Muscle Car: Pick 1 of 3 (corrected)

2»

Comments

  • phuz
    phuz Posts: 2,372
    edited March 2010
    I prefer real muscle cars.

    '69 Camaro SS, 70 Chevelle SS, etc. They stopped making muscle cars in the 70's.

    If I were going to drop $30k on a "muscle car" - this would be it:

    69_camaro_z28.jpg
  • AudioGenics
    AudioGenics Posts: 2,567
    edited March 2010
    my vote for the Chevrolet Camaro (circa 1969)....
  • ohskigod
    ohskigod Posts: 6,502
    edited March 2010
    they did not stop making muscle cars in the 70's, they stopped making the cars you like in the 70's

    I respect the muscle cars of old, I really do. but those cars were NOT running in the 13's stock, even the huge horsepower ones. they werent. Polyglass tires alone for the fail!!!

    if resale and investment factors were not counted, I would take a new camaro over the old one any day, same for the Mustang. Thats not to say I might not own one, I;m just saying car for car to have pure fun in.

    lets compare a 70's mustang and mine, and lets say you were barelling toward a turn on a road circuit, or even a mountain road faster than you should be........you want to old car's brakes and tires or mine..........you know the answer :D
    Living Room 2 Channel -
    Schiit SYS Passive Pre. Jolida CD player. Songbird streamer. California Audio Labs Sigma II DAC, DIY 300as1/a1 Ice modules Class D amp. LSi15 with MM842 woofer upgrade, Nordost Blue Heaven and Unity interconnects.

    Upstairs 2 Channel Rig -
    Prometheus Ref. TVC passive pre, SAE A-205 Amp, Wiim pro streamer and Topping E50 DAC, California Audio Labs DX1 CD player, Von Schweikert VR3.5 speakers.

    Studio Rig - Scarlett 18i20(Gen3) DAW, Mac Mini, Aiyma A07 Max (BridgedX2), Totem Mites
  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited March 2010
    Argh! That was my original choice but it's quite a bit above my budget.
    <object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5rJhgxyWVDo&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5rJhgxyWVDo&hl=en_US&fs=1&&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>



    I feel a bit like a jerk for this thread. It's fun but there are folks out there suffering in this economy and here I am looking at $30+ k cars.

    I dont understand why theyre comparing a $50k + mustang to a $36k camaro. You can get a corvette for that price...then compare.
    -Cody
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it
  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited March 2010
    Would i be unamerican to say that i wouldn't want any of these three?
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000
  • mhmacw
    mhmacw Posts: 832
    edited March 2010
    exalted512 wrote: »
    I dont understand why theyre comparing a $50k + mustang to a $36k camaro. You can get a corvette for that price...then compare.
    -Cody

    the mustang and camaro were rivals both coming out in the early to mid sixties...(64 and a half for the mustang and 66 and a half for the camaro) the vette was in a class of its own.
  • phuz
    phuz Posts: 2,372
    edited March 2010
    Brakes and tires does not a Muscle Car make.

    The term is mostly and should be reserved for pre 1975 cars made during a period of cheap gas and excess. Raw HP and torque were the focus of performance gains.

    The cars discussed in this thread are fine machines. Awesome displays of engineering and efficiency, and deserve a title of their own.
  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited March 2010
    mhmacw wrote: »
    the mustang and camaro were rivals both coming out in the early to mid sixties...(64 and a half for the mustang and 66 and a half for the camaro) the vette was in a class of its own.

    I realize that...so why dont they compare a mustang is the same price range? They do exist.
    -Cody
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it
  • ohskigod
    ohskigod Posts: 6,502
    edited March 2010
    phuz wrote: »
    Brakes and tires does not a Muscle Car make.

    The term is mostly and should be reserved for pre 1975 cars made during a period of cheap gas and excess. Raw HP and torque were the focus of performance gains.

    The cars discussed in this thread are fine machines. Awesome displays of engineering and efficiency, and deserve a title of their own.


    I get your point a little better, might not agree 100% but respect it. There's always people's perceptions of what car's should be described as. heck, to some purists the older Mustangs and even camaros were not muscle cars, but "pony" car's.

    If I were to go to that muscle car era, I would go the "resto-mod" route, but that actually devalues the car. the way the market works on those cars basically forces me not to own one. oh well, I can look at other people's and like them without spending the tons of cash. that said, i wouldnt mid having a 67 fastback Mustang (red on black or vice versa) sitting in my garage.
    Living Room 2 Channel -
    Schiit SYS Passive Pre. Jolida CD player. Songbird streamer. California Audio Labs Sigma II DAC, DIY 300as1/a1 Ice modules Class D amp. LSi15 with MM842 woofer upgrade, Nordost Blue Heaven and Unity interconnects.

    Upstairs 2 Channel Rig -
    Prometheus Ref. TVC passive pre, SAE A-205 Amp, Wiim pro streamer and Topping E50 DAC, California Audio Labs DX1 CD player, Von Schweikert VR3.5 speakers.

    Studio Rig - Scarlett 18i20(Gen3) DAW, Mac Mini, Aiyma A07 Max (BridgedX2), Totem Mites
  • thuffman03
    thuffman03 Posts: 1,325
    edited March 2010
    I like all three but I know I can fit in the Challanger. Being a bit tall and I already own a Dodge Magnum RT.
    Sunfire TGP, Sunfire Cinema Grand, Sunfire 300~2 (2), Sunfire True Sub (2),Carver ALS Platinum, Carver AL III, TFM-55, C-19, C-9, TX-8, SDA-490t, SDA-390t
  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited March 2010
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it