Stereo Rig - Am I forgetting anything?
Comments
-
SolidSqual wrote: »yeah sorry the photos are not up to date. The NAD runs far cooler than the HALO. After getting the NAD I also noticed my mid range is more balanced with the highs and lows. The NAD has four binding post on the rear which is ideal for bi-wiring, biamping or even adding a set of alternate speakers (thanks to the AB switch). I like the HALO, but ultimately I believe its many options were never used by me. I never used the balanced inputs. I never used the alternate outs for adding other amplification. I think NAD chose a simpler design and focused more on the quality of the remaining components.
I even did a blind test with a friend. Each time, he and I picked the NAD over the HALO.
I've always liked the looks of the Halos and the reputaion of Parasound and wondered how they would stack up against my NAD C270. Sounds like it would be a toss-up. I stick with my NAD."Just because youre offended doesnt mean youre right." - Ricky Gervais
"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase
"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson -
Yes, sorry the photos are not up to date. The NAD runs far cooler. My Mids blend better with my Highs and Lows. The Bass has a little more tightness with a more forward slam. The soundstage is definitely wider. The difference in soundstage is probably the greatest variable. The sound never seemed to extend past the edges of my speakers with the HALO. One final gripe. Don't get the HALO unless you plan on using all the extra connections it offers in the back. I feel NAD simplified the C272 and offered a more refined product with focus on the sound as opposed to the options.
-
It is a tight race.
