just got a Yamaha RX-A1040 and Monitor 60 and 70
afterburnt
Posts: 7,892
in Speakers
Comments
-
it has pre out, I know nothing about preamps
-
Probably fine, unless you play VERY loud. There are plenty of good 2 ch amps out there. Used in the 300-500 range and pushing 200 wpc if not more. Adcom, B&K, Parasound, Haffler, to name a few.
-
That's a very nice sounding Avr, but as mentioned, if you like to play loudly than you should add an ext. Amp, at least for the fronts.Oh, Listen here mister. We got no way of understandin' this world. But we got as much sense of this bird flyin in the sky. Now there is a lot that bird don't know, but it don't change the fact that the world is happening to him all the same. What I am tryin to say is, is that the course of your life, well its changing, and you don't even see it- Forest Bondurant
-
If I get separate amp for the fronts will that leave more power for the surrounds?
-
Yes indeed. Also set your xo to 60/80 & small setting for the fronts. That will sweeten up your midrange & take a tremendous load off your Yammie.
Here's a nice article that is worth a read...http://www.ecoustics.com/articles/set-speakers-small-receiver-setup/
"2 Channel & 11.2 HT "Two Channel:Magnepan LRSSchiit Audio Freya S - SS preConsonance Ref 50 - Tube preParasound HALO A21+ 2 channel ampBluesound NODE 2i streameriFi NEO iDSD DAC Oppo BDP-93KEF KC62 sub Home Theater:Full blown 11.2 set up. -
Thanks for all of the info so far. I guess this still leaves me with a few more questions.
1. I would like more volume when necessary so I am worried about blowing out my speakers or AVR. Is there a minimum wattage output that I should be looking for, do I have to go 200+ or would something less give me more volume, less load and keep me from blowing stuff out?
2. With a separate amp for the fronts will the enhancements etc. pass through from the AVR and into the amp unchanged?
3. Will the volume controls have to be manipulated independently or can I dial it in on the amp and use the AVR volume to control everything without having to deal with the amp every again?
4. Will adding a 2 channel amp to the pre outs leave the front speaker outputs on the AVR available for anything else?
Thanks again for the help
-
Emotiva XPA-200?
-
afterburnt wrote: »Thanks for all of the info so far. I guess this still leaves me with a few more questions.
1. I would like more volume when necessary so I am worried about blowing out my speakers or AVR. Is there a minimum wattage output that I should be looking for, do I have to go 200+ or would something less give me more volume, less load and keep me from blowing stuff out?
Power is your friend and having an amp rated higher than your speakers is ok/good thing.2. With a separate amp for the fronts will the enhancements etc. pass through from the AVR and into the amp unchanged?
Your AVR will still function as the preamp and apply any/all equalization & effects to the external amp.3. Will the volume controls have to be manipulated independently or can I dial it in on the amp and use the AVR volume to control everything without having to deal with the amp every again?
The AVR will control the volume just as it did before for all speakers, including the external amp. Just be sure to re-run any YPAO auto-calibration on the Yamaha.4. Will adding a 2 channel amp to the pre outs leave the front speaker outputs on the AVR available for anything else?
Most AVR manuals will say NOT to use both the preouts and speaker outputs at the same time.
H9: If you don't trust what you are hearing, then maybe you need to be less invested in a hobby which all the pleasure comes from listening to music. -
Thanks Erik. I think I am going to get the 150 watt Emotiva XPA 200 $339 at Amazon. I haven't seen anything else in that price range and I have no idea how to go about buying used.
-
HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
Inherently bright speakers with an inherently bright amp is not a good match.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
F1 nothing is permanent (especially these speakers). What do you suggest for three or four hundred dollars?
-
-
BTW I am trying to do a "jack of all trades" system mostly background music (classical) and some theater with all kinds of other junk in the mix. One of these days I will find all of my rock etc. CD's and try ripping them FLAC instead of mp3.
