Day 1 of Bi-Focals

Or progressives....whatever they are called, tell me wearing these gets better with time!
«1

Comments

  • dromunds
    dromunds Posts: 10,015
    I’ve had the progressives for years. Don’t remember what they were like when I first got them but no problems whatsoever now. I like them a lot actually
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,131
    edited October 2022
    I remember getting a pair of bifocals years ago. Immediately returned them and had to put up quite the fight to get them to make me another pair at no additional cost.

    The line where the focus changed was directly in my line of vision when driving. The only recourse was to put the glasses down at the end of my nose or constantly tilt my head down while walking or driving. Yeah, not gonna happen.....it was very uncomfortable.

    They stated that this was normal and that they manufactured them correctly. I called BS on them and insisted that they make me another pair of FUNCTIONAL glasses without the bi-focals.

    Haven't attempted to get another pair because of this reason. There is no way, in my mind, that having a line go across right in your central line of vision when looking forward was "normal".

    Tom
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • Emlyn
    Emlyn Posts: 4,525
    I tried some years ago but found I preferred just using glasses for distance vision. I may need to try a pair of bifocal progressives again as my near vision gets a little worse with the years. Especially in my left eye. I still have perfect close up vision in my right eye though.

    What I found with progressive lenses before was I had to pay too much attention to what I wanted to look at and move my head around too much to be worthwhile. Also gave me a headache.
  • muncybob
    muncybob Posts: 3,052
    As much as a PITA it is to use reading glasses, I doubt I'll ever go bifocal. I just need to acquire enough reading specs to be placed around the house so I don't have to go searching for them when I need them.
    Yep, my name really is Bob.
    Parasound HCA1500A(indoor sound) and HCA1000(outdoor sound), Dynaco PAS4, Denon DP1200 w/Shure V15 Type V and Jico SAS stylus, Marantz UD7007, Polk L600, Rythmik L12 sub.
  • Ricardo
    Ricardo Posts: 10,636
    Been using progressives for YEARS. Yes, it's a bit weird at first, but you get used in a couple days or less. Then there's no going back.
    _________________________________________________
    ***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***

    2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
    SOPA
    Thank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman
  • motorstereo
    motorstereo Posts: 2,142
    For me it'll be one week on Tuesday that I've been wearing progressive bi-focals. I can't say it's gotten better but it is better than not being able to see.
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,555
    edited October 2022
    Been using them for years. I will however mention the the company that makes the lens makes ALL difference. Some companies lenses are full of blurry spots where they do not "progress" well at all. So of you keep having problems research who they are buying the lenses from.
    Also too narrow top to bottom also can have negative consequences.
    It does take time to find the sweet spot.
  • SCompRacer
    SCompRacer Posts: 8,504
    edited October 2022
    I'll raise you a focal, Trifocals. Been using them for several years now. Once I got use to them, no going back.
    Salk SoundScape 8's * Audio Research Reference 3 * Bottlehead Eros Phono * Park's Audio Budgie SUT * Krell KSA-250 * Harmonic Technology Pro 9+ * Signature Series Sonore Music Server w/Deux PS * Roon * Gustard R26 DAC / Singxer SU-6 DDC * Heavy Plinth Lenco L75 Idler Drive * AA MG-1 Linear Air Bearing Arm * AT33PTG/II & Denon 103R * Richard Gray 600S * NHT B-12d subs * GIK Acoustic Treatments * Sennheiser HD650 *
  • motorstereo
    motorstereo Posts: 2,142
    Having not worn glasses for many years (lasic) I was unprepared for the sticker shock of $600 glasses and there better not be "blurry spots" at that price. One thing I noticed yesterday that I'm not pleased with is they don't get dark enough while driving in the bright sunlight.
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,737
    Are you talking about transitions where they turn into sunglasses? Car windows block out some uv light which prevents the glasses from changing.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • skipshot12
    skipshot12 Posts: 1,169
    I remember my first glasses. They actually were progressives.
    Never wore glasses for anything until I hit 40.

    Got used to them in about one week.
    Found that my head would automatically move to where it needed without noticing...
    Muscle memory after a while?
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    Been wearing bifocals for 45 years.....switched to progressives about 10 years ago. You get used to them.....first week or so sucks but pretty soon it's just the way it is.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,555
    edited October 2022
    Having not worn glasses for many years (lasic) I was unprepared for the sticker shock of $600 glasses and there better not be "blurry spots" at that price. One thing I noticed yesterday that I'm not pleased with is they don't get dark enough while driving in the bright sunlight.

