Polk SRS SDA 3.1 TL

This is my first post. I love Polk speakers. I’ve had Monitor 7, 2 Monitor 10s, RTA 15s. Just bought some 3.1 TLs from original owner for $400. Black finish. Drivers all work. Ordered new grill cloth. Has interconnect cable. These things rock. Using a Yamaha Mx-800 170wpc 8ohms. I am going to buy the rdo-198 tweets for them. I can solder so I want to do the crossovers. I’m confused about the capacitors though. I looked at Sonic cap gen 1s. Way to expensive for me. I just want to give these a refresh. What type and brand should I be looking at? Thank you
«1

Comments

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,654
    Sonicap
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,310
    Sonicap
    Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

    SVS SB16 X2

    Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
    Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
    Cary DMS 800PV Network
    OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
    VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
    Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

    VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

    MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 5,000
    Budget cascade as follows...Sonicap>Clarity Cap>Erse Black Dragons>Wuhan Yellow Dragons
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    Soniccaps would run around $400 for each speaker. I’ll go with something less expensive. Should I get polypropylene film caps or electrolytic caps. I have no clue. Thanks for everyone’s input.
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,576
    The tried and true (sonicap/Clarity) are both expensive there's no two ways about it. Polypropylene caps are forever and much tighter in tolerance than electrolytics, electrolytics shift over their lifespan and will need replacement at some point. The better sound will come from polypropylene caps, polypropylene caps all have a sound signature. Cheaper poly caps can have a very negative impact on the midrange and high end of the speakers, some to such an extent that you may not enjoy the listening experience.
    Think about if you find that negative experience and now spend the money to recap again, did you save any money? No. Trust me I've been down the road more that once it's never easy. Spend once cry once.
  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    Great advice pitdogg2. These Polks are replacing some very nice Paradigms Studio 100 V3. I’ll sell those and use the $ for some quality caps. These Polks are in my garage and can be heard down the block. Thanks for the input.
  • Emlyn
    Emlyn Posts: 4,532
    I'd definitely replace the tweeters first, listen to them as is properly set up with quality amplification for a while, and then decide if further investment in internal upgrades is what you want long term with them. Crossover upgrades don't necessarily add much/any dollar value if you think you might want to sell them later.

    The 3.1TL is a special speaker.
  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    I was reading additional info on these speakers. My amp with 170 watts may be a little low for these speakers. A quality amp with around 350 watts with the new tweeters is what I will do first. Thank you Emlyn.

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,654
    Less to do with watts and more to do with amperes (current).
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    More current the better. I love this forum. Ordered the RDO198 tweeters today. I got 20% off the price by mentioning I was a Polk forum member.
  • dpowell
    dpowell Posts: 3,068
    Sonicaps and mills and about 200 hours of play time to know you made the right choice.
    ____________________________________________________________

    polkaudio Fully Modded SDA SRS 1.2TLs + Dreadnaught, LSiM706c, 4 X Polk Surrounds + 4 X ATMOS, SVS PB13 Ultra X 2, Pass Labs X1, Marantz 7704, Bob Carver Crimson Beauty 350 Tube Mono Blocks, Carver Sunfire Signature Cinema Grande 400x5, ADCOM GFA 7807, Panasonic UB420, Moon 380D DAC, EPSON Pro Cinema 6050
  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    On the schematic one of the 12uf capacitors says Mylar. Can I replace this with a poly without a detrimental effect on sound? Thank you.
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,576
    hiheidi wrote: »
    On the schematic one of the 12uf capacitors says Mylar. Can I replace this with a poly without a detrimental effect on sound? Thank you.

    Polypropylene caps would be much better option. Be very aware the cap will be much bigger than stock. Stock caps usually are 100v, replacement caps are usually 200v or larger depending on brand. Stick with 200v options.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,654
    hiheidi wrote: »
    On the schematic one of the 12uf capacitors says Mylar. Can I replace this with a poly without a detrimental effect on sound? Thank you.

    Replace all the caps with film/poly caps, such as Sonicap. Replace all the resistors with non-inductive wirewounds such as Mills-Vishay.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • Schurkey
    Schurkey Posts: 2,104
    ANY film cap is going to be "better" than ANY aged-out, beyond-service-life original electrolytic.

    Some film caps may be preferable compared to others, but don't obsess if budget is an issue. Even "budget" film caps are better than what's in there now.
  • xschop
    xschop Posts: 5,000
    hiheidi wrote: »
    On the schematic one of the 12uf capacitors says Mylar. Can I replace this with a poly without a detrimental effect on sound? Thank you.

    I kept the factory 16uF mylar in my 8TL's for a long time. When I added a polypropylene (Erse) I could hear a little more detail in the tweeter region, but that was with billet RDO plates. With the factory plastic plates, I'm not so sure there'd be much difference.
    Don't take experimental gene therapies from known eugenicists.
  • Sitka
    Sitka Posts: 74
    I'm very happy with Clarity CSA caps, and cost with Mills resistors came to $400 on my recent SDA 2B build. Sure, the Sonicaps would sound slightly better but right now they're way over priced IMHO.
  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    I have been looking at the Clarity CSA caps. I’ll have to buy 2 27uf caps for the 55uf on the dimensional driver. Will the Physical size of the Clarity caps be an issue when installing? Thank you

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,654
    All film/foil/poly caps are considerably larger than electrolytic or mylar caps.

