AQ DiamondBacks for HT

beardog03
beardog03 Posts: 5,550
edited November 2005 in Electronics
I just got my AQ DiamondBacks for my HT rig..

Brand new..!!
Good deal on A`gon..got rid of the last of the Monsters..

The soundis almost too clear..
footsteps in the background , phones ringing, etc.

It`s almost distracting from the movie..!

I have 5 of them going to the Parasound Hca2205a 5ch amp, and the sixth going to the sub...because I want it to break in also..

Is it better to use the Better Cables I/C that I bought with the SVS, or use the DiamondBack

I`m watching the first BatMan movie, and so far , maybe it`s just me , It seems a little thin in the bass region..

I don`t need a whole schematic on cables , just your thoughts on using the same I/C for the HT and sub..

whadda ya think..?

The AQ or the Better Cable I/C for the sub..?
Cary SLP-98L F1 DC Pre Amp (Jag Blue)
Parasound HCA-3500
Cary Audio V12 amp (Jag Red)
Polk Audio Xm Reciever (Autographed by THE MAN Himself) :cool:
Magnum Dynalab MD-102 Analog Tuna
Jolida JD-100 CDP
Polk Audio LSi9 Speaks (ebony)
SVS PC-Ultra Sub
AQ Bedrock Speaker Cables (Bi-Wired)
MIT Shotgun S1 I/C`s
AQ Black Thunder Sub Cables
PS Audio Plus Power Cords
Magnum Dynalab ST-2 FM Antenna
Sanus Cherry wood Speak Stands
Adona AV45CS3 / 3 Tier Rack (Black /Gold)

:cool:
Post edited by beardog03 on
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,204
    edited November 2005
    Which one sound better? Does the other cable producing more bass sound natural? Or does the one give smoother bass? You really need to listen to how the cable reacts. The diamondbacks are very good audio cables and should make excellent sub cables.

    I like natural sound, you may be used to hearing a not so natural sound.

    Dan
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter