Polk RT800 vs Monitor 70?

I currently have Monitor 70's in living room set up and was wondering if I purchased a set of Polk RT800's would it be an upgrade ? With the Monitors I have Marantz SR6001 and Parasound 2125 powering them. Thanks. D
MIT Magnum MH-750, Monster HTS 5100MKII, Sony 77" Class - A80CJ Series - 4K UHD OLED,PS4, Def Tech 15” sub,LSIM 706c, Sunfire Signature Grand 425 x 4,Parasound hca 120, LSiM 702 x 4, Oppo 103D, SDA SRS 1.2, Pioneer Elite SC63 , Pioneer Elite BDP-05 “Why did you get married if you wanted big speakers?”

Comments

  • rooftop59
    rooftop59 Posts: 8,121
    Well the tweeter is better in the rt800s, more detailed than the m70. The bass is also tighter on the rt800, which I think is overall a little more refined sounding speaker. BUT u will lose a little bass extension and definitely lose some extension. Having twice as many drivers moves a lot more air...

    It's really more of a lateral move, and probably isn't worth the trouble. I would say rt800s for music, m70s from for HT. I would use the former if I had a really good sub in the mix...
    Living Room 2.2: Usher BE-718 "tiny dancers"; Dual DIY Dayton audio RSS210HF-4 Subs with Dayton SPA-250 amps; Arcam SA30; Musical Fidelity A308; Sony UBP-x1000es
    Game Room 5.1.4:
    Denon AVR-X4200w; Sony UBP-x700; Definitive Technology Power Monitor 900 mains, CLR-3000 center, StudioMonitor 350 surrounds, ProMonitor 800 atmos x4; Sub - Monoprice Monolith 15in THX Ultra

    Bedroom 2.1
    Harmon Kardon HK3490; Bluesounds Node N130; Polk RT25i; ACI Titan Subwoofer
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    Can't say I've heard the RT800s but I have heard the tweeter in that series and I agree with RT59s assessment there. I run some M-70s as well. And with a good power amp, you really need to STEP up into a HIGHER category of speakers to get significant gains. That's why I've been so ambivalent about the new S60s till I hear them! Hoping they would not be a lateral move if I decided to commit to a Polk upgrade! Can't afford to go full LSi-M which would definitely be a REAL upgrade!
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,201
    The RT800's are a better sounding to me speaker then the M70's
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • I ended up buying The rt600i'a to see if they were netter than my m20's which is comparable to your situation. And I'd say the rt's are better sounding but possibly less bass.
  • doggie750
    doggie750 Posts: 1,160
    I believe it would be an upgrade....
    Godspeed,
    D0661E

    AVR:Pioneer Elite SC-07
    Surrounds: RTis
    2channel:Rti100 (carver driven
    Sub:SVS PB12-Plus/2
    Dedicated AMPs:Adcom GFA535, 2xCarver 1.5t, Carver m1.0t
    Wsrn:Hitachi ultra vision LCD60, 32XBR400
    PowerConditioner: MonsterC HTS5100
    PS3, Toshiba HD A2, etc: SonySACD/ Panasonic gears DIVX.


    MR3LIGION: Polkaudio; GSXR; E46; Reeftank;
    Odyclub; Xsimulator; Sony; Zune; Canon
  • simm
    simm Posts: 570
    I had the RT800's in the early 2000's. Thought they were a pretty good speaker. Back then I was more into HT so don't remember how they were for music.