HK Bi-Amping - First Impressions

Early B.
Early B. Posts: 7,900
edited May 2004 in Electronics
Got my HK PA 2000 amplifier yesterday and wanted to give my first impressions. Based on the feedback from this forum, I bi-amped my fronts (Rti70's), running the highs to the receiver (HK 525) and the lows to the amp. I haven't had much time to play music and movies to really test it out, but as soon as I put in a CD, the sound was much more dynamic. The soundstage increased so much that 2-channel playback sounded like surround sound. Bass was tightened up. Songs that sounded wimpy (even with a PB1-ISD) now have much more authority. In addition, I didn't expect to hear another entire level of detail. (My wife likes it, too.)

Then I switched up and put in a DTS demo disk. Once again, there was a significant improvement in sound. More bass, more dynamic, more of everything. In fact, I could literally feel the difference. Awesome.

To sum up, I was choking my speakers by feeding them only 70 watts max from the receiver. The Rti70's are far more capable of a fuller, richer sound than I had ever known. Prior to a few days ago, I didn't even know how to bi-amp, but fellas on this forum explained it, I did it, and I'm glad I did.

No more upgrades for a while. I'm just gonna sit back and enjoy what I have.
HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

"God grooves with tubes."
Post edited by Early B. on
«1

Comments

  • AsSiMiLaTeD
    AsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,728
    edited April 2004
    I knew you'd notice quite a difference, glad to hear it...
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited April 2004
    Well haven't got mine hook yet, need to move some equipment around first to make room.

    From your post I may have to call in sick for the time needed, and the improvement you have heard. Well worth the $ for that AMP.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    No more upgrades for a while. I'm just gonna sit back and enjoy what I have.

    OK, maybe I spoke too soon. Please forgive me. I'm thinking about purchasing another HK amp, but I'm not sure what the best use would be. I see four options:

    1. One amp for each front speaker
    2. Power the center channel speaker
    3. Power the rears (Rti38's)
    4. Do nothing.

    Any suggestions?
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • HBombToo
    HBombToo Posts: 5,256
    edited April 2004
    Originally posted by Early B.
    OK, maybe I spoke too soon. Please forgive me. I'm thinking about purchasing another HK amp, but I'm not sure what the best use would be. I see four options:


    2. Power the center channel speaker


    Any suggestions?

    I say Option 2 will be most noticable. What center do you have? sorry for not knowing but my 400i sings in biamp mode.

    HBomb
    ***WAREMTAE***
  • AsSiMiLaTeD
    AsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,728
    edited April 2004
    Originally posted by Early B.
    OK, maybe I spoke too soon. Please forgive me. I'm thinking about purchasing another HK amp, but I'm not sure what the best use would be. I see four options:

    1. One amp for each front speaker
    2. Power the center channel speaker
    3. Power the rears (Rti38's)
    4. Do nothing.

    Any suggestions?
    Nevermind previous post...I'm retarded, see you have the HK 525

    Option 1 is not really an option with the PA2000 becuase it is not bridgeable into 1 chanel. i suppose you could split the signal coming out of the preamp outs on the receiver and run each channel to two amps and then use each amp to bi-amp the speakers, but I'm not sure about loss of sound quality...even if you could get this to work, I don't think an extra 30 WPC on the fronts will do much for you...

    If you can bi-amp the center, I'd agree that would be the best move.

    I'd rule out option 3, you really probably don't need more power back there unless you have big speakers back there...
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    My center is a Csi40.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • Tour2ma
    Tour2ma Posts: 10,177
    edited April 2004
    And another one awakens to the fact that added power is not just about added volume...

    EB,
    Glad to read you are happy with the new addition.

    As for your next move... Are you really sensing something lacking in the center channel now? If yes, have you recalibrated your HT since adding the new 2000?
    More later,
    Tour...
    Vox Copuli
    Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. - Old English Proverb

    "Death doesn't come with a Uhaul." - Dennis Gardner

    "It's easy to get lost in price vs performance vs ego vs illusion." - doro
    "There is a certain entertainment value in ripping the occaisonal (sic) buttmunch..." - TroyD
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    As for your next move... Are you really sensing something lacking in the center channel now? If yes, have you recalibrated your HT since adding the new 2000?

