RTi and CSi Impression - Boring
Comments
-
Originally posted by slink
While the CSi3 is supposedly timbre matched, could I use the CSi5? This may provide the clarity I'm looking for and just not getting with the CSI3 although with the smaller speaker setting it seems to be much better than it was. Thoughts?
ABSOLUTELY!
HBomb***WAREMTAE*** -
Glad to hear you made the right choice for yourself. Both are great speakers. I own the RF-35 which is the tower version of the one you listen to with two 8" woofs. I prefer their sound over my RT5, 800i and LSi9. Took a while before I finally found 'my sound' which is a combo of horns and tubes. If you decide to start a serious 2ch rig with high end gear, the RB or RF could be something for you to consider.
Enjoy your new toys.
Maurice -
Originally posted by slink
While the CSi3 is supposedly timbre matched, could I use the CSi5? This may provide the clarity I'm looking for and just not getting with the CSI3 although with the smaller speaker setting it seems to be much better than it was. Thoughts? -
My CSi30, presumably has the same driver as the CSi3, sounds crisp and clear with my Sony DA4ES. I did find the CSi3 sound not as good when I listened to one powered by a HKAVR630. In that case, I A/B the CSi3 and the CSi5 many times and found the CSi3 way too bright, for whatever reason. In addition to setting it to small, why not play with your EQ setting as well.
-
Originally posted by shiu
My CSi30, presumably has the same driver as the CSi3, sounds crisp and clear with my Sony DA4ES. I did find the CSi3 sound not as good when I listened to one powered by a HKAVR630. In that case, I A/B the CSi3 and the CSi5 many times and found the CSi3 way too bright, for whatever reason. In addition to setting it to small, why not play with your EQ setting as well. -
I'd consider using the 6's in the front ... and if you haven't bought the 4's yet I'd consider using FXi3's or 5's for surrounds.
-
Good to hear that you are now happier with your CSI3. It is an excellent choice. I mentioned that I found the speaker sounded bright when paired with an AVR630 (supposed to be warm sounding) in a store, and yet it does well with my supposedly "bright" sounding Sony 4ES in my home because that indicates to me that one may have to adjust their receiver's EQ settings, in order to match up with their speakers and room response characteristics.
I did not need to adjust the EQ neither, but I calibrated the speaker level settings with a sound pressure meter. When I was shopping for a center speaker, I listened to quite a few. I found the CSi30 (again I assume the CSi3 will be the same, or better) among the best at its price point. It is a much better speaker than the tiny one that came with my RM6700 satellite system. I am not sure if I would ever feel the need to upgrade to that gigantic CSI5. -
I think a lot of this has to do with the Denon AVR-2801 that I own. With the Klipsch speakers they sound good but not so heavy. Great clarity and vocal presence. Amazing. But they don't hold a candle in terms of overall spectrum and clarity to the Polk, which just provides this great, thick, ooomphy sound. Some people may think it's bass heavy but the highs are pretty clear. WHile I miss the lead vocals standing out of the mix I don't miss the feeling that the band is just in the background and my having to constantly readjust volume to compensate.
Klipsh is excellent but paired with the Denon system I've got to say that the Polk RTi series is just humming and great for house parties. -
Originally posted by shiu
I am not sure if I would ever feel the need to upgrade to that gigantic CSI5.
CSi5 - 7-1/2" H x 24" W x 14-1/2" D ... shipping weight 29 lbs
SRT - 6" H x 26 1/2" W x 17 1/2" D ... Net weight 40 lbs.