SDA SRS 2 Question
Mike Reeter
Posts: 4,315
I'm looking at a pair of SDA SRS 2's that appear to have only one set of binding posts...Any pictures that I have seen of these speakers have two sets,connected by a jumper...Did ALL the SRS 2's have dual binding posts? Or was this a change during the short time they were being built?
The reason I ask is I don't know whether these speakers have been refurbished or had an abortion preformed on them...
They are not being sold by the original owner,and the seller doesn't seem to know what I'm asking him...
The reason I ask is I don't know whether these speakers have been refurbished or had an abortion preformed on them...
They are not being sold by the original owner,and the seller doesn't seem to know what I'm asking him...
Post edited by Mike Reeter on
Comments
-
Mike,
Can you post pics of the speakers, front and rear, with a closeup of the binding post plate? That would help a lot.
Take a look at this thread on first generation SRS 2s - one set per cabinet: http://clubpolk.polkaudio.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=9459&highlight=SRS2
Mike -
Mine have only one set of binding posts.
-
That thread is about SDA 2's, he's talking SDA SRS 2's. One set of posts on mine also.
Cheers,
RussCheck your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service. -
Ooops, sorry, I clicked on the wrong entry in favorites. I edited to the right link, which shows the label and diagram on the back of a cabinet. One set of BPs.
-
There were two versions of the SRS 2.
The 1986 version with the blade/blade interconnect cable had one set of binding posts.
The 1987 version with the pin/blade interconnect cable had two sets of binding posts.Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country! -
Darque&everyone...Thank you,I thought something was up,I can assume now that the SRS 2's are original...seller is asking $650.00...from pricing I've seen,seems a little high...I might have to make a trip to check them out...Thanks again,Mike