    Yes, I the auto calibration feature on my HK 525 increased the levels on the back and surround speakers. The Csi40 is an excellent speaker, but what I'm hoping to gain by acquiring an amp for the center channel is a similar improvement in dynamic and detailed sound that I got for the fronts. So I'll go from using 70 watts from the receiver to 200 watts from a dedicated HK pA 2000 amp to power the Csi40. I don't anticipate the amp costing more than $200 shipped used or refurbed.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • AsSiMiLaTeD
    AsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,728
    edited April 2004
    Originally posted by Early B.
    Yes, I the auto calibration feature on my HK 525 increased the levels on the back and surround speakers. The Csi40 is an excellent speaker, but what I'm hoping to gain by acquiring an amp for the center channel is a similar improvement in dynamic and detailed sound that I got for the fronts. So I'll go from using 70 watts from the receiver to 200 watts from a dedicated HK pA 2000 amp to power the Csi40. I don't anticipate the amp costing more than $200 shipped used or refurbed.
    I think you may see a difference when bi-amping that center, but I feel pretty confident in saying that you won't see NEAR the improvement that you did when you bi-amped the front channels, as that CSi40 is no where near the power hungry beast that the 150s are...

    That being said, if you've got an extra $200 or so laying around, why not...
  • Tour2ma
    Tour2ma Posts: 10,177
    edited April 2004
    Agree with what Pm said...
    More later,
    Tour...
    Vox Copuli
    Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. - Old English Proverb

    "Death doesn't come with a Uhaul." - Dennis Gardner

    "It's easy to get lost in price vs performance vs ego vs illusion." - doro
    "There is a certain entertainment value in ripping the occaisonal (sic) buttmunch..." - TroyD
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited April 2004
    Well got mine hook up also, the same way AVR feeding Tweeter / Mid with the AMP feeding the Woofers. Just I would have to change to 70 watts max from the receiver to 110 watts.

    Other then this I agree 110%.




    Originally posted by Early B.
    To sum up, I was choking my speakers by feeding them only 70 watts max from the receiver. The Rti70's are far more capable of a fuller, richer sound than I had ever known. Prior to a few days ago, I didn't even know how to bi-amp, but fellas on this forum explained it, I did it, and I'm glad I did.

    No more upgrades for a while. I'm just gonna sit back and enjoy what I have.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    I think you may see a difference when bi-amping that center, but I feel pretty confident in saying that you won't see NEAR the improvement that you did when you bi-amped the front channels, as that CSi40 is no where near the power hungry beast that the 150s are...

    I don't have 150's. I have 70's. The 70's aren't considered to be power hungry, but when they got some extra juice, they really started to sing.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • HBombToo
    HBombToo Posts: 5,256
    edited April 2004
    The 40i will bring a whole new dimension to the dialog after you complete the biamp.

    If stretched for parts I would put the 70's back to single amp use and biamp the center and put on a favorite movie for a test drive.

    1/4twin
    ***WAREMTAE***
  • Mike682
    Mike682 Posts: 2,074
    edited April 2004
    Originally posted by Early B.
    Yes, I the auto calibration feature on my HK 525 increased the levels on the back and surround speakers. The Csi40 is an excellent speaker, but what I'm hoping to gain by acquiring an amp for the center channel is a similar improvement in dynamic and detailed sound that I got for the fronts. So I'll go from using 70 watts from the receiver to 200 watts from a dedicated HK pA 2000 amp to power the Csi40. I don't anticipate the amp costing more than $200 shipped used or refurbed.


    one call has the pa 2000 for under $200.00 new, here is the link.....

    http://ww3.onecall.com/About_00001000_22_68_0_18_0_0.htm
    Receiver: harmankardon AVR235
    Mains: polk R30
    Center: polk CSi3
    Rear Surrounds: polk R20
    Subwoofer: polk PSW404
    DVD: Panasonic DVD-S29
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    Thanks, Mike. Just ordered it today. It should arrive by the end of this week. I'll post a thread on it's performance with my Csi40.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • Teejai
    Teejai Posts: 43
    edited April 2004
    I have a pair of RTi6s for my fronts, would bi-amping give me much of an improvement or would I be better off putting that money towards a tower like the RTi8?
    Yamaha RX-V661
    RTi6
    CSi5
    FXi3
    PSW303
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited April 2004
    My vote would be RTi8 over an AMP.

    Then if you wanted to Bi-Amp the RTi8 yes.

    Just my $.02






    Originally posted by Teejai
    I have a pair of RTi6s for my fronts, would bi-amping give me much of an improvement or would I be better off putting that money towards a tower like the RTi8?

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • hamzahsh
    hamzahsh Posts: 439
    edited April 2004
    HK 525 has already a lot of power on its own, I don't know why you bought an extra 2-channel AMP. If you run your speakers to small setting and X-over them @ 80hz and send full bass to your sub you'll get great results. Also BI-WIRE all of your speakers and you'll get a fuller sound. Make sure there levels are calibrated well.