    They do not get dark enough because you are behind a windshield. The windshield reduces the amount of UV the lens needs to get dark. There are several type of Transitions lenses, My transitions do get dark behind the windshield, mine are also a huge step up from standard Transitions as they also have a progressive polarization.

    A $600 pair of glasses is cheap.
  • Jimbo18
    Jimbo18 Posts: 2,336
    My first pair of glasses was 22 years ago. I got a pair with progressive lenses from one of the eye glass chains. I was concerned about progressive and they assured me that I could return them. I HATED them, blurry spots, weird funhouse mirror like effects. I returned them the next day (with a bit of haggling since they wanted me to give them a chance).

    I got a pair of "regular" bifocals and had no problems with them at all. Years later I got a good (read - expensive) pair of progressives and have had no issues with them since. Like pittdogg2 said, the lenses make all the difference.
  • PSOVLSK
    PSOVLSK Posts: 5,208
    I got my first pair about 12 years ago. Due to a few circumstances, I basically never wore them and just went without glasses until less than a month ago. I wasn’t given any guidance on my frames, so I chose a pair that had a narrow lens. That, along with the fact that I had a job where I was active and having to turn my head constantly were not a good match.

    About a month ago I went back to have my eyes checked. This time, the person helping me told me that I needed a wider lens with the progressive lens. This seems to have made a big difference because I’m not having too much trouble adapting.
    Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.-John Wooden
  • motorstereo
    motorstereo Posts: 2,142
    pitdogg2 wrote: »
    Having not worn glasses for many years (lasic) I was unprepared for the sticker shock of $600 glasses and there better not be "blurry spots" at that price. One thing I noticed yesterday that I'm not pleased with is they don't get dark enough while driving in the bright sunlight.

    They do not get dark enough because you are behind a windshield. The windshield reduces the amount of UV the lens needs to get dark. There are several type of Transitions lenses, My transitions do get dark behind the windshield, mine are also a huge step up from standard Transitions as they also have a progressive polarization.

    A $600 pair of glasses is cheap.
    They mentioned that about them not changing enough in a car. I thought I'd be ok but with my recent cataract replacements bright sunshine or lights are almost painful.
    Whoa....... $600 for glasses is cheap?? Last pair of glasses I bought some 40+ years ago was $70 and I thought that was expensive at the time. Apparently I need to get with the program.

  • Emlyn
    Emlyn Posts: 4,525
    The people in my family and older coworkers who had cataract surgery came out with 20/20 distance vision. They'd just wear off the shelf polarized sunglasses without correction to drive.

    But yeah, frames themselves aren't inexpensive!
  • motorstereo
    motorstereo Posts: 2,142
    Emlyn wrote: »
    The people in my family and older coworkers who had cataract surgery came out with 20/20 distance vision. They'd just wear off the shelf polarized sunglasses without correction to drive.

    But yeah, frames themselves aren't inexpensive!

    Oh how I envy those people; unfortunately I was not that lucky.
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,555
    edited October 2022
    Emlyn wrote: »
    The people in my family and older coworkers who had cataract surgery came out with 20/20 distance vision. They'd just wear off the shelf polarized sunglasses without correction to drive.

    But yeah, frames themselves aren't inexpensive!

    Oh how I envy those people; unfortunately I was not that lucky.

    Basically because you didn't choose it. Probably because you thought it was too expensive. My mother 6mo before her death had cataract surgery on both eyes. The doctor plainly explained to her they could correct her lenses they put in her eye and if she wanted to pay extra they would do some laser surgery on her eyeballs so she could possibly have 20/10 vision. It was a $2000 up charge on each eye not covered by insurance. Obviously her health was bad enough and I was her POA and I wouldn't let her do it. Still the lenses they replaced in her eyes were corrected so she would just need reading glasses. My mother wore eye glasses her entire adult life.

    When I asked the doctor about the up charged extra I told him it sounded to me like they were doing LASIK surgery on her eyes.

    Had she been in better health and went with the up charged cataract surgery she most likely would not have needed any glasses, according to the eye doctor.


