SDAs as Fronts in HT - problem or not?

94Cobra
94Cobra Posts: 8
edited November 2006 in Vintage Speakers
Is anyone on the forum using the SDAs as front speakers in a HT setup? Does the SDA imaging effect become a problem with the surround speakers? I am wondering if the cancellations from the SDA will impact the sound from the surrounds.
I seem to have lost my interconnect cable, actually misplaced temporarily, and wanted to hear from the members who have heard the SDAs in HT with surrounds. Thanks.
Fronts: Polk SDA-1As
Surrounds: Def Tech In walls UIW-75
Surround Processor - Rotel RSP-1068
Front Amp - Rotel RB-1080
Surround Amp - Kenwood Basic M2A
Post edited by 94Cobra on

Comments

  • read-alot
    read-alot Posts: 812
    edited November 2006
    I have no problems with the SDA surround ....but I am looking at doing a LSI setup for comparison.

    You really need to find that cable.
    polkaudio SRS (rdo194 x 8)
    Dodd ELP (separate power supply)
    JC 1 blocks ( strapped )
    Rega Apollo
    MIT (speaker cables) Outlaw (ICs)

    polkaudio SDA2(rdo194x4) (front) polkaudio CRS (rdo194x4)(rear) polkaudio 400i (center)
    B&K 505
    Samsung LCD
    VIP 622
    HSU STF-2
  • DarqueKnight
    DarqueKnight Posts: 6,765
    edited November 2006
    I am currently using SDA SRS's as fronts in my HT. I have also used SDA 1C's as fronts and SDA 1C's and SDA CRS+'s as surrounds, all with the IC attached, with no problems.
    Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!
  • 94Cobra
    94Cobra Posts: 8
    edited November 2006
    Thanks for the responses. I found my interconnect cable and hooked it up. I noticed a big improvement in bass response. I haven't had a chance to see if the imaging effect is there yet, but the system sounds better overall. It is hard to believe I have owned these speakers for 20 years and they not only work, but still sound great. I can't see any reason to replace them in spite of my friends who tell me to get out of the '80s. I think I will upgrade the tweeters and buy an SVS sub for movies and ride these Polks until they break. If I haven't broken them yet then I doubt they ever will.
    Fronts: Polk SDA-1As
    Surrounds: Def Tech In walls UIW-75
    Surround Processor - Rotel RSP-1068
    Front Amp - Rotel RB-1080
    Surround Amp - Kenwood Basic M2A
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,341
    edited November 2006
    Welcome to the Club Polk Forums 94Cobra! I'm glad to see another Pittsburgher on the Forums!

    I've been using SDA's in my HT rig and enjoyed every minute of it.
    Carl

  • 94Cobra
    94Cobra Posts: 8
    edited November 2006
    Thanks for the reply Carl. I'll bet there are a good amount of these older Polks still in use. Do you use a sub in your HT setup? If so, which one? I am looking into a SVSound sub at the moment. I do not use a center channel since my fireplace is between my SDAs.
    Fronts: Polk SDA-1As
    Surrounds: Def Tech In walls UIW-75
    Surround Processor - Rotel RSP-1068
    Front Amp - Rotel RB-1080
    Surround Amp - Kenwood Basic M2A
  • obxdiver
    obxdiver Posts: 60
    edited November 2006
    I use SDA 2.3TL's for the front L/R and SDA 1C's for the rear L/R. Both have the IC connected, and both have the new RD tweets. The 2.3's have fresh re-built crossovers as well.

    My center channel is home made using 2 MW6510's in parallel connected to the line, and 1 SL3000 tweet going through a self designed crossover. Center channel speakers costing $3000 dont sound as good as my home made Polk center. Powered by an Aragon amp

    The sound is unmatched. Use lots of power.
    For me, its Aragon 8008x3 for L/C/R and an Aragon 4004 MKii amp for Rear L/R.
    300x5W
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,341
    edited November 2006
    Hi 94Cobra! I use an SVS NSD-12 subwoofer with my 2.3's. I have the sub low pass set at about 40 Hz.

    Looks like you got a nice setup there. I hope you're still enjoying the SDA's.

    Carl
    Carl

  • sda2mike
    sda2mike Posts: 3,131
    edited November 2006
    i was using my sda's for movies, with ctr and surround spkrs. to me th e sound was 'busy', or distracting. i went back to just 2 ch and i'm very pleased! the sda effect on some soundtracks even makes the cats get up and look!;)
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,341
    edited November 2006
    sda2mike wrote:
    i was using my sda's for movies, with ctr and surround spkrs. to me th e sound was 'busy', or distracting. i went back to just 2 ch and i'm very pleased! the sda effect on some soundtracks even makes the cats get up and look!;)


    Mike, if the SDA effect is distracting just unplug the interconnect.
    Carl

  • sda2mike
    sda2mike Posts: 3,131
    edited November 2006
    schwarcw wrote:
    Mike, if the SDA effect is distracting just unplug the interconnect.

    cuz i dig the sda effect!;) it does sound good, really! actually, my system is vintage 2 ch. the heart of the rig is a marantz 2270, if that's an indicator:D
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,341
    edited November 2006
    sda2mike wrote:
    cuz i dig the sda effect!;) it does sound good, really! actually, my system is vintage 2 ch. the heart of the rig is a marantz 2270, if that's an indicator:D

    Cool! I misunderstood your post. Too much travel and not enough sleep:( I'll bet that 2270 rocks those SDA's quite nice:D

    Carl
    Carl

  • dudeinaroom
    dudeinaroom Posts: 3,609
    edited November 2006
    SDA's are awesome for HT
  • jvarnadoe
    jvarnadoe Posts: 52
    edited November 2006
    Absolutely not a problem for HT. I watched Cars tonight and it reaffirmed my love for the SDA's.
    Polk collection:
    SDA SRS 2.3 w/RDO-194's
    SDA 2 w/Vampire BPHEX
    M5jr+
    CS245i
    RT15i
    RT25i
    RT35i
    LC65i x2