DLP VS LCD VS Plasma
Comments
-
SKsolutions wrote: »Twin plasmas and happy. 42" on the wall in master, and 50" in LR on pedestal. If I needed an outdoor signage display, I'd get the LCD. Are there people still buying DLP's with the price on flat panel this low?
Sure there are. Doesn't make sense to buy a TV set based on it being flat if you don't absolutely need it to be. Plasmas are great for bars and restaurants, and small rooms like bedrooms but if you want a decent size screen then DLP is the way to go.
Sam's Club was selling 61" 1080p Samsung's for sub-$2k. Where can I find similar size 1080p plasma for that price? 50" 720p screens can be had for sub-$1000. -
Sure there are. Doesn't make sense to buy a TV set based on it being flat if you don't absolutely need it to be. Plasmas are great for bars and restaurants, and small rooms like bedrooms but if you want a decent size screen then DLP is the way to go.
Sam's Club was selling 61" 1080p Samsung's for sub-$2k. Where can I find similar size 1080p plasma for that price? 50" 720p screens can be had for sub-$1000.
If you are looking to sacrifice picture quality and reliability for that extra few inches, have a large ghetto-looking box in your house, and spend the same amount of money, then I suppose you have the right formula. 1080p DLP looks worse than any decent 720/768 plasma or LCD.-Ignorance is strength - -
SKsolutions wrote: »If you are looking to sacrifice picture quality and reliability for that extra few inches, have a large ghetto-looking box in your house, and spend the same amount of money, then I suppose you have the right formula. 1080p DLP looks worse than any decent 720/768 plasma or LCD.
That's your opinion. I rate LCD worst of them all, plasma is close to DLP is PQ but I don't personally like the clayfaces in plasma picture. I don't notice rainbows in DLP so for me it's the perfect match.
Of course none of them match CRT in PQ but what can you do. I'd still love to put a 9" CRT in my HT but a digital FP has to do unless I can find one locally. -
SKsolutions wrote: »If you are looking to sacrifice picture quality and reliability for that extra few inches,
Ghetto box ? ... LOL ... it fits quite nicely between the mains which are only slightly shorter.
I will admit though that 50-60" works faily well in the bedroom. -
Wannabie,
I'm sure your living/media room looks gauche-lovely. Sounds very stylish, contemporary and an excellent use of space. I have friends, and they like to come over, so I leave a little space for us all to gather in comfort. Enjoy the Ghetto-box.-Ignorance is strength - -
SKsolutions wrote: »Wannabie,
I'm sure your living/media room looks gauche-lovely. Sounds very stylish, contemporary and an excellent use of space. I have friends, and they like to come over, so I leave a little space for us all to gather in comfort. Enjoy the Ghetto-box.
Oh, you live in Boston, all you can afford is a rat hole to live in. That explains why you can't fit in a larger screen... -
Plasma ROCKS... I have Several LCD's and none of them touch my Plasma for picture quality...Rockin' In My House
Pioneer 50 inch Plasma TV
Denon AVR-3806
Denon DVD-1930ci
Polk Montor 70's
Polk PSW-12
Polk CS2
Polk Monitor 40's
Sirius Satellite Radio, Monster 3500MKII -
Oh, you live in Boston, all you can afford is a rat hole to live in. That explains why you can't fit in a larger screen...
Actually, I'm quite solvent, and have extra rooms that I don't use. I just don't believe that an entire wall should be dominated by a large box. If I wanted a larger screen, I'd have bought one. The 50" Plasma is more than enough for the 22x14 living room, and I agree that the 42" which I also own, is perfect for the bedroom. Until I build a dedicated theater with a projector, screen, and popcorn maker, those enormous items have no place in a room that serves a meeting place for my friends and family. I'd be embarrassed to invite people over to a room that looked like a ghetto frat house.-Ignorance is strength - -
I have no TV in my main living room as it is dedicated for hanging out. My second living room (I believe the word here is family room) has a 61" set and then I have a FP upstairs in HT. Your comment about ghetto look is inaccurate as I have plenty of room and still have a large room without a TV at all. If it was, your living room with a large TV would be "ghetto"...