    For reference every two years I spend almost $2,000 on my glasses lenses and frames. It's very hard to find a good set of frames for less than $700 or $800 these days. My lenses and coatings for them make up the rest of that charge.
  • PSOVLSK
    PSOVLSK Posts: 5,208
    I just paid about $450 and thought that was expensive.
    Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.-John Wooden
  • marvda1
    marvda1 Posts: 4,903
    i didn't go blind until they told me i needed glasses. i was doing just fine without them. :D
    Amplifiers: Norma IPA 140, MasterSound Compact 845, Ayre v6xe, Consonance Cyber 800
    Preamp: deHavilland Ultraverve 3
    Dac: Sonnet Morpheus 2, Musical Paradise mp-d2 mkIII
    Transport: Jay's Audio CDT2 mk2, Lumin U1 mini
    Speakers: Rosso Fiorentino Volterra II
    Speaker Cables: Crystal Clear Magnum Opus 2, Organic Audio Organic Reference 2
    Interconnects: Crystal Clear Magnum Opus 2, Argento Organic Reference 2, Argento Organic 2
    Power Cables: Argento Organic Reference, Synergistic Research Foundation 10 and 12 ga.
    Digital cables: Crystal Clear Magnum Opus 2 bnc, Tellurium Q aes, Silnote Audio Poseidon Signature 2 bnc
    Puritan PSM156
  • motorstereo
    motorstereo Posts: 2,142
    pitdogg2 wrote: »
    Emlyn wrote: »
    The people in my family and older coworkers who had cataract surgery came out with 20/20 distance vision. They'd just wear off the shelf polarized sunglasses without correction to drive.

    But yeah, frames themselves aren't inexpensive!

    Oh how I envy those people; unfortunately I was not that lucky.

    Basically because you didn't choose it. Probably because you thought it was too expensive. My mother 6mo before her death had cataract surgery on both eyes. The doctor plainly explained to her they could correct her lenses they put in her eye and if she wanted to pay extra they would do some laser surgery on her eyeballs so she could possibly have 20/10 vision. It was a $2000 up charge on each eye not covered by insurance. Obviously her health was bad enough and I was her POA and I wouldn't let her do it. Still the lenses they replaced in her eyes were corrected so she would just need reading glasses. My mother wore eye glasses her entire adult life.

    When I asked the doctor about the up charged extra I told him it sounded to me like they were doing LASIK surgery on her eyes.

    Had she been in better health and went with the up charged cataract surgery she most likely would not have needed any glasses, according to the eye doctor.


    For reference every two years I spend almost $2,000 on my glasses lenses and frames. It's very hard to find a good set of frames for less than $700 or $800 these days. My lenses and coatings for them make up the rest of that charge.

    In my case cost had nothing to with it and the entire procedure was over 10G's. I went with my long time glaucoma specialist who also had a 98% success rate. I have vision and it's better than it was before the surgery but it's a long ways from 20/20.
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,737
    edited October 2022
    Man you guys open the wallet for glasses!

    I have bought my last few sets from Lingo Eyewear. I used their app to pull my prescription off my old glasses using my camera phone.

    Lenses and frames with transitions was like 150
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • PSOVLSK
    PSOVLSK Posts: 5,208
    VR3 wrote: »
    Man you guys open the wallet for glasses!

    I have bought my last few sets from Lingo Eyewear. I used their app to pull my prescription off my old glasses using my camera phone.

    Lenses and frames with transitions was like 150

    This is more up my alley. I thought I was splurging on my $450 pair.
    Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.-John Wooden
  • skipshot12
    skipshot12 Posts: 1,169
    I’m in need of a new pair myself.
    Thanks VR3…. Didn’t know such a thing existed.
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,737
    It's a great service and they naield my prescription on the first order, no complaints!
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • DaveHo
    DaveHo Posts: 3,534
    You fogies disappoint me. I thought I was going read about an alternative to stacked Advents...
    😀
  • mrbigbluelight
    mrbigbluelight Posts: 9,786
    edited October 2022
    $700 for cheap frames ?!
    And thousands every couple of years for glasses ?! 😵‍💫😳

    While they're very stylish, I don't think the F1 Dingus Hand Rubbed & Polished Lenses are worth it. 🤔
    And those F1 frames ?
    Just make sure that you thoroughly disinfect them before wearing.
    We won't go into how the beautiful gloss patina is created 😱


    Sal Palooza
  • Mike Reeter
    Mike Reeter Posts: 4,315
    SCompRacer wrote: »
    I'll raise you a focal, Trifocals. Been using them for several years now. Once I got use to them, no going back.

    Line-less Trifocals with one lens for distance vision and the other for close vision. These took more than a couple of days for my feeble brain to make the adjustment ;)

  • kevhed72
    kevhed72 Posts: 5,059
    Well....10 days in and I keep going back and forth on keeping them. They suck for watching TV and there are some blurry spots. They also suck being outside in nature because everything seems off when I turn my head. For phone and iPad use they are great. I guess I am still undecided but I am getting used to them as time goes on....I think lol!