Best receiver....
shawn474
Posts: 3,047
Hello everyone. I may be posting in the wrong area, but just need some advice. I just purchased the polk rm-6005 speaker package to replace my huge floor speakers and am happy with them for the most part. I have a yamaha rxv595 receiver that i love, but may not be the best match. I am looking to upgrade to 6.1 receiver if it makes a noticable difference? Advice? And what is the best receiver option in the 400 dollar price range (if there is an option)? Thanks very much and appreciate any advice.
Shawn
AVR: Marantz SR-5011
Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
Front: Polk LsiM703
Rear: LSI fx
Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
DVD Player: Sony PS4
AVR: Marantz SR-5011
Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
Front: Polk LsiM703
Rear: LSI fx
Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
DVD Player: Sony PS4
Post edited by shawn474 on
Comments
-
Welcome..
You could try one of these:
http://www.harmanaudio.com/search_browse/default.asp?sp=S&brand=HK
Refurbished Harman Kardon;as good as new, great price, great service._________________________________________________
***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***
2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
SOPAThank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman -
At your price point no sonic difference, save your dough, stick with the Yammie unless you want some new bells and whistles features it does not have.
RT1 -
I respectfully disagree with reel. There is a sonic difference at that pricepoint between various receivers. HTrookie gave you a great starting point.
-
I'm gonna agree with you both. There are sonic differences, but it's hard to say one is better at that pricepoint- each one has it's own colorations and depending on your ear some will be more/less pleasing to you.Gallo Ref 3.1 : Bryston 4b SST : Musical fidelity CD Pre : VPI HW-19
Gallo Ref AV, Frankengallo Ref 3, LC60i : Bryston 9b SST : Meridian 565
Jordan JX92s : MF X-T100 : Xray v8
Backburner:Krell KAV-300i -
I really appreciate everyone's advice. I am a newbie to the audiophile fix - I started out with the receiver when it first came out and spent 500 dollars for it (almost seven or eight years ago). I listen to a lot of music and watch a ton of movies and football on sundays. The polks sound great, but lack the "boom" that I got with my cerwin vega d5's and infinity studio monitors. Those became too big and with a toddler learning to walk I was afraid that she would pull them over and hurt herself. I was just wondering whether or not it would be worth it to upgrade to 6.1 and get a new receiver. Thaks again for the input and I look forward to anyone else's opinions.Shawn
AVR: Marantz SR-5011
Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
Front: Polk LsiM703
Rear: LSI fx
Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
DVD Player: Sony PS4 -
yes, Unc. agreed, they might sound different but not better or worse so why waste the dough unless he wants more channels or something. Athough all the mass market entry level Asian receivers have a bright to some, harsh to others sound to them. Not suprising since all the Asian piano's like Yamaha, Wang, Akai, are also bright compared to say a Steinway. Entry level is just that. Its just they way it is. ie non-discreet circuity, cheap caps, power supply, everthing in one box, heat, yada yada the science guru's can explain it I just hear it.
Andrew and HT well its OK to disagree and I dont mean to rip or dis ya, everbody has budget or like in this case safety concerns but there is a whole world of audio levels, your next level, oh say Rotel, NAD, Outlaw, then maybe B&K, Sunfire, Parasound, its gets mixed at the mid level gear but these are definetly seperated from the pack. Some of these are now even from the far east but just better.
Then speaking of Seperates
Its audio its fun.
RT1 -
What I meant by sonic difference was not quality, but for the type of sound the listener prefers. Bright, Warm, Scrambled, Over-Easy, etc..
-
shawn474 wrote:I was just wondering whether or not it would be worth it to upgrade to 6.1 and get a new receiver. Thaks again for the input and I look forward to anyone else's opinions.
I would stay 5.1 or upgrade to 7.1. I'm just not sure about 6.1's future. I think the industry will skip 6.1 and record movies in 7.1 down the road, making 7.1 the mainstream like 5.1 is now.
How do my fellow polkies feel about 6.1's future???Receiver: harmankardon AVR235
Mains: polk R30
Center: polk CSi3
Rear Surrounds: polk R20
Subwoofer: polk PSW404
DVD: Panasonic DVD-S29 -
Mike682 wrote:How do my fellow polkies feel about 6.1's future???
imo it has no future. -
There are plenty of choices in that price range. Either look for one that has all the features you want and sounds the best to you. Or if it is more boom you want, look into getting a new sub.
One of these from here:http://svsubwoofers.com/subs_pb10_isd.htm
Or one of these from here:http://www.outlawaudio.com/products/lfm1.html
http://www.outlawaudio.com/products/lfm2.html
Welcome to the club Shawn!Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2 -
what movies are in 7.1?
-
none
RT1