    I have a Yamaha RX-V1400 and thats what I have done. IMO Bi-Amping would be a great thing to feed more power hungry speakers especially 4 OHM capable. Bi-Wiring is great for 8 OHM speakers.

    My 2 cents!
    Panasonic TH-50PX80U Plasma HDTV
    Polk Audio RT800i (fronts)
    Polk Audio CS400i (center)
    Polk Audio F/X1000 (side surrounds)
    Polk Audio RTi6 (back surrrounds)
    Velodyne CHT-15 (subwoofer)
    Yamaha RX-V1400 (Pre/Pro)
    NAD C272 (2-ch Amp)
    Adcom GFA-7605 (5-ch Amp)
    Toshiba SD-3109 (DVD/CD player)
    Malata DVP-580 (Multi-region DVD player)
  • hamzahsh
    hamzahsh Posts: 439
    edited April 2004
    Originally posted by Teejai
    I have a pair of RTi6s for my fronts, would bi-amping give me much of an improvement or would I be better off putting that money towards a tower like the RTi8?

    Get RTi8 'cause it has 2 mid/bass drivers and better bass venting system. It will handle anything you throw in without any problem and BI-WIRE them for fuller sound.

    BTW I use RTi6 for my back surrounds.
    :D
    Panasonic TH-50PX80U Plasma HDTV
    Polk Audio RT800i (fronts)
    Polk Audio CS400i (center)
    Polk Audio F/X1000 (side surrounds)
    Polk Audio RTi6 (back surrrounds)
    Velodyne CHT-15 (subwoofer)
    Yamaha RX-V1400 (Pre/Pro)
    NAD C272 (2-ch Amp)
    Adcom GFA-7605 (5-ch Amp)
    Toshiba SD-3109 (DVD/CD player)
    Malata DVP-580 (Multi-region DVD player)
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    HK 525 has already a lot of power on its own, I don't know why you bought an extra 2-channel AMP. If you run your speakers to small setting and X-over them @ 80hz and send full bass to your sub you'll get great results. Also BI-WIRE all of your speakers and you'll get a fuller sound. Make sure there levels are calibrated well.

    Not so. I run my speakers on small, have them crossed over at 80hz, have my system calibrated, AND I had them bi-wired before adding the amp. Nevertheless, there was a significant improvement in sound when I bi-amped the fronts.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • hamzahsh
    hamzahsh Posts: 439
    edited April 2004
    Originally posted by Early B.
    Not so. I run my speakers on small, have them crossed over at 80hz, have my system calibrated, AND I had them bi-wired before adding the amp. Nevertheless, there was a significant improvement in sound when I bi-amped the fronts.

    I think that BI-AMPING only fronts is not a justice for other speakers. Especially when you watch DVDs. Do you notice the difference in the sound quality between other channels. Also do you listen to SACD and DVD-A and have you noticed fronts being more powerful than rest of your speakers?

    Since you BI-AMPED your fronts how about getting a 5-channel AMP and BI-AMP rest of the speakers. OR you prefer 2-channel AMP especially for CDs.
    Panasonic TH-50PX80U Plasma HDTV
    Polk Audio RT800i (fronts)
    Polk Audio CS400i (center)
    Polk Audio F/X1000 (side surrounds)
    Polk Audio RTi6 (back surrrounds)
    Velodyne CHT-15 (subwoofer)
    Yamaha RX-V1400 (Pre/Pro)
    NAD C272 (2-ch Amp)
    Adcom GFA-7605 (5-ch Amp)
    Toshiba SD-3109 (DVD/CD player)
    Malata DVP-580 (Multi-region DVD player)
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    I think that BI-AMPING only fronts is not a justice for other speakers. Especially when you watch DVDs. Do you notice the difference in the sound quality between other channels. Also do you listen to SACD and DVD-A and have you noticed fronts being more powerful than rest of your speakers?

    You're correct. My main interest in bi-amping the fronts was for 2-channel music. I don't prefer to listen to SACD or DVD-A.

    However, I just ordered an amp for my center channel. It will be here Thursday and I'll let you know what kind of contribution it makes.

    Nevertheless, once I calibrated the system for 7.1 channel playback, there was no real need to get another amp. I'm getting it because they're inexpensive and I'm doing some experimentations. My hypothesis is that a separate amp pumping 200 watts into the center channel will improve our movie watching experience. If all goes well, I may decide to get another amp for the rears (Rti38's) at some point in the future. At $200 ea. NIB for a 100 wpc amp, can't beat it.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • hamzahsh
    hamzahsh Posts: 439
    edited April 2004
    How about considering OUTLAW 7100 AMP 7 X 100watts all channels driven for only $899. I love this AMP because of its price and performance. I've read great reviews about this AMP. I'm also a 2-channel music lover like you and not interested in SACD and DVD-A at this moment.

