Which SVS (PB-10 or PB-12)
I have attached a .PDF drawing of our living room that contains our H/T system along with a few pictures (two are before I got the RTi8's). I talked with Erik @ SVS today about getting a PB-10 and he suggested that I may want to step upto the PB-12 because the room opens into other rooms. He asked that I provide an overhead view and he would be able to give me better recommendations. I value everyones opinion here too, so I'm open to suggestions. The PB-12 is really about all I want to spend on a sub-actually more than I want too, but I don't want to upgrade if we move into a larger home a couple years down the road.
I appreciate the feedback.
I appreciate the feedback.
Post edited by MattN03 on
Comments
-
Go big or go home. I have yet to hear someone say they bought too much sub from SVS.
-
Shizelbs wrote:Go big or go home. I have yet to hear someone say they bought too much sub from SVS.
lol, that is what I've read here before. -
MattN03 wrote:lol, that is what I've read here before.
And for good reason. -
If you can swing the PB-12 I would get it. Of course I am of the bigger is better camp of subwoofers.
AVR: Elite VSX-21TXH
Amplifier: B&K 7250 Series ii
Misc: Velodyne SMS-1
Mains: RTi-10
Center: CSi-5
Rear: Boston DSi460
Sub: SVS PC-Ultra
TV: Panasonic TC-P58V10
DVD: Panasonic DMP-BD60K -
Definitely PB-12. I have one and my room is the same size as yours. SVS won't try to oversell you, they want sell you the right size. Good customer service and return policy. Go for it!Carl
-
Yep. Go 12 if you can afford it.Sharp Elite 70
Anthem D2V 3D
Parasound 5250
Parasound HCA 1000 A
Parasound HCA 1000
Oppo BDP 95
Von Schweikert VR4 Jr R/L Fronts
Von Schweikert LCR 4 Center
Totem Mask Surrounds X4
Hsu ULS-15 Quad Drive Subwoofers
Sony PS3
Squeezebox Touch
Polk Atrium 7s on the patio just to keep my foot in the door. -
schwarcw wrote:Definitely PB-12. I have one and my room is the same size as yours. SVS won't try to oversell you, they want sell you the right size. Good customer service and return policy. Go for it!
So how do you like it? Is it enough sub? -
Any suggestions on placement for the sub? Are there any problems placing it directly behind the right RTi8 near the fireplace?
-
That would be a good place to start. Only experimentation (which is the fun part anyways) will be able to tell you what works best in your room.
-
PB-12 or a 20-39 PCiAudio: Polk S15 * Polk S35 * Polk S10 * SVS SB-1000 Pro
HT: Samsung QN90B * Marantz NR1510 * Panasonic DMP-BDT220 * Roku Ultra LT * APC H10 -
Erik said a PB10 would probably be fine in the room now, but wouldn't be able to handle a larger room in the future as well as a PB12. I'm definately leaning towards a PB12. Does anyone have links to reviews on the 12? Does it have a textured finish-it almost looks like Rhino Lining for truck beds?
It looks like the 20-93 PCi has cloth/carpet finish. Is this right? I don't think I want anything else I have to use the Dustbuster on -
No dustbuster required with the 20-39 PCi - nothing sticks to it (not even cat hair). It's lighter than the PB-12 (save a little $$$ on shipping + it's easier to move around than the box subs). I'm biased - I have one and I love it.Audio: Polk S15 * Polk S35 * Polk S10 * SVS SB-1000 Pro
HT: Samsung QN90B * Marantz NR1510 * Panasonic DMP-BDT220 * Roku Ultra LT * APC H10 -
Halo wrote:No dustbuster required with the 20-39 PCi - nothing sticks to it (not even cat hair). It's lighter than the PB-12 (save a little $$$ on shipping + it's easier to move around than the box subs). I'm biased - I have one and I love it.
How does the P20-39 PCi perform compared to the PB-12? -
PB 12 VS. PCi 20-39
20-39 PCi - "The best of both worlds. These subs go nearly as low as the bottom trolling SVS 16-46's, and have nearly the sheer sound pressure level capability of the mighty 25-31's."
PB-12 - "Sometimes folks attracted to the performance of the world-famous PCi subs just couldn't get comfortable with their cylinder design. So after a long process of developing an affordable enclosure offering "Made in the USA" quality it's here. The PB12-ISD is the affordable "box" sub with the components you expect from SVS (virtually identical to the PCi)"
I think the 20-39 hits a little deeper (16Hz in-room response vs. 18Hz with the PB-12) - but I could be wrong - call SVS to confirm.
