I need need a center channel old or new thats timbre matched to the following speaker

2»

Comments

  • Dennis Gardner
    Dennis Gardner Posts: 4,861
    edited March 2006
    Lots of input has been given here and my take would be that the 400i would be the best match since all drivers are the same. With that said, I would consider your FXi30s to be mismatched also, since they don't have the trilam tweeter but the newer silk. This isn't quite as critical, and the surrounds with trilam tweeters are a little harder to find since they are older too but once you've gone to the trouble of matching the front stage, you might as well get it all right, since no real $$$ are in the equation for a side sell/swap.

    Just my .02,

    DG
    HT Optoma HD25 LV on 80" DIY Screen, Anthem MRX 300 Receiver, Pioneer Elite BDP 51FD Polk CS350LS, Polk SDA1C, Polk FX300, Polk RT55, Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz, ICs-DIY Twisted Prs, Speaker-Raymond Cable

    2 Channel Thorens TD 318 Grado ZF1, SACD/CD Marantz 8260, Soundstream/Krell DAC1, Audio Mirror PP1, Odyssey Stratos, ADS L-1290, ICs-DIY Twisted , Speaker-Raymond Cable
  • cmy330go
    cmy330go Posts: 2,341
    edited March 2006
    Shack, I can appreciate your preferance, and think I'm in the minority. I have found that having a mismatched center keeps my focus there, and the mains don't draw me off center (if that makes sense to you). Appreciable vocal pans from main to center should sound different when the "dialog" source moves say "left stage". You wouldn't expect a car that whizzes by to keep the same steady pitch that the recording engineers give to vocals that move off screen.

    The ESL quip was a stretch.:D

    Just wanted to point out that the change in pitch of a sound as it moves past you (ex: car horn) is due to the Doppler effect, not it's position in relation to you. It is actually due to a compressing and stretching of the waveform. Hence the reason the car horn's tone is higher as it comes toward you and lower as it moves away. The faster it moves the greater the effect. This is something that would be naturally captured by the recording, not something that the engineer would have to manipulate.

    Just an FYI. Not trying to question your preference.:)

    Dave
    HT
    Mits WD-65737, DirecTV, Oppo DV-970HD, XBOX ONE, Yamaha RX-A1030, Parasound Halo A23, Rotel RB-985, Music Hall MMF-7, Parasound PPH-100, LSi-15, LSi-C, LSi-FX, LSi-7, PSW-1000, Monster HTS2600

    2 CH
    Parasound Halo P3, Parasound Halo A21, Sutherland Ph.D, VPI Classic 3 w/ 3D arm & Soundsmith Aida Cartridge, Arcam CD72T, B&W 802 S3, Monster HTS2500,
  • SKsolutions
    SKsolutions Posts: 1,820
    edited March 2006
    cmy330go wrote:
    Just wanted to point out that the change in pitch of a sound as it moves past you (ex: car horn) is due to the Doppler effect, not it's position in relation to you. It is actually due to a compressing and stretching of the waveform. Hence the reason the car horn's tone is higher as it comes toward you and lower as it moves away. The faster it moves the greater the effect. This is something that would be naturally captured by the recording, not something that the engineer would have to manipulate.

    Just an FYI. Not trying to question your preference.:)

    Dave

    I was just trying to illustrate a point, and I welcome anyones input, so I thank you for responding. The point being that there is very little done to a vocal "dialog" effect. It is usually run through a compressor/limiter, and that is it. This is done to maintain as much intelligibility as possible. So, more often than not, it reads, in my ears, flat. Anyway, I dig mine, you dig yours, and that is why we're here.
    -Ignorance is strength -
  • peteran
    peteran Posts: 141
    edited March 2006
    My Poor "sneakyPersona" he just wanted an opinion for the center channel and he is gettin a Bar fight..!!!
    I'm jumping in. The front stage speakers are the most important to timbre match, 70% of the sound filters through them and of that 50% is the center channel.
    Maybe Sksolutions feels that since half the sound comes from the center channel timbre matching isn't important.
  • AzN_plyR
    AzN_plyR Posts: 96
    edited March 2006
    AndyGwis wrote:
    That's easy. . . because my girlfriend would likely leave me for upgrading my system for the fourth time in two months.

    But, I guess in that case I would have plenty more time to listen to my new RTis. . . :rolleyes:

    Don't worry, just after you upgraded and sit her down for a listen, she'll forget about the whole thing :)
  • markopolo
    markopolo Posts: 18
    edited March 2006
    Same question. Just bought some RT7's for my mains, still waiting delivery, currently I Have an Energy Ex:Lc centre channel. Won't know about how they are timbre matched til they get here but assuming they don't match, what is the best centre channel to match with the RT7?
  • cmy330go
    cmy330go Posts: 2,341
    edited March 2006
    markopolo wrote:
    Same question. Just bought some RT7's for my mains, still waiting delivery, currently I Have an Energy Ex:Lc centre channel. Won't know about how they are timbre matched til they get here but assuming they don't match, what is the best centre channel to match with the RT7?

    Old timers correct me if I'm wrong.

    I believe it would be the CS275, CS350.