    Right now, I'm enjoying my Yamaha RX-V1400 and satisfied with its all in one performance but If I've to buy an AMP in future sometime I'll definely go for OUTLAW 7100 and BI-WIRE all my speakers to it and run my Yamaha 1400 as a PRE/PRO.

    ;)
    Panasonic TH-50PX80U Plasma HDTV
    Polk Audio RT800i (fronts)
    Polk Audio CS400i (center)
    Polk Audio F/X1000 (side surrounds)
    Polk Audio RTi6 (back surrrounds)
    Velodyne CHT-15 (subwoofer)
    Yamaha RX-V1400 (Pre/Pro)
    NAD C272 (2-ch Amp)
    Adcom GFA-7605 (5-ch Amp)
    Toshiba SD-3109 (DVD/CD player)
    Malata DVP-580 (Multi-region DVD player)
  • nemos2
    nemos2 Posts: 111
    edited April 2004
    I will have to agree with Hamzahsh.

    The outlaw amps are rock solid products. I run an outlaw 755 amp, and love it. I would not trade it in for the world. The outlaws offer a great product at a great price.

    If you are still looking, I think that there are outlaw Mono blocks for sale in the forum.....check them out.
    Polk LSi 15 Fronts
    Polk LSi C center
    Polk LSiFX Surrounds
    Outlaw Audio 990 Pre/Pro
    Outlaw Audio 755 amp
    Paradigm PDR-12 Sub
    Outlaw Audio Cables
    BetterCables Cables
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited April 2004
    Ok, I too Bi-Amp'd my front speakers (but they are RTi150's) Love it, and like the music openness. Also using the HK PA-2000 amp. I thinking in the future down the road some doing this.

    Current setup Onkyo 898 110w per channel AVR.

    RTi150's /Front Bi-Amp'd woofers with PA-2000

    CS400i / Center

    RT800i / Rear surrounds

    Future ;)

    Adding a Outlaw 7x200 watt amp.

    Then this as a setup.

    RTi150's / Front Bi-Amp'd with 4 channels of Outlaw.

    CS400i / Center Bi-Amp'd with 1 channel of Outlaw /Center of AVR

    RT800i / Rear's Bi-Amp'd with 2 channels of Outlaw woofers / the PA-2000 amp bridged feeding the tweeter & mid speakers.

    Only if I had the $ to play with.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    I watched a movie this evening for the first time with the bi-amp configuration. Geez, it's much more incredible than I orgiginally indicated at the beginning of this thread. The sound was absolutely captivating. The rears and surrounds appear to be receiving more juice. They are much more involved in contributing to the sound, and it sounds much more like "surround sound." It was like I was in the middle of the movie. More detail in the rears, as well. I was amazed. Didn't think it could get much better than what I already had.

    I say go for the Outlaws or whatever other brand of amp you choose and be prepared to be blown away (literally).
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • HBombToo
    HBombToo Posts: 5,256
    edited April 2004
    Originally posted by Early B.
    I watched a movie this evening for the first time with the bi-amp configuration. Geez, it's much more incredible than I orgiginally indicated at the beginning of this thread. The sound was absolutely captivating. The rears and surrounds appear to be receiving more juice. They are much more involved in contributing to the sound, and it sounds much more like "surround sound." It was like I was in the middle of the movie. More detail in the rears, as well. I was amazed. Didn't think it could get much better than what I already had.

    I say go for the Outlaws or whatever other brand of amp you choose and be prepared to be blown away (literally).

    Did this include your center biamped? I have not heard back from ya bud?

    HBomb
    ***WAREMTAE***
  • PolkThug
    PolkThug Posts: 7,532
    edited April 2004
    Originally posted by HBombToo
    Did this include your center biamped? I have not heard back from ya bud?

    HBomb

    I think the PA2000 is a 4 channel x 45 or you can bridge it to 2 channel x 100. I assume he's doing the 2 channel bridge. I could be wrong though, its been awhile since I looked at that amp.
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2004
    No, it didn't include the center channel bi-amped.

    I've got the PA 2000s in bridged mode.

    Just hooked up the center channel with its own 2000. I haven't had a chance to give my impression on it yet because I need to watch a couple more DVDs with it. My initial impression in watching T2 was that it didn't make much difference. But then I put in Black Hawk Down today and there was noticeable improvement. However, I can't tell how much of this difference is attributable to the bi-amped center channel or the bi-amped fronts.

    I should have a follow-up in a few days.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • HBombToo
    HBombToo Posts: 5,256
    edited April 2004
    Cool

    HBomb
    ***WAREMTAE***