LSi9's versus Vienna Acoustic Haydyn's
Has any one heard both sets? Thinking of starting a small tube setup with a Jolida inetgrated, probably 50 watts.
Post edited by Graymane on
Comments
-
I really like the Hadyn. It is probably my favorite bookshelf speaker in it's price range. I don't really consider the LSi9 a bookshelf. I have heard both...a lot...and for the money the LSi9 is probably a better speaker...if you have the room for it. But I could go either way."Just because youre offended doesnt mean youre right." - Ricky Gervais
"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase
"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson -
Both speakers are very nice. they are however different.
The Polks have a higher end sound then there price tag. They are warm and clear. They also have a very good ability to play anything to give em and do it well.
The Vienna's are refined. Moving if you will. They make you lose youself in the music. They are also alittle easier to drive. The cabinets are some of the best . All Vienna's cabinets are beautiful and very well constructed. I have always has a soft spot for there speakers. You also can have them alittle wider then the distance of the seating and they keep there center image. Amazing speakers.
DanDan
My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time. -
The Haydns are very good speakers. I have auditioned the Haydns and I own the LSi9's. To my ears, the Haydns always had that sparkle of magic that I was never able to reproduce with my LSi9's. Maybe it's due to placement, the room where I auditioned the Haydns had considerable amount of room treatment, as opposed to my current room which has zero room treatment. When I am shopping for small bookshelves in the future, the Haydns will definitely be on my short list.
-
I don't really consider the LSi9 a bookshelf.
Please elaborate, I am curious why you think this. -
I was seriously considering some Haydn's a couple of months ago. After several auditions I discovered I was disappointed with their base reproduction for "harder" metal and rock and roll. The Haydn's cannot easily be beat for classical. I ended up getting some B&W 605's after a tireless search. You might also find a place to demo some Usher S-520's before you buy. Here is thread from my search.
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68321My Main Gear
Mitsu HC5000 (Proj.)
Marantz SR8001 (AVR)
Sunfire TGA7200 (AMP)
Marantz DV7001 (SACD)
Samsung BD-P1500 Blu-Ray
LSi 15's (Front)
LSiC (Center)
LSiFx (Surrounds)
DUAL SVS 20-39 CS Plus (Passive Subs)
Marantz IS201 I-Pod Dock[/SIZE]
Panamax M5300EX
Carada Criterion 106" Brightwhite Screen
Sunfire TGA 5200 & (4) B&W 605's in the party room -
zx_toth wrote:Please elaborate, I am curious why you think this.
I think they are too big to be a true bookshelf. I have a pair of RT55is that are "technically" a bookshelf but not at that size IMO. The D'Appolito or MTM configuration is between a bookshelf and a floorstander but has more characteristics of a floorstander. I put the LSi9 in that category."Just because youre offended doesnt mean youre right." - Ricky Gervais
"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase
"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson -
I am close to buying a pair of Haydns for my Analogue/TT setup. Intially I will probably purchase with the Franklin and Lowell stands and add a small sub later on. I do love the sound of VA speakers.[
-