Anyways, a 50" DLP does not take a lot of space, looks stylish, looks as good as (or better) than LCD or plasma, and costs way less. Unless you need to have something that hangs on the wall, it's a great option. -
I like Plasma picture quality but hate having to stretch/zoom 4:3 SD programming. Burn-in is a problem I'd rather now worry about. Changing bulbs sucks too for RP/DLP.
I think I'll just continue to wait for new technology. And also wait for programming to move away from 4:3.
DLP/RP keeps getting thinner and thinner as well. Quite a few newer models are even wall mountable. -
And also wait for programming to move away from 4:3.
That's true, 4:3 stinks but for me the only SD programming that I end up watching these days is Formula One, and an occasional NHL game that's not on HD. I don't watch TV that much nowadays so I can afford to be picky but even if I did HD selection is great with the channel package I have. -
SKsolutions wrote: »Wannabie,
I'm sure your living/media room looks gauche-lovely. Sounds very stylish, contemporary and an excellent use of space. I have friends, and they like to come over, so I leave a little space for us all to gather in comfort. Enjoy the Ghetto-box.
In any case our family room is 24 x 16 which is plenty of room for HT ... The living room is twice that size ... No need for TV's in there ... -
PolkWannabie wrote: »With that attitude and myopic view you and your friends shouldn't have any probs fitting comfortably into a closet ....
Something you suggest to strangers often?
Am I at a rest stop. . . tapping my foot?
A 600 sqft apartment in my area goes for 400K, so with 1300 sqft, I'm grateful to live so lavishly. You would need well over a million to have room to do what Sami describes, so in his case I'll say that it may make sense, although I've yet to see an attractive DLP.
If Wannabies room is as big as he states (48 x 32), putting a DLP in there instead of a FP, is ludicrous. How. . . Jersey.-Ignorance is strength - -
SKsolutions wrote: »Something you suggest to strangers often?
Am I at a rest stop. . . tapping my foot?
A 600 sqft apartment in my area goes for 400K, so with 1300 sqft, I'm grateful to live so lavishly. You would need well over a million to have room to do what Sami describes, so in his case I'll say that it may make sense, although I've yet to see an attractive DLP.
If Wannabies room is as big as he states (48 x 32), putting a DLP in there instead of a FP, is ludicrous. How. . . Jersey.
I don't see you making friends on here very fast. You shove your 2 cents down people's throats......brag about how expensive your location is.....and now throw a put down at the state of Jersey:rolleyes:
Can you say snob?
By the way, I like my DLP. The picture quality is much nicer then many plasmas I have seen. General rule of size for a room is sitting area should be twice the length of the TV's diag. mesurement. But this may only be true in gehtto land I guess.Michael
Samsung 50" HD DLP
Yamaha RX-V2500
(2) Outlaw 200
Adcom GFA 555
Sony BDP300
Denon 2900 DVD
Lsi9's mains
Lsi7's rear
Lsic center
12.1 SVS driver in 4.53 cuft. tube
Harmony 880 -
SKsolutions wrote: »A 600 sqft apartment in my area goes for 400K, so with 1300 sqft, I'm grateful to live so lavishly.
I told you, a rat hole.
Texas isn't the best place to live in, not even close, but there are advantages to it and one of them is real estate. $400k puts you into a mansion in the rich neighborhood around DFW. Boston is a nice area, I'm not putting it down at all, but once you get used to warm weather and large living area there just isn't going back. 1300sq.ft is a $100k starter home here, if in decent condition. -
SKsolutions wrote: »... If Wannabies room is as big as he states (48 x 32) ...
-
PolkWannabie wrote: »In any case our family room is 24 x 16 which is plenty of room for HT ... The living room is twice that size ... No need for TV's in there ...
Those are your words. If you care to read them again. You reference the family room at 24x16, then state that that the living room is twice that size. I won't give you the benefit of being able to multiply by two, so I'll do it for you. . . . . carry the 1. . .. . 48x32. Tool.-Ignorance is strength - -
I told you, a rat hole.
Texas isn't the best place to live in, not even close, but there are advantages to it and one of them is real estate. $400k puts you into a mansion in the rich neighborhood around DFW. Boston is a nice area, I'm not putting it down at all, but once you get used to warm weather and large living area there just isn't going back. 1300sq.ft is a $100k starter home here, if in decent condition.
