Where’s the “Signature “ bipolar speakers?

sdufresne650
Posts: 3
in Speakers
Instead of purchasing the FXI A6 dipole/ bipolar speakers, Which are, from many comment sections, wonderful. I am willing to practice some patience and wait for a “Signature series “ set of bipole surrounds. Does anyone know if they are in our near future? The merits of this design are hard to ignore and concur with it’s growing popularity. I’m not ocd but having the speakers match in my theatre rooms seems more attractive and actually make much more sense.
Best Answers
-
Nope....don't even think it's on the radar.HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
Good morning @sdufresne650,
We are not going to make any bi-pole/di-pole speakers for the Signature Series. I don't know if it was ever discussed but I do know nothing is being added to the Series.
Thank you for your interest!
Answers
-
It would be redundant. Your surround speakers are for ambient sounds so they don't really have to voice match the front 3.HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
Understandable. But I was wondering if Polk had floated any rumors about bipolar Signature surrounds. Thanks.
-
It is a curious omission from the line, but Polk does market their smaller Signature bookshelf speakers as appropriate for surround sound duties. In practice in most home theater systems, those would function pretty much the same way as Polk's more traditional dipole/bipole surround speakers. The bipole setting on the dedicated type surround speakers is for direct sound radiation and the dipole setting is for more diffuse surround sound. It is the dipole function that is missing from the Signature line rather than bipole. When I ran a 7.1 system with LSi speakers I usually had a pair of surround speakers at the rear set in bipole and on the sides set at dipole.
If I was running a Signature home theater system I would get four S15 speakers and run them in 7.1 mode. I would not use the older FXi line. -
I would get the FXi surrounds. As others have mentioned, marching surrounds really isn’t essential for movies.Living Room 2.2: Usher BE-718 "tiny dancers"; Dual DIY Dayton audio RSS210HF-4 Subs with Dayton SPA-250 amps; Arcam SA30; Musical Fidelity A308; Sony UBP-x1000es
Game Room 5.1.4: Denon AVR-X4200w; Sony UBP-x700; Definitive Technology Power Monitor 900 mains, CLR-3000 center, StudioMonitor 350 surrounds, ProMonitor 800 atmos x4; Sub - Monoprice Monolith 15in THX Ultra
Bedroom 2.1 Harmon Kardon HK3490; Bluesounds Node N130; Polk RT25i; ACI Titan Subwoofer -
I have the fxi-3s as my surrounds and have the Signature 60's. I think they sound great together. It would be different if you were trying to pair them with the LSIs.Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2