NAD Reliability? Specifically T175HD?

msg
msg Posts: 10,026
edited August 2014 in Electronics
Hey guys,
any of you have any experience with NAD gear? I'm considering moving to a T175HD pre/pro, but seem to recall reading something about NAD gear not being so reliable. I've been building my system out piece by piece, and almost always with used gear for the main components. I've been pretty fortunate so far where reliability's concerned (knock knock knock), so just trying to gather some info on whether this would be a sketchy move.

Thanks in advance.
I disabled signatures.
Post edited by msg on

Comments

  • AsSiMiLaTeD
    AsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,727
    edited July 2014
    NAD has had a few reliability problems through the years. Most companies have issues, but seems like NAD has had more than their fair share.
  • msg
    msg Posts: 10,026
    edited July 2014
    yeah, this is what I was concerned with.
    thinking about contacting them directly, and/or trying to find reviews and stuff.

    any other ideas for determining specifically troubled units or technologies?
    I disabled signatures.
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,447
    edited July 2014
    The article I read was on the receivers in the last few years are problematic. Some of their warranty service people will not work on them. I have not heard the same with the separates
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited July 2014
    I remember some problems with the preamp/tuner combos years ago.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,967
    edited July 2014
    msg wrote: »
    Hey guys,
    any of you have any experience with NAD gear? I'm considering moving to a T175HD pre/pro, but seem to recall reading something about NAD gear not being so reliable. I've been building my system out piece by piece, and almost always with used gear for the main components. I've been pretty fortunate so far where reliability's concerned (knock knock knock), so just trying to gather some info on whether this would be a sketchy move.

    Thanks in advance.

    I don't know about "sketchy", but certainly carries a higher risk factor. Every manufacturer creates lemons every now and then. Even companies like Cary, Anthem have had their fair share of products requiring more than normal warranty work. Look at the specific model and date made on your research. Hate to paint with a broad brush for any company, but by researching the exact model you can get a better feel on it's reliability.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • msg
    msg Posts: 10,026
    edited July 2014
    alright guys, great, thanks, good feedback, all.
    yeah, I'll narrow it down a bit and see what I can turn up.

    I think it's more the long term reliability I'm concerned with. If I get something that has a warranty for a year and it makes it, I'd like to think I'm good. isn't the general consensus that electronics fail mostly within the first 90 days, or is that an old wives tale kinda thing?
    I disabled signatures.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,194
    edited July 2014
    The Better choice would be going with the T187 which has the modular frame work, sounds amazing and looks much better.
    I did a review on mine awhile back , if you search for it you can check it out.

    The T175HD if I remember correctly did have some issues, I just don't remember off hand. We didn't sell many of them.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • msg
    msg Posts: 10,026
    edited July 2014
    funny you say that, because I just saw the 187 last night while looking up 175 info and see that they're supposed to be the same for audio, but the 187 having all the new video stuff, for not much more considering the price point of the 175.

    isn't the 175 also modular?
    I disabled signatures.
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,447
    edited July 2014
    Sorry but I call BS..I have seen more than a handful of these units weather NAD, Onyko and one other I fail to remember. I have never seen any new blades on mod units to ever be put into a unit that the manufacture says "upgradable future proof" . In fact my old Rotel preamp was to be upgradable through CD-rom or RJ45 to computer. When the new preamp came out I ask Rotel about an upgrade for my unit to on par with the new unit, they said no way trade it in. Now this was before HDMI so no new connection just firmware upgrades...Future proof laughable.


    From NAD site...

    MDC - True Innovation

    End the frustration of having to replace your entire AV preamp processor just to keep pace with the ever-changing world of AV. Our most important recent innovation, MDC battles technology obsolescence by allowing you to upgrade the T 187 with new connectivity and features as new technology becomes available. Winner of the prestigious reddot Design Award, MDC should be at the top of your checklist.


    Good luck but I wouldn't hold my breath on this feature.
  • msg
    msg Posts: 10,026
    edited July 2014
    I've been speaking with a guy from Audiogon that sells NAD refurbed stuff. he was telling me about these cards. yeah, I've seen provisions for this on other equipment before - the Parasound Halo C2, for instance - but didn't see for this particular model that anything was ever released to make use of it. I think it was supposed to be for HDMI or something.

    NAD does currently sell these cards, though, apparently - I was told there was an upgrade for the video/switching on this 175 that was around $300. the current pre/pro model with it already installed - the 187, as is my understanding (?) - was only $500 more than the 175HD. these are refurb models, fwiw. in this case, I would just opt for the newer model and call it a day.
    I disabled signatures.
  • peteypete
    peteypete Posts: 1
    edited August 2014
    The T175HD initially launched with what NAD called the VM-200 video module and AM-200 audio module installed in it. The VM-200 had the Sigma Designs VXP chip which could scale resolutions up to 2048x2048. The board itself as a whole was not HDMI 1.4 compliant, however, so this meant no Audio Return Channel or 3D pass through which were part of the new standard when it released.

    NAD did make good on their word and then offered the VM-150 video module which was 1.4 compliant (which revision a,b,c of 1.4 I'm not certain) and still sells this card at dealers. I got mine here in Southern California at a dealer for $599 shipped directly to me. I then took it to another authorized repair center and it was installed for $95 with the new firmware. So in total it was roughly $700 to upgrade when a new HDMI format hit the market. I think things have been quite on the module front recently because HDMI 2.0 is still yet to release. My hunch is when it does, NAD will eventually release a new video card to support the format as well.

    The T187 does indeed ship with the VM-150 card already installed but my guess is that used pricing may be higher than the T-175HD since you're building your system from previously owned components. Not entirely certain about this, however.

    I've had zero issues my my 175. It's been rock solid since I bought it three years ago.

    Hope this helps....