-
afterburnt wrote: »BTW I am trying to do a "jack of all trades" system mostly background music (classical) and some theater with all kinds of other junk in the mix. One of these days I will find all of my rock etc. CD's and try ripping them FLAC instead of mp3.
Why would you rip to MP3 anyway ?
A used Parasound or B&k amp is a better match for your speakers and can be had in the 4-600 buck range.HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
I did not know any better
-
It may seem intimidating at first, but you can find good deals used.
Despite some drawbacks, audiogon.com is still a place to find used values.
And don't forget the for sale section here - it may take some patience, but good deals show up here, too!
H9: If you don't trust what you are hearing, then maybe you need to be less invested in a hobby which all the pleasure comes from listening to music. -
afterburnt wrote: »I did not know any better
No worries pal, that's why we are here to help you. We've all been in those shoes. Don't be afraid to ask questions no matter how dumb you may think it is. Good sound is about tailoring things to your own personal taste, and to get there requires some thought and gear matching with stuff that has been proven to work well together.
Enjoy the forum.
HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
I am confused about amps being referred to as bright. I have had many AVR'S in my day. Onkyo, Denon, Sony and a few yamaha's. My current set up in Yamaha rx A2010,
RTI A5, CSI A4 FXI A4 Surronds, svs sb1000 sub, oppo bdp 103 for movies SACD AND FLAC files. this is the best system I have ever had, I had an Onkyo 1009 that sounded great for movies but really bad with music. The yamaha is warm sounding and much cleaner then the onkyo for music. For me brightness in music has a lot more to do with your listening environment furniture, carpet some room acoustics can change any speaker sound from one room to another. Just something to consider -
While the room certainly plays a role in the final sound, so does the gear. Some gear is inherently bright, which could also be called harsh, edgy, unpleasant, fatiguing, etc. regardless of the room.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
agreed with some speakers mainly Klipsch, but to say yamaha and polk are a way to bright combination. I am just not hearing that with what I have. No fatiguing no harshness an certainly not unpleasant, my wife would have killed me if it sounded bad
-
I was referring to an amplifier, not an AVR that the OP was considering.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
Well I hope I don't hate it. At any rate if I do $339 is one of the least expensive mistakes that I have made lol.
-
I guess buying an mp3 download of a Pink Floyd album was a pretty cheap mistake. I just ordered the real CD from Amazon and now I will get the mp3 again that I already paid even more for but this time its free! %^(
-
Those monitors aren't bright speakers. I'd get the Emotiva with its five-year warranty. Should be an excellent match and won't come with the risk of buying used. But, it's your money.
Two Channel Setup:
Speakers: Wharfedale Opus 2-3
Integrated Amp: Krell S-300i
DAC: Arcam irDac
Source: iMac
Remote Control: iPad Mini
3.2 Home Theater Setup:
Fronts: Klipsch RP-160M
Center: Klipsch RP-160M
Subwoofer: SVS PB12NSD (X 2)
AVR: Yamaha Aventage RX-A2030
Blu Ray: Sony BDP-S790
TV Source: DirecTV Genie -
I didn't think they were bright maybe more piquant but not bright lol. Amp is supposed to get here today I will hook it up after work and see. Thanks everyone for your input.
-
Spicy?
-
afterburnt wrote: »Thanks Erik. I think I am going to get the 150 watt Emotiva XPA 200 $339 at Amazon. I haven't seen anything else in that price range and I have no idea how to go about buying used.
Go to emotva.com join the forum and get it for 279 or so -
Thanks Mike but what I see in the "e club" is XPA-200 was $399 now $339 thats what I paid at Amazon. I got it all hooked up last night I will put it through is paces today.
-
pearsall001 wrote: »Yes indeed. Also set your xo to 60/80 & small setting for the fronts. That will sweeten up your midrange & take a tremendous load off your Yammie.
Here's a nice article that is worth a read...http://www.ecoustics.com/articles/set-speakers-small-receiver-setup/
I read somewhere that you should "never" go above 60 on the sub xo. I wish I could find the article where I saw that. Can anyone elaborate on this?