    You could probably also use CS245i and the CS400i. Both use the Tri-Lam tweeter. But I believe these were really intended to match the RTi series.

    Welcome!
    Dave
    HT
    Mits WD-65737, DirecTV, Oppo DV-970HD, XBOX ONE, Yamaha RX-A1030, Parasound Halo A23, Rotel RB-985, Music Hall MMF-7, Parasound PPH-100, LSi-15, LSi-C, LSi-FX, LSi-7, PSW-1000, Monster HTS2600

    2 CH
    Parasound Halo P3, Parasound Halo A21, Sutherland Ph.D, VPI Classic 3 w/ 3D arm & Soundsmith Aida Cartridge, Arcam CD72T, B&W 802 S3, Monster HTS2500,
  • shawn474
    shawn474 Posts: 3,052
    edited March 2006
    While I agree that a Polk center Channel (seems the CS400i is the consensus) would sound better to timbre match your system, I own the JBL EC35 as well. It is a great center channel in my most humble opinion. Not to get into a pissing contest, but the staement that JBL is crap is way off. Maybe because this is a Polk forum and other brands aren't though that highly regarded, but this center channel is a beast. It is by far the best sounding and performing center channel that I have owned. While JBL might not be on the "same level" as Polk, I think they offer a very comporable quality to price ratio to Polk that has its own niche in the market. I have owned Polk, DCM, Cerwin Vega, Infinity, etc. and feel that for my applications and budget that my JBL's offer a sound that is more than adequate for me.
    Shawn
    AVR: Marantz SR-5011
    Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
    Front: Polk LsiM703
    Rear: LSI fx
    Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
    Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
    DVD Player: Sony PS4
  • AndyGwis
    AndyGwis Posts: 3,655
    edited March 2006
    Just to recap, I have monitor 60 fronts, monitor 30 surrounds, omni s12, and CSi3 center. Finally figured out that I ended up with the CSi3 because Tweeter doesn't carry the CS1 or 2, and I was too dumb to know what matched what at that point.

    Would it match better to get the CS1 or CS2? I'm thinking the CS2, since my fronts are now powered by some separate amps I picked up and may overpower CS1.

    Also, where should I buy the CS2, and sell the CSi3? Flea Market???

    Thanks!
    andygwis
    Stereo Rig: Hales Revelation 3, Musical Fidelity CD-Pre 24, Forte Model 3 amp, Lexicon RT-10 SACD, MMF-5 w/speedbox, Forte Model 2 Phono Pre, Cardas Crosslink, APC H15, URC MX-950, Lovan Stand
    Bedroom: Samsung HPR-4252, Toshiba HD-A2, HK 3480, Signal Cable, AQ speaker cable, Totem Dreamcatchers, SVS PB10-NSD, URC MX-850
  • cmy330go
    cmy330go Posts: 2,341
    edited March 2006
    AndyGwis wrote:
    Just to recap, I have monitor 60 fronts, monitor 30 surrounds, omni s12, and CSi3 center. Finally figured out that I ended up with the CSi3 because Tweeter doesn't carry the CS1 or 2, and I was too dumb to know what matched what at that point.

    Would it match better to get the CS1 or CS2? I'm thinking the CS2, since my fronts are now powered by some separate amps I picked up and may overpower CS1.

    Also, where should I buy the CS2, and sell the CSi3? Flea Market???

    Thanks!
    andygwis

    That would be a good move. The CS2 is a fine center and would certainly match your mains better than the CSi3. Also if you can't return the CSi3 I'm sure you would have no problem selling it. However just as a heads up, you would probably get a better price on eBay. I'm not discouraging you from selling in the FM (far from it), it's just that the FM is more of a place to cut fellow polkies a nice deal. If you can stand to loose a little money it would be GREAT to offer it in the flea market!

    Edit: Almost forgot. It is now required the you have at least 25 post before selling in the FM. Just FYI.

    Hope all goes well!
    Dave
    HT
    Mits WD-65737, DirecTV, Oppo DV-970HD, XBOX ONE, Yamaha RX-A1030, Parasound Halo A23, Rotel RB-985, Music Hall MMF-7, Parasound PPH-100, LSi-15, LSi-C, LSi-FX, LSi-7, PSW-1000, Monster HTS2600

    2 CH
    Parasound Halo P3, Parasound Halo A21, Sutherland Ph.D, VPI Classic 3 w/ 3D arm & Soundsmith Aida Cartridge, Arcam CD72T, B&W 802 S3, Monster HTS2500,
  • AndyGwis
    AndyGwis Posts: 3,655
    edited March 2006
    Thanks, Dave. 25 posts shouldn't be a problem. . . I've got way more noobish questions to ask :D
    Stereo Rig: Hales Revelation 3, Musical Fidelity CD-Pre 24, Forte Model 3 amp, Lexicon RT-10 SACD, MMF-5 w/speedbox, Forte Model 2 Phono Pre, Cardas Crosslink, APC H15, URC MX-950, Lovan Stand
    Bedroom: Samsung HPR-4252, Toshiba HD-A2, HK 3480, Signal Cable, AQ speaker cable, Totem Dreamcatchers, SVS PB10-NSD, URC MX-850