Polk... Plz bring back PSW1200 ! ! !

rskarvan
rskarvan Posts: 2,374
edited February 28 in Clubhouse Archives
Matt Polk, Justin, or Micah:

A lot of people seem to be interested in the PSW1200 - a discontinued flagship sub. I have the PSW650 - while its a fine sub, its output is certainly not overwhelming.

Why did Polk drop this sub?
Why won't Polk bring it back?

I'm sure a lot of people would like to know.

Thanks.
Post edited by RyanC_Masimo on

Comments

  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited May 2002
    I think Paul commented on this at one point.......essentially, the point was that it didn't have enough broad consumer support to justify it's existence......

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • Aaron
    Aaron Posts: 1,853
    edited May 2002
    I think Paul commented on this at one point.......essentially, the point was that it didn't have enough broad consumer support to justify it's existence......
    In other words, Circuit **** wouldn't stock them and couldn't sell them. Of course, now that they're setting up their LSi dealer network, they could market through that chain. Also, there needs to be an LSi-quality subwoofer. I don't think you can pass the PSW650 off as such. Perhaps a revival of the PSW1200 does make sense.

    Aaron
  • jrausch
    jrausch Posts: 510
    edited May 2002
    What about a new LSI sub that enhances the LSI experience.
    "The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it."
  • har_navalta
    har_navalta Posts: 957
    edited May 2002
    Guys... you're only wasting your breath begging Polk CEO's or
    Matt Polk for bringing it back this SUB ~ its history ~ like SDA's
    so why you don't turn on SERVO-15 like some people says:


    Quote:
    ________________________________________________
    I have a PSW1200. I've heard the Servo-15.

    PSW1200 is a very good subwoofer, but the Servo-15 is hands-down better.

    ________________________________________________


    I am very disappointed in finding this sub so I'm turn my
    sight to SERVO-15! :lol:

    Har
  • rskarvan
    rskarvan Posts: 2,374
    edited May 2002
    Har-navalata,

    So, two opposing 12" woofers aren't as good as one
    15" servo-controlled woofer?

    Is the Paradigm just tighter... or, is it louder too?

    I agree... I really like the servo-15 (sweeeet sound).
    I've never heard the 1200. My PSW650 is a little on the
    weak side - imo.

    - Ron
  • har_navalta
    har_navalta Posts: 957
    edited May 2002
    I currently purchased the PSW 650. I really want the PSW 1200 but there's no chance to own one. I never heard the PSW 1200 or the Servo-15 to tell which one is better. I'm just relying on people's reviews on them. This weekend, I will go to a local dealer to audition the Servo-15 then I can tell what ever the Servo-15 is.



    Har
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,190
    edited May 2002
    I agree,
    We need a better sub in the line to match the LSI.Aub isn't a sub unless it can play down to 20hz.
    The psw1200 was Polks best sub to date.
    The psw650 as flagship......no..........a fine woofer but not a great sub.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • jmierzur
    jmierzur Posts: 489
    edited May 2002
    I would look at the Vandersteen 2Wq (or others) if you would consider purchasing a PSW1200 (if you could find one). Polk makes great speakers (LSi series); other companies make better subs.

    Vandersteen 2W series subs
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited May 2002
    I agree that there needs to be an LSi-type sub. I think that in thier price points that Polk subs compete very well. Having said that, I opted for the Paradigm though.

    I would tend to think along the lines of quality over quantity.....I would say that a sub that plays down into the mid 20's, and does it well would be very sufficient, especially if the primary focus is on being musical. Building a sub that will thump at 20hz doesn't neccesarily make it a good sub.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • jcaut
    jcaut Posts: 1,849
    edited May 2002
    Since that was my quote, about the Servo-15 vs. the PSW1200, I think I should say again that the PSW1200 is a very good subwoofer and that I'm very pleased with it.

    For what a Servo-15 costs, I could have bought two PSW1200's (at the price I paid) and had enough money left over for a decent CD changer. Point is, it SHOULD sound better. It's very well constructed, is a SEALED box, with sophisticated electronics and a powerful amp. The sealed box and the servo control help give the Servo-15 excellent transient response, even with the large driver. Paradigm claims that it's response is flat to about 18Hz, and accurate down to 10Hz--- Compared to a bottom end of about 22 Hz on the Polk. Max output-wise, they're very close.

    That said, you don't listen to specifications---- What I heard is that the Servo-15 has more oomph! on the super-low, seat shaking notes and still sounds very controlled and musical.
    I think the PSW1200 compromises a little bit on the lowest notes in exchange for tighter control of the slightly higher material. I think it's hard to acheive both with a ported design.

    Sorry for the rambling--- I just though I should clarify WHY I think the Servo-15 is better.

    Jason

    --and to add, I think Aaron's absolutely right about the reason for the PSW1200's demise-- Circuit City couldn't move them, Crutchfield couldn't ship them- 'cause they're HUGE. Perhaps if they'd been marketed at higher-end audio shops...