Well, the rats have the day off, but being mostly filled in swampland, there isn't a shortage of them:D When I'm not here, I'm in Mexico so I can see the sun occasionally. Prices here are a bit crazy, and so are the people, but that's why they let me stay.:eek: Mansion eh? I'll take two.-Ignorance is strength - -
I don't see you making friends on here very fast. You shove your 2 cents down people's throats......brag about how expensive your location is.....and now throw a put down at the state of Jersey:rolleyes:
Can you say snob?
By the way, I like my DLP. The picture quality is much nicer then many plasmas I have seen. General rule of size for a room is sitting area should be twice the length of the TV's diag. mesurement. But this may only be true in gehtto land I guess.
No, the rule in the Ghetto, is that if it barely fits in the room, then it's too small.-Ignorance is strength - -
SKsolutions wrote: »When I'm not here, I'm in Mexico so I can see the sun occasionally.
-
Go SXRD baby
I’m looking to eventually get 2 Samsung LCD 40's TV's for my media room. If I were to buy a new rear projection TV I would go:
1) SXRD
2) DLP
If I were to get a new flat panel
1) LCD
2) Plasma
If I were to get a new front projection right now
* The new Sony (SXRD) or the new panny (LCD) that just came outTesting
Testing
Testing -
SKsolutions wrote: »Those are your words. If you care to read them again. You reference the family room at 24x16, then state that that the living room is twice that size. I won't give you the benefit of being able to multiply by two, so I'll do it for you. . . . . carry the 1. . .. . 48x32. Tool.
-
SKsolutions wrote: »No, the rule in the Ghetto, is that if it barely fits in the room, then it's too small.
-
I thought id throw this into the mix DLP are yes good pciture but fair warning they becomming obsolete and they are very expensive to repair.HT setup
Panasonic 50" TH-50PZ80U
Denon DBP-1610
Monster HTS 1650
Carver A400X :cool:
MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
Kef 104/2
URC MX-780 Remote
Sonos Play 1
Living Room
63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
Polk Surroundbar 3000
Samsung BD-C7900 -
bigaudiofanatic wrote: »I thought id throw this into the mix DLP are yes good pciture but fair warning they becomming obsolete and they are very expensive to repair.
How would they become obsolete? The technology? Who cares if you already have one. -
PolkWannabie wrote: »I'm well aware of my words ... Unfortunately you obviously still don't get it ... Since the math appears to be over your head, try drawing it on paper ...
Twice the size, double the other diameter and you have it. So something like 24x32. Did I get it right? -
Yes ... A toughie huh ...
If you double both dimensions in a 2 space problem you get FOUR times the area in square feet ... not twice ... i.e.
24 * 16 = 384 SqFt ... 48 * 32 = 1536 SqFt ... maybe it's different some how when one is living lavishly ... -
PolkWannabie wrote: »In any case our family room is 24 x 16 which is plenty of room for HT ... The living room is twice that size ... No need for TV's in there ...
You gave two lengths (a size) in linear ft, not area, and said it was "double that size" If you calculate this as it reads, it's twice the dimensions. That was my point.
If you said my room is 384 ft, different story. Missing the point.-Ignorance is strength - -
Off-topic, I know, but where in Mexico? My wife is from Puerto Vallarta and we are buying a 2BR condo right on the beach, as investment and maybe some day for retirement (but I'm sure by then we'll have quite a few of them).
Cancun. Saturated in the hotel zone over the last 4 years. Pricing has gone up and you only have 3-4 bed layouts approx 2200ft. Approx 600K for these, 300K for something 5 minutes out.
I'm looking in Costa Rica, and it's a hot investment area. There is some flipping of unbuilt lots already, and it's expected to continue over the next ten+ years. The beauty is that 2/3 of the country is green space and cannot be developed, so they have a smart growth plan. Stable government. 1.5-2 acre lots on/near ocean with infrastructure around 100K. Build out with CBS structure at 75$ per foot.-Ignorance is strength - -
SKsolutions wrote: »You gave two lengths (a size) in linear ft, not area, and said it was "double that size" If you calculate this as it reads, it's twice the dimensions. That was my point.
If you said my room is 384 ft, different story. Missing the point.
Stating the room is 16x24 defines the area, there is no different story.
If you chose to multipliy both dimensions by 2 then by definition you arrived at an answer that was 4 times the size.
If you for some reason have a need to insist on believing that 1536 SqFt is some how only twice the size of 384 SqFt then so be it ...