The reason I went with the cylinder is because it's cheaper (after you factor in shipping), it's easier to move around, goes a little deeper, and it had the WAF.
Either way you can't make a mistake here. Don't forget about the 25-31 PCi too - better than a PB-10 IMO & le$$ than the PB-12 or PCi 20-39.Audio: Polk S15 * Polk S35 * Polk S10 * SVS SB-1000 Pro
HT: Samsung QN90B * Marantz NR1510 * Panasonic DMP-BDT220 * Roku Ultra LT * APC H10 -
The cylinder might look odd, but don't underestimate the ease of moving and placing one...
And do experiment with placement, a few inches can actually make readily audible differences depending on the room.
I wound up placing my 25-31 PCi about three feet to the left of my Left channel and almost a foot out from the wall. It looks much less out of place to me as a black cylinder than one of the big boxes would.
I love my sub, I'd really be surprised if you could do better for the money than an SVS or maybe a Hsu in the same price range. I've never felt like I needed more power which is saying a lot as I expected I would at the price I paid.Harman Kardon AVR-435 Receiver
Polk RTi6 (L/R) CSi3 (Center) RM3000 (SL/SR)
SVS 25-31 PCi (Sub) -
Halo wrote:PB 12 VS. PCi 20-39
20-39 PCi - "The best of both worlds. These subs go nearly as low as the bottom trolling SVS 16-46's, and have nearly the sheer sound pressure level capability of the mighty 25-31's."
PB-12 - "Sometimes folks attracted to the performance of the world-famous PCi subs just couldn't get comfortable with their cylinder design. So after a long process of developing an affordable enclosure offering "Made in the USA" quality it's here. The PB12-ISD is the affordable "box" sub with the components you expect from SVS (virtually identical to the PCi)"
I think the 20-39 hits a little deeper (16Hz in-room response vs. 18Hz with the PB-12) - but I could be wrong - call SVS to confirm.
The reason I went with the cylinder is because it's cheaper (after you factor in shipping), it's easier to move around, goes a little deeper, and it had the WAF.
Either way you can't make a mistake here. Don't forget about the 25-31 PCi too - better than a PB-10 IMO & le$$ than the PB-12 or PCi 20-39.
Well, I have to say I like what I've read about the 20-39 PCi. It's the same price as a PB12 and is cheaper to ship. It sounds like the 20-39 PCi outperforms the PB12 to boot (atleast from what this newbie has figured out! ) Decisions decisions. Both are also on backorder till the 1st of April so that gives me a few more weeks to save & research. -
I say.. go BIGGER or go home. I say stop peddling around and get the PB12+/2.
Magico M2, JL113v2x2, EMM, ARC Ref 10 Line, ARC Ref 10 Phono, VPIx2, Lyra Etna, Airtight Opus1, Boulder, AQ Wel&Wild, SRA Scuttle Rack, BlueSound+LPS, Thorens 124DD+124SPU, Sennheiser, Metaxas R2R -
I was considering the PB-12 or the 20-39 and after talking to SVS, they actually recommended the PB-10 for my room size and configuration.
They definiately do not seem to try to oversell.
Now I'm just saving up for one.
-Lou -
Then go PB10. Good luck!Magico M2, JL113v2x2, EMM, ARC Ref 10 Line, ARC Ref 10 Phono, VPIx2, Lyra Etna, Airtight Opus1, Boulder, AQ Wel&Wild, SRA Scuttle Rack, BlueSound+LPS, Thorens 124DD+124SPU, Sennheiser, Metaxas R2R
-
A nice thing about the cylinders...they can be hidden. Couldn't pass WAF with the box, so said f**k it and order the water heater. Since I don't see it everyday, I'm still not used to it.
Combo rig:
Onkyo NR1007 pre-pro, Carver TFM 45(fronts), Carver TFM 35 (surrounds)
SDA 1C, CS400i, SDA 2B
PB13Ultra RO
BW Silvers
Oppo BDP-83SE -
Audio: Polk S15 * Polk S35 * Polk S10 * SVS SB-1000 Pro
HT: Samsung QN90B * Marantz NR1510 * Panasonic DMP-BDT220 * Roku Ultra LT * APC H10 -
Halo wrote:
I found that thread in a search earlier today & found it very useful. Thanks for posting it