    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    Just found a pair of Polk SRS 2.3 non TL for $400. Seller says they are excellent condition. 2 hour drive one way. We’re the stock 2.3 that much better than the 3.1. Thanks
  • Schurkey
    Schurkey Posts: 2,104
    hiheidi wrote: »
    Just found a pair of Polk SRS 2.3 non TL for $400. Seller says they are excellent condition. 2 hour drive one way. We’re the stock 2.3 that much better than the 3.1. Thanks
    $400 is an outright steal...depending on condition. They'd have to be fairly screwed-up to not be worth more than $400 + your travel expenses and time.

    Buy them. Sell the ones you like least. What works/sounds best may depend on the size/shape of your listening room, and the condition of the two pair of speakers including which modifications/repairs you make to them.
  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    After Schurkey’s post I contacted the seller of the Polk Srs 2.3. He said a sale is pending. Anyway I’ll be happy with the 3.1TL. Installed the RDO198 tweeties. Sound is noticeably better. Getting ready to buy the Clarity caps. I have budgeted around $1000 for amplifier. I saw the following. Rotel RB-980BX, Kenwood M2, Yamaha MX 1000u and Carver M 1.0T. Thoughts on these and other suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
  • Schurkey
    Schurkey Posts: 2,104
    edited February 18
    Any "vintage" amplifier is likely going to need repairs. The electrolytic caps will be near the end--or beyond--their expected service life, just like the ones in the speaker crossover. The Carver could be an outstanding choice...AFTER it's rebuilt. I don't know about the others.

    When it was my money, I bought a Made-in-USA amplifier having outstanding current (amperage) delivery into low-impedance loads. Your SDA-SRS 3.1TL speakers have generally higher input impedance than my modified SDA-1Bs, so adequate amperage into a 4-ohm load is probably completely acceptable.
  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    Regarding the Carver. This following is part on the ad for it. ad is a month old. ” Highly reviewed "sleeper" power amplifier ("the great Stereophile/Conrad-Johnson Premier Five killer") that has had a complete service/upgrade ($600+) by Nelion Audio less than 6 months ago. he is asking $1050
  • Schurkey
    Schurkey Posts: 2,104
    edited February 18
    hiheidi wrote: »
    has had a complete service/upgrade ($600+) by Nelion Audio less than 6 months ago. he is asking $1050
    IF (big IF) he's got proof of service by Nelion, and there's no indication that it's been dropped into a bathtub, or run over by a semi-truck, or other obvious damage since then...jump on that thing especially if you can negotiate the price downwards a bit.

    Nelion is top-notch.

    OTOH, at $1000+, you have some other choices although they'd not be recently serviced. Aragon, B&K, ATI, Bryston (Canadian, eh?) select Adcom, and so forth.

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,654
    hiheidi wrote: »
    Regarding the Carver. This following is part on the ad for it. ad is a month old. ” Highly reviewed "sleeper" power amplifier ("the great Stereophile/Conrad-Johnson Premier Five killer") that has had a complete service/upgrade ($600+) by Nelion Audio less than 6 months ago. he is asking $1050

    BS, that amp isn't even close the one Carver had at the Stereophile event. The one he used had to be constantly adjusted/tweaked because it was so unstable. He even said he could never make it into a production amp. The whole thing was a joke.

    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,576
    He even said he could never make it into a production amp.
    True words.

  • hiheidi
    hiheidi Posts: 20
    So I’m a little confused. So F1, is this a good amp for my 3.1TL?. Any recommendations? Thank you
  • Schurkey
    Schurkey Posts: 2,104
    edited February 18
    C-J Premier Four (Not Five.)
    https://www.stereophile.com/content/carver-challenge

    And also
    https://www.stereophile.com/content/carver-challenge-responses

    The "production" M1.0Ts were not capable of the deep null produced by the prototype...but they were entirely reasonable amplifiers in other respects, ESPECIALLY after thorough service work which can upgrade some questionable parts choices in the original design.

    Personally, I would not want an amp modified to have a high output impedance to simulate a "tube amp". My preferred amplifier topology is for the lowest-possible output impedance among other qualities. The added impedance of the M1.0T is--I think--able to be bypassed by merely connecting the speaker cables to the alternate output terminals on the back of the amp.

    Note that early versions of the M1.0 are NOT common-ground, and will be unsuitable for some SDA speakers if the SDA interconnect cable is still attached, and usable with others only with an isolation transformer in the SDA cable.
  • invalid
    invalid Posts: 1,373
    I wouldn't buy that carver amps for that price, there is a lot better out there used for that kind of money.