for 4 people for just flights. Ouch. Additionally, a rental car while we are there cost about $3500-$4000 'cause it's a "low capacity market". Not many people vacation in West Texas oil country, I guess. So, anyway, $7,000-$8,000 a trip 'cause we stay for 2-3 weeks.
Navelgazer costs about $600 in gas round trip and we spend about $750 in total on food and hotel rooms for the 4 of us on the 24-26 hour drive. So a fraction of flying, significantly. Figured if we got a used vehicle that hauls everything we needed for about a month in Texas, we'd save a bunch. Since 2023, we've done 5 trips to Texas. At about $1400 a pop, we've spent around $7500 on trips since June of 2023. So 5 trips for the same price as 1 flight and rental car. If we make one more trip to Texas, the Navelgazer's sub-50K price will have paid for itself in savings from not having to fork over the ENTIRE yearly vacation budget for one trip.
Anyway. I told you that to tell you this. While I was doing all that figuring out, I noticed something. Jackie will usually book a hotel while we are driving so we can adapt to weather, traffic, etc. on the road. I will choose a stopping point and look at prices for hotels in that stopping point and if they are more than we want to spend, I'll check another stopping point for better rates.
So using Lebanon, TN as an example, I will look up rates there and the cheapest hotel I was able to find last trip was $237 a night for a double queen bed room. Jackie, on the same app, same time frame, same room paid $207 for the room. The only difference is who looked up the price. I have a much more extensive traveling history than Jackie because of work. So my "profile" means I'm "willing to pay more". I'm not, actually but, what stinks about this is that I might be willing to pay more for a better hotel room but I don't have a choice to not pay more for any hotel room.
I also checked flights too. Jackie and I, both on the same network, in the same location, at the same time, looking at the same booking site for the same flight, same days, times and everything the same. Jackie's round trip price, $5300. My round trip price $6900. That's a 30% increase for me.
This has been noticed since we started trying the drive to Texas in 2019 because the plane tickets in 2018 were $3600 round trip and that was getting unpalatable. We also rented an SUV while there and that was $1800 for the week and a half we stayed.
The difference between the surveillance pricing that this guy is talking about and the new algorithmic pricing is that they can only do this surveillance pricing online, easily. Like the Target example in the video. You shop online and do delivery or curbside pickup you are stuck with the surveillance pricing they foisted upon you. However, you, yourself, walk in to the store, get your stuff and pay in store, you're not getting surveillance pricing.
What big retail is trying to do now, though, is to use those new carts where they scan and price stuff as you put it in the cart and then they charge your account? Yeah, you need an app to use that and the fine print of that app says they are mining your personal data. So they will do that surveillance pricing in the store too. Which doesn't jive with most consumer protection laws where a price is supposed to be clearly marked to protect consumers from being fleeced like this.
I have seen systems demo'ed, though, where they use facial recognition to get your "profile" and things ring up at different prices for different profiles.
So it's easy to change the presented prices online because they make the change before the product page loads so you only see your tailored price. But in person, it's more difficult and they have, apparently, found ways around that.
The massive amount of compute power behind A.I. is what is able to drive this too and the fact that A.I. can do this profile work exponentially faster than humans. But without your data, it doesn't work.
That's why they want you super social on social media and arguing about anything and everything because you give away a lot of what makes you you when you get into heated arguments with bots that are designed to just tick you off and get you going.Expert Moron Extraordinaire
You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you! -
I refuse to use these so called store apps to get "digital" coupons to save .30 cents, Fvck it, I'll pay the .30 cents. The amount of intrusive crud that comes along with these so called "apps" is over the top. I do not need more stuff in the background mining information about my personal purchases or buying habits. Heck I've had to stop Sams Club from sending me "It's time to buy these things now" I started getting stuff sent to my email account telling me I need to buy more or that they have already compiled a shopping list for me. I do not need your help making a list of things I need, NOT things you think I need. Besides I go there to get items in bulk that I do not need to worry about gong bad. They seem to think I need the conga huge jug of laundry detergent every week. The damn thing lasts me more than a month.What big retail is trying to do now, though, is to use those new carts where they scan and price stuff as you put it in the cart and then they charge your account? Yeah, you need an app to use that and the fine print of that app says they are mining your personal data.
