CD vs SACD vs DVD-A
Comments
-
There are good SACD recordings and somoe not so good SACD recordings...then there are those EXCELLENT SACD recordings. An excellent SACD blows away an excellent redbook...PERIOD! There is no "conspiracy" to have a poor redbook version on a hybrid disc to make SACD sound better, because it isn't necessary. The SACD layer IS better...if done well.
Great Post, Shack! About time to straighten out what format is superior!Trying out Different Audio Cables is a Religious Affair. You don't discuss it with anyone. :redface::biggrin: -
What I am saying is that you're comparing 2 different remasters on 2 different formats.
Why can't all CD's sound like Steely Dan CD's?Because Steely Dan sucks?Testing
Testing
Testing -
Because Steely Dan sucks?
Well there is no accounting for individual taste is there?;)-Kevin
HT: Philips 52PFL7432D 52" LCD 1080p / Onkyo TX-SR 606 / Oppo BDP-83 SE / Comcast cable. (all HDMI)B&W 801 - Front, Polk CS350 LS - Center, Polk LS90 - Rear
2 Channel:
Oppo BDP-83 SE
Squeezebox Touch
Muscial Fidelity M1 DAC
VTL 2.5
McIntosh 2205 (refurbed)
B&W 801's
Transparent IC's -
Ok, I take back one statement I made earlier. I just listened to Led Zeppelin's Mothership on CD and this sounds far superior to the original vinyl. However, the Mothership versions have been remastered and I don't have it on LP to compare. I just wish Jimmy, Robert, and John would remaster the whole Zep catalogue this well. Some day......SDA-1C (full mods)
Carver TFM-55
NAD 1130 Pre-amp
Rega Planar 3 TT/Shelter 501 MkII
The Clamp
Revox A77 Mk IV Dolby reel to reel
Thorens TD160/Mission 774 arm/Stanton 881S Shibata
Nakamichi CR7 Cassette Deck
Rotel RCD-855 with modified tube output stage
Cambridge Audio DACmagic Plus
ADC Soundshaper 3 EQ
Ben's IC's
Nitty Gritty 1.5FI RCM -
Of course they didn't hear a difference. They were probably using lamp cord for cables, a Radio Shack amp, and a $39 CD player since they are likely the same crowd that believes none of that matters.
Agreed 100% LOL!